Text

Answers to Board 14 Questions (Memo;Proposed Memo of 860414) Re Action Plan Results Rept I.b.1.* Certificate of Svc Encl
	ML20204B789
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	03/20/1987
From:	Bizzak R, Mallanda J; TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	;
References
	CON-#187-2883 OL, NUDOCS 8703250151
	Download: ML20204B789 (78)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:m m 7 2 783 a 4 Filsd: March 20, 1987 DOCKETED USNRC 157 IgR 23 N1:29 0FFICE OF SECih IAr 1 00CKETING A Sf 6VIU. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BRANCH NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD ) In the Matter of ) ) Docket Nos. 50-445-OL TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC ) 50-446-OL COMPANY et al. ) ) (Application for an .(Comanche Peak Steam Electric ) Operating License)- Station, Units 1 and 2) ) ) ANSWERS TO BOARD'S 14 QUESTIONS (Memo; Proposed Memo of April 14, 1986) Regarding Action Plan Results Report I.b.1 In accordance with the Board's Memorandum; Proposed Memorandum and Order of April 14, 1986, the Applicants submit the answers of the Comanche Peak Response Team ("CPRT") to the 14 questions posed by the Board, with respect to the Results Report published by the CPRT in respect of CPRT Action Plan I.b.1, Flexible conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation. [2fD 3 1)$0 P o

s Opening Requesti Produce copies of any CPRT-generated checklists that were used during the conduct of the action plan.

Response

The CPRT inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels utilized inspection reports which are attached to CPRT Quality Instruction QI-004, "CPRT ACTION PLAN I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation; CPRT ACTION PLAN I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation." All of the questions below dealing with checklists are answered with respect to this inspection procedure. The CPRT also utilized checklists in the compil'ition of multi-train panels. One of the actions requested by the NRC was a reinspection of all panels that contain redundant conduits. In order to determine the scope of this activity, it was necessary to identify all panels that contain more than one train. To do this, the CPRT Electrical Review Team reviewed all Unit i electrical drawings to determine which panels contained cables from more than one train. This list was then used by the CPRT to examine the multi-m 1 .s s' train panels to determine where Servicair flex had been used as a barrier. The process that was used to compile the list of multi-train panels is described in the ISAP I.b.1 Working File, in particular, Documents I,b.1-6B.009 and I.b.1-6B.Oll. Since these checklists were only used to determine the scope of the multi-train panels and were not used in inspection activities to determine the acceptance or rejection of safety-related attributes, Questions 2 through 9 are not relevant to this review s. checklist. Question: 1. Describe the problem areas addressed in the report. Prior to undertaking to address those areas through sampling, what did Applicants do to define the problem areas further? How did it believe the problems arose? What did it discover about the QA/QC documentation for those areas? How extensive did it believe the problems were?

Response

The original issue raised by the !!RC-TRT was the practice of allowing redundant cables in Servicair flex to come into contact with each other. Though this practice was in accordance with the Project criteria, the NRC questioned whether or not analyses had been performed to demonstrate that adequate protection is (( '* u ,+ h? provided by the Servicair flex. The Results Report for s N" I.b.1 describes the steps that were taken to u demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier. The NRC stated that TUEC should reinspect all panels that contain Servicair flex to ensure that adequate separation is maintained or provide analysis to demonstrate the acceptability of each configuration. Though it was assumed at the start of this action plan that Servicair flex was used only in the coritrol boards and vertical ventilation panels, it became apparent that Servicair flex had been used in other electrical panels. Rather than use sampling g techniques, the Electrical Review Team examined all multi-train panels, i.e., panels that contain more than one electrical train. These are the only panels that would have used Servicair flex as a barrier. As noted in Section 3.0 of the I.b.1 Results Report, the Project deemed Servicair flex to be a metallic conduit and allowed its use wherever rigid metallic conduit was authorized. Therefore, the use of q Servicair flex for each of two touching, redundant cables was allowed by the Project criteria. Therefore', I s i . 'L a

t ~ '3. i i provided by the Servicair flex. The Results Report for I.b.1 describes the steps that were taken to i demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier. The NRC stated that TUEC should reinspect all panels that contain Servicair-flex to ensure that adequate sepa$atien is maintained-or provide analysis .g

(

to demonstrate the acceptability of each configuration. I

~

Though it was assumed at the start of this action plan that: Servicair flex-was used only in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels, it became apparent that Servicair flex had been used in other electrical panels. Rather than use sampling techniques, the Electrical Review Team examined all I multi-train panels, i.e., panels that contain more than i one elecdrical train. These are the only panels that would have used Servicair flex as a barrier. As noted in'Section 3.0 of the I.b.1 Results i Report, th-Project deemed Servicair flex to be a f metallic conduit and allowed its use wherever rigid matcllic conduit was authorized. Therefore, the use'of Servicair flex for each of two touching, redundant t cables was allowed by the Project criteria. Therefore, l [ l l l-

e i QA/QC documentation was not an issue to be investigated. Since the issue raised by the NRC was limited to the use of Servicair flex, the " problem areas" were 1 confined to electrical panels that contained Servicair i flex. Question: 2. Provide any procedures or other internal documents that are necessary to understand how the checklists should be interpreted or applied.

Response

As noted above, the inspection report used by the CPRT third-party inspectors during their inspection of the control boards and vertical ventilation panels was a part of Quality Instruction QI-004. All revisions of this procedure are included in File I.b.1-3 of the ISAP I.b.1 Working File. In addition, all background information used to develop the criteria in the procedure are included in this file. Question: i 3. [ Original acceptance checklists. See Transcript of the Pre-Hearing Conference of April 22, 1986, at 24,353-57.] l..

I i

Response

The Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels were inspected shortly before the CPRT third-party inspection. During the Project inspection, the procedure used was QI-QP-11.3-40, Revisions 19, 20 and 21, " Post Construction Inspection of Electrical Equipment and Raceways." In addition, in-process inspections had been previously performed in accordance with QI-QP-11.3-28, " Class 1E Cable Terminations." As noted in the Results Report, preliminary, conservative inspection guidelines were used during the CPRT inspection. This was done so as to provide an s indication of the extent of potential modifications required for compliance with the final CPRT separation criteria. In addition, the information obtained from this inspection was used in the testing and circuit evaluation performed to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier. The separation distances specified in the CPRT inspection guidelines were greater than or equal to the distances specified in the criteria in QI-QP-11.3-40

and QI-QP-11.3-28. Question: 4. Explain the extent to which the checklists contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes to which Applicants are committed to conform.

Response

With one exception, the CPRT Inspection Report included a check of all physical separation attributes required by IEEE 384-1974, "IEEE Trial-Use Standard Criteria for Separation of Class lE Equipment and Circuits," and Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 1, " Physical Independence of Electric Systems." The one exception is that the separation of cables, each enclosed in a vendor wireway, was not verified. Since the Project criteria at that time allowed two redundant cables in metallic conduits to touch, the metallic wireways used in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels are allowed to be in contact with one another. Therefore, no inspection of separation between vendor wireways was required. Question: 5. (Answer question 5 only if the answer to question 4 is that the checklists do contain fewer attributes.) Explain the engineering basis, if any, for believing that the safety margin for m_. o components (and the plant) has not'been degraded by using checklists that contain fewer attributes than are required for conformance to codes.

Response

See-response to Question 4. Question: 6. Set forth any changes in checklists while they were in use, including the dates of the changes.

Response

The following revisions were made to the CPRT inspection procedure QI-004: Initial issuc 1/18/85 Revision 1 2/18/85 Revision 2 2/26/86 Revision 3 3/6/85 Revision 4 3/12/85 Revision 4 of QI-004 was used for all control L boards and vertical ventilation panels except control boards CP1-ECPRCB-01 thru -04, which were inspected to Revision 2 and control boards CP1-ECPRCB-05 and -07, which were inspected to Revision 3. Since the first revision used in an actual inspection was Revision 2, changes made prior to Revision 2 do not affect the inspections performed. In addition, changes made

~. subsequent to~ Revision 2 of the procedure do'not affect the panels inspected to revisions earlier than -Revision 4. 1. Revision 3 changed the inspection method for missing barriers. Rather than perform a paper trace to determine if documentation exists for the installation / reinstallation of missing barriers, the inspector was to determine whether or not the barrier is required for separation purposes. In addition, changes were made in the way in which the Inspection Reports were to be completed for control boards CP1-ECPRCB-lO and -11 and the vertical ventilation panels (CPX-4 ECPRCV-01 and -03). 2. Revision 4 provided additional l j clarification on the inspection criteria l. l for control boards CP1-ECPRCB-10 and -11 l and the vertical ventilation panels (CPX-ECPRCV-01 and -03). Since control boards CP1-ECPRCB-lO and -11 and the vertical ventilation panels (CPX-ECPRCV-01 and -03) l

~ I were inspected to Revision 4 of QI-004, the changes did not affect the inspections performed to Revisions 2 and 3 of.QI-004. Question: 7. Set forth the duration of training in the use of checklists and a summary of the content of that training, including field training or other practical training. If the training has changed or retraining occurred, explain the reason for the. changes or retraining and set forth changes in duration or content.

Response

Classroom and field training were conducted for Revision O of QI-004. A 50-minute classroom session and a one-hour field course were held for inspectors. Training was performed for Revision 2 of QI-004, the first revision actually used in the inspection of the panels. Revisions 3 and 4 contained minor changes that were addressed in formal discussions with the inspectors. Question: 8. Provide.any information in Applicants' possession concerning the accuracy of use of the checklists (or the inter-observer reliability in using the checklists). Were there any time periods in which checklists we:- used with questionable training or QA/QC supervision? If applicable, are problems of inter-observer reliability addressed statistically?..

Response

There is no information available concerning the accuracy of the use of the checklists or inter-observer. reliability in using the checklists. The subject inspections were conducted primarily in the first quarter of 1985; there were no time periods in which the checklists were used with questionable training or QA/QC supervision. All inspectors were certified Level. II or'above in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and~ Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1. Question: 9. Summarize all audits or supervisory reviews (including reviews by employees or consultants) of training or of use of the checklists.. Provide the factual basis for believing that the audit and review activity was adequate and that each concern of the audit and review teams has been resolved in a way that is consistent with the validity of conclusions.

Response

No ERC Corporate Audits or Supervisory Reviews were conducted which were directly related to the use of the checklists or training applicable to this action plan. However, ERC Corporate Audits 85-01 and 85-03 j and QA Surveillances I85-01 and III85-09 verified that ERC inspectors were qualified and certified in l ! L l i

o i

accordance with ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1. In addition, applicable-ERC inspectors received classroom instruction and on-the-job training in the requirements of QI-004, which is the instruction which governed the reinspection effort. Question: 10. Report any instances in which draft reports were modified in an important substantive way as_the result of management action. Be sure to explain any change that was objected to (including by an employee, supervisor or consultant) in writing or in a meeting in which at least one. supervisory or management official or NRC employee was present. Explain what the earlier drafts said and why they were modified. Explain how dissenting views were resolved.

Response

Neither Mr. Bizzak (the Issue Coordinator) ner Mr. Mallanda (the Review Team Leader) could recall any substantive changes during the generation, review, and editing of the report resulting from management action. Accordingly, our answer to_this question is: None. Question. 11. Set forth any unexpected difficulties that were encountered in completing the work of-each task force and that would be helpful to the Board in understanding the process by which conclusions.

I' were reached. <How were each of these unexpected difficulties resolved?

Response

Several unexpected difficulties were encountered during the implementat;on of this action plan ~that resulted in dela'fing the completion of this action plan. These difficulties can be categorized as problems arising from the sequencing of tasks, technical problems, and interface problems. The problems arising due to the sequencing of tasks were dae in large part to the initial schedule developed for the resolution of the issue. To accommodate this schedule, several related activities were performed simultaneously rather than sequentially, which resulted in extra effort. The optimum approach would have been to determine the scope of the issue, i.e., where had Servicair flex been used; perform circuit evaluations of the panels where Servicair flex existed; conduct tests for those cases in which the circuit evaluation could not be used to demonstrate acceptability of flex as a barrier; issue criteria; and perform reinspections to the new criteria. During the formulation of the action plan, the assumption was made that Servicair flex had been used only in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels. The action plan tasks were then initially formulated to only address these panels. Though the assumption that flex is only used in the control boards and vertical ventilation panels is true for the majority of.the Servicair flex used, flex was later found in other panels. This necessitated a new task to identify all multi-train panels and a subsequent examination of these panels to determine where Servicair flex had been used. Circuit evaluations, testing, and inspections of the control boards were performed during the same time period. Since criteria resulting from the circuit evaluation and testing were not finalized, the inspections utilized preliminary guidelines that were confusing. Subsequent work had to be performed to ~ determine if the findings against the preliminary guidelines were also violations of the final CPRT criteria. The testing that was performed was based on a typical installation, but did not include a full range 1 t

of current levels or the worst configuration. Due to .this, subsequent parametric computer analyses were required 1to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex. The technical problems involved the testing and analyses performed for the Servicair flex. As noted above,-the initial test con!iguration selected was not for the-worst case. The subsequent time-history computer analyses.took much longer to complete than-anticipated. In addition, it was found after the analyses were completed that an out-of-date version of the computer code had been used, which resulted in some of the analyses being redone. The last area of difficulty involved the interface between the CPRT and the Project. The interface was strained at times which resulted in an inefficient use of resources. Disagreements on the need to perform certain activities, such as the identification of multi-train panels to determine where Servicair flex might have been used, resulted in the .CPRT third-party performing these activities. Rather than coordinate activities with the CPRT third-party, the Project placed its emphasis on resolving the issue along a parallel path using Wyle -.-.

m test data, which was not provided to the third-party. The lack of emphasis on the completion of the CPRT action plan shown by the Project resulted in the CPRT ' third-party spending excessive time to close out the issues, especially where the Project's input was required. However, none of the above items had an effect on the activities or results of this ISAP. Question: 12. Explain any ambiguities.or open items left in the Results Report.

Response

Open items are addressed in Section 7.0, " Ongoing Activities," of the Results Report. The results of these activities will be reported in a supplement to the Results Report. Any potential ambiguities are addressed in the response to Question 14. Question: 13. Explain the extent to which there are actual or apparent conflicts of interest, including whether a worker or supervisor was reviewing or evaluating his own work or supervising any aspect of the review or evaluation of his own work or the work of those he previously supervised. [

m--

Response

To the best of our knowledge, no conflicts of interest exist. Question: 14. Examine the report to see that it adequately. discloses the thinking and analysis used.- If the language is ambiguous or the discussion gives rise.to obvious questions, resolveLthe-ambiguities and anticipate and resolve the questions.

Response

There are three potential areas in the Results Report that could be confusing to someone not familiar with the subject of the Action Plan:

1) the chronology of events; 2) the basis for the different types of inspections performed; and 3) the technical details of the analyses performed to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier.

Due to the simultaneous activities performed for several different, interrelated tasks, i.e., inspection of separation in~the control boards and vertical ventilation panels, evaluation of circuits, and testing of Servicair flex, the chronology of events is difficult to follow. This possible confusion was noted during the review of Revision _O of the Results Report, y _ and a chronology of events was added in Revision 1 to clarify the time phasing of the various activities. During the implementation of the I.b.1 Action Plan, several different physical reviews of electrical panels were performed; some of these reviews utilized different criteria. In addition, previous or future inspections of the panels were referenced in the Results Report. The following summary of inspection activities and the criteria used should provide a clearer understanding of the physical reviews performed: Activity 1: Post construction inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels. Performed by: TUGCO inspectors Date: November 1984 - January 1985 Criteria used: The " original" Project criteria in existence since November 1980. Activity 2: CPRT third-party inspection-of-l the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels. Performed by: CPRT third-party inspectors Date: February - April 1985 l Criteria used: Preliminary, conservative separation guidelines designed to envelope the " final" CPRT criteria.to be developed as a result of this action plan. l' l

C ;c l Activity 3: TUGCO inspection;of the Unit 1 control boards.and to vertical ventilation panels validate the CPRT findings and to provide a Project inspection to the " final" CPRT criteria. Performed by: TUGCO inspectors Date: October 1985 Criteria used: The " final" CPRT separation criteria developed as a result of.this action plan. Activity 4: Examination of all multi-train panels other than the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels to determine where-Servicair flex has been used as-a L:.rrier. -Performed-by: CPRT Electrical Review Team Date: January, May, and June 1986 ' Criteria used: The primary purpose of this examination was-to determine where Servicair-flex has been used as a separation barrier. During the examination of multi-train panels, the Electrical Review Team noted several violations of the " final" CPRT separation criteria. Activity 5: Inspection of multi-train panels other than the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation i panels to determine the validity l of the findings noted by the L Electrical Review Team and issue Nonconformance Reports (NCRs), as appropriate. l l. l i. i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. -. - -. -. _ - _, _ _ _ _ _... _ _.. _. - _ _ _. _. _ _.. _ - - - -. _ - - _, - ~.

[--. Performed by: TUGCO inspectors Date: July - September 1986 Criteria used: The primary purpose of.this examination was to validate the Electrical. Review Team's findings and issue NCRs, as appropriate. During this inspection several additional violations of the " final" CPRT separation criteria were noted. Activity 6: TUGCO inspection of the Unit 1 control boards and vertical ventilation panels subsequent to the completion of all outstanding work items. Performed by: TUGCO inspectors Date: (Future) Criteria used: (Future) The technical details of the heat transfer testing and analysis that was performed to demonstrate the adequacy of Servicair flex as a barrier are somewhat complex, but the report was prepared in such a way so as to present the logic used in a clear, straightforward manner. In addition, a report was prepared by the Electrical Review Team (Document I.b.1-4B.014 of the ISAP I.b.1 Working File) that sunmarizes -.

c 3-to:a cs; -3cEn F0

.:. 3 E. c 3 the test and analyses results, starting with the basic principles of heat transfer.

Respectfully submitted, YN0$--d> Robert Sgsak// Action F..an I.b.1 Issue Coordinator _l/d A 1L Jynn J. M ilanda Wiectriddl Review Team Leader The foregoing responses have been reviewed and are concurred in.by the CFRT Senire Review Team. . _. - -. - -,. ~... - _.. _.. _ _ _ _

g 'l L/. 3. 5. - i COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE QI-004 4 3/12/85 _i_ o f 3 PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY: DATE 3 //2/s5 Evaluation Rdsearch Corp. APPROVED BY: Il. /Iu14m_ DATE 2 2,[FI~ Evaluation search Corp. APPROVED BY: dh a DATE / 6 R.TAL. Elfir::/I;strumepation

1.0 REFERENCES

1.1 Office memo, 1/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel " Inspection Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office memo, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M.' B. Jones (CPP-17.823) ' 1.3 office memo, 2/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,854') 1.4 Office memo, 3/05/85, M. B. Jones to J. Hansel 1.5 Office memo, 2/22/85m W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization. This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2. 2.2 The scope of this procedure is the cabling and wiring within selected control panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections is any interaction between safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wireway to vendor wireway (per Ref. l 1.5). I NOTE: The scope of this Quality Instruction may be expanded at the direction of the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader. I i

g QI-005 R*.vioicn : 4 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports. 4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that: ACTIVITY 1 -Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit. ENT, or Unistrut F-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref.' 1.1, para. 3 and Ref. 1.5). ACTIVITY 2 -Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref. ~ 1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3). ACTIVITY 3 -Verify that wiring is separated in accordance with, Ref 1.1, para. 4, 5 Fig. I and Table 1 of Ref. 1.3. ACTIVITY 4 -Wiring is mounted and supported such that mintaus separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref.1.3). ACTIVITY 5 -The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref. 1.1, Note). ACTIVITY 6'-Verify that " required" barriers are installed. Note: " Required" means either required by a design document, or indications that a barrier was installed but has been removed. The inspector will state the location of missing barriers and whether or not a separation violation has been created by the barrier's absence. 4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefsel wiring _(Ref.1.1, para. I and Ref. 1.2). 4.3 DOCUISNTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results and inspections for para. 4.1 on the IR (Attachments 2 and 3, as applicable). For para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR. 4

QI-004 R violent 4 '4.3 DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd) 4.3.3 The inspection d6cuments (Attachments 2, 3 and 4) shall be completed in accordance with their respective completion. instructions, as applicable. The inspector completing the report shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number. The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed IR shall be submitted to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader for review and approval. 4.3.4 Per Reference 1.1, Para. 5, the inspection results of panels XCV-01 and XCV-03 will indicate that Section A/B criteria and inspections e are not applicable. All sections of panels 1CB-10 and 11 will be inspected to C/D criteria and documented accordingly. l l l 1 l L i \\

M e 18Lrrten,i i rech 1 or 4 'y.;.w, - ew r.

e M

6*

l. J 'k-.

l I Ill - taAs:4 *3* (evout? ?ltAIN ' A' ?RMM

C' CCW90ef TEF1EL OR

.h4N* TEFIEL TEFitL CASLE NON *fEFIEL CARLE DIOTEd) Cants DETAIL 1A TEFZEL $ NON-TEFZEL CABLES J@- rL ll l vnam *s' inow

a*.

CA&LE CCu0utT TRuu ' A' CDNCutT DETAll 18 ALL TEFIEL CAELES FIGURE i (NOTE a) TYPICAL SEPARATIDW DETAILS FOR-e l'

1) AL:, WIRING ik l*C310 ( l-CS-11, AND CRCulT5 L1W IN TABLE 1.

l. P

2) NON-TEFIEL WIRINGIN ALL CDMTROL 801RDS ANDVER-p TICAL PNLS.

i

3) WsRlue tuSECrlONS C Au0 0 0F AMY CONTROL ECAAD.,

I l NOTES

1) FOREBIEitAL uofE5,SFI Owe 1313*El 1702 02 NOTES 4,144

2) NOT187LCisLE ~3 2xu::xcIA*:2 LAMPE0Y CAELES AEG CDAXIAL CRT CASLES.

3) CDucusT5 ARE RIGIO OR FLEXISLE.

4) EhCLD$lua THIS CAELE IN FLEXISLE CCNDuiT #1(L asT EEDUCE SEPARAT*.3M SHOWW.

S) SE7& RATION C:ST1E::151%N ADMY tu ALL C::tC:Out (li, NORIIDWTAL Au3 VERTICAL). b 41 1:31'!0X&L E"1ILS ARE SHC**iw Ok Omd. 21:1 !!.87 1..~2, CETill Tel A T420 Ol C. i

,,d.I-05 REY.4 T' TAC 18T 1 PAGE 2 0F 4 ,} TA3"I 1 ~ - CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION _ RATED.MORE THAN 10 M4P5 1-C3, Control Bd.- Cable Cable Protective Devic' Device Train Nu:nber Tvoe Volts Ratine & I.cca-io'

X-ES-3264 C

NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-ES-3450 C NK139045 G36 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1-ES-4250A A E2138987 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES -4251A B EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-C3, 1/1 - APSII A EG138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR IIA 1 1/1 - APsI2 B EG139032 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA2. 075 Handsat Station C IPA-CR30 Handsat Station C IPA-CR29 075 1-cs 1-ES-4518A A EQ139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL l 1-ES-4519A B EG139503 237 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EAZ 1-C3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APRE1 A E3135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 1 1/1 - APRE1 E EG139586 23 7 125vde 30A, SWGK IIA 2 l Handsat Station C IPA-C'.29 075 Hanosat Station C IPA-C328 075 C IPA-CR2M 051 ja g e,y ta g t, 43 1/1 - iPCPX1 C UK139458 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 i 1/1 - 1PCPX2 C NK139459 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - IPCPX3 C NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 9 G .-------,-m_

,. 41-004 REV 4-......_ - = - - - - =- A1TACHMENT 1 lc - PAGE 3 0F 4 7 . > ;,s. - . } p[ 7,* i,. ' ). .,.; j.g,; i v' .TA3t.E 1 (Continued)

(j' '

...i s -s 5.- . e-

, g,

..q,- ,c .) i ' ' ' ~ ?-~ <?'- 'IN ... M $ 06 - N? .7)1.C5- - i..YT*i . ! p;. n. . L '*,'.-[,.fg,G Protective ' Device .-e l'd Cable . Cable kO:. Control Rd"#' ? E.? ~'y oTraib*-$2 Number M,J.? Type ,.' volts Q 2.Racine & t.ocation' Device .n...:., i .n

].f:.)30 A, Starter Csi:,'. ygg

.. ;g:q;u -)l1/1 - ABCU f ,C NK139535 036,,. 120Vac t-TEX-TRANCU-M 1/1 - APCH1 A* EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 5 .EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 _p~ 1-CE - see Note 3 Handset Station C IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station C, IPA-CR36 075 1-C3 - 1-ES-2111A/B C NKI39357' 035 15Vdc (2) FWF 1A Control Box *Ea* l i i I-ES-2112A/B C NK139367' 035 15Vde (2) FWP 15 Control Box "EH" 4 1-HS-2111C C NK139358 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. skr. Ic2 1-H5-2112C C 'NK139365 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. skr.102 1-ES-2111D/E. C NKI39359 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Ek::.102 1-H5-2112D/E C NK139369 ,036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr.102 1-H5-3302 C NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D2 ' 1-HS-3299 C NK139620 036 125Vdc 10A Ckt. Ekr. 1D~.. ~ i i 1-CB (Nota 5) 1-H5-2225 ,C NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-H5-2229 C WK139654 037 125Vde 3dA, SWGR 1A4 1-H5-2450A A EGI38895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-R5-2451A B EG138349 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 i 1-RS-2452r AA AG138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1EDI 1-55-2452G/s AA AG138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr. IEDI ' l! / 1-C5-10 Hanosat Station. C 1PA-CR36 075 Handset Station C IPA-CR36A 051 Handset Station C IPA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 Handset Station C IPA-CR37 075 ~ l ! X-CV-01 . Raiidset Station C 2PA-CR31 075

r -- s. .QI.004 REY. 4 ATTACH 4ENT 1 . PAGE 4 0F 4 +

r. ::t5:

s.r ] OAE* I 1 (cca-inued) .b - ; n.., v 7.. ~:p.

e. 2.G.,-

M$tsJrdi-l" ~? ? 4:.&:!":i

,.4 w;: ** Notes:- . Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are (1) ~ fuse ratings There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control (2) panel: a) 120Vac,.15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt. 97 125vde, 20A circuit breakas in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt.'611 h) Detailed information for 15Vde paver supply (ree GE drawing $125D443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available. 3PDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-ES-SPDS/P2500 41rine (3) This wiring should be separated in have not been reviewed. accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection critaria. All auto / manual control stations in Section B of G-4, 5 and.5 (4) have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps. The following auto / manual cont =ol scations in G-08 and G. (5) have 26Vdc lamo circuits fused at 15 amps. "C3-Os G-09 ' r 1-PK-507 1-rK-510 1-5K-509A 1-FK-520 l 1-5K-5095 1-FK-530 1-5K-509C 1-rK-540 i 1-rK-550 I e t

,qt-004.REV.4 m [ COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 REY. Ill and I.b.2 REY._ (I) ,ptDESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT /CA8tE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT ID _ h DRAWING (2) _ REY. ' oCv, h INSPECTION CRITERIA PANEL SECTIONS A & 8 (5) DCA's b PANEL SECTIONS C & O h DCA's A v INSPECTION RESULTS @ AhB C&D Art

SAT UNSAT SAT UNSAT 1

2 3 4 4 6 REMARKS: b _4 INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b DATE h BADGE NO. [6') I 9EVIEW AND APPROVAL b DATE b I ERC Level III REVIEW AND APPROVAL h DATE h l Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L. l

m. ~ . 'qt-004 REY. 4. ATTACHMENT 2 i FAGE 2 os 4 -. 3 3.. y COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAN - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2 'c 1 INSPECTION rep 0RT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS -) .'q.. S ,Q e., .c e,,. .{. .. i. t' f -; J. ~e.. .b.;. P $. .'. a.', 4 . kBLOCK$: k!b .s

i. '..c '. c..:..-[<'u..

g y. f..... ;. ins 0*{ hQ: '.*kT. i 5. ' o, k ':';.;f.. N.q s: .t. ..~ ,,,1

g. p,.

g;'s;.. i 1. Enter current revision level. 5.-a +q

.- ?{

~' 2. Enter equipment ID, drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as requfre ! 3. Enter all appitcable inspection criteria, including revision levels, specific detail: as aopropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading. -4. A. Sign and date the appropriata block (SAT /UNSAT) of each Panel Section column for each inspection activity performed in that Panel Section. B. If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the appropriate Panel Section. 5. A. Document all deficiencies (UNSATS) in a brief, clear manner and organized in outline form. Ex. Activity 1. Item 1 - (Deficiency description) Item 2 - (Deficiency description) B. Enter applicable DCA's and any additional information necessary to clarify the inspection results. Attachment 3 say be used if more space is required. i 6. Inspection signature, date and badge number. 7. Approval signature and date of ERC Level III. 8. Approval signatum and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader. t e ,.,--,,.,-------,-,,,,,e,.,. ,,,-,,,.--,,---,.m,--n.-.,-...,._,,..e,.,.-,_--n,-_,-.,,,__,-._,,a.,. -_.m._,_..-,

k.-004REV.4 QI q.. .'ACHMENT 3 Pag) 1 of I' SHEET OF ~ i;g ,s. ' COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM [. 7 INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET - ' FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT / CABLE SEPARATION - ACTION ITEM !. ' 3 . ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REY. 7,T t v ~ r .s ' 6, *... p,. '.i.. .s . v.J'6 .b~ 3,.. ..r _,,.,, s, T =s. * .*, 6,% ,' ,> *g

[ '&.y.j.

.s

g y

M ' ' g. fQb!PMENTID DRAWI$3-REV. ~ s ;s i ' T, i REMARKS (cont'd), b ((x c s (i (\\ f t,3' i ~~%. k, c s i \\' 4 b, .c < i i .y i !,n [ \\ \\ s \\

.i

,.. a ' g A \\ i ( s. ,s w I k b ~ .) ' t, A y 8 k I i ! ) i.< I l N d__i I. mI ( y 'l ) s. t' t i 7 3 E j. \\ s* O i l k 4 k ) t, f s,g 1 t: t , ~ -, _. -

p-ATTACit!ENT 4 Pag 21 of 1 SHEET OF Q1-004 REY.4 - ~ CPRT It.SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITDI !.b.1 REY. b T ACTION ITEri 1.b.2 REY. (;.) -) , {.;, v SUPPLEMENT SHEET Y i ., INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 i EQUIPMENT i h SECTION DRAWING p REY. [3) DCA's NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW. i M$ ensmana REMARKS: 1 l I 1 l .1

QI-004 REY. 4 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 of 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b 2 .) i SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS..';; .1 THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON T5IE SUPPLEMENT SHEET.- l. ' ' ' ' 1. Enter the current revision level. 2. Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number. 3. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 4. Enter all outstanding DCA's, 6. List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section. 7. Note any inspection comments. l l

4 3 0,y 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM I QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE 3 3/6/85 1 of 3 PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY: v4 L h S. ~./ DATE 3/5/85 Evaluation Re e rch Corp. APPROVED BY: n/ VA, 4v ^- DATEb(!I5~ . valuation Research Corp. F 1 APPROVED BY: [ 3 2.f/K.5' _;M DATE R.T.L. Elec/Instruse 1.1 Office meno, 1/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel " Inspection Attributes for Action Items I b.1 and I.b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office memo, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,823) 1.3 Office meno, 2/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. 3. Jones (CPP-17,854) 1.4 Office meno, 3/05/85, M. B. Jones to J. Hansel 1.5 Office meno, 2/22/85m W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Qurlity Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization. This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2. 2.2 The scope of this procedure is the cabling and wiring within selected control panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections is any interaction between safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wireway to vendor wireway (per Ref. 1.5). NOTE: The scope of this Quality Instruction may W expanded at the direction of the Electrical /Instrumentatfasi Review Team Leader. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Page 2 of 3 ) 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for c?nducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports. 4.0' INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that: -ACTIVITY 1 -Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid ~ conduit, ENT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel-is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and. components (Ref. 1.1, para. 3 and Ref. 1.5). ACTIVITY 2 -Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref. 1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3). ACTIVITY 3 -Verify that wiring is separated in accordance with, Ref 1.1, para. 4, 5.. Fig. I and Table 1 of Ref. 1.3. ACTIVITY 4 -Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum sepgration 4 will be maintained (Ref. 1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3). ACTIVITY 5 -The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref. 1.1, Note). ACTIVITY 6 -Verify that " required" barriers are installed. 9 Note: " Required" means either required by a design document, or indications that a barrier was installed but has been removed. The inspector will state the location of missing barriers and whether or not a separation violation has been created by the barrier's absence. 4.2.For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefzel wiring (Ref. 1.1, para. I and Ref. 1.2). 4.3 DOCUMENTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results and inspections for para. 4.1 on the IR (Attachments 2 and 3, as applicable). For para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefrel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR.

r 1 Paga 3 of 3 4.3 DOCUMENTATION (Cont'd) 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2, 3 and 4) shall be completed in accordance with their respective completion instructions, as applicable. The inspector completing the report shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number. The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed IR shall be submitted to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader for review and' approval. 4.3.4 All section a and b criteria blocks and inspection results blocks for panels ICB-10, ICB-11, XCV-01 and XCV-03 will be NA'd per Ref. .4 1.1, para. 5. All section e and d criteria and inspection results blocks shall be completed as appropriate. 4 i e - + -. ,,---,---,<m- ,,,,e,- ,..---v,-,----r-..-,.,,,n,,. -,.w-- w --,,,-nn,--n --+---,--,-----y,, .r- ..m,n-.--,-

yl-UU4.Nev.'3 ATTACHMEN.T 1 Pace 1 Of 4 .I l l 4 6' L J f L-- 1 l 1l -tamu *a couent masu 'A' inum aca ecuent ftPTEL OR MON-TEFIEL TETitt CARLE NON ftFIEL caskt useTEd) cAaLE DETAIL la TEFZEL *, NON-TEFEEL CA8LES --Ifi-yth ll l1 Tnun =s Tnun s.. casta cououif rnuu A comouir l DETAll 18 ALL TEFEEL CASLES g FIGURE 1 (NOTE a) TVplCAL SEPARATI0u DETAILS FDR- ',I -

1) ALL WIRING IN 1 CS-10 ( l-CE il, AND QRCulT5 L151ED IN TABLE 1.

f. 21 NON-TEFEEL WIRING IN ALL CONTROL 80AADS ANO VE.R. TTCAL puts.

3) WIRIMS IN SECT 10NS C ANO O 0F ANY CONTROL EcutD.,

1 NOTES

1) FORGEllERAL uoTES,$EE Dwe 1323-El 1702-02 NOTES t,1 4 4

2) NOTIFPuC15'_E *D.mut*WCA*CR LAMPEOY CAELES ANO CDAtlAL CRT r1RI M.

3) CDNouaTS ARE RIGIO OR FLEXISLE.

4) ENCLDSIMG THIS CARLi'i IM 8tE188LE CONOUlT #1LL edlT EEDUCE SEPARAT'.0M SHOWN.

$) SEPARATION 61STAECES EMoww Apply tw att cittCQug (li, NORIIQWTAL Au3 VERTICAL).

4) A33tTIONAL :E71LS 141 SHCWW Ok Owd. 3 3 !! 170 1 *2,

CET11L el A TARU 41 C.

c ,, I-054 REY. 3 AT' TACH E'NT 1 PAGE 2 0F 4 TA3.E 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTICTION_ RATED.MORI THAN 10 AMP 5 1-C3 Control Bd.- Cable Cable Protective Devic Device Train Number Tvoe Volts Ratincr & Locatic X-ES-3264 C-NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-55-3450 C NK139045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-ES-4250A A EG138987 137 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-85 -4251A B-EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2' 1-CB 1/L - APSII A EG138998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR.IZA1. 1/1 - APSI2 B EG139032 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 2. Handset Station C IPA-CR30 075 Handsat Station C IPA-CR29 075 1-CB 1-ES-4518A A EG139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4519A B EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB (Note 4) l 1/1 - AP3E1 A EG135550 -137 125Vdc 30A, SWGK 1EAL 1/1 - APRE1 R EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 Handsat Station C IPA-CP.29 075 Hanoset Station C IPA-CR28 075 1PA-CR23A 051 Hagegtatgg,4)C g 1/1 - IPCPX1 C UK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - iPCPX2 C NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 G

' ~ ' -

.-.-r

l _,,,'QI.004-REYN ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 3 0F 4 TABLE 1 (Continued) 1-CB Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device ~ Device Train Number Type Volts Racine & Location 1/1 - AHCU C ~NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter C 2. TBX-TRANCU-M 1/1'- APCH1 A' E9139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 1 1/1 - APCH2 B EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 1 1-CB see Note 3 Handset Station C IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station - C, IPA-CR36 075 1-CB - 1-HS-2111A/B C NEI39357 035 15Vdc (2) FWF IA Control Box EH" I-BS-2112A/B C -NK139367 035 157de (2) FWP 18 l l Control Box "EH* 1-RS-2111C ,C NK139358 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 10: 1-HS-2112C C NK139365' 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. Skr. lo-1-MS-2111D/E C NKI39359 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr. 102 1-HS-2112D/K C NK139369 ,036 125vda 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D* i 1-HS-3302 C NK139366 037 125vde 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D* , -l 1-HS-3299 C NK139620 036 125Vde 10A Ckt. Bkr.1D2: j 1-CB (Note 5) 1-HS-2225 C NK1396S1 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C NK139654 037 125Vde 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A A E9138895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1-HS-2451A B EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-HS-2452F AA AG138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr.1EDI, 1-HS-2452G/H AA AG138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1EDI 1-CS-10 Handset Station. C IPA-CR36 075 Handset Station C IPA-CR36A 051 l Har.dset Station C 1PA-CR37 075 1-C8-11 Handset Station C IPA-CR37 075 ~ I-CV-01 aandset Station C IPA-CR31 075

~ F- .e ATTAClf4ENT 1 PAGE 4 0F 4 .. -004 REY. 3 - "A3*.I 1 (C:ntinued) Notes: Unless otherwise noted, all protective device r'atings are (1) fuse ratings-(2) There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control panel: a) 120Vac,.15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt. 97 h) 125vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. 612. l Detailed information for 15vde power supply (See GE drawincr $1250443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available. (3) SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-ES-SPDS/P2500 Wirine have' not been reviewed. This wiring should be separated.in accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria. . (4) All auto / manual control stations in Section B of CB-4, 5 and 6-have 16vde lamo circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps. (5) The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and CB-09 have 26Vdc lamo circuits fused at 15 amps. 'C3-08 C3-09 1-PK-507 1-FK-510 1-5K-509A 1-FK-520 1-SK-5098 1-FK-530 1-SK-509C 1-FK-540 1-FK-550 e O e b i

P . QI-004 ' REY. 3 UF 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 REY. @ and 1.b.2 REY. (T) , ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT / CABLE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT ID h ORAWING (2) REV. (D oCA's M INSPECTION CRITERIA PANEL SECTIONS A & 8 h DCA's b PANEL SECTIONS C 8 D b OCA's M INSPECTION RESULTS h AhB C&0 ACT* SAT UNSAT SAT UNSAT 1 2 3 l 4 s l*t 6 REMARKS: b INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b DATE h BADGENO.h REVIEW AND APPROVAL b DATE b ERC Level 111 REVIEW AND APPROVAL h DATE h Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L.

r QI-004 REY. 3 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 2 of 2 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS BLOCKS: INSTRUCTION ~ 1. Enter current revision level. 1 2. Enter equipment 10. drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as required. 3. Enter all applicable inspection criteria, including revision levels, specific details as appropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading. l 4. A. Sign and dat'e the appropriate block (SAT /UNSAT) of each Panel Section column for eahh inspection activity performed in that Panel Section. B. If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the appropriate Panel Section. 5. A. Document all deficiencias (UNSATS) in a brief, clear manner and organized in outline fons. Ex. Activity 1. Item 1 - (Deficiency description) Item 2 - (Deficiency description) B. Enter appifcable DCA's and any additional information necessary to clarify the inspection results. Attachment 3 nay be used if more space is required. 6. Inspection signature, date and badge number. 7. Approval signature and date of ERC Leve.1 III. 8. Approval signature and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader. 9 -,.--.-.,,,_,,--.,.m..,,,_...,,wm_ .-.v.-.m. ,--,e... __--,-_-.m

QI-004 REY. 3 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF _ COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET FLEXIBLECONOUITTOFLEXIBLECONDUIT/CABLESEPARATION-ACTIONITEMI.b.1R ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REV._ i n v EQUIPMENT ID b. DRAWING h REV. REMARKS (cont'd): h

C

gg.co4. REY.3 ATTACl#1ENT 4 Paga 1 of 1 SHEET OF CPRT It:SPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM !.b.1 REV. b ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REV. ( ;. )

SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 EQUIPMENT # (b SECTION ~ .oRAWIm a CD aEv. (i) oCa., (4) NON-TEFZEL WIRIM IS IDENTIFIED BELOW. g 4 4 f I e } f l l REMARKS: i e

i h QI-004 REY. 3 ATTACHMENT'5 PAGE 1 of 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 i SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET. 1. Enter the current revision level. 2. Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number. 3. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 4. Enter all outstanding DCA's. 6. List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section. 7. Note any inspection coments. . ~ ~ - - ---,--,,,-,---,,,e-re. ,---,-----e--,---- ---,--,-------n,--nc-------- r---

F COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I b.1 and I.b.P. INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE 01-004 2 2/26/85 1 of 2 PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 - Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY: DATE

27 6 // 6 Evaluafio/Res rch Corporation APPROVED BY:

4 DATE 2. 25. E r. Evaluation Research Corporation APPROVED BY: bk DATE 2 Z(, 85~ R.T.L. p ec/ Inst @mentapon () m

1.0 REFERENCES

saara vnih b ggLL 1.1 Office memo, 1/15/85, W. I. Vogelsang to J. L. Hansel " Inspection Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I,b.2" (CPP-17,721) 1.2 Office memo, 2/1/85, W. I. Vogelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,823) 1.3 Office memo, 2/15/85 W. I. Vooelsang to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,854) 1.4 Office memo, 1/17/85, W. I. Vogelsang to A. S. Hurbanek (CPP-17,746) 1.5 Office memo, 2/22/85. W. I. Vogelsano to M. B. Jones (CPP-17,914) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the inspection activities, methods, and documentation requirements necessary to assure that adequate physical separation of wiring has been maintained, and that required barriers have not been removed without authorization. This effort is in direct support of CPRT Action Items I,b.1 and I.b.2. 2.2 The scope of this procedure is the cabling and wiring within selected control 2 panels and cabinets as identified in the above references. The scope of inspections is any interaction between safety related wiring and components and other safety related or non-safety related wiring and components, excluding vendor wiring to vendor wireway (per Ref.1.5). NOTE: The scope of this Quality Instruction may be expanded at the direction of the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspections and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports. .n,

k QI-004 REV. 2 PAGE 2 of 2 .4.0 INSTRUCTION

4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that:

ACTIVITY 1 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref.1.1, para. 3 and Ref.1.5). ACTIVITY 2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1. 3). ACTIVITY 3 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para. 4 and 5 and Figure 1, Ref. 1.3, Table 1 (Attachment 1). ACTIVITY 4 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref.1.3). ACTIVITY 5 - The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref.1.1, Note). ACTIVITY 6 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e. brackets installed but no barriers, etc.), or if design drawings < require barriers that are not installed, verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization (Ref.1.4). ACTIVITY 7 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring installation / reinstallation of the barriers (Ref. 1.4). 4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefzel wiring (Ref. 1.1, para. 1 and Ref. 1.2). 4.3 DOCUMENTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para. 4.1 on the IR (Attachments 2 and 3, as applicable). For para. 4.2, the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 (Supplement Sheet) and attach the form to the appropriate IR. 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2, 3 and 4) shall be completed in accordance with their respective completion instructions, as applicable. The inspector com-plating the report shall indicate that all applicable inspections have been completed and documented correctly by entering signature, date and badge number. The IR's shall be reviewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed IR shall be submitted to the Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader for review and approval.

ATTACHMEN.T 1 " Nage 1 of 4 f 91-904 Rev. 2 l .e .r-. ~ .-I s' W ft-. ^ I IJl 'A

z.,.

- temm'acasar uum ' A' numac*comoer TEPTEL OR ,tesN.ftpt tL TEFIEL CAtts NON TE71st. CAtta Osoftd) CAaka DETAIL lA TEREL $ NON-TEREL CASLES J4 N 1l l nun s= nun e*. casts couanT vnu= A* ODiNT DETAll 18 Au. TEFart. CA8LES FIGURE 1 (NOTE 2,) TYPICAL SEPNEATION DETAILS FOR-e

8) ALL wtmlue IM l-CS-to ( l-CE 18, AND QRCUIT5 LISTED IM RSLE 1.

11 NON-TEFEEL WlRiaet IN ALL CDim:0L SQLADS ANO VER-TICAL puts. i $ watame atSEt:rtout C Aue 0 0F ANY CONTROL 30MtD., l i NOTES t 6 FoltENERALl:0TES,SEE DWG 1515 El 1701-02 NOTES I,1 $ 4

2) Ncr13pLcs!.E *D akut.WQA*t2 LAMPt0Y CASLES As0 CDhuAL CRT CASLES.

13 CDummT5 ARE RieI0 OR FLEXISLE, 4 suctosnes ruis cAals su atexists CaucuiT mu. NOT REDUCE SEMitAT'.QM SHOWN. S) SEP& Ration thST1 hat SHOWN A38LY tu &LL CIXEC;4ut (IE, NORlIDMTAL Au3 vEAT: Cat.). f 41 AssmonAL :E ul.s A*E tucw Ok :wt nn.t!.it:z.:2, CETML MATdAU 44C.

F 1 j l,d!-054 RU. 2 AT' TAC 19tdtf 'l PAGE 2 0F 4 ~ T A 3* *, 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION RATED RORE THAN 10 AMPS ,.,. [(. l,, g . C3. Control Ed.- Cable Cable Protective Devic Device Train Number Tvoe volts Racine 5 Locacie

K-ES-3264 C

NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-E5-3450 C. NE129045 036 115Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1-NS-4250A A EG138987 137 1257de 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES -4251A 5 EG139021 237 1257dc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-CE, 1/1 - APSIL A EG138998 137 1257dc 30A, SWGR LEA 1 1/1 - APSI2 E EG139031 237 12Svde 30A, SWGR 1EA2. 075 Handset Station C 1PA-CR30 Handset Station C IPA-CR29 075 1-CB 1-ES-4518A A EG139466 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4519A E EG139503 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-C3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APRE1 A EG135550 137 125vde 30A, SWGK IEA1 1/1 - APRE1 1 EG139586 137 125vde 30A, SWGK LEA 2 Handset Station C IPA-CP.29 075 Hanosat Station C IPA-CH28 075 C IPA-CR20A 051 Ha g e g tat g, y 1/1 - LPCPX1 C NK139458 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - IPCPX2 C NK139459 036 125vde 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - IPCP13 C NK139460 036 125vde 30A, sWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C NK139461 036 11Syde 30A, SWGR 1A4

e

,,.s.

ne sawiuu a - PAGE 3 0F. 4 P Jt-TA3LE 1 (Continu:d) i 1-CB ,- Control Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train. ' Number Type Volts Racine & Locatior. 1 1/1 - ABCU C NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter Csh, TBX-TRANCU-01 1/1 - APCN1 A* E8139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1/1 - APCH1 5 EG139338 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-C3. See Note 3 Handset Station C 1PA-CR35 075 Handset Station C, IPA-CR36 075 1-CE

1-55-2111A/B C

NEI39357 035 15Vdc (2) FWF Ik l Control nor "En* 4 1-RS-2112A/B C NE139367

035 15Vdc (2) FWP 13 Control Box *ER*

1-H5-2111C ,C NE139358 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. skr. 10' ' 'i 1-HS-2112C C EE139365 035 125Vde 20A Ckt. skr. 10" 1-H5-2111D/E. c NEI29359 036 125vde 20A Ckt. skr. 10' 1-H5-2112D/E C NE139369 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D* 1-H5-3302 C NE139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr.1D* !I 1-H5-3299 C NK139620 036 125Vdc 10A Ckt. Bkr.101.' ,I ii 1-C5 (Note 5) 1-H5-2225 ,C NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-H5-2229 C NK139654 037. 125Vde 3dA, SWGR 1A4 P 1-H5-2450A A EG138895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL i 1-H5-2451A B EG138949 231 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 i 1-H5-2452F AA AG138423 735 115Vdc 20A Ckt skr.1E01 1-H5-2452G/H AA AG138621 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt Bkr.1EDI, l' 1-CS-10 Hiiidie7 Station. C 1PA-CR36 075 Handset Station C 1PA-CR36A 051 l Handset Station C 1PA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 Handset Station C 1PA-CR37 075 X-CV-01 i Mandset Station C IPA-CR31 075

i - M-W, REY.2 ATTACIMENT 1 ; PAGE 4 0F 4 'TA3;I 1 (Cen-inued) ~ Notes: rx.' 1 e. v. ., ~. z r. 9,.g'.,.. l Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings.are (1) fuse ratings There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control (2) l. panels 1 a) 120Vac,.15A circuit breaker in panelboard IC2, Ckt. 97 b) 125vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 1D2-1, Ckt. 612 Detailed information for 15vde power supply (See GE drawing $125D4433E, P.O. $CP-0005) not available. SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-NS-SPOS/P2500 Kirincr (3) have not been reviewed. This wiring should be separated in accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria. All auto / manual control stationa in Section 3 of CB-4, 5 and,6 (4) have 26vde lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps. The followinct auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and CB. (5) have 26Vdc lama circuits insed at 15 emps. 'C3-08 C3-09 I 1-PK-507 1-FK-510 1-5K-509A 1-rK-520 1-sK-5093 1-FK-530 1-SK-509C 1-rK-540 c 1-rK-550 t l I I e i i e .-,--,,.,---,n,_-,--.

r " ' " ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' * * ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' " ' 1-004 EV. 2 ,m W /,- d COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 REY. Il) andI.b.2REV._(I) l , ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT /CA8LE SEPARATION EQUIPMENT 10 h DRAWING M REY. _ S .j ~. n v INSPECTION CRITERIA PANEL SECTIONS A & 8 DCA's b PANEL SECTIONS C & O b t I DCA'S M w h, INSPECTION RESULT 5 Ah B C a0 ACT* SAT UNSAT SAT UN5AT 1 E [ 3 1 4 5 6 I 7 b REMARKS: { h BADGENO.@ INSPECTOR SIGNATURE b DATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL b DATE b ERC Level III REVIEW AND APPROVAL h DATE b Elec/ Instrumentation R.T.L.

QI,004 REY. 2 ATTACHPENT 2 PAGE 1 a 2 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.k.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS 8LOCX5: ~ INSTRUCTION 1. Enter current revision level. 2. Enter equipment ID, drawing number and current revision number, and DCA's as require-3. Enter all applicable inspection criteria, including revision levels, specific detail: as appropriate, and DCA's in each criteria block of the inspection report heading. 4. A. Sign and date the appropriate block (SAT /UNSAT) of each Panel Section column for each inspection activity performed in that Panel Section. B. If an inspection activity does not apply to a given panel section, enter N/A in the SAT block of the, appropriate Panel Section. 5. A. Document all deficiencies (UNSATS) in a brief, clear manner and organize'd in outline form. Ex. Activity 1. Item 1 - (Deficiency description) Item 2 - (Deficiency description) 8. Enter applicable DCA's and any additional inforention necessary to clarify the inspection results. Attachment 3 say be used if more space is required. 6. Inspection signature, date and badge number. 7. Approval signature and date of ERC Level III, t 8. Approval signature and date of Electrical / Instrumentation Review Team Leader. e i ,,,_m___

QI-004 REY. 2 TACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 SHEET _ 0F - COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - CONTINUATION SHEET FLEXIBLECONDUITTOFLEXIBLECONDUIT/CABLESEPARATION-ACTIONITEMIb.1 ACTION ITEM I.b.2 REY._ m v EQUIPMENT ID h DRAWING h REY. @' REMARKS (cont'd) h l t

P e.,

- hi.004 'nEV. 2-ATTACittENT 4 -

Page 1 of 1 SHEET OF CPRT ItiSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM !.b.1 REV.__ O ACTION ITEM 1.b.2 REV. ( : 1 SUPPLEMENT 5HEET INSPECTION ATTR! RITE - 4.2 ~ Equ!PMENT f b SECTION eRaim f nEv. DCA's NON-TEFZEL WIRING 15 IDENTIFIED BELOW. Q i 1 l 3 l. REMARKS: l: f I i i t l i

QI-004 REY. 2 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 Gf 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT S%ET. 1. Enter the current revision level. 2. Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number. 3. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 4. Enter all outstanding DCA's. 6. List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section. 7. Note any inspection coments. ( t e

7, 3 d..L COMACNHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEM I.b.1 and I,b.2 INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUED DATE PAGE 01-004 1 2/18/85 1 0F 2 ~ PROCEDURE FOR: CPRT ACTION ITEM I,b.1 - Flexible, Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation CPRT ACTION I EM I.b.2 - Flexible Conduit to Cable Separation PREPARED BY: / ^' DATE CS /8 85 Evaluatro es rch Corporation APPROVED BY: 7-DATE /t e //tJ~. Eval tion Research Corporation V APPROVED BY: Nd k .tL 6 DATE 19 MSS. R.l.L. El /Instruptatig C ( Nu,Vt

1.0 REFERENCES

1.1 Office memo,1/15/85, W.I. Vogelsang to J.L. Hansel - " Inspection Attr butes for Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2". (CPP17,721) 1.2 Office memo, 2/1/85, W.I. Vogelsang to M.B. Jones (CPP 17,823) ) l. 1.3 Office memo, 2/15/85, W.I. Vogelsang to M.B. Jones (CPP 17,854) l-2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the method by which to ensure that requ. ired separation is maintained within specific Main Control room panels and that no separation barriers have been removed with-t out authorization. This is in direct support of the CPRT Action Items I.b.1 and I.b.2. 2.2 The scope of this Quality Instruction is to verify by inspection, that required separation is maintained and that no separation barriers have been removed without authorization. l 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third part inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspec- { tions and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports. l i 4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that: I ACTIVITY #1 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation l will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para 2 and Ref.1.3) 1 ACTIVITY #2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para. 2 and Ref. 1.3) 1 l

QI-004 REV.1 PME 2 0F 2 4.1 (cont.) ACTIVITY #3 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel (Ref. 1.1, para 3). NOTE: If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptac1e wiring is not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channels, N/A Activities 3 and 4 and complete Activity 5. ACTIVITY #4 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring routed in rigid conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 1 inch from safety related components (Ref. 1.1, para 3). ACTIVITY #5 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1, para 3). NOTE: If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel, N/A Activity 5 and complete Activities 3 and 4. ACTIVITY #6 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para 4 and 5 and Figure 1 Ref.1.3 Table 1 (ATTACIMENT 1) NOTE: Inspector shall note the specific drawing and detail used for verifi-cation in the appropriate block of the I.R. ACTIVITY #7 - The correct type barrier material is installed (Ref.1.1, Note). ACTIVITY #8 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e. brackets installed but no barriers, etc.), or if design drawings require barriers that are not installed, verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization. ACTIVITY #9 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring insta11 tion / reinstallation of the barrier (s). 4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality Inspector shall identify all exposed non-Tefzel wiring (Ref.1.1, para 1 and Ref. 1.2) 4.3 DOCUMENTATION 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para. 4.1 on the I.R. (Attachment 2). For para 4.2 the Quality Inspectors shall identify exposed non-Tefzel wiring on Attachnent 4 supplement sheet and attach the fann to the appropriate I.R. 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2 and 4) shall be completed in accor-dance with Attachments 3 and 5, as applicable. The I.R. 's shall be re-viewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level III. The completed I.R. shall be submitted to the Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader for review and approval.

I QI-004 Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 4 ---4 6' W 1*l-- I IIl w TRAIN 'B' (OMOve? TRAIN ' A' TRAIN 'C' CONoglf 7tPTEL OR NON TEFIEL TEFZEL CASLE NON TEFIEL CASLE (N0ftd) CASLE DETall IA TEFZEL $ NON-TEFZEL CA8LES - I l'h -{ l*I L-- 1I I TRAIN '8' TR AIN ' S' CASLE CON 0ulf coupuif DETAIL iB ALL TEFZEL CABLES FIGURE i (NOTE 2) TYPICAL SEPMtATIDW DETAILS FOR -

1) ALL WlRIN6 IN 1.CS 10 ( l CS II, AND CIRCulTS LISTED IN TABLE 1

2) NON-TEFZEL WIRING IN ALL CONTROL 80AR05 ANDVER-TICAL PNLS.

3) WIRING IN SECTIONS C AND D OF ANY CONTROL ECARD.,

NOTES

1) FOR 6ENERAL WOTES,5EE DWG 2325 El 1702 02 NOTES 1,144

2) NOT APPLiciBLE "J AMwL'NCIATOR LAMPB01 CABLES AND COAxlAL CRT CABLES.

3) CONOUlTS ARE RIGIO OR FLEXIBLE

4) ENCLOSING THIS CABLE IN FLEXIBLE CON 0uti #1LL NOT REDUCE SEPARAT'.oM SHOWW.

S) SEPARATI0u 61STALCES SHOWN APOLY IN ALL CitECT:Ous (IE, WORIZONTAL AND '.ERTICAL)

6) A00lfiON AL lE* AILS aRE SWCWW ON :ad 21:3.!! 170 Z.22, OETill 61 A TARU 61 C l

p QI-004 REV.1 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 0F 4 l L TABLE 1 CIRCUITS WITH PROTECTION RATED ltORE THAN 10 AMPS 1-CB Control Bd. Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Tyce Volts Rating & Location X-ES-3264 C NK139053 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR XA1 1-E5-3450 C NR139045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 113 1-RS-4250A A EG138987 137 125vde 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES -4251A B EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-C3402 - 1/1 - APSIL A E@l38998 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR.1EA1 1/1 - APSI2 5 EG139032 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2. Handset Station C IPA-CR30 075 Handset Station C 1PA-CR29 075 1-CB-03.- 1-ES-4518A A E0139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-ES-4 519 A B EG139503 237 125vde 30A, SWGR LEA 2 1-C3 (Nota 4) 1/1 - APREL A EG135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EAL 1/1 - APR52 B EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LEA 2 Handset Station C IPA-CR29 075 Hanaset Station C 1PA-CR28 075 Ha g e g tati g y C IPA-CR28A 051 1/1 - iPCPX1 C NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A1 1/1 - iPCPX2 C NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C NX139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1/1 - IPCPX4 C NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR LA4 e - I

E QI-004 REV.1 ATTACMENT 1 PAGE 3 0F 4 TABLE 1 (Continued) 1-CB Control'Rd Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Type Volts Racine & Location 1/1 - AHCU C NK139535 036 120Vac 30A, Starter Cah, TBX-TRAHCU-01 1/1 - APCH1 A' EG139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 B EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CB See Note 3 Handset Station C IPA-CR35 075 Handset Station C IPA-CR36 075 1-CB

1-ES-2111A/B C

NK139357 035 15Voc ( 2') FWF IA Control Box, "ER" I-HS-2112A/B C NK139367 035 157de (2) FWP IB Control Box "EH" 1-NS-2111C C NK139358 035 125vde 20A Ckt. Bkr. 102-1-HS-2112C C NK139368 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr. 102-1-HS-2111D/E C NK139359 036 125vde 20A Ckt. Skr. 102-1-NS-2112D/E C NK139369 036 125Vda 20A Ckt. Skr.1D2-1-HS-3302 C NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Bkr. 1D2-1-NS-3299 C NK139620 036 125Vde 10A Ckt. Bkr.1D2-1-CB (Note 5) l 1-NS-2225 C NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-HS-2229 C NK139654 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-HS-2450A A EG138895 140 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS-2451A B EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 i i 1-HS-2452F AA A0138623 735 125vde 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED1-1-HS-2452G/H AA A0138622 737 125Vdc, 20A Ckt Bkr.1ED1-1-CS-10 Handset Station. C 1PA-CR36 075 Handset Station C IPA-CR36A 051 Handset Station C 1PA-CR37 075 1-CB-11 Handset Station C 1PA-CR37 075 i X-CV-01 Handset Station C IPA-CR31 OhT

F~ QI-004 REY.1 ATTACMENT 1 PAGE 4 0F 4 TABLE 1 (Continued) Notes: (1) Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are fuse ratings (2) There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumos control panel: a) 120Vac,.15A circuit breaker in panelboard 1C2, Ckt. 47 b) 125Vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard. 1D2-1, Ckt. til Detailed information for 15Vde power supply (See GE drawine

1250443BE, P.O. #CP-0005) not available.

(3) SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-HS-SPDS/P2500 Wirine have not been reviewed. This wiring should be separated in accordance with Figure 1 of the inspection criteria. (4) All auto / manual control stationa in Section 8 of CB-4, 5.and 6 have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps. (5) The following auto / manual control stations in CB-08 and CE ' have 26Vdc lamo circuits fused at 15 amps. CB-08 CB-09 1-PK-507 1-FK-510 1-SK-509A 1-rK-520 1-SK-5098 1-TK-530 1-SK-509C 1-rK-540 1-FK-550 t SPM:sce 7 f e l l

'QI-004 REY. 1 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 10F A SHEET _1, OF COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I.b.1 DRAFT b REY. ACTION ITEM I.b.2 DRAFT /Ts REV. v ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO FLEXIBLE CUNDUIT SEPARATION AND FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO CABLE SEPARATION h EQUIPMENT f DRAWING # b REVISION h DCA's INSPECTI0fl ATTRIBUTES - 4.1 SECTION/ ACT.1 ACT.2 ACT.3 ACT.4 ACT.5 ACT.6 DWG./ ACT.7 ACT.8 ACT.S INSP. sigil./ APP PANEL 5 J 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U DETAIL 5 U 5 U 5 U DATE DCA M M 1 h $ ( 2) O (@ 3 k M 68') I i ? h REMARKS: INSPECTOR DATE BADGE # REVIEW All0 APPROVAL [2 11 DATE Esaluation Riisearch Corportation REVIEW AllD APPROVAL DAfE Electrical / Instrumentation R.T.L. I

(~ QI 004 'REVo 1 ATTACl91ENT 3 PAGE 1 0F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUM8ERED BLOCKS ON THE INSPECTION RECORD. 1. Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item I.b.1. 2. Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item I.b.2. -3. Enter the Equipment or Panel ID number. 4. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 5. Enter all outstanding DCA's against the drawing. 6. Enter the appropriate Section or Panel ID. 7. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 1. 8. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 2. 9. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 3. 10. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 4. 11. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 5. 12. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 6. 13. Enter drawing and detail used for Activity 6 verification. 14. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 7. 15. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 8. 16. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 9. 17. Inspectors Signature and Date Inspection was performed. 18. Enter applicable DCA's 19. Describe unsatisfactory items and any other inspection comments. 20. Inspection Signature, Date and Badge number. 21. Approval Signature and Date of ERC Level III. 22. Approval Signature and Date of R.T.L. Elec./ Instrumentation.

I QI 004.REVo 1 ATTAtletENT 4 PAGE 10F 1 CPRT INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM I.b.1 DRAFT REY. ACTION ITEM I.b.2 DRAFT REV. SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRIBUTE - 4.2 EQUIPMENT # SECTION DRAWING # REY. OCA's NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW. REMARKS: t i

h QI-004 REV. 1 ATTACW4ENT 5 PAGE 1 0F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 SUPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPOND TO THE NUM8ERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET 1. Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item I,b.1, 2. Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item I.b.2 3. Enter the equipment ID number and appropriate equipment section number. 4. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 5. Enter all outstanding DCA's 6. List all non-Tefzel wiring in the equipment section. 7. Note any inspection comments. r e

i

y. JS I COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION CPRT ACTION ITEMS I.b.1 and I.b.2 INSTRUCTION NO.

REVISION ISSUE DATE PAGE 01-004 0 1/18/85 1 0F 2 PROCEDURE FOR: Flexible Conduit to Flexible Conduit Separation (I.b.1) and F1 xible Conduit to Cable Separation (I,b.2) PREPARED BY: <d I DAM

d6N1, ATE

///1//6 ' Eval tion Research Corporation APPROVED BY: ,w b f. [8141/ / 7!f3~ DATE Tvaluati Re earch Corporation APPROVED BY: b M8hW DATE f (( [ R.T.L. Ele:/Insgeftation

1.0 REFERENCES

1.1 Office memo,1/15/85, W.I. Vogel rg gj 'g' 1 "Inggetip Attributes for Action Items I.b.1 and I b 2' b f tl., M) 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE eJ l 2.1 The purpose of this Quality Instruction is to define the method by which to ensure that required separation is maintained within specified Main Control room panels and that no separation barriers have been removed with-out authorization. This is in direct support of the CPRT Action Items I,b.1 and I.b.2. 2.2 The scope of this Quality Instruction is to verify by inspection, that required separation is maintained and that no separation barriers have been removed without authorization. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The third party inspectors (ERC) shall be responsible for conducting inspec-tions and for completion of inspection reports. The Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader is responsible for the review and approval of the inspection reports. 4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 The Quality Inspector shall inspect the specific Main Control boards and vertical panels (Ref.1.1) to verify that: Activity #1 - Wiring is mounted and supported such that minimum separation will be maintained (Ref.1.1, para 2). Activity #2 - Flexible conduit attached to control switch modules does not exceed 3 feet in length without additional support (Ref.1.1, para.2). Activity #3 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel (Ref.1.1, para 3).

.QI-004 REv. 0 PAsE 2 0F 2 4.1-(cont.) NOTE: If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is not routed in rigid conduit, EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channels. M/A Activities 3 and 4 and complete Activity 5. - Activity M - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring routed in rigid conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at least 1 inch from safety related components (Ref. 1.1 para 3). Activity #5 - Internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring not routed in rii11d conduit. EMT, or Unistrut P-1000 channel is separated at ' east 6 inches from safety related wiring and components (Ref. 1.1 para 3). NOTE: If internal lighting and 120 VAC convenience receptacle wiring is routed in rigid conduit. EMT or Unistrut P-1000 channel. N/A Activity 5 and complete Activities 3 and 4. Activity #6 - Separation is maintained in accordance with Ref.1.1, para 4 and 5. Table 1 and Figure 1 (Attachment 1).. NOTEt Inspector shall note the specific drawing and detail used for verift-cation in the appropriate block of the !.R. Activity #7 - The correct type barrier material is installed. (Ref.1.1 Note). Activity #8 - If it is obvious that separation barriers have been removed (i.e. brackets installed but no barriers, etc.), or if design drawings require barriers that are not installed verify that these barriers have not been removed without authorization. Activity #9 - If barriers have been removed or are not installed, verify that documents exist requiring installation / reinstallation of the barrier (s). F 4.2 For Sections C and D only of the inspected control boards, the Quality l Inspector shall identify all non Tefrel wiring (Ref.1.1 para 1). [ 4.3 DOCUMENTATION i' 4.3.1 The Quality Inspectors will be furnished with the applicable drawings and documents required to perform activities in paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. 4.3.2 The Quality Inspectors shall document the results of inspections for para 4.1 on the !.R. (Attachment 2). For para 4.2. the Quality Inspectors shall identify non Tefzel wiring on Attachment 4 supplement sheet and attach the form to the appropriate !.R. 4.3.3 The inspection documents (Attachments 2 and 4 dance with Attachments 3 and 5. as applicable.) shall be completed in accor-The !.R.'s shall be re-viewed for legibility, accuracy, and completeness and approved by the ERC Level !!!. The completed I.R. shall be submitted to the Electrical /Instru-mentation Review Team Leader for review and approval. i

f yt-uus nev. U ATIACHMENT 1 Page 1 Of 4 W s' k J (1-- 1 l l l veuw rtenen vnain 'A' rame 'C' conooir e ferttL en t0N*fEPIEL TEFIEL CASLE N04 7EPlth Caskt (seeftd) casLE OETait IA TEFIEL $ NON-TEFIEL CASLES -4 rH-r(-- 11 l taain es' inun s. e (**'t covovir ,,,,.3 coweviT DETAIL 18 ALL TEFIEL CASLES FIGURE ,}. (NOTE 2 ) TYplCAL SEPIMIATIOW OETAILS FOR =

1) ALL WIRING IN l CS l(( l C3.ll, AND CIRCUITS LISTED IN TASLE 1.

1) NON TEFIEL WIRlhe tN ALL CONTROL 80&RDS ANOVER.

TICAL PNL%.

3) WIRING IN SECTIONS C AWO O 0F ANY CONTROL 804R0,,

NOTES

1) FORethUtAL WOTES,SEE DWG 1323*Elal702 02 NofE5 1.1 $ 4

1) NOT APPLICAB'.E T DuL'WCIATOR LAMptor CA8(t$

AND COAllAL. CRI C1&lES.

3) CONOUlTS ARE M40 OR FLEXISLE,

4) EkCLOSING'THl3 CA4LE IW FLEXISLE C0400lf #1(L NOT nEDUCE SEFJ'ATRN SHowN.

S) StpARAT;0u dlSTAttJ.S twoww APPLY tN ALL Citt:*;aus (iE, h0Rl!JNTAL M '.EMICAL)

4) A33tfl0N AL E utt att $4ww Ok :*4 :1:1.tt.it:N2, CETut. 66 A idau 41 C.

QI 004 REV. 0 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 4 TAJLE 1 CIRCUITS WITN PROTECTION RATED Jt0RE THAN 10 MIPS 1-C5 Control Bd. Cable Cable Protective Device Device Train Number Volts Rating & Locatior X-Hs-3264 C NK139053 036 - 125Vdc 30A, sWGR XA1 1-NS-3450 C NK139045 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 1-MS-4250A A E0138987 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-MS-4251A B EG139021 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-C5 ' 1/1 - APSIl A E0138998 137 125Vdc 30A, sWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APSI2 5 EG139032 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR,1EA2 1-C5 1-MS-4518A A E9139466 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-HS-4519A E EG139503 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-C5-04, - (Note 4) 1/1 - APRH1 A E9135550 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APRH2 a EG139586 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 l 1-CD (Note 4) 1 ) 1/1 - 1PCPX1 C NK139458 036 125Vdc 30A, sWGR 1A1 1/1 - 1PCPX2 C NK139459 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A2 1/1 - IPCPX3 C NK139460 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A3 l 1/1 - IPCPX4 C NK139461 036 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 i t

r Q1-004 REV. 0 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 4 TAR $E 1 (C:ntinued) m. Control Rd cable Cable Protective Device Device g g h Volts Rating & Locatior 1/1 - ANCU C NK139535 034 120Vac 30A, starter Cab, T3K-TRANCU-01 1/1 - AFCN1 A E0139308 137 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1/1 - APCH2 3 EG139338 237 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-CS ' See Note 3 1-CE-08 + 1-Es-2111A/B C NK139357 035 15Vdc (2) FWF 1A control Box "EN" 1-MS-2112A/B C NK139367 035 15Vdc (2) FWP 15 control Box 'EN" 1-NS-2111C C NK139358 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr. 10. 1-MS-2112C C NK139348 035 125Vdc 20A Ckt. skr. lo 1-MS-2111D/E C NK139359 036 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr.1D 1-MS-2112D/E C NK139369 036 125Vds 20A Ckt. Skr.1D 1-MS-3302 C NK139366 037 125Vdc 20A Ckt. Skr. 1D 1-MS-3299 C NK139620 036 125Vdc 10A Ckt. Skr.1D 1-C3 (Note 5) 1-H3-2225 C NK139651 037 125Vdc 30A, SAGR 1A3 1-MS-2229 C NK139454 037 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1A4 1-H5-2450A A E0138895 140 125Voc 30A, SWGR 1EA1 1-H5-2451A B EG138949 238 125Vdc 30A, SWGR 1EA2 1-HS-2452r AA A0138623 735 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr.1CD. 1-ils-24 52G/I! AA A0138622 737 125Vdc 20A Ckt skr.1ED P e i

F 01-004 REV.0 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 4 TABLE 1 (C:ntinued) M21sas (1) Unless otherwise noted, all protective device ratings are fuse ratings (2) There are two power supplies to the feedwater pumps control panels a) 120Vac, 15A circuit breaker in panelboard 1C2, Ckt. 67 b) 125vde, 20A circuit breaker in panelboard 102-1, Ckt. 012 Detailed information for 15Vdc power supply (see GE drawing 0125D443BE, P.O. GCP-0005) not available. (3) SPDS Touchpad, CRT Control Panel, and 1-MS-SPDS/72500 Wirine have not been reviewed. This wiring should be separated in accordance with paragraph 33 of the inspection criteria.. (4) All auto / manual control stations in section 5 of C3-4, 5 and 6 have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 to 20 amps. (5) The following auto / manual control stations in C3-08 and CB-09 have 26Vdc lamp circuits fused at 15 amps. C5-08 g-M 1-FK-507 1-FK-510 1-8K-509A 1-rK-520 1-5K-5098 1-FK-530 1-SK-509C 1-FK-540 1-rK-550 t arMisce

r-Qt-006 REV. O ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 1 0F. SilEET l 0F C0HANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM !.b.1 ORAFT b REY. ACTION ITEM !.b.2 DRAFT m REV. v ITEM DESCRIPTION: FLEXIBLE CON 00!T TO FLEXIBLE CONDUIT SEPARATION AND FLEXIBLE CONOUIT TO CA8LE SEPARATION h EQUIPMENT # ORAWING f b REVISION DCA's b INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES - 4.1 SECTION/ ACT.1 ACT.2 ACT.3 ACT.4 ACT.5 ACT.6 DWG./ ACT.7 ACT.8 ACT.1 INSP SIGN./ APPL. _ PAN (L 5 J 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U DETAIL 5 U 5 U 5 U DATE DCA's 1 1 3 % l I2) (13) {@ 3 M 68) 2 8 l = = _= REMARKS: h i INSPECTOR DATE BADGE # REVIEW Afl0 APPROVAL ([d DATE Lyaluation R1rsearch Corportation h REVIEW Af40 APPROVAL DATE Electrteal/ Instrumentat1on R.T.L.

i Q1-004 REY. O ATTACHMENT 3 PAGE 10F 1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and I.b.2 INSPECTION REPORT COMPLET!0N INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBERS BELOW CORRESPONO TO THE NUM8ERED BLOCKS ON THE INSPECTION RECORD. 1. Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item !.b.1. 2. Enter Draft and/or Revision of Action Item !.b.2. 3. Enter the Equipment or Panel ID number. 4. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 5. Enter all outstanding DCA's against the drawing. 6. Enter the appropriate Section or Panel 10. 7. Indicate SAT!$ FACTORY or UNSAT!$ FACTORY for Activity 1. 8. Indicate SAT!SFACTORY or UNSAT!$ FACTORY for Activity 2. 9. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 3. 10. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSAT!$ FACTORY for Activity 4. 11. Indicate SAT!SFACTORY or UNSAT!$ FACTORY for Activity 5. 12. Indicate SAT!SrACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 6. l 13. Enter drawing and detail used for Activity 6 verification. 14. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSAT!SFACTORY for Activity 7. 15. Indicatt SATISFACTORY or UNSATISFACTORY for Activity 8. 16. Indicate SATISFACTORY or UNSAT!$ FACTORY for Activity 9. 17. Inspectors Signature and Date Inspection was performed. 18. Enter applicable DCA's 19. Describe unsatisfactory items and any other inspection comments. 20. Inspection Signature, Date and Badge number, 21. Approval Signature and Date of ERC Level !!!. 22. Approval Signature and Date of R.T.L. Elec./ Instrumentation. i I t

'ql004 REY. O ATTACHMENT 4 PAGE 1 0F 1 h CPRT INSPECTION REPORT - ACTION ITEM !.b.1 DRAFT REV. _ ACTION ITEM !.b.2 DRAFT _ f '1 REV. SUPPLEMENT SHEET INSPECTION ATTRl8UTE - 4.2 EqulPMENT# SECTION h REY. DCA's ORAWING f NON-TEFZEL WIRING IS IDENTIFIED BELOW. M O eseeBee I e t i e L N

(~ Q,1004 RLV. O ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 0F 1 l COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - ACTION ITEMS !.b.1 and !.b.2 $UPPLEMENT SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS THE NUMBER $ BELOW CORRESPONO TO THE NUMBERED BLOCKS ON THE SUPPLEMENT SHEET 1. Enter the Draf t and/or Rev. of Action Item !.b.1. 1 2. Enter the Draft and/or Rev. of Action Item !.b.2 j 3. Enter the equipment 10 number and appropriate equipment section number. 4. Enter the drawing number and it's current revision number. 5. Enter all outstanding DCA's 6. List all non Tefsel wiring in the equipment section. 7. Note any inspection coments. l 1 l l i i l l I I

00LMCi[D U;nkt CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE g gg g3 gg gg I, R. K. Gad !!!, one of the attorneys for the Applicants 0F F itf, N ' '. " t r A r t herein, herebsl certify that on March 20, 1987,00C%ggg{syryfheof the within document by mailing copies thereof, postage prepaid, to: Peter B. Bloch, Esquiro Mr. James E. Cummins Chairman Resident Inspector Administrative Judge Comanche Peak D.E.D. Atomic Safety and Licensing c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Board Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory P.O. Box 30 Commission Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Walter 11. Jordan Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Administrative Judge Midwest Office 801 W. Outer Drivo 3424 N. Marcos Lane Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37030 Appleton, WI 54911 Chairman Chairman Atomic Dafety and Licensing Atomic Dafety and Licensing Appeal Panol Board Panol U.D. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Lawrence J. Chandler, Esquiro Mrs. Juanita Ellin office of the Executivo President, CADE Legal Director 1426 8. Polk Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Dallas, Texas 75224 Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 L i l

o'. Renea Hicks, Esquire Ellen Ginsberg, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Environmental Protection Division Board Panel P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Austin, Texas 78711 Washington, D.C. 20555 Anthony Roisman, Esquire Mr. Lanny A. Sinkin t Executive Director Christic Institute Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 1324 North Capitol Street 2000 P Street, N.W., Suite 611 Washington, D.C. 20002 Washington, D.C. 20036 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom Mr. Robert D. Martin Administrative Judge Regional Administrator 1107 West Knapp Region IV Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 1000 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Arlington, Texas 76011 Elizabeth B. Johnson Ceary S. Mizuno, Esq. Administrative Judge Office of the Executive ) Cak Ridge National Laboratory Legal Director P.O. Box X, Duilding 3500 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oak Ridge, Tennossee 37030 Washington, D.C. 20555 l Nancy W1121ams I Cygna Energy Services, Inc. 101 California Street Suite 1000 San Francisco, California 94111 ,m (' k f dw i ,, e t

k. K. OT W I1

/ i ( [ i i .}}

ML20204B789

Contents

Text

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

ML20204B789

Text

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

1.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search