ML20203L474
| ML20203L474 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/13/1998 |
| From: | Christina Antonescu NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| To: | Hodges M NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1951 NUDOCS 9803060083 | |
| Download: ML20203L474 (18) | |
Text
- - -
.y a
february 13, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: M. Wayne Hodges, Director Division of Syt.tems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research THRU:
Thomas L. King, Acting Chief (signed by J. Dersensky for)
Control, instrumentation, and Human Factors Branch Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research FROM:
Christina Antonescu Control, Instrumentation, and Human Factors Branch Divislora of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research l
SUGJECT:
REQUEST TO ACCEPT FINAL 189 IN JOB CODE L1951 I recommend that the attached preliminary proposal for Job Code L1951, ' Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Criteria for Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Interference in l&C Systems' be made final. My recommendation is based on the following:
The attached preliminary final proposal was evaluated, discussed with the proposer, and the results of the negotiations are documented in the attached NRC Form 555.
I believe that the agreed upon work is cost effective and consistent with the budget that is available for this work. Thus, I recommend that you approve acceptance of the 189. Funding in the amount of $100K has been provided for FY98.
Attachments:
- 1. Form 189
- 2. Form 555
- 3. Proposed Evaluation DISTRIBUTION Central File PUBLIC ClHFB R/F TKing n E JPersensky 1
y JCalvert pg%
g CAntonescu g
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\CIHFB\\WINFILES\\L1951X.LTR To recolve a copy of this document. Irdcate in the bout 'C' = Copy without enclosures *E' = Copy with enclosures *N' = No copy 0FFICE CIHFB: DST E
CIHFB: DST e,
CIHFB: DST,
c gg NAME /j cAntonescu JPersensky I//
TKing ///4' h
DATE
'02/ 17 498 02/ q./90 L
02/ / 6 /96 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY vetU ;4 P6IQ
[gj-f 4 -y Ilfl,ll]l~lllll mie my cens espy
,y,
pn at09 s
W, k g8 y,..
UNITED STATES f
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
wAswiwof oN, D.C. 20656-0001 i
- y February 13, 1998
(
MEMORANDUM TO: M. Wayne Hodges, Director Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research THRU:
Thomas L. King, Acting Chief f
Control, Instrumentation, and Human Factor: ELranch Lt Wn of Systems Technology iW9. O Nuclear Regulatory Research FROM:
Control, lastrumentation, and Human Factors Branch Division of Systems iechnology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
SUBJECT:
REQUEST TO ACCEPT FINAL 189 IN JOB CODE L1951 l recommend that the attached preliminary proposal for Job Code L1951,
- Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Criteria for Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Interference in l&C Systems" be made final. My recommendation is based on the following:
The attached preliminary final proposal was evaluated, discussed with the proposer, and the results of the negotiations are documented in the attached NRC Form 555.
I believe that the agreed upon work is cost effective and consistent with the budget that is available for this work. Thus, I recommend that you approve acceptance of the 189. Funding in the amount of $100K has been provided for FY98.
Attachments:
- 1. Form 189
- 2. Form 555
- 3. Proposed Evaluation
SUMMARY
OF 155 DES DISCUSSED (continued)
MATERIALS Acceptable as submitted.
EOUiPMENT PURCHASE Not applicable.
REQUIRED START DATE The project will start as soon as the contract is in place.
SPENDING PLAN Acceptable as proposed.
NF Un itLtLUMMUNILMilVNO LUVriUINAt(UN Not applicable.
COST l
j Acceptable as proposed.
Additional work requires an increase in cost.
X THE PROPOSED COSTS WERE CONSIDERED REASONABLE, GIVEN THE SKILL MIX, LEVEL OF EFFORT REQUIRED AND DEGREE OF COMPLEXITY INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED EFFORT. NO EXCEPTIONS WERE TAKEN TO THE NRC SOW.
X THE ITEMS NOTED ABOVE WERE DISCUSSED AND/OR CLARIFIED WITH THE DOE LABORATORY.
X THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE NRC SOW WERE AGREED UPON.
dfHER COMMENTS
- SIGNATURE (Pnnted or Typed NWne) stG)N. @E oATE MNLA 2-h yg Christ.ina Antonescu
/,
L
-,- s. no.2,
,. 0,.1m um A,,o _cm,m,.
NHC f OdM 556 U.S.. NUCLEAR HEGULATORY COYMISSION JOB CODE no n, W.W 117
SUMMARY
OF NEGOTIATIONS Li951 teAML Of LAbOf%10HV NHC OF fICL NkG DMsiON Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
RES DST M40JLCT TilLL Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Criteria for EMI/RFI in I&C System
SUMMARY
OF ISSUES DISCUSSED APPHOACH Acceptable as proposed, since it follows the 50W very carefully.
SCOT L The preliminary proposal was within the scope of modification.
PLHSONNEL QUALIFlCAllONs Acceptable as proposed.
l 1RAVLL l
Acceptable as proposed, sCHLOULL The comnietion timos in the pronosal on certain tasks are extended somewhat beyond those in the 50W schedule to accommodate additional work.
sVDCON1RAC*/ CONSULT AN1 EFFORT Not applicable.
REPORT RLQUIREMENTS The proposal follows the 50W.
OT HLH DLUVERABLEs Not applicable.
' La m m o
~su ~4;a:um
,, nnosua
l
/',
('
k e'
+-
uRC FORM its (Pa'i 11 U.$. NUCLEAR ret dLATORY COMMISSION
.b DATC rROPOS4 SENT po.g3, f '* ***. g l/23/94
) NE LABORATORY PROJECT AND NRCuDiir Ew rv IYYK
..... < COST PROPOS AL FOR NRC WORK X
ArvisioN NovetR
-4 PROJE CT 1 TLE JOB CODE Regulators Guide and Acceptance Cntena for FMl/RFIin IAC Sutems 1.1951 NAC OF FICE NRC B&R NUMBE R Ofike of Nuclear Reculatorv Research Dniuon of Sutems Technoloct
%015211015 DOC CONTRACTOR NRC00CC00E I.ockheed Martin Fnern Research Corporation 253D
&lTE Oak Ridge National Laboratory CONTRACTom ACCovNT NUVBER Oak Ridee. Tenneuce 37R31 41 WI 9511.1 COGNIZANT PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION TELEPHONE NO.
DOE D&R NUMBER 40 10 01 06 NRC PROJECT M ANAGER PERIOD OF PERFORM ANCE Chnstina Antonetro RES/ DST /CIHFH (3011415 6792 OTHER NRC TECHNICAL $TAFF PROJECT ST ART DATE 06/01/9i Prae?pa'"**aare ep ;;;;;,;;,,;;
5 R. Manin DOF.ORO (423 i 576.4 A22 12/31/94 LABOR ATORY PROGRAM DIRECTOR C F Puch CMG (423i 574-0422 LABORATORY PROJECT M ANAGER R T. Wood IAC 4423i 574 557R PRINCIP AL INVESTIG ATOR(S)
P. D E wine 16C (4231576 5019 KEY PERSONNEL STAFF YEARS OF EFFORT FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 DIRECT SCIENTIFIC / TECHNIC At 07 06 00 0
0 OTHER DIRECT (SVPPORT SERvlCES) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
0 TOTAL DIRECT STAFF YEARS 0.7 06 0.0 0
0 COST PROPOSAL inumww %uws, DIRECT LABOR (SCIENTIFIC / TECHNIC AL) 94 75 2
0 0
OVE RHE AD (INCLUDED IN DIRECT LABOR)
MATER:ALS/ SERVICES 6
3 0
0 0
TRAVEL FOREIGN 0
0 0
0 0
DoVESTic 5
8 0
0 0
suoCoNinAcT(S) 0 0
0 0
0 OTHE R DIRECT 0
0 0
0 0
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRAT vE EXPENSES 4R 39 1
0 0
TOTAL ESTIM ATED LABOR ATORY 153 125 3
0 0
PROJECT COST doe ADDED FACTOR 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL DOE PROJECT COST 153 125 3
0 0
C ARRvovER FRou PniOR rY 19 28 3
0 0
CARRYOVE R TO NE AT FY 28 3
0 0
0 TOTAL FUNDING REQUIRED 162 100 0
0 0
NRC FORM ie9 00 93)
PAGE 1
OF 12
)
NRC sokM isp iran ts U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j;gCong (to ssi 1.1951 NRCvDtit DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 FOR PROJECTS, EXCLUDING TASK ORDERS AND TASK ORDER AOREEMENTS PROJECT TITLE Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for EMI.RFIin 1&C Splems DOE PROPOSING ORGANIZAflON Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation Oak Ridge National Laboratory ESTIMATED COST BY TASK ($k) i TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4 TASK $
l 329 217 81 376 384 I Ath 0 (Athi IMon o eAsha fAbh(U Sh7 34 49 TASK 11 TASK 12 TASK 13 TASK 14 TASK 15 TASK 16 TASK 17 TASK 18 TASK 19 TASK 20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Q N ARRATIVE DESCf.iPT10N t$ PROVIDED ON C ACH OF THE FOLLOWING TOPICS IN THE ORDER LISTED, I-OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED WORK O'
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE 2-
SUMMARY
OF PRIOR EFFORTS 9.
SUBCONTR ACTOR / CONSULT ANT AND MAJOR PROCUREYENT INFORMATION' 3.
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS
- 10. SPECIAL F ACILITIES, IF REQUIRED 4.
PROPOSED PERSONNEL = INCLUDE RESUMES
- 11. CONFUCT ChlNTEREST INFORMATION S. MEETINGS / TRAVEL
- 12. CLASSIFIC ATION OR SENSITIVITY. IF APPLIC ABLE (e g., safeguards, proprietary, Other) 6.
NRO FURNISHED MATERIALS
- 13. J.DDENDUM: (A) INTERPRETATIONS OF STATEVENT OF
- WORK, (B) COST INFORMATIN, AND(C) SCHEDULE INFORMATION
- 7. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS IO-SPENDING PI AN
- PROJECTS WITH COST
- TYPE SUBCONTRACT $ CANNOT BE CLOSED OUT UNTIL REQU! RED DCAA AUDITS HAVE DEEN CONDUCTED.
SIGNATURE-APPROVAL AUTHORITY DATE
[/
C. E. Pugh. Director. N AC Programs 2*d*
NRC FORM 189 (1493)
PAGE 2
OF 12
le tmc sonu $oncomeo, U.$. NUCLEAR FtEGULATORY COMMISSION
~
gcm T
poen 1.1951 emeuo m DOE LABORATORY PROJECT ANO em COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 PROJECT TrfLEt Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for Eh11/RFI in l&C Spiems 1.
OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED WORK:
This research deals with electromagnetic interference iEh11) and radio frequency interference (RFI)in the required tunetional performance of instrumentation and control (l&C) hardaare. De Eh11/RFI and pow er surges of concern to nuclear power -
plants INPPslinsolses transient and steadyctate modes of electneal esents including switching transients. lightning induced transients, and effects of RFl.
Per 10CFR50 Appendis A. GDC 4,l&C equipment must be compatible with the environmental conditions it could esperience.
Because of low operating voltages, digital systems especially must withstand Eh11/RFI from esternal and mternal des tees such as transformers, solenoid coils, and relays. electrical surges induced by lightning and power switching transients, and radio frequency disturbances. Safety.cntical protection and control spiems must be appropnately hardened (e p., shielded) against such interference.
De objectn es of this pro}ect are to: 11 develop the technical bases for regulatory guidance in the areas of Eh11/RFI and surge withstand capability (SWC)in safety-critical l&C sptems. 2) formulate tesung enteria for evaluating both the suscepubilities and the emissions of such sptems. 3)desisc in plant measunny spiems capable of establishing a baseline of the electromagnetic environment in nuclear power plants (NPPst. and 4) establish technical bases for the endorsement of industry standards related to Ehti/RFl grounding and shielding practices. Eh11/RF1 test requirements and test methods, surge withstand capability, and other topics appropriate to the regulatory process.
This research unlites a hardware oriente'd engineenng appros:h to deal with Eh11/RFI issues in electronic systems in an NPP environment with emphasis on the etfcctiseness of grounding sptems, technical considerations discussed in IEEE 1050, hill.
STD 461 and 462 (C and D), and other issues essential to this effort. The research approach taken is to: 1) assess the applicabihty of mihtary esperience with Eh11/RFI and soltage surges,2) esperimentally demonstrate I&C system vulnerability to Eh11/RFI and surge effects,3) identify the applicable test methods for assessing electromagnetic susceptibility, emissions, and surge withstand capabihty,4) determine the equis atence of comparable electromagnetic corppstibility test methods. 5) formulate appropriate acceptance critena based on available nuelcar power plant data, test hmit proposals by the nuclear industry, and engineeringjudgment, and 61 confirm the recommended entena by measunng the electromagnetic operating enselopes at a representatise sample of nuclear power plants under espected operating conditions.
Some confirmatory research tasks undertaken include: 1) assembling and using measurement hardware with unique capabilities to allow long term, unobtrusive, unattended in plant monitoring that can be used to confirm electromagnetic operaung enselopes; 2) working with plant engineering from panicipaung uulities to resiew each plant's electrical component configuration and arrangement of !&C hardware that might contribute to emissions or pose susceptibility concerns, thereby allowing the_ selection of measurement locations in NPPs to be optimited; 3) and using esisting laboratory electromagnetic -
compatibiht) tEh1C) test facilities to evaluate the suscepubihty of I&C equipment to Eh11/RFI and to assess the clanty of suscepnbility test procedures from military standards. The research is intended to provide the technical basis for the NRC to utablish regulatory guidance for ensuring Eh1C of both analog and digital !&C systems within an NpP. This research is reles ant to the !&C equipment being proposed for reactor protecimn systems in advanced light w ater reactors (ALWRsi, as well as for upgrades in present. generation nuclear powet plants.
.2.
SUMMARY
OF PRIOR EFFORTS:
ne project began late in FY 1991. The pnmary focus of the initial research was a critical review of esisting recognized standards and guidelines (most notably hiilitary Standards 461C 462,46]D, and 462D. IEEE Std. 10501989," Guide to Instrumentation and Control Equipment Grounding in Generating Stations " and IEEE Std. C62.41 1991. " Recommended Practice on Surge Voltages in Low Voltage AC Power Circuits *) to assess their applicability to the regulatory issues and-concerns associated with Eh11/RFI and power surges in the control and protection systems of NPPs. Two letter trports relating
' to standards wcre produced: (l) Applicability ofIEEEStd. 10$01939. Grounding and Noise Reduction Practices. to Digital __
_ Sprems in Nuclear Pou er Plants (h1ay 1992), and (2) Appiscability ofMilitary Standards 46IC and 162 to NucIcar Poner Plant Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Interference in DigitalSprems th1ay I992).
NQC FORM 109 (1493)
PAGE 3
OF 12
-_____m-J ;
wc FcAu %cww U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,ca cot,g Oveh 1.1941 ocuo ti r DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND out i
COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 PROJECT TITLE: -
Reruletory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for Eh11/RFI in I&C Systems To assist NRC in providing regulatory guidance and acceptance enteria for Eh11/RFI in I&C systems of NPPs, several documents related to estabbshing the f.eeded technical basis ha$e been generated. First, a letici report. Techmral Basisfor Regulators Guidance on the Susceptsboliry of Dignal Srstems to Electromagnetic Interference (February I994. w as prepared j
for NRC's use in fortnulating the Drst draft of a Regulatory Guide on the subject of Ehtt/RFI and its presention. A scbsequent lettet report. intenm Electromagnetic Oprvormt Em elopesfor DigitalInstrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Pon er Plants (Nosentber 1993), suggested appropnate testing lesels for determininF the Eh11/RFl susceptibility of l&C systems in NPPs. In early 1994, these recommendations were formally documented in NUREG/CR.$941. Trchnical Basisfor Regularon i
Guidance rm Electromagnene and Radiofrequenct Interference in Safety Criticalla C Systems. Effort has continued to update the technical information included in the supphed recommendations to reflect current international and U.S. mihtary approaches and to support NRC staf f in the development of a Regulatory Guide. Final recommendations are being descloped for electromagnetic operating enselopes in nuclear power plants that estabhsh reasonable testing lesels to assess the electromagnetic susceptibihty and emissions of I&C systems.
Annehcr maior activity to dair hu been the meawrement of ambient electromsencair' oneratine e onditions ai NPPe Fleceric and magnetic spectral receivers v cte assembled and placed at cipht NPPs to measure and monitor electromagnetic levels.
Long term measurements wcre taken at units representmg each of the US sendor types under operatir.g conditions that included full power, low power, stariup, coast down. and unit trip. The sursey results are reported in NUREG/CR 6436. Suncy of Ambient Electromagnetic and RadwJrequency Interference Levels in Nuclear Pon er Plants. The measurement findings are being used to con 6rm the concicions of EPRI TR.102323, which suggests expected maximum electromagnetic neld strengths
}
based on short term measurements taken at NPPs. and to update recommended operating emelopes for establishing Eh1C that were descloped under this project, i
l 3.
WORK TO HE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS:
hmman The pioposed work suppons NRC staff in their development of the technical bases far regulatory guidance on Eh1C practices for safetprelated I&C systems in NPPs. The anticipated guidance will address installation prar tices, test methods, and methods for establishinF acceptance enteria for l&C equipment shielding, groundmg, noise rejection, and SWC, The application environment includes both conducted and radiated Eh11. In FY 1998, the research approach involves: 1) participatinF in standards development on Ehtt/RFl effects and test methods. 2) providmg technical espertise to suppon the Anahration of regulatory Fuidance addressing Eh11/RFI issues in safety-related I&C systamt, and 3) providin g technical assistance to the NRC Project hianager in the presentation of project results to ACRS, NRR, and the nuclear industry, EtpSMfd Period of Performase W 1998 - First Quarter W 1999 Task 1. Project hianagem nt.The owrall project will continue to be managed through approved procedures, hionthly-1 reports summanzing technical progress, repons and publications produced. meetmps and trips, problems, and project l
expenditures will continue to be prepared.
The deliserables for this task are hionthly Status Letter Repons.
(a)
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31 1998 (b)
FY 1998 Estimated Level of Effort:
0.13 FTE FY 1999 Estimated Level of Effort:
0.01 Fill Task 2. Literature Search and Resbs of Applicable Standards and Specifleations-This task is an ongoing process of review ing guides, and national and is tional standards related to Ehtt/RFI emissions and susceptibility, SWC, or associated topics (e.g., power quahty issues) that hase been revised recently or hase not been examined thus far in this study.
2 Participation in NRC, industry, and technical committees and workshops related to Eh11/RFI and SWC will continue, with concurrence from the NRC Project hianager.
a NRC FOAM 189 poem PAGE 4
OF 12 4
w.e e,-,,r..w,
-,-w
,,m-
,~nw,--
,,,.-,,.- m wr,--
--,.,m, w
am,----w,-
- + - - - -, - -,,
Nkc roku 169 tcom%em U.S. NUCLnAR Rt.GULATORY COMMISSION Jce Cot >E 0043)
L19$1 encuo111 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND oog 3
COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 PROJECT TITLEt Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Critena for EMl/RFl in !&C Systerns The dehscrables for this task consist of trip reports documenting the activities at the standards committee meetings.
(al Estimated Completion Date:
September 30,1998 (b)
- FY 19911 Estimated Lesel of Effon:
0 09 FTE FY 1999 Estimated Level of Effort:
0.00 FITI Task 3. Evaluation of Vendor EMt/RFI Test Programs - This task was completed in FY 1996.
Task 4. Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Criteria for EMl/RFIin Nuclear Power Plant I&C Splems-his task provides for assistance to and suppon of NRC staff in developing the technical basis for recommended test methods and acceptance criteria for grounding, bonding, and shielding practices to be incorporated in a regulatory Fuide dealing with the means for avoiding EMI/RFl in l&C spiems of NPPs. NUREG/CR 6431, which recommends EMI/RF1 acceptance entena fur I&C in NPPs. will be finahred following NRC and ACRS review, Final technicalinput for the draft Regulatory Guide DG.
1029 on EMl/RF1 in 1&C spiems in NPPs will be prosided as requested by the NRC Project Manacer. In addition, this task provioes technical assistance in preparation of t.kUR and ALKS packages, support f or the revision of DU.1029 based on public commento and support for the finahtauen of the regulatory guide.
The deliseraNei under this task are a resised NUREG/CR 6431 documenting recommehded EMI/RFI and SWC acceptance b ik r steria for l&C in NPPs and technical support for revision of DG.1929 anu preparation of CRGR and ACRS pack ges, t
(a)
Estimated Completion Date:
September 30.1998 (bi FY 1998 Estimated Lesel ofliffort:
0.25ITE FY 1999 Estimated Leset of Effort:
0.00 FfE Task 5. Degelopment of Testing Criteria for EMI/RFI Susceptibility of I&C Systems and Implementation of Validation a
Criteria for Confirming Testing Engelopes - This task was completed in FY 1997.
I Task 6. Assembly of Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Signal Measurement Spiem for NPPs-This task was completed in 13' 1994.
Task 7. Mathematical Model Deselopment and Analpis - This task was concluded in FY 1995, Task 8. Technical Assistance to the NRC Project Manager-Dis task involves providing technical assistance and input to the NRC P40 ject Manager. Acuvities include support for presentation of project results to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards ( ACRS) and supplemental documentauon of project findings for tesiew and discussion with NRR.
Deliverables for this task are ACRS presentation materials and testimony.
(a)
Estimated Completion Datei September 30.1998 (b)
FY 1998 Estimated Level of Effort:
0.11 I'm FY 1999 Estimated Lesel of Effort:
0.00 iTE 4.-
~ PROPOSED PERSONNEL-INCLUDE RESUMES:
Richard T. Wood Program Manager responsible for program planning. administration. and reporting.
Principal Investi ator for all tasks.
Paul D. Ewing F
.S
.,,,,, _= - _,.......,..
,.-g.
m.
-e Et FonM 199 t1493)
PAGE 5
OF 12
toc tonu iev iccewom U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION M CODE tio e3i ilott uncuoitr DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND out COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/us PQOJECT TITLE:
Regulatory Guide and Acceptince Cntena for EML/RFl in I&C Spiems 5.
MEETINGS / TRAVEL:
Irin purtsose Staff and Time
- Wash. DC To participate in ACRS meetinF 2 tnps 2 people for 3 days San Diego, CA To panicipate in ANSI I tnp, I person for 2 days C63 Standard meeting on Eh!1/RFIimrnunity Denser. CO To participate in ANSI Standard I inp, I person for 4 days meetinF and attend EMC
.bu.pn.a.n Deslations from the 'rascl submitted as pan of NRC Form 189 and accepted by issuance of an NRC Form 173 will be coordmated with the NRC Project hianager.
Foreign tras el must be addressed teparately and approval must be obtained by processing NRC Form 445 in addition to being provided as part of the approsed proposal.
6.
NRC FURNISiiED SI ATERIALS:
SEC 91273 " Review s of Vendor's Test Programs to Suppon the Design Ceni0 cation of Passive Light Water Reactors."
Detailed program plan for NPAR (NUREG ll44. Rev.1 L lt is encouraged that the program strategy delir.cated in the plan be followed stuoughout the duration of the project.
Proprietary or other pnsileged information may be prosided by the NRC Project hianager on an indisidual basis with the understanding that it will be protected from disclosure and will be returned to NRC upon completion of the task. ORNL will safeguard proprietary or pnvileged information including company confidential data in accordance with 10CFR 2.790 and not relene such information to any person not directly insched in the performance of work under this project unless such release is authorized by the contracting ol0cer.
- 7. - RELATIONSillP TO OTilER PROJECTS:
ORNL programs related to this project include JCN BpB28, Acmg-Comp <ments and Sprems lit and JCN Ll798, Qualification of Adianced la C Surems. Programs at other laboratories that are closely related to this project include JCN W6542 (previously JCN L1908. Aging-RisA.llased Prioriri:arion ofStressors) at Brookhasen National Laboratory, in addition. we are aware that tbc National Research Council has deseloped for NRC.RES a proposed research framework in which to address total sptems issues for digital 1&C sptems.
8.
REPORTING REQUIREhlENTS AND SCllEDULE:
s NUREG Reportst I,
Publish a NUREG/CR recommending EhlC acceptance ent.ria Onal revision December 30,1997 appropnate for safety related I&C sptems m NPPs (Task 4) e...,_ _ _ -,.. _ _. _ _.._._._. _ _ _. - _. _. _,
Nec Fonu ses tio 93)
PAGE 6
OF 12
wc roRu ieg ico%nvem U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOD C00t no ni 11951 Nacuosif DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND em COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 PROJECT TITLE:
kegulatory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for EMI/RFIin l&C Spiems Other Publications and Presentationu A Technical Reoorts 1,
Proude trip ieports documenting the actiuties at standards committee final Within 20 day of meetings and at the EMC Symposium. (Task 21 cach meetmg 2,
input for the finalization of DG 1029. (Task li final September 30,1998 3.
Provide testimony in a presentation before the Advisory Committee on As scheduled Reactor Safeguards. (Task kl it l'ublication Note ne NRC Of fice of Nuclear Regulatory Research(RES) encourages the pubhcation of the scientific results from RES-sponwred programs in refereed scient:6e engineenng journals as appropnate. If the laboratory proposes to publish in the open hierature or present the information at meetings in adJition to submitting the required technical reports, approsal of the proposed article or presentation shoulJ be obtained from the NRC Project Manager. The RES Project Manager shall either dpprose the material al suhmittCd, approje it sub cCt to NRC suggested resisions, or disapprove it. In any event, the RES J
Project Manager may disapprme or delay presentation or publication of papers on information that is subject to Commission -
_ approval that has not been ruled upon or w hich has been disapprosed. ( Additional information regarding the publication of NRC. sponsored research is contamed in NRC Management Directise 3.9 and 3.10.)
If the presentation or paper is in addition to the required technical repons and the RES Project Manager determines that it will benent the RES project, the Project Manager may authonic pay ment of trasel and publishmg costs,if any, from the project fundt if the Project Manager determines that the articles or presentation would not benefit the RES project, the Project Mam.;er can specify the costs associated with the preparation, presentation or publication will be borne by the contractor For any publications or presentations falling into this category, the NRC reserses the right to require that such presentation or publication not identify the NRC's sponwrship of the work.
Any reports to be generated shall not contain any propnetary (including the unit specific NPRDS datal, con 6dential or cop > nghted matenal without written permission from the institutions and organizations to w hich the information may belong.
C. Monthly leer Status Renort Monthly letter status repons tMLSRsl will be delisered dunny the course of the period of performance and a final report will be generated following the completion of all scheduled tasks. Details on the content and format required for the MLSR are included in Pan VI and Exhibit 12 of Handbook 11.7.
De MLSR will be submitted by the 20th of the month to the NRC;RES Project Manager, Christina Antonescu, with copies prmided to the followinP M. Way ne Ibdges Director. Disition of Systems Technology, M/S T 10E17
- Thomas L. King, Acting Chicf.Contrel, instrumentation, and Human Factors tiranch, M/S T.10E37 Division of Contracts and Propeny Depanment, Offke of Administration, M/S T.712.
-5
- 9.
SUHCONTRACTOR/ CONSULTANT AND $1AJOR l'ROCUREh1ENT INFORhlATION:
A. Subcontractor /Consuhant Information Not applicable, I
NRC FORM 109 t10-93)
PAGE 7
OF 12
e.nc r onM tee icontem U.S. NUCLEAR REQULATORY COMMISSION JOBCODr 00 teh 1.1951 bROM0ii7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND out COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/23/98 PROJECT TITLE!
Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Cnteria for EMI/RFl in l&C Systems IL[guinment Purthmi No equipment purchases are planned for this period of performance. Nonnail). the purchase of property costmg M(Mt or more uncluding rederal Information Processmg (FIPi resourcess will be apprmed tbtough issuance of a work order necepting the proposalin which the property is hsted. If additional property costmp M(X)or more uncluding FIP resourceu is needed af ter wotL stans, the laboratory will request approsal of the additional property in wnting to the RES Project Manager. This written request can be in the form of a revised proposal or a letter.
C Maior Procurements Not applicable.
- 10. SPECI Al, FACil.lTIES. IF RFOl'IRFD:
Noi appheable.
- 11. CONFLICT.0F.INTE REST INFORhl ATION:
There are no know n relationships betw een this organisation or its employees with industries regulated by the NRC and supphers thercol that might gne nse to an apparent or actual con 0ict of interest regarding the work desenbed in the proposal.
- 12. CLASSIFICATION OR SENSITIVITL TF APPLICAllLF (e.g., safeguards, proprietary, other):
Any software deselopment perfonned under this program will adhere to the procedures speci0ed in the Oak Ridge National L.aboratory Instrumentation and Controls Dnision Quality Assurance Proecdures tQA lC 19 Software). These procedures are based on ANSl/IEEE Stds. 730198 8 and 98319e and on ANSl/ASME NQA 1 and NQA 2 I
- 13. ADDENDUSI:
(A) Interpretations of Statement of Work - The esumated lesel of effon for some tasks differ from that in the Statement of Espected Work because the estimated !cvel of effon includes effon covered by carryover funds from FY 199L Task I, which emers project managemer% was not directly identified in the Statement of Espected Worki The level of effon required for project inanagement was estimated for Task 1 and is within the overall budget prosided for the project in FY 1998.
Project documentation in the form of NUREO/CR N31 is idenuned as a deliseWe for Task 4 in FY 1998 to reDeet the cunent status of the report, whnh has been deinered and is awaiting pub!,.ation. This milestone was accomphshed under FY 1997 carrymer fundmg.
NQC FORM 189 04930 PAGE 8
OF 12
Noic F o$iv ise < coni.nue1' U.6, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.C0 cCtet 00th 1.luti Nacuo n 7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND str COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/2.v9s PROJECT TITLE:
Regulatorv Guide and Accepance Cntena for EMl/RFIin IAC Spiemi
- 13. (H) Cost Information Ettimated Cost %chedule l$k)
Yrsor l
Years 1997 199k 1999 Xoi Oml Total Task i 247 44 28 3
0 0
322 Task 2 157 33 22 0
0 0
212 Task 3 78 0
0 0
0 0
78 l
Task 4 248 75 47 0
0 0
370 l'ask $
375 0
0 0
0 0
375 Task 6 568 0
0 0
0 0
$68 Tast7 33 0
0 0
0 0
33 Task 8 20 1
28 0
0 0
49 Presiously Completed Task s 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Subtotal 1726 153 125 3
0 0
2007 DOE Added Factor 50 0
0 0
0 0
30 Total tCostsi 1776 153 125 3
0 0
2057 Canymer from Pnor Year 0
19 28 3
0 0
50 Can)oser to Neu Year 19 28 3
0 0
0 50 Total (Funding:
1795 162 100 0
0 0
2057 Nec roRu te9 00 th PAGE 9
OF 12
Nhc r oku tov itwe U.S. NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 6
jog, c ott 0093 1.1951 Nncuo n f DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND out COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 1/2 F94 PROJECT TITLE:
Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Cniena for Ehtt/RFI in 1&C S stems 3
- 13. (C) Schedule Information Subtask /Mllestone Schedule rv tw7 rv im rv 19 %
rv Own rv : col stvoNo Subtask / Milestone i it i a 4 i :iai4 i :iai4 5
lai4 5 ::iai4 ty :m,i i
lask I:
Complete project planning and i 'A Al i
l 4
budget proposals (189 Formis i
i lask I:
Reuew project progress and repon to [g g
[
l NRC Project hianarer (SpnnF and l
Fall Program Resiew s) l l ll I
Task F Oversee ntnicet hv mononnne enm l
' I prepanng h1LSRs. rcuewing Q
j l
I i !
technic al reports l
1 Task 2:
Resiew standards and speci0 cations l
l l
l reirted to Eh11/RF1 in NPPs
'/\\
i l
l'l Ta>L 2:
Participate m ANSI and other reuew i'l/
i i
'YU
\\j I
'YY committees oserseen by standards-wnting bodies i
j Task 2:
Insestigate treatment in standards of l
l hk l
conducted susceptibility for signal l
lines and document findings l
I Tuk4:
Document recommended acceptance I
i I
' Y' N entena appropnate for establishing Eh1C of NPP IAC systems Task 4:
Review and comment on Regulaton Yll/
Guide DG 1029 Y'
\\
I lI t
I Tast 4.
Generaie CRGR and ACRS packages T T Y!
/\\
i Task 5A: Characterire and document the Eh!
enuronment m NPPs through anal) sis of field data Task 0:
Proude technical assistance. as l
l 4
needed, to the NRC Project hianager
/\\
regarding dissemination of project Gndings j
Task 0:
Present project GndinFs at appropriate meetings ( ACRS. ANS. etc.)
A Task 8:
Present project findings to ACRS gj l
l l
i i
NRC FORM 189 00 93)
PAGE 10 OF 12
sc roHM 50 eire, s' U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Jcecoor
- 14. SPENDING PLAN NHCMD11?
FY 1998 uooinc Atio.N, Nuveta s.mem 3
RAut or (AponAtosv Pr ntonM ANe t Pr mioD Oak Ridge National 1.aloratory enoM to (W01/91 12/4l/uu ti?LE OF PROJECT D.7%L.
Regulatory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for EMI/RFlin l&C Spiems E,,~ "
$2.0$7 K CSTiM ATf 0 COST AND COVPLrtioN B t uoNTH USTILIMENT OCT00fA NovtvDt m OtttMptm jaNuany pgpngany yanny I2 IU 2
12 Il 14 Diat cT cost r$k) 0 0
0 0
0 0
moiarci cost ($k) 10 2
12 ll 14 90tal Cost ($k) 95 95 9b Nb 97 DAOJECT COMPLETION ('k) 3 FSTIMATED COST AND COMPLE fioN ev MONTH COST CLEMFNT APAIL MAY JUNr juty AUGUST fTFTIMPtR 1.
6 6
7 12 20 ointCT cost ($k) 0 0
0 0
INDIAICT COST ($k) 6 6
7 12 20 TOTAL Cost ($k) 9 99 PROJE'CT COMPLETION i'i) k NOC FOAM 189 0493)
PAGE 11 OF 12
i o
1 s nC FonM senPsu' e
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.co Coot
- 14. SPENDING PLAN NRCMD 11 T FY 1999 MMihC A1.C.N NUMBE R u.m 3
KAME Or LADORATORf Pt ar0RMANet PtnioD Oak Ridge National Laboratory
, nom To ONolNI 12n l/vx Titt E OF PROJECT
.'.". I ".
Reputatory Guide and Acceptance Cntena for EMI/RFl in !&C Sptems
$2,057 K
=
1 L --
ESTtM ATf D COST AND COMPttTiON BY MONTH I
I i
l COST FLf MINT OCTOBER NOVtMBER DECEMf;t A J ANU AN V FtDAUARY MAACH DCtCT COST ($k)
INDIRECT COS1 ($k)
TOT AL COST ($k)
PROJECT COMPLETION ('k) t tTIM ATED COST AND COMPLETION BY MONTH COSitLtMENT APAll MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST ttPTEMetR DCFCT Cost ($k)
INOCf'CT COST ($k)
TOTAL COST ($ki PQOJr CT COMPLETON ('k)
NRC FORM 189 (1493)
PAGE 12 OF 12
i Biographical Sketch Richard T. Wood instrumentation & Controls Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory January 8,1998 Educationt B. S. Nuclear Engineering 1980 The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering 1990 The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN Employment llistoryt 1986 - Present Des elopment Staff Engineer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
contributing to and managing activities focusing on PWR surveillance and diagnostic methodologies based on neutron noise; automated acoustic data acquisition tystems advanced reactor control systems:
l guidelines for qualification of digital safety systems for advanced reactors; and distriteuted systems of workstations for nuclear power plant operations 1980 1986 Graduate Research Assistant of The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, focusin g on surveillance and diagnostic methodology development basec on neutron noise and dynamic process modeling i
Professional Societiest Control and Instrumentation Section Editor, Nuclear Safety Journal ASME Standards Subcommittee on Reactor Internals and lieat Ewhangers American Nuclear Society
d*
~
i l
Biographical Sketch Paul D. Ewing Instrumentation & Controls Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory January 8,1998 Education:
B. S. Electrical Engineering 1980 Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN hl. S. Electrical Engineering 1988 The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN Employment Illstory:
1993 Present Group Leader, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managing professional staff members and performing development activities focusing on advanced electromagnetic-based measurement ar.d instrumentation systems 1980 - 1993 Development Staff Engineer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, perfomaing electromagnetic interference (Ehil) test methodologies, developing electromagnetic sensors and measurement systems, and designing process control and data acquisition systems Professional Societies:
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers National Association of Radio and Telecommunications Engineers Amencan National Standards institute Recognition:
Registered Professional Engineer G:rtified Eh1C Engineer Senior Memte. IEEE EhtC Society Member, IEEE EMC TC-4 Commiitee (EMI Controls)
ORNL Representative, ANSI C63 Committee (EMC Standards)
EMC Technical Expert, NIST Laboratory Accreditation Program Member, ISA SP67.16 Working Group 1