ML20203B554

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 860519-23
ML20203B554
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/1986
From: Brownlee V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203B546 List:
References
50-424-86-45, 50-425-86-22, NUDOCS 8607180246
Download: ML20203B554 (1)


Text

_

c 9

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia Power Company Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425 Vogtle Units 1 and 2 License Nos. CPPR-108 and CPPR-109 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on May 19-23, 1986 a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved control of corrective actions. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50.54(a)(1) requires Georgia Power Company (GPC) to implement the Quality Assurance Program described or referenced in the Safety Analysis Report. Section 17.1.5 of the GPC Quality Assurance Program requires the licensee to have procedures governing their activities. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Procedure GD-T-01 Nonconformance Control requires that all corrections be completed prior to QC acceptance of the deviation report.

Contrary to the above, GPC failed to accomplish the corrective actions prescribed in deviation report PP 12074.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Georgia Power Company is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Not. ice a written statement or explanation in reply including (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further viola-tions, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, cons *deration will be given to extending the response time.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MU.5 %

Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this g day ofA lv 1986

\

8607180246 860707 PDR ADOCK 05000424 0 pon