ML20202J846

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Response in Writing W/Info Describing Actions Planned to Address Comments Re 10CFR20
ML20202J846
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/05/1997
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Aldrich R
NEW YORK, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20202J850 List:
References
NUDOCS 9712110256
Download: ML20202J846 (18)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:1 p rst y 4 *4 UNITED STATES y j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t WA SHING1oN, D.C. 3021H1001 \\,,,,, 8 December 5, 1997 Ms. Rita Aldrich, Principal Radiophys icist Radiological Health Unit Division cf Safety and Health New York State Department of Labor NYS Office Campus, Bldg.12, Room 457 Albany, NY 12240 l

Dear Ms. Aldric":

Given the significance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge National Labcratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated November 14,1995, documenting its staff review of the New York Department of Labor final Part 20 equivalent rule 1 is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). NRC staff first evaluated tha ORNL report to determine if any potentially significant health and safety issues were identified that required immediate attention. If there were none, NRC staff then conducted, as resources permitted, a detailed review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy issues that should be brought to your attention for routine action. The NRC review focused on those provisions of the rules that are required for compatibility or for health and safety under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). Enclosure 3 provides our comment on the State's regulations and shows the current compatibility categories (i.e., A, B, C, D, NRC, and H&S). There are two provisions, as noted in Enclosure 3, that are not compatible with 10 CFR Pa t 20 under the new compatibility procedures. This letter takes into account the comments received in the November 7,1997 letter from Clayton Bradt to Cardelia Maupin of my staff. A separate letter wiii be sent to Mr. Bradt detailing our responses to the comments, j i Within 45 days, we request that you respond in writing with information describing the actions g you plan to take to address our comments. As you are aware, Agreement States have flexibility to adopt rules required for compatibility or health and safety in the form of legally binding requirements other than regulations. This methodology may be appropriate to resolve some of ' the compatibility issues with New Yc.-k Departrnent of Labor's regulations. The compatibility concerns identified by this letter are specific to New York Department of Labor's equivalent of 10 CFR Part 20. We would like to stress that these compatibility concems are not an indicatiun that the State's overall program is incompatible with NRC's progmm. Rather, this regulation review identifies areas that need to be addressed by the State which, if C 0 noJt ddressed by the State, could potentially lead to an incompatible program. The overall i I 1U ! Q ' jh b' [ @ 2 O' ("P.N Q OSUV hfkllkiib1pj'ijl! 1 i p 54 { 9712110256 9712G5 A PDR STPRO ESON l

i Ms. Rits Aldrich compatibility determination of the State of New York's Agreement program will be made as part of the Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program. Finally, implementation procedures for the new policy statement provide guidance that indicates Agreement State rules that are not currently consistent with the new compatibility catogory designations should conform with the new policy not later than 3 years after the policy's effective date. If you have any questions regarding these comment,, the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415-2326 or Lance Rakovtn of my staff at (301) 415-2589, or INTERNET: LJR2@NRC. GOV.

cerely,

/ 0 /' LQ! l bau[l H Lohaus, Ds'puty Directorg)hW) Office of State Programs

Enclosures:

As stated

Ms. Rita Aldrich.DEC s 1997 compatibility determination of the State of New York's Agreement program will be made as part of the Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program. Finally, implementation procedures for the new policy statement provide guidance that indicates Agreement State rules that are not currently consistent with the new compatibility category designations should conform with the new policy not later than 3 years after the policy's effective date. If you have any questions regarding these comments, the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415-2326 or Lance Rakovan of my staff at (301) 415-2589, or INTERNET: LJR2@NRC. GOV. Sincerely, OriginalSigned BY PAUL H. LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs

Enclosures:

As stated Distribution: DlR RF (7S226) DCD (SPOS)-Copies of Enclosure '1 to be ' - SDroggitis filed in Central Files and PDR only DWhite, Rl PDR (YES)- KSchneider NYDOL File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\LJR\\20NYDOL.LTR

  • See Previous Concurrence Ta receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box: "C" = Cony witnout attachtnentiendosure "E" = Copy with attachtnent/ enclosure 'N" =Jo copy OFFICE OSP l

OS $M OSP:DD l OGC l 05@ l l NAME LJRakovan:nb CHMau$ttloW PHLohaus FXCameron RLBangart DATE 10/07/97

  • 10/16/97*'

10/16/97* 11/03/97* 1A/6/97 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-20-3, SP-P-1

Ms. Rita Aldrich +2- [ Finally, implementation procedures for the new policy statement provide guidance that indicates Agreement State rules that are not currently consistent with the new compctibility category' designations should conform with the new policy not later than 3 years after the policy' ' effective date. l If you have any questions regarding these comments, the compatibility criteria e NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me 30 ) 415-2326 or i Lance Rakovan of my ',taff at (301) 415 2589, or INTERNET: L JR2@NR OV. Sincerely, Paul. Lohaus, Deputy Director O e of State Programs

Enclosures:

As stated 4 l 1 4 I J l Distribution:, DIR RF (7S226) DCD (SPOS)-Copies of Enclosure 1 to be SDroggitis I filed in Central Files and PDR only DWhite, RI PDR (YES) KSchneider NYDOt, File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\LJR\\20NYDOL.LTR

  • See previous concurrence.

To receive a copy of this document. indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure *E'

  • Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE OSP /,

Ml l @ bd OGC l OSP:D l l NAME LJRakovan:T& CH Wid'pih PHbd83uW ~ FXCameron RLBangart I DATE 10/ip /97 10/10/97 10/l@97 11/03/97* 11/ /97 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-20-3, SP-P-1 3

- ~ =~ Ms. Rita Aldrich

  • Finally, implementation procedures for the new policy statement provide gui ance that indicutes Agreement State rules that are not currently consistent with the new compdibility category designations should conform with the new policy not later than 3 years after the policy's effective date.

If you have any questions regarding these comments, the compatibility, riteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415-2326 or Lance Rakovan of my staff at (301) 415-2589, or INTERNET: LJR2@NRC. GOV. / Sincerely, Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of Slate Programs

Enclosures:

As stated / // / / I' l .I i Distribution: / DIR RF (7S226) / DCD (SP05)-Copies of Enclosure 1 to be SDroggitis ,/ filed in Central Files and PDR only DWhite, RI PDR (YES) KSchneider NYDOL File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\LJR\\20NYDOL.LTR To receive a copy of this clocument. ind6cate in the box: 'C" E Copy without attachment / enclosure *E' = Copy we attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE OSP fn M l @k OGC6M], OSP:D l l NAME LJRakovan:TA-C H di W pih PHkelauW ~ FXCameir'on RLBangart DATE 10/is 197 10/10/97 10/l@97 1% 10/ /97 g Bg66P FILE CODE: SP-AG-20-3, SP-P-1 NUbD

Ms. Rita Aldrich l If you have any questions regarding these comments, the compatibility criteria, th NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (30'1) 415-2326 or Lance Rakovan of my staff at (301) 415-2589, or INTERNET: LJR2@NRC.GP. Sincerely, l Paul H. Lohaus eputy Director Office of Stat rograms nelosures: As stated 4 Distributiort. DlR RF (76226) DCD (SP07)-Copies of Enclosure 1 to be SDroggitis put in Central Files and PDR only RSAO,' PDR (YES) KSchneide-NYDOL File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\LJR\\20NYDOL.LTR To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy wdhout attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachinent/ enclosure "N" a No copy OFFICE OSP y l OSF OSP:DD l OGC OSP:D l NAME LJRakovarthlE_ CHMaupin PHLohaus FCameron RLBangart DATE 10/7 /97/ 10! /97 10/ /97 10/ /97 10/ /97 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-20-3, SP-P-1

i l Coinoatibility Cateoorv and H&S Identification l for NRC Raoulations Key to categories: A= Basic radiation protection standard or related definitions, signs, labels or terms necessary for a - - common understanding of radiation protection principles. The State program element should be essentially identical to that of NRC. B= Program element with significant direct transboundary implications. The State program element should be essentiplY Hentical to that of NRC. C= Program element, the essential objectives of which should be adopted by the State to avoid conflicts, duplications or gaps. The manner in which the essential objectives are addressed need not be the same as NRC provided the essential objectives are met. D= Not required for purposes of compatibility. NRC = Not required for purposes of compatibility. These are NRC program element areas of regulation that cannot be relinquished to Agreement States pursuant to the AEA or provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The State should not adopt these program elements. H&S = Program elements identified as H&S are not required for purposes of compatibility; however, they do have particular health and safety significance. The State should adopt the essential objectives of such program elements in order to maintain an adequate program. ENCLOSURE 2 [

1 j NRC Comments on the New York Department of Labor Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, lonizing Radiation Protection,12 NYCRR Part 38, Required for Compatibility or Health and Safety 1 State NRC Cateaorv Raoulation Reaulation Subiect and Comments -A 38.3-20.1003 Definition of " Unrestricted Area " This definition has been omitted from the New York Department of Labor (NYDOL) regulations. This comment i was previously made in the January 7,1994 letter from John J. Surmeier, Acting Assistant Director for State Agreement Programs, Office of State Programs, to Rita s Aldrich. A 38.25(c)(4) 20.1905 Exceptions to labeling requirements, in 38.25(c)(4)(1) and 38.25 (c)(4)(ii), NYDOL adds the phrase " equal to or..." to the regulation and thus does not require containers holding quantities equal to those listed in Table 4 of Section 38.41 to have a label. This phrase j should be deleted from the rule. i I l i 4 lt i i i I. i h a j f ENCLOSURE 3 J I i i + rn .---.+-.-+r

i EXECUTIVE TASK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM l ~~------- ~~~ -~~~~~~~~~ --~~~~ <<< PRINT SCREEN UPDATE FORM >>> TASK # - 7S226 DATE- 09/05/97 - - --- -- ' MAIL CTRL. 1997 I -~~~ -~~-- ~~~~~ JAS{,,SJAR((g- 09/05/97 {AS{,gg{ - 10/30/97 {AS{,,COM{g(({g- / / TASK DESCRIPTION - PART 20 EQUIVALENT REVIEW - STATE OF NEW YORK DOL REQUESTING OFF. - OSP REQUESTER - PHL WITS - 0-FYP - N -~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~~~~~.. ~~~ PROG.- LJR PERSON - STAFF LEAD - LJR PROG. AREA - ~~~..-- - ~~~~~~~~ PROJECT STATUS - OSP DUE DATE: 10/30/97 PLANNED ACC. -N LEVEL CODE - 1 4

BACKGROUND MATERIAL FOR OSP FILES REVIEW OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PART 20 EQUIVALENT REGULATIONS October 1997 l EXPLANATION OF ENTRIES UNDER "Comoatible" [Y] means the definition or rule is determined to be compatible with 10 CFR Part 20 [N] means the definition or rule is determined to be NOT compatible with 10 CFR Part 20 i Desionation Definition NRC Section State Section Comoatible A Absorbed dose 20.1003 38.3(2) [Y] A Activity 20.1003 38.3(4) [Y] A Adult 20.1003 38.3(5) [Y] r A Airbome radioactive material 20.1003 38.3(7) [Y] A Airborne radioactivity area 20.1003 38.3(8) [Y) A ALARA 20.1003 38.3(10) [Y} A Annuallimit on intake (ALI) 20.1003 38.3(9) [Y) A Background radiation 20.1003 38.3(11) [Y] A Bioassay 20.1003 38.3(13) [Y] l A Byproduct material 20.1003 38.3(14) [Y] A Class (lung class or inhalation class) 20.1003 38.3(18) [Y] A Collective dose 20.1003 38.3(19) [Y] A Committed dose equivalent 20.1003 38.3(21) [Y] A Committed effective dose equivalent 20.1003 38.3(22) [Y] D Controlled area 20.1003 38.3(23) [Y] A Declared pregnant woman 20.1003 38.3(25) [Y]

~ _ -. _ _ _- -._.._. -- ~ _ _ .e ~ l d -?

Rule Reviewi New York Depar+ ment of Labor Part 20 equwalent competituhty rules t

l =i i Designabon Definsbon NRC Sechon State Secten Compebbie .i A Deep dose equwalent. 20.1003 '38.3(27) [Y) .A-Denved air concentration (DAC) - 20.1003 .38.3(30) [Y] ~! A Denved air concentration-hour (DAC-hour)' 20.1003 38.3(31) [Y]' LD Dose -20.1003 ,. 38.3(32) - [Y] A Dose equivalent '20.1003 38.3(33)- [Y] A Dose limits { limits); 20.1003 38.3(53).; '[Y] l D Dosimetry processor - 20.1003 38.3(34) [Y]. A Effective dose equivalent 20.1003 ,38.3(35) [Y] A

Embryo #etus 20.1003-
38.3(36).

[Y]- C Entrance or access point 20.1003 38.3(37) [Y] A Exposure .20.1003 38.3(38) [Y] A Extemal dose 20.1003 38.3(39)- -[Y] A Extremity 20.1003 38.3(40) .[Y] a L A .. Eye dose equivalent; 20.1003 38.3(41)- [Y] A/D* Generally applicable environmental - 1 1 radiation standards 20.1003 . Omitted [Y) j

  • (A for states with authonty'to regulate uranium mill adMty. D for states without authonty)

-i A Gray - 20.1004-08.3(42) [Y) i A High radiation area ~ '20.1003 38.3(43) [Y] A Individual 20.1003 38.3(45)- [Y] i A Individual monitoring" 20.1003 ^ 38.3(46)- [Y] l C Individual monitoring devices 20.1003 38.3(47) [Y] A Intemal dose 20.1003' '38.3(49) [Y) i D Licensed [or registered] matenal 20.1003 38.3(51) [Y]- i B Lost or missing licensed [or registered] 1 1 i source of radiabon { material} - 20.1003 38.3(54) [Y] A-Member of the public 20.1003. T 38.3(55) [Y] A Minor 20.1003.. - 38.3(56). [Y] 'j A Monitoring 20.1003 38.3(57) [Y] j A Nonstochastic effect 20.1003 38.3(59). [Y] A Occupationaldose 20.1003 38.3(61) [Y]. [ l y 2 .) 'I Q ,e n

l

-,,l-

-.-. 7 - ~ -~. - -.. _ = - q i Rule Review: New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent competitwhty rules 1 Designation Definsbon NRC Secten State Sechon Compabble i D Planned special exposure ~ 20.1003 Omitted.. '[Y] i A Public dose 20.1003 38.3(68) [Y] 1 . Quality factor 20.1003 - 38.3(69)' [Y] l .A D - Quarter 20.1003- - 38.3(70)- [Y] 1 A ' Rad 20.1004 38.3(71); [Y] i A Radiation 20.1003 38.3(72).l [Y] A ' Reference Man ' 20.1003 ' 38.3(73); [Y] i A' Radiation area 20.1003 38.3(80)- [Y] i A . Rem' 20.1004-38.3(83) [Y] .i C Respiratory protective equipment { device} 20.1003 38.3(84) -[Y] l A Restncted area 20.1003 38.3(85). [Y] A Sanitary sewerage '20.1003 38.3(87) [Y]. A Shallow dose equivalent -20.1003 ~ 38.3(90) [Y] e A Sievert - 20.1004' 38.3(92) [Y] + D ' Site boundary 20.1003 38.3(93) [Y] A ~ Source material

20.1003 38.3(94)

[Y] A Special nuclear material 20.1003 38.3(97) [Y] A Stochastic effect 20.1003 . 38.3(100) [Y] j A Survey 120.1003 ' 38.3(102) [Y] A Total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) 20.1003- ' 38.3(104) [Y] A Unrestricted area'-

20.1003.

Omitted [N] 1 l A .Very high radiation area -20.1003 38.3(109)- [Y] 1 D Week '20.1003 ' 38.3(111)' [Y] A Weighting factor w 20.1003 38.3(112) [Y]- t r A Whole body 20.1003 38.3(113) [Y] A Working level (WL) 20.1003 .38.3(115) [Y] A Working level month (WLM) 20.1003 38.3(116) [Y] 4 A Year 20.1003 38.3(117) [Y]' ] + I '( ! j e 4~,._. ,.. ~ .t

. ~ . ~.. - - ...~ 1 Rule Review: New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent' compshbility rules . Qir Dessnahon NRC rule Rule subpct State Rule Compabble 1 A 20.1004 Units of radiation dose 38.3(69(i and ii)). [Y] Table 38.3-1 ' Table 38.3-2 1 A: 20.1005-Units of r7% activity 38.3(12) [Y]- 38.3(24)- ) 2 D 20.1008(b - e) Implementation, general ~ Omittted [Y]. 1 i 2 D 20.1101 Radiahon protection programs 38.17. [Y] - 1-A~ 20.120i Occupahonal dose limits for adults . 38.18(a). [N] 2 4 .g 1 A" .20.1202 Requirements for summation of external and intemal doses 38.18(b) [Y) - 'l r C.! 1 ~A, 20.1203 Determination of extemal dose from airborne radioactive 38.18(c) [Y] material ?.: .1 1 A 20.1204(except c) Determination ofintemal exposure 38.18(d) [Y] "j l 2 A 20.1204(c) ,information on intemal exposure 38.18(d) [Y) j 1 -D 20.1206 Planned special exposures 38.18(f) [Y) l 1 A 20.1207 Occupahonal dose limits for minors 38.18(g) [Y] I l 1 A-20.1208 Dose to an emtxyo#etus 38.18(h)'

[N] 3 i

1 A 20.1301(a, b) Dose limits for individual members of the public 38.19(a). [Y] 1 D 20.1302 Compliance with' dose limits for indmdual members of ,38.19(b) [Y]' I the public I 4 'l 'i

( Rule Review: New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent compatibility rules Diy Designation NRC rule - B.yle subiect State Rule Compatible i 4 2 D 20.1501(a, b) Surveys and monitoring-general 38.22(a+), (g) [N]4-1 D 20.1501(c) NVLAP requirement 38.24(a)(3) [Y] 2 D 20.1502 Conditions requiring individual monitoring of external ' 38.24(a)(1), (2) [Y] and internal occupational dose and (b) 1 D 20.1601(a - d) Control of. access to high radiation areas 38.25(d) [Y) [ . 2 D 20.1601(e) Control not required for DOT pacit.ge 38.25(d) ,[Y] 2 D 20.1601(f) Control not required for hospital rooms and areas 38.25(d) [Y] 1 D 20.1602 Control of access to very high radiation areas 38.25(e). [Y] l 1 D 20.1701 Use of process or other engineering controls 38.26(a)(1) [Y] 1 D 20.1702 Use of other controls 38.26(a)(2) [Y] i 1 D 20.1703 Use of individual respiratory protection equipment 38.26(b) [Y] i 2 D 20.1801 Security of stored sources of radiation Omitted [N] 5 2 D 20.1802 Control of material not in storage Omitted [N] 6. 1 A 20.1901 Caution signs 38.25(a) [N] 7 - 1 A 20.1902 Posting requirements - 38.25(b)(1) [Y] 1 A 20.1904 Labeling containers 38.25(c)(1), (2) -[Y] and (3) i 5

... - -.. -. -. -... -. -... ~.. -... .... - ~ L - :- l. Rule Review: New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent compahbility rules - Diy Desianation NRC rule Rule subpct State Rule Compabble 1 A 20.1905. Exceptions to labeling requirements \\ 38.25(c)(4) [N] 8 :. 2 D 20.1906 Procedures for receiving and opening packages 38.32 [N] 9 2 C 20.2001 ' Waste disposal - general requirements 38.20 [Y) 2 D 20.2002

Method for obtaining approval of proposed dispos'd Omitted

[Y] [ proceduresi. 2 A -- (a)(2) & (3) 20.2003 Disposal by release into sanitary sewerage ' Omitted [Y]. l C - (a) (4) t D -(a)(1) & (b) t 2 B 20.2006 - Transfer for disposal and manifests Omitted [Y] 1 D 20.2104(except f) Determination of prior occupational dose 38.18(c) [Y] (C ir state adopts pienned specist exposure-) t 2 C 20.2201(except c) Reports of Stolen, Lost, or Missing Licensed or Registered 38.29(a) [Y) Sources of Radiation i 1 C 20.2202(except e) Notification ofincuents 38.29(b) [Y] [ 2 C -(a), (b) 20.2203 Reports.of Exposures, Radiation Levels, and Concentrations 38.29(c) [Y] f D -(d) of Radioactive Matenal Exceeding the Limits j NRC -(c) i 2 D 20.2204 Reports of Planned Special Exposures 38.29(d) [Y] i 'i + !r 6 [ i

i

I'.. i . Rule Review: New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent compatibility rules - Diy ; Desianation NRC rule Rule subpect State Pule Compabblo 1 C 20 Appendix A Protection Factors for Respirators 38.41, Table 6 ' [Y) 1 A '. 20 Appendix B. All's and DAC's; effluent concentrations; concentrations 38.41, Appendix B [Y] for release to sewerage. 1 A

20 Appendix C

. Quantities of licensed material requiring labeling 38.41. Table 4 - [Y] .( 2 B 20 Appendix F LLW transfer for disposal and manifests Omitted [Y] l l Designation Definition NRC Sechon State Sechon Compabble Becquere! 20.1005 Z8.3(12) ' [Y) Curie 20.1005 38.3(24) [Y] i U.S. Department of Energy { Department} 20.1003 38.3(105) [Y] l Diy Designation NRC rule. Rule subsect State Rule Compatible 2 -20.1603 Control af access to very high radiation areas - 38.25(f) (Y] -{ irradiatoro i l 1 e f i i 4 7-p 4 E I

--.___.m .__._.7._.....___ t . Rule Review-New York Department of Labor Part 20 equivalent compshbility rules. ,i NOTES: i 1. 38.3 Definition " Unrestricted Area" New York Department of Labor omits this definition.- 2. 38.18(a) Occupational dose limits for adults ~j New York Department of Labor uses the phrase "no person shall transfer, recene, posses or use any radiabon source so as to cause any i individual adult to receive an o-ahanal dose from all sources of radiahon." By using this phrase, New York Department of Labor fails to.

l include perscas who dispose of sources of radiahon in the scope of their regulations.

3. 38.18(h) Dose to an embryo / fetus. New York Department of Labor uses the phrase " review past history and adpust wortong conditions so as to avoid a monthly radiabon dose of more than 50 mrem to a declared pregnant woman," replacing the phrase "to the embryonetus" with "to a declared pregnant worker.' ' A declared pregnant worker can receive many deerent types of dose, mctudmg sha' low dose equivalent, deep dose equivalent, eye dose equivalent, etc. The only dose to the declared pregnant woman that is applied to the embryo #etus is the deep dose equivalent of the declared pregnant woman. Also, by only including dose to the declared pregnant woman in Sec. 38.18(h)(2), New York Department of Labor appear to exclude the dose to the embryo / fetus from intemal radionuchdes as stated in D.208c.ii. And New York Department of Labor Sec. l 38.18(h)(3)(ii). 'I 4. 38.22(a-e), (g) Surveys and monitoring - general I New York Department of Labor does not require that instruments used for surveys be cahbrated every 12 months. New York Department of I Labor omits a rule requiring licensees to take precautions to prevent deceptive exposures of individual monitonng devices 5. Security of Stored Sources of Radiation [ New York Department of Labor omits a sechon correspor. ding to 10 CFR 20.1801. [ 6. Control of Sources of Radiation Not in Storage New York Department of Labor omits a section correspondog to 10 CFR 20.1802. 7. 38.25(a) Caution signs New York Department of Labor omits a rule compatible with 10 CFR 20.1901(c). .j b ? . 8 J ~ i j! ~v - +

t Rule Reviouc New York Department of Labor Pad 20 equivalent compshtwhty rules NOTES: i 8. 38.25(c)(4) Excephons to labehng requirements in 38.25(c)(4)(i), New York Depadmant of Labor adds the phrase " equal too or." to the regulabon and does not require contamers holdmg i . quantities equal to those listed in Table 4 of sechon 38.41 to have a label. Also, in 38.25(c)(4)(iii), New York Department of Labor does not i require precautionary measures to be taken in order to exempt laboratory contamers from the labehng requirements of ttus Part.- I i 9. 38.32 Procedures for Receiving and Opening Packages New York Department of Labor regulabons give excephon from surveyeg packages that have been monitored before shoppog 6 4 1 i f d t 'i 'I 9 r If -}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20202J846&oldid=4078800"