ML20203J595

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Topical Rept Evaluation of Rev 1 to XN-NF-82-06(P), Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel for Extended Burnup. Rept Acceptable for Referencing in License Applications
ML20203J595
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/18/1986
From: Rossi C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Ward G
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
Shared Package
ML20203J600 List:
References
NUDOCS 8608050334
Download: ML20203J595 (2)


Text

,

+

.- i Mr. G. N. Ward, Manager Reload Licensing Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road JUL 18 gg P. O. Box 130 Richland, WA 99352

Dear Mr. Ward:

Subject:

Acceptance for Referencing of Licensing Topical Report XN-NF-82-06(P) Rev. 1, " Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel for Extended Burnup" We have completed our review of the subject topical report. We find this report act:eptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.

)

We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specified plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.

In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Exxon publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted i versions should incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between 1

the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designated accepted) following the report identification symbol.

Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the i acceptability of the report are invalidated, Exxon and/or the licensees referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their 4

respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.

l

Sincerely, 8608050334 860710 Or!91"$1 LD TOPRP EMVE

{DR Charles E. Rossi, Assistant Director Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated DISTRIBUTION:

i Central File AD RF TNovak RDiogs, LFMS j *See previous sheet C. Berlinger R. Lobel BClayton LPhillips for concurrences S. Wu PD - homas RSD:PWR-A* RSD:PWR-A* RSD:PWR-A

  • V DPLABURF -

i SWu:sl RLobel CBerlinger d s s 7/ /86 7/ /86 7/ /86 7//g86 7/1 3 /86 7/gg(6 G

71(p)

Mr. G. N. Ward, Manager Reload Licensing Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

2101 Horn Rapids Road P. O. Box 130 Richland, WA -99352

Dear Mr. Ward:

Subject:

Acceptance for Referencing of Licensing Topical Report I XN-NF-82-06(P) Rev. 1, " Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel  !

for Extended Burnup" We have completed our review of the subject topical report. We find this report acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.

We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specified plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.

In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Exxon publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions should incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designated accepted) following the report identification symbol.

Should our criteria or regualtions change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Exxon and/or the licensees referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their repsective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.

Sincerely, Charles E. Rossi, Assistant Director Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated DISTRIBUTION:

Central File AD RF C. Berl R. Lobel

< [ PRR-A(W k S. Wu RS : -A R 5: RSB:PWR-A PWR-A:AD SWu:sl RLobel CBerlin'ger CERossi 7/j[/86 7/ /86 7/ 86 7/ /86

_ _ _