ML20204C963

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wishes Counsel to Be Prepared to Discuss in Detail During 781206 Oral Argument the Basis for Proposing Water Quality Monitoring Condition & Consequences That Will Follow If It Is Not Imposed
ML20204C963
Person / Time
Site: Yellow Creek  
Issue date: 11/22/1978
From: Duflo M
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:
References
NUDOCS 7812050302
Download: ML20204C963 (1)


Text

UNITED STA'.75 OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

_ M PML ATO".IC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Dr. John H. Buck Richard S. Salzman

)

l In the Matter of

)

)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

)

Docket Nos. STN 50-566

)

50-567 (Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

)

MEMORANDUM November 22, 1978 Our order of November 9, 1978, scheduling oral argument of the staff's appeal for Decerher 6th, described the question presented in terms of the Commissidn's authority to ir. pose the water quality monitoring condition rejected by the Board below.. In addition, we wish counsel to be prepared to discuss in detail at that argument, (1) the basis for proposing the condition and (2) the consequences that will follow if it is not imposed.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD g,

5;fg 44HP b

j[

A Margeget E.

Du Flo C

m 2 2197.8 >

Secretary te the

-~

Appeal Board

,,,,,g,,, w" w

o,w c

<b

-4 78.120503od-

_ _ _ = _ _ _ _ ___

_