ML20203G699

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That NRC Received Addl Antitrust Advise from Atty General Re Util CP Applications.Encl Atty General Concludes That Antitrust Hearing Re Eua Power Co Participation Unnecessary
ML20203G699
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/1986
From: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Markey E
HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE
References
A, NUDOCS 8608040011
Download: ML20203G699 (2)


Text

JUL 2 51986 Docket Nos.;50-443A, 50-444A The Honorable Edward J. Markey, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United ~ States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.

20515'

Dear Mr. Chairman:

This letter is to inform the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power that the Commission has received additional antitrust advice from the Attorney General in connection with Public Service Company of New Hampshire's construction permit application for the Seabrook Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.

The Attorney General's review was precipitated by the anticipated sale of approximately 12% of the Seabrook Units to the EUA Power Company.

This advice is rendered pursuant to Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

The Attorney General's letter concludes that:

"Our review of the information submitted in connection with the present application, as well as other relevant information, has disclosed no evidence that the proposed participation by EUA Power Company in the Seabrook Units would either create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws under Section 105(c). We do not, therefore, believe it is necessary for the Commission to hold an antitrust hearing in this matter."

A copy of the Attorney General's letter, dated July 1, 1986, is enclosed for your information.

Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated 8608040011 e60725 cc:

Rep. Carlos Moorhead

{DR ADOCK 0500 3

DISTRIBUTION OCA(3)

WLambe HDenton Docket' File',TNo.750-443Aa BVogler, OGC RVollmer PRAB R/F & S/F VNerses, PM OCA JFunches NRCPDR VStello LSolander LPDR

  • see previous concurrences.

OFC :PRAB:PPAS

PRAB:PPAS
DIR:PPAS
DDIR: HRR
DIR:NRR
0GC
0CA
f

,a o

RARE}WLambe":an

LSolander" *JFunches"
  • F Uner HD on BVogler*

UATE]7/

86 7/2.')/86 7/ /86 7/ /86

/86 7/ /86 7/ /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

D:cket N:s. 50-443A, 50-444A The Honorable Edward Markey, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.

20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

This letter is to inform the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power that the Commission has received additional antitrust advice from the Attorney General in connection with Public Service Company of New Hampshire's construction permit application for the Seabrook Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.

The Attorney General's review was precipitated by the anticipated sale of approximately 12% of the Seabrook Units to the EUA Power Company.

This advice is rendered pursuant to Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

The Attorney General's letter concludes that:

"Our review of the information submitted in connection with the present application, as well as other relevant information, has disclosed no evidence that the proposed participation by EUA Power Company in the Seabrook Units would either create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws under Section 105(c). We do not, therefore, believe it is necessary for the Commission to hold an antitrust hearing in this matter."

A copy of the Attorney General's letter, dated July 1, 1986, is enclosed for your information.

Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated cc:

Rep. Carlos Moorhead DISTRIBUTION OCA(3)

Wlambe HDenton Docket File, No. 50-443A BVogler, OGC RVollmer PRAB R/F & S/F VNerses, PM JFunches NRCPDR i

LSolander LPDR pu i

0FC PAS PA D

PAS D0lR:NRR DIR:NRR 0GC T'

i RARE :WLambe:an

LSolahder idFunches
RVollmer
HDenton
BVogler DATE 7/p /86 7/7/86 7/g/86 7/ /86 7/ /86 7/ly/86 0FFICAL RECORD COPY

U.S. Departament of Justice v

9 Antitrust Division 4

Office of the Assistant Attorney General Mushington. D.C 20H0 JUL 011986 Joseph Rutberg, Esq.

Antitrust Counsel Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Re:

In The Matter Of Seabrook Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 (Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444), Amendment No. 57 to License Application Dated March 30, 1973, Request for a Partial Transfer of Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-135 and CPPR-136

Dear Mr. Rutberg:

You have requested our advice pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, in connection with the purchase by EUA Power Company of an ownership interest in the above-captioned nuclear facility.

EUA Power Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eastern Utilities Associates will purchase an interest totalling ap-proximately 12% of the two Seabrook units from Central Vermont Public Service, Corporation, Central Maine Power Company, Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Maine Public Service Company and Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co.

Our review of the information submitted in connection with the present application, as well as other relevant information, l

has disclosed no evidence that the proposed participation by i

EUA Power Company in the Seabrook Units would either create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws under Section 105(c).

We do not, therefore, believe it is necessary for the Commission to hold an antitrust hearing in this matter.

l Sincerely, P

Charles F. Ru D Acting Assistant Attorney General, 3 ohf D

9

-