ML20204C475

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Exam Repts 50-424/98-302 & 50-425/98-302 for Exams Administered on 980721
ML20204C475
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  
Issue date: 03/11/1999
From: Michael B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
50-424-98-302, 50-425-98-302, NUDOCS 9903230108
Download: ML20204C475 (1)


See also: IR 05000424/1998302

Text

- _ ~

.

.

-.

..e

, .

-

March 11,1999

NOTE TO:

NRC Document Control Desk

Mail Stop 0-5-D-24

Beverly Michael, Licer%rhdL/

od d ~

FROM:

ing Assistant, Operator Licensing and Human

Performance Branch, Division of Reactor Safety, Region 11

SUBJECT:

OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS ADMINISTERED ON

JULY 21,1998, AT THE VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT

'

DOCKET NOS. 50-424 AND 50-425

On July 21,1998, the administrative portion of an Operator Licensing Examination was

administered at the referenced facility. Attached, you will find the following information for

processing through NUDOCS and distribution to the NRC staff, including the NRC PDR:

Item #1 -

a)

Facility submitted outline, designated for distribution under RIDS

Code A070,

b)

As given administrative portion of the operating examination,

designated for distribution under RIDS Code A070.

Item #2 -

Examination Report designated for distribution under RIDS Code IE42.

Attachments: As stated

\\

\\

9903230108 990311

PDR

ADOCK 05000424

V

PDR

'

i

.

.

.

,4

July 28, 1998

Southern Nuclear Operating Company Inc.

ATTN:

Mr. J. B. Beasley. Vice President

P. O. Box 1295

Birmingham, AL 35201-1295

SUBJECT:

NRC EXAMINATION REPORT NOS. 50-424/98-302 AND 50-425/98-302

Dear Mr. Beasley.

On July 21. 1998. the NRC administered the Administrative portion of the

Operating Examination to one Senior Reactor Operator Upgrade (SRO-U)

at the Vogtle Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2.

At the conclusion of the

examination. the chief examiner discussed the examination and preliminary

findings with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

'

The chief examiner concluded that the candidates' perfccmance on the

Administrative Portion of the Operating Examination was satisfactory.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's reguletions a copy of

this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC Puolic Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact me

at (404) 562-4638.

Sincerely.

(Original signed by T. A. Peebles)

Thomas A. Peebles. Chief

Operator Licensing and Human

Performance Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-424. 50-425

License Nos. NPF-68. NPF-81

Enclosure:

Examination Report

cc w/ encl:

(See page 2)

!

DISTRIBUTION CODE

IE42

$$$$

1

.

.

SNC

2

-

.

cc w/ encl:

Manager. Radioactive Materials

J. D. Woodard

Program

Executive Vice President

-Department of Natural Resources

Southern Nuclear Operating Co. . Inc.

4244 International Parkway

P. O. Box 1295

Suite 114

Birmingham. AL 35201-1295

Atlanta. GA 30354

J. Gasser.

Attorney General

General Manager. Plant Vogtle

Law Department

Southern Nuclear Operating Co.. Inc.

132 Judicial Building

P. O. Box 1600

Atlanta. GA 30334

Waynesboro GA 30830

Program Manager

J. A. Bailey

Fossil & Nuclear Operations

Manager-Licensing

Oglethorpe Power Corporation

Southern Nuclear Operating Co. Inc.

2100 E. Exchange Place

,

P. O. Box 1295

Tucker. GA 30085-1349

'

Birmingham. AL 35201-1295

Charles A. Patrizia. Esq.

.

Director. Consumers' Utility Counsel

Paul. Hastings. Janofsky & Walker

Division'

10th Floor

Governor's Office of Consumer

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue

'

Affairs

Washington. D.C.

20004-9500

2 M. L. King. Jr. Drive

Plaza Level East: Suite 356

Senior Engineer - Power Supply

Atlanta, GA 30334-4600

Municipal Electric Authority

of Georgia

Office of Planning and Budget

1470 Riveredge Parkway NW

Room 6158

Atlanta. GA 30328-4684

270 Washington Street. SW

Atlanta. GA 30334

Bob Brown. Plant Training &

Emergency Preparedness Manager

Office of the County Commissioner

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant

Burke County Commission

P. O. Box 1600

Waynesboro. GA 30830

Waynesboro. GA 30830

Director. Department of Natural

Resources

205 Butler Street. SE. Suite 1252

At1anta, GA 30334

Distribution w/ enc 1: (See page 3)

l

.

.

i

SNC

3

s

l

Distribution w/ encl:

L. Plisco. RII

P. Skinner. RII

M. Ernstes. RII

0. Jaffe. NRR

PUBLIC

NRC Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

8805 River Road

Waynesboro. GA 30830

i

.*

Asf

OFFICE

Rll:DRS.j

Rll:DRS

Ril:Dgli > \\

RII:DRS

/

g

SIGtATURE

g ' g {'

g

if /J

gg/

jkAME

tmellen

DL PDC

PSkinner

TPeebles

jDQ1E

7/ A q /98

7/ g g

ff 'pLfy, l

7/ M /98

7/

/98

7/

/98

7/

/98

lCDPV?

YES

NO

g; / wo)

/TES// XNg ) l * yep

NO

TES

NQ

TES

NO

TES

No

/

ll

Off!CIAL RECORD CDPT

DOCUMJ)iT kW

0 : \\00tT\\LA\\WOG\\V098302.LSN

\\

-

.

.

.

>

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

Docket Nos.:

50-424, 50-425

License Nos..

NPF-68. NPF-81

Report Nos.:

50-424/98-302. 50-425/98-302

Licensee:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company. Inc.

Facility:

Vogtle Nuclear Plant

Location:

Waynesboro. GA

Dates:

July 21. 1998

Examiners:

I

a (N

,

(Lprry3Mellen.

Chief License Examiner

Approved by:

Thomas /A.'Peebles. Chief

Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure

9ggo3Dee7

.

_.

>

i

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

-

-

'

Vogtle Nutlear Plant

NRC Examination Report No. 50 424/98-302. 50-425/98-302

On July 21. 1998. The NRC conducted an announced operator licensing

Administrative portion of the Operating Examination in accordance with the

guidance of Examiner Standards. NUREG-1021. Interim Revision 8.

These

examinations implemented the operator licensing requirements of 10 CFR 555.43

and 55.45.

Doerations

One SRO-U candidate received the Administrative aortion of the Operating

.

Examination. This examination was administered ]y the NRC on July 21.

1998.

Candidate Pass / Fail

.

SRO

CD

Total

Percent

Pass

1

0

1

100%

Fail

0

0

0

0%

The examiner concluded that the candidates' performance on the

.

Administrative portion of the Operating Examination was satisfactory.

(Section 05.3).

.-

- - - .

.

.

.

..

Reoort Details

,

o

l

l

Summary of Plant Status

During the period of the examination, both Units were in Mode 1.

I. Ooerations

05

Operator Training and Qualifications

l

l

05.1 General Comments.

The facility (under the guidance of the NRC) developed an operator

licensing Administrative Portion of the Operating Examination.

It was

to be administered by the NRC under the requirements of an NRC security

agreement. in accordance with the guidelines of the Examiner Standards

(ES). NUREG-1021. Interim Revision 8.

One SRO upgrade re-take applicant

received and passed the Administrative portion of the Operating

Examination.

05.2 Pre and Post-Examination Activities

a.

Scope

The NRC chief examiner reviewed the licensee's examination submittal

using the criteria specified for examination development contained in

NUREG 1021. Interim Revision 8.

b.

Observations and Findinas

The licensee developed the SRO Administrative portiori of the Operating

Examination.

The chief examiner reviewed, modified. and approved the

examination prior to administration

The NRC conducted in-office and

onsite pre aration. prior to examination administration. The revised

s

examination met the criteria set forth in NUREG 1021. Interim

Revision 8.

During the review the NRC noted that one PM required the candidate to

interpret Technical Specification (TS) 3.1.4.

This required the

operator to determine if a rod was "untrippable" to determine if entry

into an LCO was required. The term ~untrippable" was not defined in the

Technical Specifications. in tra'ining or in any procedures.

During the

performance of JPM RQ-JP-63508-NRC. the training ctaff expected the

operator to determine that a rod was "untrippable:

however, the

candidate did not believe that it was based on his interpretation of the

term.

This was identified before the examination, but was maintained as

a non-critical step.

Following further review by the training staff and

discussions with training management. it was determined that the

operators' decision was justified.

.

_

. _ _

.

.

a

.

2

'

C.

.Conclusif0

The NRC concluded that the facility had placed emphasis on ensuring that

the examination was technically accurate and discriminating.

During

the exit meeting the examiner stressed that it was important to define

the term "untrippable" to ensere the actions associated with TS 3.1.4

were appropriately understtod and implemented.

05.3 Examinatipn Pesults and_Relatad, Find 1nos. Observatior,s. and Conclusions

a.

Scope

The chief examiner reviewed the results of the Administrative portion of

the Operating Examinction.

b.

Observations and Findincs..

The overall performance of the candidate was considered satisfactory.

c.

Conclusiqn

The chief examiner identified no discrepancies.

V. Manaaement Meetinos

.

X1. Exit Meeting Summary

On July 21. 1998,

the chief examiner discussed the examination results with

the Trcining and Emergency Preparedness Manager.

Dissenting comments were not

received from the licensee.

No proprietary information was identified.

'

.-

(

. *

i

.

3

-

.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Licensee

  • Leon Ray. Operations Training Supervisor
  • Thad Thomson. Licensed Operator Instructor

William Evans, Reactor Operator

NRC

,

,

  • J. Zeiler Senior Resident Inspector
  • Attended the Exit Interview

ITEMS OPENED. CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Doened

None

Closed

.

None

Discussed

None

l

l

l

. . . -