ML20203F811
| ML20203F811 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1986 |
| From: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Puntenney J SAFE ENERGY COALITION OF MICHIGAN |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203F816 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#386-130 2.206, DD-86-10, NUDOCS 8607310183 | |
| Download: ML20203F811 (3) | |
Text
-
\\
p* H ru
- y A
UNITED STATES 4
g 8
c(
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 JUL 2 9 586 g
0 2.9 00 Ce.
o Docket No. 50-341
- %gj Sc (10 CFR 2.206)
%f$5j@
Safe Energy Coalition of Michigan c/o Ms. Jennifer Puntenney 24220 Locust Farmington Hills, Michigan 48018
Dear Ms. Puntenney,
This is in response to your request for action filed pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 on February 15, 1986, supplemented by letter dated March 28, 1986, in which you requested that the Commission immediately issue an order requiring the licensee to show cause why its license should not be revoked based on the five allegations you set forth in your request. You assert as grounds for that request that (1) the NRC has not elevated enforcement actions against the licensee to the extent mandated by the. Atomic Energy Act and the Commission's regulations, (2) continued lack of management controls at levels that meet NRC requirements have resulted in ineffective programs and incompetence at critical levels of the licensee's organization including operations, maintenance, security, and engineering, (3) twenty-six violations issued recently were willful in that they showed a careless disregard for requirements, (4) the licensee has been unable to comply with certain NRC requirements, and (5) the recently released operations improvement plan will not provide the substantive changes needed to correct the serious breakdown of operations at Fenni 2.
For the reasons stated in the enclosed " Director's Decision under 10 CFR 2.206," your request has been denied.
A copy of this decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for its review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c) of the Commission's regulations.
As provided by this regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the decision unless the Connission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the decision within that time.
A copy of the notice, which is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication, is also enclosed.
Sincerely, J
s M. Taylor,
' rector ffice of Inspec ion and Enforcement
Enclosures:
As stated cc: Detroit Edison Company Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
$No$h42 d))
O PDR l
h
1 s
hkfo k
29 U2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.m ~e
[DocketNo.50-341]
THE DETROIT EDIS0N COMPANY k5 /4 0^4 (Fenni-2)
Issuance of Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 (00-86-10)
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement has denied a petition under 10 CFR 2.206 filed by Jennifer Puntenney on behalf of the Safe Energy Coalition of Michigan (SECOM) for immediate action.
In its petition, SECOM requested that the Commission take immediate action to require the licensee to show cause why its license should not be revoked in light of the allegations set forth by the Petitioner. SECOM asserts as grounds for its request that (1) the NRC has not elevated enforcement actions against the licensee to the extent mandated by the Atomic Energy Act and the Commission's regulations, (2) continued lack of management controls at levels that meet NRC requirements have resulted in ineffective programs and incompetence at critical levels of the licensee's organization including operations, maintenance, security, and engineering, (3) twenty-six violations issued recently were willful in that they showed a careless disregard for requirements, (4) the licensee has been unable to comply with certain NRC requirements, and (5) the recently released operations improvement plan will not provide the substantive changes needed to correct the serious breakdown of operations at Fenni-2.
The SECOM request for immediate action to show cause why its license should not be revoked has been denied. The reasons for this decision are fully described in the " Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206" issued on this date, which is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Document
I s
0 2
Room located at 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555, and in the local public document room for Fenni-2 located at Monroe County Library System, 3700 S. Custer Road, Monroe, Michigan 48161.
l l
t j
DatedatBethesda,Marylandthis2$dofJuly1986.
o FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
1
-r ames M. Tay1
, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement l
i O