ML20203M379
| ML20203M379 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper, Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1998 |
| From: | Dicus G NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9803060363 | |
| Download: ML20203M379 (3) | |
Text
.
>**80:
00000000000000000mooo000 COMMISSihN RELEASED TOTHE PDR g
')
NUCLEAR R U
R I
g WASHINGTON,0.C.20565
- %,..... /
dem
' weisis Orr:cs OF THe February 10,1998 C06M9610NE R MEMORANDUM TO:
John C. Hoyle Secretary FROM:
Commissioner Dicut g
h,*%
SUBJECT:
COMSECY.98-003 C MMENTS ON DRAFT FY1999 l
PERFROMANCE PLAN I have one comment and some edits on the current draft of the FY1999 Performance Plan provided to the Chairman in a memorandum from Jesse Funches on February 2, 1999, and circulated as COMSECY 98 003.
On page 8 of the draft, we have modified the figures for operating reactors and reactors in decommissioning to reflect the decisions on Zion 1 and 2. However, there is a drop in operating reactors of 2 but an increase in decommissioning reactors of 4. Please verify the current numbers are correct and explain the apparent discrepancy.
Several pages with minor edits are attachei Attachments: As stated cc:
Chairman Jackson Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan EDO t
- ^
i (f
o D
l CIO OGC n
OlG e "t i EO gg A
g 9803060363 980210 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
e e
4y U.S. Notarer Retel**'1 W^" -
n im w,e. o.ogn, rw ese seg.<w,)
n s w w - =ee,* m Meterer noense asfers s
Nuclear Reactor Safety
. ~..
s a v5'""' V"5Pusa inu suyyve i vsugu mi uvas a end its ieleted Peifviiinance-Gosis General Goal Prevent radiation related deaths or illnesses due to civilian nuclear reactors (GoalI)
.. u,.... _.- uw,. u v. u.2.
,_.,s UU. guv-a.nf
-_.,_.-___..__m_
__,4 AY5 mgHEMIgl yyyv gy g yg gsty W5 5 7 5 3553 T7 355% 55 TYWuguFEmu IV N pgvE55 54bruggyte
.s guvaa a.n. a f 2.
i_i _ m 2,.,_
545 U UEN Egg 3 rg ut gy g augsgyygg__.
2,___..
yg g augygg g gy ggy g wyg myW3 gg gggs 43T HgNyg EgW4F% B
, ~
s sauvs s guuma a uj
- _,-. m._.--
2,_
asi v 5 " " '5 " " 5 8 " " '" ' ' v " 5 8 V"* "' 58 " " 5 ' " " ' "'" " ""5"' ' 5""V' \\vvs4
+B'O l
. v.m.s v w Strat es:
1 t We. w111 assure that b.-
eensees dhcharge th..
.b.l ty for duct..
fe eir pnmary responsi ii
. con ing sa bperations, y
We.._,11 m.._._.. ly implem._-,,k,, fo, d,.. _d,wh_ere_ap_propn~ ate, perfo~rm, an,-
eremental m, ent ns m rme an s
~~.
t w1 based. regulatory approache's for power reactorid 3 0/
m.
We will_pos ion f*f.NRC (6r'hcensmg,fu_ture reactors and _ren_ew.,_,stl._h. _ m y
t it mg exi ng censes
)
li,c_en._. _. sing activit.,.ies associat
.m e w1 post ont NRC decothmissi6ning,!
reactor r,
Wm.,ll
._intaln a._..
._bilc _,.._..de..r.,ly_and m. de,m de_n_t tech,n.rl bases ewi ma research capa ity to provi time.
s
.s.
R pen ica for NRCiegulatory' decisions W-. _.ll,m_p, rove th_e me_asu.. _f_for. __fn_ucle_ar p.
,_la..__idm.,
e wi i rement er mance o ower p nts.1o. enti p' lanis) hat warrant heightened NRC attentioitl REGUhATORY-PROGRAMS
&t S$
s
.tspreas /
fiiM hetrum Oernats (Wreas and Karategies)
U.s. Neelear RegeJaary Caesaission
~
proeirer Matraats Saftry
!Y I M Prrierameare 91aa e
Program Output: integratedfristerials hgreement State Pro'g'am,~ State Llaldadnd r
Performance Evaluation Program M The NRC, with Agreement State participation, conducts periodic BfPEP reviews of Agreement State and NRC regional office programs for adequacy to ensure public heahh and safety and compatibihty of Agreement State programs with NRC programs.
Output Measure:
Number ofIntegrated Materials Performane Evaluation Program (miPEP) reviews of Agreement States and NRC Regional Omces completed.
FY 1999 Target:
Complete 10 Agreement State IMPEP miews, and 2 NRC regional BiPEP reviews.
Responsible Organization: Office of State Programs / Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards REGUhATORY-EFFE6ffVENESS Program Output:
Independent Performance Evaluationr(Materials)
This activitybiojrsin includes lucident and accident investigation to ensure that significant eve invohing radiological material are investigated in a timely, systematic, and technically sound manner and that information is obtained on the causes of the events so that NRC can corrective actions that are timely and effective. This activity also includes maintenance of the NRC's incident response capability to ensure that it is prepared to respond to any radiologica emergency at NRC-licensed facilities or Agreement State licensed facilities or invohing NRC-licensed or Agreement State-licensed material.
The NRC will review radiological event reports, NRC inspection reports, and U.S. industr reports. On the basis of this comprehensive and systematic review ofradiological event data sources, significant events are identified and selected for further in-depth evaluation to assess the root causes of the identified deSciencies, the safety significance and generic implications of the deficiencies, and the adequacy of corrective actions implemented and/or planned The NRC will continue to issue case studies, special studies, and technical reviews. Results, findings, and recommendations to prevent recurrence will be widely disseminated to the staff, the radiological industry, and the public in a timely manner. In addition, radiological events that are conside be significant from the standpoint of public health and safety will be reported to the Commission with recommendations that they be considered as " abnormal occurrences." On antnnual abnormal occurrences will be reported to the Congress and the public.
-