ML20203A902
| ML20203A902 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 02/17/1998 |
| From: | Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 9583-100, NUDOCS 9802240147 | |
| Download: ML20203A902 (5) | |
Text
- - _ _ - _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - -.
),
/,
/ k, sargeNeA Lundy"*
+
w ;]
Y-;;
,N' Don K. Schopfer Senior Vice n're9 dent 312-269-6078 Fct. mary 17,1998 Pro lect No. 9583-100 Document No. 50-423 Northeast Nuc.leuFnergy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commissic.c.
I Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 As required by the Communications Protocol PI MP3-01, Sargent & I undy is responsible for providing meeting sammaries for tho= conferences in which its personnel are participants.
Enclosed for your use are the summaries for the conferences held on February 6,10 and 17,1998 to discuss NU responses to varioca discrepancy reports.
You may direct any questions to me at (?!?) 269-Q78.
t k
Yours very truly,
%7
)
D. K. v Seniopfer Senior Vice President and ICAVP Manager I
Copiet:
E. Imbro (1/1/4) Deputy Director, ICAVP Oversight T. Concenon (1/1/0) Nuclear Energy Advisory Council h
J. Fougere (1/1/l) NU
~
!g n
.B. A. Erler (1/1/0)
M$u3\\logsk.orr\\NR0217-A.DC*,'
.; G *v -
- t s
9802240147 980217
. li d
PDR ADOCK 05000423 P
PDR l
L e
55 East Mon oe Street. Chicago IL 60603-5780 UaA + 312-269-2000 g
g v
.. ex
Telecon Summary Millstone Unit 3 ICAVP Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Nuclear Energy Advisory Council /
Northeast Utilities /Sargent & Lundy February 6,1998 PURPOSE: This telecon was held to discuss technbal issues related to instrument setpoint calculation compliance with RG 1.105, Rev.1.
SUMMARY
OF DISCUSSION:
1.
Sargent & Lundy provided comments regarding NU's iugonse to Discrepancy Reports DR-MP3-0166 and DR-MP3-0301. The discussions focased on MP3 commitments with respect to RG 1.105. Based on these discussions NU agreed to submit revised responses to DR-MP3-0166 and DR-MP3-0301 which wout document MP3 RG 1.105 commitments. S&L agreed to place these two DRi as well as the following related DRs on hold pending NU's response.
DR-MP3-0173 DR-MP3-0173 DR-MP3-0275 DR-MP3-0287 DR-MP3-0302 DR-MP3-0339 DR-MP3-0523 DR-MP3-0833 DR-MP3-0834 DR-MP3-0836 DR-MP3-1049 NU also agreed to address in their revised response the potential discrepancies htween the setpoint calculations referenced in the DRs and NU procedures NEAM-41 and NETM-43.
1 y
1
-U
Meeting Summery Millstone 3 IC AVP Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Northeast Utilities / Sargent & Lundy February 10,1998
Purpose:
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss technicalissues related to AllVS and SLCRS filter units compliance with RG 1.52, Rev. 2 and secondary containment drawdown.
Location:
Northeast Utilities. Millstone Unit 3 l
Summary of Discussion:
S&L discuswd the comments made on NU's responses for the following Discrepancy l
Reports (DRs):
DR MP3 0201 DR MP3 0315 DR MP3 0328 DR MP3 0441 DR MP3 0480 DR MP3 0575 DR MP3-0588 i
DR MP3 0589 DR MP3 0705 DR MP3-0724 DR MP3 05GG DR MP3-0514 The action to be taken based on the dis.ussions at the meeting are:
DR MP3 0291 NU to provide justification for their interpretation that they meet ANSI N509 and that a FSAR clanfication to RG 1.52 is not needed DR MP3 3315 NU to provide vendor documentation that supporta uw of the HEPA filters et maximum system airflow.
DR MP3 0328 - NU to redo MEPL to determine clas-ification required for drain velves and address corrective actions if valve needs t.c be upgraded DR MP3 0441 S&L to address if FSAR Table 3.21 should be revised to address ANSI N509 exceptions not covered in RG 1.52. NU to address changes to vendor manual and specification.
DR-MP3-0480 - NU to clarify assessibility DR MP3 0575 - NU to clarify response regarding 09% va-95% removal efliciency DRAPP l of 2 1
_d
S e
Muting Summary Millstons 3 ICAVP Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Northeast Utilities / Sargent & Lundy 3ehruary 10,1998 t
DR MP3 0584,588, & 724 NU to prepare a comprehensive response to l
l aderbent issues that include 1) iodine loading, radiodecay heat generation, cooling required, acceptability of fire protection water sprays for adsorbent coolir.g. acceptability of FP timer setting vs cooling required.
DR MP3 0589 NU to revisit engineering evaluatian regarding relative hamidity used in tests DR MP3 0705 S&L to address if FSAR Table 3.21 should be revised to address ANSI N509 exceptions not covered in RG 1.52. NU to provide copy of FSAR CR 97 MP3105 DR MP3 0725 NU to address impact on filter housing design pressure DR MP3 05GG NU to clarify FSAR regarding ABVS filter discharge location DR MP3 0514 - NU to provido location of difrerential pressure taps used in test:
NU to address why its is acceptable to reference service building instead of outdoor for secondary containment differential pressure; NU to clarify what was meant in the letter when they say that the top elevation does not always go negative; NU to address how weather conditions were accounted for selecting negative pressure acceptance criteria; NU to address statements in letter regarding exhaust duct for recombiner building.
(
s DRAFT 2 of 2
Meeting Summary Millstone 3 ICAVP Nuclear Regulatory Commission / N <theast Utilities / Sargent & Lundy February 17,1998
Purpose:
The purpose of the me ting was to discuss technical issues related to Calculation 230E. This calculation determines if cdequate voltago is available across the relays v,d starter coil of the Charging Pump & Component Cooling Water Pump Area Supply Fan (311VR*FN14A).
l Location:
Telephone conference between parties Summary of Discussion:
S&L discussou the comments made on Nil's response for DR MP3 0671.
There were thwe items of concern addressed in the discussion:
item 1 Changing the taps en the unit substation transformers in order to raise e
the minimum voltage...NU stated thet tuo information required by Sargent &
Lundy can be found in calculation NL 038, attachments B through L. Sargent &
Lundy will evaluate the calculation and determine if the necessay information is in the Attachments.
Item 2 The rated voltage of the typical General Electric CR120B control relay used for 42X is 115 volts not 120 volts... NU will reviso calculation 230E.
Item 3 - The rated no lead voltage of the control transformer is 128 volta... NU will revise calculation 230E.
1 of 1