ML20202H328
| ML20202H328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1999 |
| From: | CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202H280 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-D-1035, CON-FIN-J-5164, CON-FIN-J-5186, CON-FIN-J-5206, CON-FIN-J-5210, CON-FIN-J-5266, CON-NRC-02-97-009, CON-NRC-2-97-9, REF-WM-11 HLWR, NUDOCS 9902080067 | |
| Download: ML20202H328 (40) | |
Text
_
{
i l
CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER'S PERIODIC REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES l
l l
For the Fiscal Reporting Period l
December 19,1998 - January 15,1999 1
PMPR No. 99-4 l
I January 28,1999 l
l l
9902080067 990128 ~
1
I
)
1 i
l TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page b
TABLES................................................................,........iv
- A B B REV IATIONS................................................................... v.
EXECUTIV E
SUMMARY
-PERIOD 4................................................ xi I-1.
. TECHNIC AL '............................................................... I 1.1 CNWRA Operations (COPS)............................................. I 1.2 Igneous Activity (IA)................................................ 2 1.3 Stmetural Deformation and Seismicity (SDS)................................ 3 1.4 Evolution of the Near-Field Environment (ENFE)............................ 4 1.5 Container Life and Source Term (CLST)................................... 5 1.6 Thermal Effects on Flow (TEF).......................................... 6 1.7 Repository Design and Thermal-Mechanical Effects (RDTME)................ 7 1.8 Total System Performance Assessment and Integration (TSPAI)................. 8 1.9 Activitier Related to Development of the NRC High-Level Waste Regulations (ARDR)................................................ 9 1.10 Unsaturated and Saturated Flow Under Isothermal Conditions (USFIC)..........
10 1.11 Radionuclide Transport (RT).............................................
11 1.12 Tank Waste Remediation Systems (TWRS)................................
12 1.13 - Three Mile Island Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (TMI-2 ISFSI).............................................. 13 1.14 Dry Transfer System (DTS)............................................
13 1.15 Centralized Interim Storage Facility (CISF)............................... 13 1.16 Private Fuel Storage Facility (PFSF)...................................... ' 14 1.17 Savannah R.iver Site Aluminum-Based Spent Fuel (SRSASF).................
14
~2 MAN AGEM ENT ISS UES...................................................
14 3
M AJ OR PROB LE MS............ c......................................
14 4
SUMMARY
OF SCHEDULE CHANGES.....................................
14 5
SUMMARY
OF FINANCIAL STATUS........................................
14 APPENDIX-Planned and Actual Costs, and Cost Variances Period 4-FY1999 -
l 1.
I i
iii 1
r:
l,-
.__.._.-._...._.__._..._m_
t TABLES t
Table Page
- 1 CNWRA Core Staff.-Current Profile and Hiring Plan * (Period 4)..................
19 2
Summary of Schedule Changes (Period 4)....................................... 20 j
3' Deliverables (Period 4)....................................................... 21 j
4 Financial S tatus (Period 4)................................................... 22 E
5 Private Fuel Storage Facility License Fee Cost Recovery Status (Period 4)............ 23 i
k 4
f
?
4
- i i
t I
t I
I t
i
't iv
.. ~..,.
l.. _
_ _. ~ _.. _ _.... _ _ _ _... _..... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
+
b h
ABBREVIATIONS l
ID
' One-Dimensional CDROM Compact Disk Read Only Memory 2D Two-Dimensional '
CDS Compliance Determination Strategy 3D Three-Dimensional CDTS Commission Decision Tracking System AA Atomic Absorption CEB Center for Environmental Biotechnology AAI Average AnnualInfiltration CEC Commission of the European ACD Advanced Conceptual Design Communities ACF Alumina (in excess of alkali feldspar),
CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics Calcium Oxide. Ferromagnesian Oxide CFR Code of Federal Regulation
.ACNW' Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste CIAC Computerincident AdvisoryCapability ACRS Advanced Computer Review System CISF Centralized Interim Storage Facility ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and CLST Container Life and Source Term Management System CM Configuration Management AECL Atomic Energy of Canada Limited CNWRA Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory
-)
AES Atomic Emission Spectrometry Analyses i
AGU American Geophysical Union CNWRA OPS Operations Plan for the Repository Al Administrative item Program ALTS Apache leap Test Site COI Conflict ofInterest AML
. Areal Mass Loading COPS CNWRA Operations ANS American Nuclear Society CPP Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization ANSI American National Standards Institute CQAM CNWRA Quality Assurance Manual AO Annotated Outline CRG Center Review Group AP Administrative Procedure CRM Corrosion Allowance Material
'APB Acid-Producing Bacteria CRWMS Civilian Radioactive Waste AR
~ Assessment Report Management System ARD't Activities Related to Development of CSCS Constrained Stochastic Climate the NRC High-Ixvel Waste Regulations Simulator ASCE American Society of Civil Engineets CSH Calcium Silicate Hydrate i
ASCII American Standard Code for '
CSPE Corrosion Science and Process information Interchange Engineering i
-ASLB Atomic Safety and Licensing Board DAS Data Acquisition System ASME American Society of Mechanical DBE Design Basis Event Engineers DC Division of Contracts ASTM American Society for Testing and DCAA Defense Contract Audit Agency Materials DCB Double Cantilever Beam
_j l'
ASU Arizona State University DCF Dose Conversion Factor ATDTS Automated Technical Data Tracking DCM Dual Continuum Model System D&D Decommissioning and Decontamination l
BDCF Biosphere Dose Conversion Factor DECOVALEX Development of Coupled Models and BEG Bureau of Economic Geology Their Validation Against Experiments BFD Basis for Design in Nuclear Waste Isolation BM Bare Mountain DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement BMF Bare Mountain Fault DEM Digital Elevation Model BNFL-British Nuclear Fuels Limited DF Dilution Factor B1P Branch Technical Position DFCSS Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and CAI Color Alteration Index Safeguards CAM Corrosion Resist Material DIE Determination ofimportance CAR Corrective Action Request Evaluation CCDF Complementary Cumulative -
DIMNS Division ofIndustrial and Medical l
Distribution Function ~
Nuclear Safety CCL' Commitment Control 1.og DKM Dual Permeability Model CCM Constant Capacitance Model DLG Digital Line Graph CD-R CDROM Recordable DLM Diffuse Layer Model CDF Cumulative Distribution Function DNAG Decade of North American Geology lJ
'CDM Compliance Determination Method DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board CDOCS Consolidated document Management DOE US Department of Energy System V
i n-
~.
ABBREVIATIONS (cont'd)
DOE-DP U.S. Department of Energy Defense GERT General Employee Radiological Program Training DOE-RU U.S. Department of Energy Regulatory GET General Employee, Training Unit GFM Geological Framework Model DRA Division of Regulatory Applications GHGC GeoHydrology and Geochemistry DST Drift Scale Test GIA GeneralizedImportance Analysis DTED Digital Terrain Elevation Data GIS Geographic Information System DTS Dry Transfer System GLGP Geology and Geophysics DWM Division of Waste Management GMS Goundwater Modeling System EBS Engineered Barner System GPS Global Positioning System EBSER Engineered Barrier System GROA Geologic Repository Operations Area Experimental Research GS Geologic Setting EBSPAC Engineered Barner System GSA Geologic Society of America Performance Assessment Code GTFE Great Tolbachik Fissure Eruption ECM Equivalent Continuum Model GUI Graphics User Interface EDO Office of the Executive Director for GWB Geochemist's Workbench Operations GWSI Groundwater System lntegration EDX Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy G W'IT Groundwater Travel Time EIS Environmental Impact Statement HE Hydrogen Embrittlement EM Element Manager HLUR High-level Waste and Uranium EMPA Electron MicroProbe Analysis Recovery Projects Branch ENE East-Northeast HLW High-Level Waste ENFE Evolution of the Near-Field HRTEM liigh-Resolution Transmission Electron Environment Microscopy ENGB Engineering and Geosciences Branch IA Igneous Activity EnPA Energy Policy Act of 1992 IBM Intemational Business Machines ENS European Nuclear Society ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ICPP Idaho Chemical Processing Plant EPR Electrochemical Potentiokinetic ICRP Intemational Commission Radiological Reactivation Protection EPRI Electric Power Research Institute IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and EQA Extemal Quality Assurance Health EROS Earth Resource Observation System IHLRWMC International High-level Radioactive ESF Exploratory Studies Facility Waste Management Conference and ESP Environmental Simulation Program Exposition EW East-West IM Intermediate Milestone EXAFS Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine IME Industrial Mobilization Exemption Structure IMS Information Management Systems FAC Favorable Condition INEEL Idaho National Engineering and FCRG Forrat and Content Regulatory Guide Environmental Laboratory FDSHA Fault Displacement and Seismic Hazard INETER Instituto Nicaraguense de Estudios Analysis TERritoriales FEHM Finite Element Heat and Mass Transfer INTRAVAL International Code Validation FEM Finite Element Method 1/O Input / Output FEP Features, Events, and Proceses IP inspection Procedure FFRDC Federally Funded Research and IPA Iterative Performance Assessment Development Center IR&D Internal Research & Development FIT Fast Fourier Transform IRIS Interim Records Information System ITE Full-Time Equivalent IRM Office ofInformation Resources FTP File Transfer Protocol Management FY Fiscal Year IRSR issue Resolution Status Report FYTD Fiscal Year-to-Date ISA Initial Safety Analysis GDF Ghost Dance Fault ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage GEM General Electrochemical Migration Installation GEOTRAP Geologic Transport of Radionuclides ISM Integrated Site Model Predictions IVM Interactive Volume Modeling vi
l ABBREVIATIONS (cont'd) i 1%PE Integrated Waste Package Experiments NMSS Office of Nuclear Material Safety and JC Job Code Safeguards JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory NNE North-Northeast JRC Joint Roughness Coefficient NNW Nonh-Northwest KESA Key Elements of Subsystems Abstraction NOAA National Oceanographic and KTl Key TechnicalIssue Atmospheric Administration KTU Key Technical Uncertainty NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission LA License Application NS North-South LAAO License Application Annotated Outline NSRRC Nuclear Safety Research Review LAN Local Area Network Committee LANL les Alamos National Laboratory NTS Nevada Test Site LARP License Application Review Plan NUREG NRC Technical Report Designa,ica LAW Low-Activity Waste NWPA Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory NWTRB Nuclear Waste Technics Rniew Board LBT Large Block Test OBES Of6ce of Basic Energy Sciences LHS Latin Hypercube Sampling OCRWM Office of Civ;han Radioactive Waste LITC Lockheed Information Technology Management Company OGC Office of General Counsel LLC Limited Liability Company OITS Open-Item Tracking System LLNL Lawrence Livermore National OMB Office of Management and Budget Laboratory ORR Operations Readiness Review
)
LLW Low-Level Waste ORS Overall Review Strategy LMAES teckheed Martin Advanced OWFN One White Flint North Environmental Systems PA Performance Assessment LSS Licensing Support System PAAG Petformance Assessment Advisory LSSPP Licensing Support System Pilot Project Group LSSTI!
Licensing Support System Test Bed PAC Potentially Adverse Condition LWR Light Water Reactor PAHT Performance Assessment and M
Molar Hydrologic Transport Ma Million Years Ago PASP Performance Assessment Strategic Plan mal Mean AnnualInfiltration PC Personal Computer MC Monte Carlo PCfrCP Personal Computerffransmission METRA Mass and Energy Transport Control Protocol MGDS Mined Geologic Disposal System PDF Probability Distribution Function Mil Mechanical-Hydrological PDR Public Document Room MIC Microbially influenced Corrosion PEL Permissible Exposure Limit MINC Multiple Interactmg Continua PEM Program Element Manager MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology PER Prelicensing Evaluation Report MM Major Milestone PEST Parameter Estimation MO Management and Operations PFD Probabilistic Fault Displacement MOU Memorandum of Understanding PFDHA Probabilistic Fault Displacement MPC Multi-Purpose Canister Hazard MRS Monitored Retrievable Storage PFS Private Puel Storage MSS MultiSpectral Scanner PFSF Private Fuel Storage Facility MTU Metric Ton of Uranium PHA Preliminary Hazard Analysis NAS National Academy of Sciences Pi PrincipalInvestigator NAWG Natural Analogue Working Group PMDA Program Management, Policy NCR Nonconformance Report Development and Analysis Staff NEA Nuclear Energy Agency PMPR Program Manager's Periodic Report NEl Nuclear Energy Institute PMT Pho'o-Multiplier Tube NFS Network File Server PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NIOSH National Institutes of Safety and Health PO Project Officer NIR Near-Infrared PPA Proposed Program Approach NIST NationalInstitute of Standards and PPE Prepassivated Platinum Electrode Technology PRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment PRT Peer Resiew Team Vii l
l
ABBREVIATIONS (cont'd)
PSAG Probabilistic System Assessment Group SHT Single Heater Test PSHA Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses SIP Scientific Investigation Plan PITE Polytetrafluoroethylene SKI Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate irTn Paintbrush Nonwelded Tuff S-L Short Transverse-lengitudinal PVHA Probabilistic Volcanic Hazards SLAR Side Looking Airborne Radar Assessment SNF Spent Nuclear Fuel PVHVIEW Probability of Volcanic Hazards SNL Sandia National Laboratories VIEW SOTEC Source Term Code PVM Parallel Virtual Machine SOW Statement of Work PWR Pressurized Water Reactor SPCR Software Problem Correction Report QA Quality Assurance SRA Systematic Regulatory Analysis QAP Quality Assurance Procedure SRB Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria QRAM Quality Requirements Application SRBS Shafts, Ramps. Boreholes, and neir Matrix Seals RAI Request for AdditionalInformation SRD Software Requirements Description RASA Regional Aquifer System Analysis SRS Savannah River Site RDCO Repository Design, Construction, SRSASF Savannah River Site Aluminum-and Operations Based Spent Fuel RDTME Repository Design and nermal.
SS Stainless Steel Mechanical Effects STEM Scannirg Transmission Electron REE Rare Earth Element Microscopy REECO Reynolds Electrical and Engineering STP Staff Technical Position Company, Inc.
SUFLAT Stochastic Analyses of Unsaturated RES Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Flow AndTransport RFP Request for Proposal SVF Springerville Volcanic Field Ril Relative Humidity SwRI Southwest Research Institute RIP Repository Integration Program SZ Saturated Zone ROC Repository Operations Criteria TA Technical Assistance RPD Regulatory Program Database TBD To Be Determined RRT Regulatory Requirement Topic TBM Tunnel Boring Machine l
RSRG Real Space Renormalization Group TCP/IP Transmission Control Protocol /
RT Radionuclide Transport laternet Protoco!
l RTS Radwaste Treatment System TDEM Time-Domain Electro-Magnetic
[
SAP Standards Approval Package TDI Technical Document Index j
SAR Safety Analysis Report TDOCS Technical Document Reference l
SCA Site Characterization Analysis Database System i
SCC Stress Corrosion Cracking TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent SCCEX Substantially Complete Containment TEF Thermal Effects on Flow Example TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy SCE Standard Calomel Electrode THC Rermal-llydrologic-Chemical SCFF Southern Crater Flat Fault THMC Thermal Hydrologic-Mechanical-SCM Surface Complexation Models Chemical SCP Site Characterization Plan T-L Transverse-lengitudinal SDMP Site Decommissioning M anagement Plan TLM Triple-Layer Model SDS Structural Deformation and Seistnicity TM Thermal-Mechanical SECY Secretary of the Commission, Office of TMH Thermal-Mechanical Hydrologic the (NRC)
TMI-2 Three Mile Island Unit 2 SELM Spectral Element Method TMS ne Minerals, Metals, and Materials SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy Society SER Safety Evaluation Report TOP Technical Operating Procedure SFPO Spent Fuel Project Office TP Technical Position SFVF San Francisco Volcanic Field TPA Total-system Performance Assessment SGI Silicon Graphics Inc.
TPi Time Period of Regulatory Interest SGML Standard Genera?ized Markup TR2 DOE Seismic Topical Report No. 2 Language TRG Technical Review Group SHE Standard Hydrogen Electrode TSAR Topical Safety Analysis Report Vili
1 1
ABBREVIATIONS (cont'd)
TSPA Total System Performance Assessment YMP Yucca Mountain Project TSPA-VA Total System Performance Assessnent-YMSCO Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Viability Assessment Office TSPAl Total System Performance Assessment YMR Yucca Mountain Region and Integration YTD Year-to-Date TSw-Chnv Topopah Spnng Welded-Calico Hills Nonvitric TVD Total Vanation Diminishing TWFN Two White Flint North "IWINS Tank Waste Information Network System TWRS Tank Waste Remediation System UA University of Arizona UACil Universidad Aut6 noma de Chihuahua UCLA University of California los Angeles UDEC Universal Distinct Elemen; Code UK United Kingdom UNM University of New Mexico UR Uranium Recovery U.S.
United States USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USGS U.S. Geologic Survey UTM Universal Transverse Mercator USFIC Unsaturated and Saturated Flow Under Isothermal Conditions UZ Unsaturated Zone VA Viability Assessment VCS Version Control System VF Vitrification Facility VSIP Vertical Slice Implementation Plan WAN Wide Asea Network WAPDEG Waste Package Degradation WBS Work Breakdown Structure WCIS Waste Containment and Isolation Strategy WFO Work for Others WGB Western Great Basin WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
.WMB Waste Management Branch WNYNSC Western New York Nuclear Service Center WOL Wedge-Opening leading WP Waste Package WSEI Waste Systems Engineering and Integration WSRC Westinghouse Savannah River Company WSS Waste Solidification Systems WTSO Washington Technical Support Office WVDP West Valley Demonstration Project WVNS West Valley Nuclear Services WWW World Wide Web XPS X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy XRD X-ray Diffractometry YM Yucca Mountain IX
l EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
-PERIOD 4 In the Division of Waste Management (DWM) Job Code (JC), the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory I
Analyses (CNWRA) delivered revision 1 of the software requirements description for MULTIFLO Version 2.0 and a report on the installation and execution guide for the Personal Computer version of the Total-system Performance Assessment Version 3.2 code and the source code. Moreover, CNWRA produced journal papers on Evolution of the Near-Field Environment sensitivity studies, analysis of drift instability
^
and rockfall, variations of drift stability at the proposed Yucca Mountain (YM) repository, grain boundary chemistry and intergranular corrosion in Alloy 825, an approach for using detailed sorption model results in performance assessment :alculations at the repository, and an evaluation of data on ion exchange between aqueous solutions and the zeolite mineral clinoptilolite. These papers have been or will be submitted for acceptance in recognized technicaljournals. Staff participated in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Drift Seepage Peer Review Meeting, DOE Enhanced Design Alternatives Workshop, and other technical meetings and workshops. Staff alsc, made field trips to YM and Crater Flat, Nevada.
The DWM JC year-to-da;e (YTD) cost variance was 19.2 percent. Spending fell from the previous period primarily as a result of the holiday season and associated vacations.
In the Tank Waste Remediation System JC, staff continued preparation of various reports and manuals-new and revised-incorporating Nuclear Regulatory Commission comments, as required. The YTD cost variance was 35.1 percent. Spending fell from last period because of planned absences during the holiday season and allocation of staff resources to higher priority review of the Viability Assessment.
In the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) JC, the staff continued its revision of the draft safety evaluation report (SER) and provided assistance in the preparation of NRC proposed exemptions from requirements of 10 CFR 72.102(f)(1) and 10 CFR Part 20. The YTD cost variance for the TMI-2 ISFSI was -34.3 percent resulting from continued efforts to prepare the draft SER.
This effort consumed approximately 90 percent of FY1999 funding during the last four periods.
In the Dry Transfer System JC, the staff pursued preparation of the draft SER at an extremely slow rate while waiting for the DOE to respond to the first round Request for Additional Information. The YTD cost variance was - 1.9 percent. Spending again fell significantly from last period as the result of decreased staff utilization, bringing costs into line with the plan.
In the Centralized Interim Storage Facility (CISF) JC, staff performed only preliminary review of the Seismic Topical Report on HI-STAR /HI-STORM cask systems. The YTD cost variance for the CISF was 22.9 percent. This underspending resulted from staff waiting for tasking relative to revision of the computer code RISKIND and instruction for revising the draft assessment report.
In the Private Fuel Storage Facility JC, the staff continued preparation of the draft SER. The YTD cost variance was 15.4 percent. Despite increased spending, expenditures fell short of the revised spending estimate for the period-accounting for the higher cumulative variance.
In the Savannah River Site Aluminum-Based Spent Fuel JC, the staff received acceptance of the letter report, Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy Aluminum-Based Spent Fuel Criticality, and provided technical comments separately for further revision of this report. No significant technical activities were conducted as the staff awaited receipt of additional documents from ti ' DOE for review. The YTD cost variance was xi
f...
- -. -. - -. ~.... - _ ~.... ~. -. _. -.....
. ~. -. ~ - -
.l 4
2 71.2 percent. Spending fell substantially compared with the previous period due to lack of tasking in this project.
It should be noted that the current spending estimates in all JCs are based on the assumption that staffing is consistent with the aggressive hiring plan delineated at the time these operations plans were first developed l
in late FY1998. A revised staffing plan was presented in the Annual Review of the CNWRA that recognizes the slower than anticipated hiring through the first quarter. Current staffing remains below authorized levels I
and recruitment continues.
i t
i t
I l
)
5 t
T s
4 1
i t
f xii
-j t
I
9 CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER'S PERIODIC REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE i
CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES TITLE Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA)
CONTRACTOR: Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78238-5166 CONTRACT NO: NRC-02-97-009 JOB CODES: D1035, 35164, J5186, J5206, J5226, J5210 NRC CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER: John J. Linehan,(301) 415-7780 1
NRC CNWRA DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER: Deborah A. DeMarco,(301) 415-7804 CNWRA PRESIDENT. Wesley C. Patrick,(210) 522-5158 j
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $87,611,477 PERIOD OF P_ERFORMANCF,: 09/27/97--09/27/02 PERIOD OF THIS REPORT. 12/19/98-01/15/99 1
TECHNICAL 1.1 CNWRA Operations (COPS)
In addition to a wide range of day-to-day activities, accomplishments in the management and planning area included (i) reconciling the carryover monies for FY1999 and revised spending estimates for FY 1998; (ii) responding to various ad hoc requests for input to NRC management staff meetings and presentations concerning spending and hiring for CNWRA operations during FY1999; (iii) further addressing COI-related topics among the NRC, i
SwRI, and CNWRA management staffs; and (iv) participating in weekly HLW Management Board meetings.
i Status of CNWRA staffing is indicated in table 1. A revised staffing plan is being j
developed consistent with the CNWRA Annual Program Review and subsequent meetings with NRC management, and will be transmitted as part of the modified CNWRA Management Plan later this year. During period 4, intensive recruitment efforts continued as additional database-and university-related sources were used to identify potential candidates. A materials scientist c cepted an offer and will join the staff in period 8. In addition, an offer was made to a pu formance assessment professional.
Computer system support activities encompassed (i) continuing the use of consultant support to assist in development and implementation of the database retrieval system I
r
(replacement for CDOCS); (ii) testing the SUN Microsystems and Silicon Graphics hardware and software associated with the GIS and IMS computing facilities and' retrofitting hardware components in the Silicon Graphics hardware; (iii) pursuing the j
installation and upgrade of standardized desktop computer systems; (iv) participating, as requested, in the monthly NRC/CNWRA Computer Coordination meeting; and (v) maintaining LAN operations.
QA activities focused on (i) preparing the annual CNWRA surveillance schedule and distributing it to key CNWRA staff members; (ii) conducting surveillances, issuing nonconformance reports, as required, and working with cognizant staffin response to these reports; (iii) supporting the application of configuration control for CNWRA scientific and engineering software ready for release; (iv) preventing organizational COls by reviewir.g SwRI RFPs; (v) performing QA verification checks on each CNWRA deliverable; (vi) providing QA indoctrination for new CNWRA staff members; and (vii) holding discussions with an NRC staff member on the general expectation of the Technical Specialist Audit Observation Training.
In the next period, the CNWRA staff expects to (i) initiate preparations for an NRC/
CNWRA management meeting;(ii) continue input to estimates of spending and hiring for FY1999; (ii) aggressively pursue hiring for open core staff positions; (iii) continue testing of computer hardware and software for GIS and IMS computing facilities, as well as sustain the development of a new database retrieval system as the replacement for the CDOCS software; and (iv) provide CNWRA LAN operation and maintenance support.
In addition, the staff will (i) perform scheduled and unscheduled QA surveillances, (ii) conduct QA indoctrinations for new CNWRA staff and consultants, (iii) review SwRI RFPs for potential COI, (iv) perform QA verification checks on each CNWRA outgoing deliverable, and (v) provide a draft outline of the Technical Specialist Audit Observation Training to be presented to identified NRC staff.
1.2 Igneous Activity (IA)
Staff continued to review the TSPA VA assessments of risk from future repository-penetrating igneous events. DOE concluded that volcanic events that penetrate the proposed repository site within a 10,000-yr postclosure period present zero risk to public health and safety. This assessment is based primarily on models that conclude the WP remains intact when incorporated into a volcanic conduit. Initial staff assessment of these models suggests that appropriate physical conditions have not been evaluated for YMR basaltic volcanic events. In contrast, the TSPA-VA analyses conclude the WP is breached by plastic deformation induced from lavas that flow down repository drifts. Moreover, the limited r
available information indicates WPs will be breached during volcanic and intrusive igneous events. In addition, models presented in the TSPA-VA indicate that the annual probability l
of future volcanic disruption of the proposed repository site is viewed by the DOE as <104 The staff indicates that the technical bases for this probability model would not meet the acceptance criteria in the IA KTI IRSR. Staff concludes that many important components of the TSPA-VA risk assessment for IA would not meet proposed acceptance criteria.
Previous staff calculations produced an expected dose from future volcanic disruption that l
l l
l 2
significantly exceeds expected dose from normal repository performance during the first 10,000-yr postclosure. Thus, the current DOE approach to IA risk assessment presents a significant licensing vulnerability.
Staff prepared, and received the NRC approval to submit, two abstracts for presentation at the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics meeting in Birmingham, England. This meeting coincides with planned laboratory investigations at the University of Bristol to conduct numerical and analog experiments on magma-repository interactions. Using detailed time volume relationships, staff examined the eruptive history of the Cerro Negro volcano and concluded that the next eruption from this cinder cone is likely before 2006 A.D. This is one of the first models to present a testable forecast for renewed activity at a basaltic cinder cone. Staff also will present the results of technical investigations into subsurface conduit dimusions and processes of formation. This work provides the technical basis for the parameter that controls the source-term for volcanic disruptive events.
Also during this period, staff began preparations for field work at the Cerro Negro volcano that will focus on processes controlling airborne resuspension of fine-grained ash from basaltic fall deposits. They also continued to work with consultants from the University of B ristol on the design of an experimental apparatus for magma-repository interaction studies.
In the next period, staff will finalize review of the DOE VA in support of a Commission paper identifying significant DOE licensing vulnerabilities. They will participate in an Appendix 7 meeting at SNL to discuss technical bases for volcanism source-zone models and physical processes associated with basaltic volcanoes of the YMR. Staff will finalize methodology development for sampling airborne particulates at Cerro Negro and complete preparations for field investigations planned for period 6. Initial designs for the magma-repository interaction experiments will be completed and construction of the experimental apparatus will begin at the University of Bristol.
1.3 Structural Deformation and Seismicity (SDS)
Staff primarily focused on preparation for and initiation of the VA review. It should be noted that the SDS KTIIM deliverable, SDS Technical Input to Review of the DOE VA-Letter Report, will be recast as a series of Als, following the KESA organization adopted by the NRC for VA review. In conjunction with the VA review, staff continued a detailed review the DOE PSHA report. Staff expects to meet with the DOE on the PSHA in an upcoming Appendix 7 meeting in early March 1999. They also continued work on the 3D Structural Model of Amargosa for Input to USFIC-CNWRA Report, Structural Evolution of Crater Flat, Nevada-Journal Article, and analyses of new TPA results for sensitivity studies of faulting on repository performance.
Staff participated in field work at YM and in Crater Flat, Nevada, and collected oriented samples from the ESF and ECRB for tuin section analysis by a consultant. The analyses will be used for SDS investigations of fault zone deformation mechanism studies designed to further constrain faulting parameters used in the TPA Version 3.2 code and forjoint SDS and USFIC studies of structural effects on groundwater flow. Staff also collected 3
paleomagnetic cores from basalts and breccia deposits in southem Crater Flat, Nevada. The paleomagnetic analyses will be used to further confirm or refine tectonic models currently' considered by staff to be viable for the YMR.
Staff prepared for and participated in an NRC/CNWRA meeting with consultants on fractures and faulting in the repository. A workshop on fracturing and faulting in the repository was postponed until after the VA review is completed.
In the next period, staff will continue to (i) review the DOE VA;(ii) assess the PSHA and fault displacement hazard analyses report; (iii) refine the EarthVision 3D model of the Amargosa trough; (iv) write a journal article on the structural evolution of Crater Flat, Nevada; (v) analyze the sensitivity studies of faulting on repository performance; and (vi) evaluate geologic and geophysical data from the Volcanic Tablelands, California.
1.4 Evolution of the Near-Field Environment (ENFE)
Staff continued debugging, testing, and documenting MULTIFLO Version 1.2p. Testing continued on the operator splitting transport algorithm for the reactive-transport module GEM. One-dimensional versions of the TVD spatial discretization algorithm were added to GEM and are being evaluated. The TVD algorithm is required to reduce numerical dispersion, a numerical artifact that can be amplified by chemical reactions. Published implementations of the TVD algorithm are limited to stmctured grids with constant grid spacing and explicit time stepping. More general implementations of the TVD algorithm are being studied. Revision 1 of the software requirements description for MULTIFLO Version 2.0 was transmitted as Revised MULTIFLO Version 2.0 Software Requirements Description-Letter Report.
Application of the MULTIFLO code to coupled THC processes for the proposed repository environment advanced by testing kinetic phenomena with consideration of the carbonate and silica systems. Benchmarking MULTIFLO nonisothermal, kinetic chemistry results with EQ3/6 models progressed with attention to small discrepancies between the codes.
Staff continued review of the TSPA-VA Technical Basis document and the VA. Comments are being prepared to address relevant KESAs.
Aggressive efforts were undcriaken to advance activities by several consultants and SwRI staff on subjects supporting the ENFE KTI, including evaluation of potential effects of microbial activity, aqueous actinide chemistry, solubilities of radioelements, alteration of engineered materials on the near-field chemical environment, and properties of altered tuff materials.
A manuscript titled Alternate Source Term Models for Yucca Mountain Performance Assessment Based on Natural Analog Data and Secondary Mineral Solubility was submitted to fulfill ENFE Sensitivity Studies-Journal Paper.
In the next period, staff will continue (i) reviewing the TSPA-VA Technical Basis document and the VA, (ii) preparing the VA comments as Als corresponding to related 4
l l
l-KESAs, and (iii) debugging e.nd benchmarking the MULTIFLO code. Near-field i
radioelement solubility modeling and aqueous actinide chemistry studies will advance and sensitivity studies on the effects of cementitious materials will continue.
i l
1.5 Container Life and Source Term (CLST)
Staffinitiated review of the DOE VA for the proposed monitored geological repository in YM, Nevada. The review is being conducted to assess potential licensing vulnerabilities and identify technical issues related to VA and LA designs. Once the review is completed, the major licensing concerns will be sununarized to provide appropriate input to the pending Commission paper and its attachments. A more detailed evaluation of other technical issues will be presented in the CLST IRSR, Revision 2.0.
Concurrently, staffis preparing a report examining the performance issues associated with potential WP design alternatives. This report will summarize the materials and corrosion issues surrounding the major classes of materials considered as potential construction materials for the WP, including carbon and SS, nickel alloys, and titanium alloys.
Degradation processes of Zircaloy cladding and ceramic coatings will also be included in this report.
Electrochemical corrosion testing continued to confirm the applicability of repassivation and corrosion potentials as predictive parameters for the long-term, localized corrosion of Alloy 825 in chloride-containing solutions at 95 *C. Specimens were removed from the test cell and examined for signs oflocalized corrosion. Four of the tests will not be continued so that the test facilities can be used for long-term testing of Alloy C-22. Two tests using Alloy 825, however, will be continued. In one of the tests, a specimen is exposed at the open circuit potential in an air-saturated chloride solution. In the other test, another specimen is maintained at 50 mV below the repassivation potential.
SCC tests continued on Alloy C-22 and type 316L SS. Fatigue precracked, wedge-loaded specimens of each material have been immersed in a deaerated 5 percent Nacl solution, acidified to pH 2.7 by the addition of hcl, and heated to 90 *C to duplicate the conditions used at the LLNL. The Alloy C-22 tests used an initial stress intensity of 33 MPa m'8, while the type 316L SS specimens were tested at an initial stress intensity of 25 MPa m".
For further comparison, one specimen of each material was immersed in 40 percent MgCl2 at 110 "C, a more aggressive environment in which SCC of Alloy 825 and type 316L SS was previously studied at the CNWRA. The staff observed crack propagation on type 316L SS after 2 wk of testing in the MgCl solution, accompanied by significant branching 2
of the main crack and growth of secondary cracks in the arms of the specimen. No crack growth, however, was detected in the Alloy C-22 specimen after a total exposure time of 8 wk. Additional tests are planned using redesigned specimens that will allow testing of both welded and nonwelded material at higher stress intensities.
Welded Alloy C-22 test specimens to be used in the localized corrosion testing were ordered. The welded test specimens will be tested in solutions with chloride concentrations of 0.5,1.0, and 4.0 M using an autoclave system at temperatures ranging from 80-150 'C.
Results obtained for nonwelded specimens indicate that significant localized corrosion can 5
occur even at 95 *C at chloride concentrations equal to or greater than 1 M and at relatively low repassivation potentials. In addition to tests with welded specimens, tests on nonwelded '
specimens at lower temperatures are planned to determine the critical temperature for j
crevice corrosion of the alloy. In addition, the effects of environmental conditions on the passive current density of Alloy C-22 will continue to be examined to aid in predicting the long-term uniform corrosion rate of Alloy C-22.
j j
A paper titled Grain Boundary Chemistry and Intergranular Corrosion in Alloy 825 has been prepared for publication in Materials Transactions. This IM will be added to the list of deliverables in the current OPS. The paper captures research performed in previous years and was completed with a small expenditure of staff time during this FY.
The interdependence of solution chemistry, temperature, and potential on localized corrosion of A 516 carbon steel is being investigated in simulated repository environments containing bicarbonate and chloride anions. Work continued on examining whether localized corrosion of A516 can occur under free corrosion (open circuit) conditions in air-saturated solutions. Experiments designed to determine the repassivation potential of I
creviced A516 specimens as a function of environment were initiated. A paper detailing
)
these results will be presented at the 1999 NACE International Annual Corrosion l
Conference and included in the proceedings.
The two materials scientist positions in the CSPE Element were filled. One of the new staff joined the CNWRA in this period and the other willjoin on May 8,1999.
In the next period, long-term corrosion tests of Alloy 825 will continue at a lower level of effort and tests of Alloy C-22 will be initiated. Localized corrosion testing of Alloys C-22 and 625, together with SCC tests using Alloy C-22 and type 316L SS, will also continue.
Most of the experimental activities planned for A 516 carbon steel are expected to be completed in the next period. Staff will initiate procurement of Ti Grades 7 and 16 and welded specimens of Alloy C-22.They will continue sensitivity analyses, review of the VA, and review of attemate materials and design options. Moreover, the paper entitled Grain Boundary Chemistry and Intergranular Corrosion in Alloy 825 will be submitted as an IM.
1.6 Thermal Effects on Flow (TEF)
Numerical analysis of the DST continued during this period. A preliminary DCM model of the DST was designed to evaluate the effect of mesh size (i.e., distance to the boundaries) on calculational results.
Analysis and improvement of continuum models of seepage into drifts continued during the reporting period. A DCM drift-scale repository model was combined with the Phillip's characteristic length scale for penetration of the boiling isotherm. Results indicate that between approximately 0.25 and 0.5 Ilhr fracture flow along a finger was sufficient to result in water contacting WPs.
The second phase of the laboratory-scale boiling isotherm depression heater experiment continued during this period and is expected to be completed by the end of January 1999.
6
Staff continued the mountain-scale repository analyses. These analyses are extensions of earlier repository-sca!e nonisothermal analyses of perched water.The current analyses will investigate an EW-trending, vertical 2D geologic section midway through the repository block. These analyses use the MULTIFLO code with a dual-continuum conceptual model.
Staff attended the DOE Drift Seepage Peer Review Meeting held in Las Vegas, Nevada, January 11 and 13,1999. The staff did not participate in the field trip that took place on January 12,1999. A trip report is in preparation.
Investigation of capillary diversion at the drift walls continued. A laboratory-scale experiment designed to resolve the distinction between capillary diversion and dripping has been conceptualized and preliminary designs as well as instrumentation have been explored.
Staff continued review of the TSPA-VA Technical Basis document and initiated review of the TSPA-VA.
A workshop on dripping was held December 21-22,1998, at the CNWRA. The TEF KTI staff were responsible for organizing and conducting the workshop and preparing summary remarks of the discussions. Workshop objectives were to coordinate activities that address seepage and dripping and focus these efforts toward performance issues. NRC and CNWRA siaff from several KTIs and four consultants participated in this workshop.
Discussions were held with these consultants to identify the tasks on which they can participate in resolving issues associated with dripping. Several immediate tasks were identified: (i) preparation of a nonstructured grid generator to provide a more representative numerical rendering of a drift, (ii) integration of a groove / film flow model into the mechanistic fracture flow model, and (iii) exploration of the potential to investigate existing drifts and tunnels to shed light on dripping mechanics.
In the next period, TEF KTI staff plans to (i) complete the second phase of the boiling isotherm penetration laboratory-scale experiment, (ii) analyze results from the first phase of the laboratory-scale heater test, (iii) test the MULTIFLO-DCM numerical code in modeling the DOE DST, (iv) initiate the integration of a groove / film flow model into the mechanistic fracture flow model,(v) explore the possibility of field observation of dripping in drifts, and (vi) complete the preliminary review of the VA.
1.7 Repository Design and Thermal Mechanical Effects (RDTME)
Staff continued the UDEC analyses to predict the size and extent of rockfall under seismic loads in the repository thermal environment. Preparation of a paper entitled Analysis of Drift Instability and Rockfall Due to Earthquake Ground Motion at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, was completed for presentation at the 37* U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium scheduled to be held in Vail, Colorado, June 6-9,1999. The fundamental damping issue and wave transmission through jointed medium handled by the UDEC code are being evaluated.
The ABAQUS modeling of WPs continued to investigate the thermal stress of WPs and also assess WP responses when subjected to the impact of falling rocks at various times.
7
The ultimate goal is to develop a rcasonable failure criterion to be used in the SEISMO module to assess the effect of rockfall on WP integrity.
i Staff pursued development of the review plan for preclosure aspects of design, construction, and operations using the integrated safety assessment methodology. An outline of the review plan is being developed. An NRC/CNWRA meeting on this activity occurred during this period.
Staff continued studying of the behavior of the rock mass surrounding the emplacement drifts under heated conditions at the repository scale using ABAQUS. This study emphasizes rock mass behavior beyond the preclosure period and effects of thermal load on permeability changes in the surrounding rock mass. A paper titled Variations of Drift Stability at the Proposed Yucca Mountain Repository was delivered on January 15,1999, as Long-Term TM Effects on Repository Design / Performance: Continuum Model-Conference Paper.
Staff continued the literature review on concrete performance at high temperature. Ihis review will provide valuable information to assess the DOE desi;n of the concrete liner for use at high temperature.
One RDTME K".1 staff member attended the DOE Enhanced Design Alternatives Workshop on January 4-6,1999,in Las Vegas, Nevada. Another staff member is preparing a technical paper for presentation at the 7* International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation scheduled for September 26-30,1999, in Nagoya, Japan.
In the next period, RDTME KTI staff plans to (i) review the literature collected on concrete performance at high temperature, (ii) investigate rock mass behavior under heated conditions on repository scale with an emphasis on long-term degradation of rock mass material properties and strengths, (iii) conduct rockfall simulations, (iv) use the AB AQUS code to model WPs,(vi) develop the standard review plan, and (vi) continue review of the VA.
1.8 Total System Performance Assessment and Integration (TSPAI)
Staff initiated cleanup of the TPA Version 3.2 source code and conducted some l
reasonableness tests in preparation for the potential public release of the code. Change pages for the TPA Version 3.2 User's Guide, along with the latest input data, were prepared and distributed to the NRC and CNWRA users. Based on recommendation from the USFIC KTI, the input data set representing climatic change was made consistent with the description in the climate IRSR.
I Data generation for sensitivity analyses using the TPA Version 3.2 code continued and code testing conducted on an as-needed basis. Support was provided to the NRC staff in resolving comments from the technical editor for publication of the sensitivity studies report as a NUREG.
8
l Staff began development of the part I of the SRD document for TPA Version 4.0. Part I of the SRD will address the system-le,el changes to the code and the merge of the PVM and PC versions with J.e UNIX version of the code. Module-level changes will be initiated after completing review of the TSPA-VA and conducting the external review of the TPA Version 3.2 code.
Although delayed because of the late arrival of the VA documents, staffinitiated review of the TSPA-VA in late December 1998. Preliminary runs were made to compare DOE results and NRC outputs using the base case data set.
Staff conducted a literature review on the instrumentation for collecting data in Nicaragua for computing the AML factor. This information will be used to refine the model and data currently implemented in the TPA Version 3.2 code for estimating inhalation doses due to radionuclides released by extrusive volcanism.
The CNWRA presentation on the parameter tree approach for interpreting results of the TPA Version 3.2 code was discussed with the ACNW.The CNWRA approach was viewed as useful but did not fully meet the ACNW expectations. A manuscript outlining the general parameter tree approach and its feasibility will be delivered as an AI. Because full i
resolution was not reached at the meeting with the ACNW, more effort may be required to debate whether, and if so how, to proceed prior to actually performing additional work.
The installation and execution guides for the PC version of the TPA Version 3.2 code and the source code were delivered, but the formal installation of the PC version of the TPA Version 3.2 code will be delayed until NRC installs a new multi-processor PC. The PVM version of the TPA Version 3.2 code and the post-processor were successfully installed on j
an NRC UNIX workstation.
i Two candidates were interviewed to fill open PA positions and an offer made to one of these candidates.
In the next period, the PA staff will focus on (i) reviewing the TSPA-VA,(ii) preparing and mailing letters of invitation for the review of the TPA Version 3.2 code, (iii) contributing to the draft Commission paper on the VA, (iv) refining the parameter tree approach for interpreting TPA results, and (v) initiating work on revision 2 of the IRSR. Recmitment will continue for the two PA modelers, a health physicist, and a risk analyst.
1.9 Activities Related to Development of the NRC High Level Waste Regulations (ARDR)
Detailed modeling continued to evaluate the effects of well characteristics and plume dimensions on the accuracy of estimates of doses from the groundwater transport pathway.
Staff continued construction of the flow and transport models developed in the previous period that will use synthetic random hydraulic conductivity fields and also ordered new flow simulation software to improve the model development effort.
Period 4 work concentrated on review of the DOE VA to support development of a Commission paper. The staff reviewed those VA sections that pertain to KESAs relevant 9
to ARDR activities (i.e., location and lifestyle of the critical group and dilution of radionuclides in soil). The review emphasized staff analysis of DOE BDCF calculations.'
Specifically, staff compared DOE BDCFs with NRC values in the TPA code, contrasted DOE and NRC parameter selections, and initiated confirmatory calculations using DOE data. During this pc riod, the IM, Review Final VA and Prepare Comments for Paper, was changed to two Als (due next period) to ensure consistency with the NRC KESA approach to VA review.
Investigation continued on topics penaining to calculation of age-specific doses at YM. A large body of age-specific intake information was identified in a draft EPA report, but because the report is a draft, the original sources of data are being investigated. Although slowed by higher priority VA review work, the investigation results are expected to be completed in time to suppon response to public comments on draft 10 CFR Part 63.
Revisions to the previously issued report,Information and Analyses to Support Selection of Critical Groups and Reference Biospheres for Yucca Mountain Exposure Scenarios, are undergoing internal review. The revised report is an IM that will be issued as a NUREG/CR-a key reference document for the rulemaking effort and TSPAl activities.
In the next period, staff will test new flow simulation software to aid development of transport models for the fractured tuff aquifers as part of the borehole dilution study.
Assessment of age-specific DCFs will continue. If the draft EPA Standard is published, staff will assist the NRC with reviewing it and preparing comments. The revised report, Information and Analyses to Support Selection of Critical Groups and Reference Biospheres for Yucca Mountain Exposure Scenarios, will complete internal technical review during next period.
1.10 Unsaturated and Saturated Flow Under Isothermal Conditions (USFIC)
The CNWRA hosted a workshop on seepage of water into open drifts, during which USFIC staff played an active role in identifying imponant issues and goals relating to models of fracture and matrix flow around open drift space. During the discussions, staff highlighted the importance of considering film flow along fracture surfaces. At present, neither the DOE nor NRC conceptual models for drift seepage consider film flow. Participants agreed that direct observation of seepage processes at analog sites could prove useful if appropriate sites could be identified. Laboratory experiments, conducted under the TEF KTI, to investigate related processes are being explored as a result of these discussions.
Investigations continued on the problem of capillary diversion of deep percolation away from open drifts. Additional sensitivity studies of seepage into drifts are being conducted using MULTIFLO Version 1.2p.These analyses continue to suppon review of DOE studies on seepage into drifts modeling and abstractions used in the TSPA-VA.
An USFIC representative attended the DOE Drift Seepage Peer Review in Las Vegas, Nevada, January Il-13,1999. A trip report is in preparation.
I l
10
l D
Technical review continued of the DOE VA. Identification of potential licensing vulnerabilities and supporting technical documentation will be submitted as Als during the next reporting period.
Work continued on Formal Review of DOE UZ Studies-Letter Report. The draft version of this report will undergo intemal review during the next reporting period. This document will provide technical bases for UZ-related portions of Input to USFIC IRSR, Revision 2-Letter Report. To this end, the report includes review of the LBNL Site-Scale UZ Model of YM, the DOE TSPA-VA Technical Basis document (chapters 2 and 7), and the DOE VA (volumes 1 and 3).
Geophysical surveys of the Forty-Mile Wash area north of U.S. Highway 95 near YM i
began. Survey lines using magnetic and electromagnetic techniques will be used to explore and possibly confirm the regional water table elevation in the alluvial aquifer system southeast of YM. Other goals include identification of perched water bodies and location of the interface where the water table leaves the tuff aquifer and enters the alluvial aquifer.
In the next period, USFIC activities will include (i) continuation of geophysical surveys in the Forty-Mile Wash area and associated data analyses, (ii) progress on alternative l
conceptual models for flow and transport from the potential repository to the water table, (iii) continued development of models for seepage into drifts, (iv) internal review of Formal Review of DOE UZ Studies-Letter Report, (v) analysis of Formal Review of DOE SZ j
Studies-Letter Report, (vi) resumption ofinterpretation of data from C-Well hydraulic and i
i tracer tests,(vii) continued review of the DOE TSPA-VA and supporting documents, and l-(viii) participation in the working group on alternate conceptual models for structural controls on flow.
1.11 Radionuclide Transport (RT) i Staff initiated formal review of the DOE VA. Review comments are being prepared and organized according to the KESA structure.Two KESAs are directly related to the RT KTI, j
including Retardation in Fractures in the Unsaturated Zone and Retardation in Water-l Production Zones and Alluvium.
I l
Two manuscripts were submitted during period 4. The first manuscript, Abstraction of Mechanistic Sorption Model Results For Performance Assessment Calculations at Yucca L
Mountain, Nevada-Journal Paper, provides an approach for using detailed sorption model results in PA calculations. The staff plans to submit this manuscript for publication in Waste Management. The second manuscript, Experimental and Modeling Study of Ion l
Exchange Between Aqueous Solutions and the Zeolite Mineral Clinoptilolite-Journal
(
Paper, is planned for submittal to the Journal of Solution Chemistry. This manuscript includes an evaluation of data from published literature and unpublished CNWRA results on ion exchange between aqueous solutions and the zeolite mineral clinoptitolite. Two abstracts _ were accepted for presentation at the American Chemical Society national meeting, March 21-25,1999, in Anaheim, California: (i) Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Uranyl Adsorption on Quartz Surfaces and (ii) Experimental and Modeling Studies of 4
11
Uranyl Adsorption Onto Binary Mixtures of Silicate Minerals. Writing began on a manuscript describing a stochastic analysis of transport of radionuclides in fractures.
Mixed mineral sorption experiments began for 0.35g of clinoptitolite and 1.00g of quartz (M/V ratio = 10 g/L). The uncapped vial experiments (open to atmospheric CO ) are 2
currently being counted using liquid scintillation analysis. A set of five uncapped experiments for quartz (clinoptitolite mass ratios of 1:0.0035,1:0.035, and 1:0.35 and end-member quartz and clinoptilolite) is available for modeling. Initial attempts to use existing sorption models provide reasonable agreement with the observed sorption behavior. Low CO capped vial experiments are at the desorption stage to investigate reversibility. In 2
addition, samples are being prepared for scanning electron microscope analysis to examine the mineral surfaces for signs of dissolution and reprecipitation. Staff began development of laboratory procedures for neptunium-alluvial material sorption experiments. This work includes a literature review of current procedures used in handling sorption experiments on carbonate and identification and acquisition of laboratory equipment in preparation for laboratory setup. Staff continued to compile available data on alluvium to the south of YM.
Efforts by several consultants and SwRI staff progressed on a variety of subjects in support of the RT KTI. Staff began using available data to develop internally consistent parameters for a surface complexation model of sorption as a function of system chemistry. They continued molecular dynamics simulation of radionuclide sorption. Work also continued on placing contracts to develop computerized optimization models of wetted surface areas and stochastic models of spatially variable sorption parameters.
In the next period, the staff will complete its initial review of the DOE VA. Conunents will be submitted in the form of Als. Laboratory analyses will continue, including multiple-mineral experiments. Modeling of experimental results will continue, and work will begin to prepare presentations for the American Chemical Society national meeting. Staff will continue to develop experimental protocols for sorption experiments on alluvium minerals, including calcite. RT staff will assist in the PA abstraction process and continue sensitivity analyses using the TPA Version 3.2 code to investigate the effects of correlation of sorption parameters on performance.
1.12 Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS)
In subtask 1.2, internal review of Low-Activity Waste Feed Makeup, Solidification, and Offgas Technology and Process System Hazard and Safety Issues Report for TWRS-LetterRepc:4 is croceeding on schedule.The CNWRA should be able to meet this IM by the scheduled delivery date of January 29,1999.
In subtask 1.6, revisions continued on the report titled Chemistry of Hanford Tank Waste Pretreatment Technology addressing the NRC staff comments on a draft version of this report. The final report is currently due on May 28,1999, with a final version scheduled for submission July 30,1999. Revisions are based on the NRC staff comments on the Hanford TWRS HLW Chemistry Manual, which is currently to be submitted on March 1,1999, for publication as a NUREG/CR. Permission to use copyrighted material included in the report is being solicited from the publishers of the reference material.
12
l In subtask 2.1, staff started activities related to Review of Hanford Immobilized Low Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment scheduled for delivery February 26,1999.
In subtask 2.2. the NRC comments on the draft inspection manual chapter were incorporated, and an IM will be delivered Febmary 5,1999. The previously scheduled j
delivery date for this milestone was June 30,1999.
In the next period,in subtask 1.2, staff will begin work on Low-Activity Waste Auxiliary Support System II-Process System Hazard and Safety Issues Report for TWRS-Letter Report. The currently scheduled delivery date for this report is April 30,1999. In subtask 1.4, the staff will continue to resolve the NRC staff comments and include assessment of 10 CFR Part 70 changes on the TWRS facility as they become available. In subtask 1.6, staff will continue to incorporate the NRC comments on the pretreatment report. Revisions L
to the HLW Chemistry Manual will be completed, and the revised report will undergo l'
internal editorial, technical, and programmatic reviews. In subtask 2.2, the staff will continue to work on IPs 35016 and 35060 and forward draft procedures for review. IPs are due on March 31,1999. Staff will attend several DOE-RU meetings at Hanford on design safety features: configuration management, hydrogen explosion hazard of HLW receipt tank, disposition and close-out of old ISA open issues, and commitment tracking.
1 1.13 Three Mile Island Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (TMI-2 ISFSI)
Revision of the draft TMI-2 SER continued during this reporting period. A staff member visited NRC headquarters to discuss this revision with NRC staff. Reviews of the DOE I
reports on structural evaluation of TMI-2 ISFSI basemat and technical specifications were completed. The review findings of these two documents, as well as the TMI-2 ISFSI on site transportation report, are being incorporated into the revised TMI-2 SER. Assistance was also provided to NRC staff in the preparation of NRC proposed exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.102(f)(1) and 10 CFR Part 20.
i In the ner.t period, TMI-2 ISFSI staff plans to complete preparation of the final SER and l
assist the NRC staff to prepare TMI-2 ISFSI Materials License No. SNM-2508.
1.14 Dry Transfer System (DTS)
The preparation of the draft SER continued this reporting period at an extremely slow rate while waiting for the DOE response to the first round RAI.
In the next period, DTS staff plans to continue preparation of the draft SER while awaiting l
the DOE response to the first round RAI.-
l 1.15 Centralized Interim Storage Facility (CISF)
Only preliminary work on the review of the High Seismic Topical Report on HI-STAR /
HI-STORM cask systems was conducted during this reporting period.
13 L
In the next period, CISF staff plans to begin preliminary work related to revision of the, computer code RISKIND while waiting for instruction for revising the draft AR and reviewing the High Seismic Topical Report on HI-STAR /HI-STORM cask systems.
1.16 Private Fuel Storage Facility (PFSF)
Preparation of the draft SER continued during this period. The CNWRA staff attended the NRC/PFS LLC meeting on the NRC second round RAI for SAR and first round RAI for the EIS.
In the next period, PFSF staff plans to continue preparation of the draft SER.
1.17 Savannah River Site Aluminum Based Spent Fuel (SRSASF) t The letter report, Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy Aluminum B ased Spent Fuel Criticality, was accepted programmatically. Technical comments were conveyed separately for further revision of the report. No significant technical activities were conducted during this reporting period, pending receipt of additional documents from the DOE for review.
In the next period, the letter report, Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy Aluminum Based Spent Fuel Criticality, will be revised to incorporate the NRC staff technical comments. Additional reports sent by the DOE will be reviewed.
2 MANAGEMENTISSUES None to report.
3 MAJOR PROBLEMS None to report.
4
SUMMARY
OF SCHEDULE CHANGES Schedule changes for IMs are included in table 2. Completed deliverables are noted on table 3.
5
SUMMARY
OF FINANCIAL STATUS Table 4 summarizes the CNWRA financial status in the context of authorized funds. Total commitments are $211,194. The appendix lists planned and actual costs to date, as well as variances between these, without allowance for fee, on both a per-period and a cumulative basis. These data do not include commitments. Pertinent financialinformation is provided for the DWM JC, including COPS and 10 KTIs, TWRS JC, TMI-2 ISFSI JC, DTS JC, CISF JC, PFSF JC, and SRS ASF JC. The planned costs per period are based on the revised spending plans contained in the cunent operations plans.
It should be noted that the current spending estimates in all JCs are based on the assumption that staffing is consistent with the aggressive hiring plan delineated at the time these OPS were first 14
developed in late FY1998. A revised staffing plan was presented in the Annual Review of the CNWRA that recognizes the slower than anticipated hiring through the first quarter. Current staffing remains below anthorized levels and recruitment continues.The CNWRA will continue to monitor and update the staffing plan presented during the November 18,1998, CNWRA Annual Program Review.
Period 4 FY1999 CNWRA composite expenditures fell 8.1 percent from the previous period, and this aggregate of all JCs was underspent by $777,274 or 19.5 percent. When comparing period 4 with last period, the DWM, TWRS, TMI-2 ISFSI, DTS, CISF, and SRSASF JCs evidenced lower 1
spending levels while only the PFSF JC showed a higher level.
The DWM JC was underspent by $658,376 or 19.2 percent. Overall expenditures decreased 3.8 percent from the previous period as costs rose in the SDS, ENFE, TEF, RDTME, and USFIC KTIs but declined in the COPS and the IA. CLST, TSPA, ARDR, and RT KTIs. Costs to date are 32 percent above those a year ago and period 4 costs are 37 percent greater than the same period last year. Taking into consideration that (i) the FY1999 budget is 24 percent greater than FY1998 and (ii) activities are just beginning on the augmented scope of work, the outlook is quite good for achieving the spending targets.
The TWRS JC was underspent by $101,572 or 35.1 percent. Spending decreased substantially from the previous period as a result of the holiday season and allocation of staff resources to review the VA.
The TMI 2 ISFSI JC was overspent by $28,019 or -34.3 percent. Although spending fell again from last period, costs exceeded the period 4 estimate as CNWRA staff focused on revision of the draft SER-expending approximately 90 percent of the funding for FY1999. This cost variance will be remedied as staff are shifted to other projects following completion of the SER.
The DTS JC was overspent by $938 or -1.9 percent. Expenditures again decreased significantly from the previous period, reflecting that staff awaits the DOE response to the first round RAI.
The CISF JC was underspent by $ 15,611 or 22.9 percent. Spending decreased by one half compared with the previous period because staff performed only preliminary review of the High Seismic Topical Report on HI-STAR /HI-STORM cask systems.
The PFSF JC was underspent by $5,900 or 15.4 percent. Although expenditures in reased by one half over the last period. While the staff pursued preparation of the draft SER, cxpenditures fell short of the revised spending estimate for the period-accounting for P, higher cumulative variance.
The SRS ASF JC was underspent by $24,772 or 71.2 percent. Spending declined significantly from last period and was near zero as the staff awaits receipt of additional documents from the DOE for review.
Expenditures on SwRIlabor, consultants, and subcontractors as a proportion of composite spending on all JCs were 15.3 percent. Expense of consultants and subcontractors as a fraction of composite 15
i spending on all JCs was 10.6 percent. The CNWRA remains committed to enhance,,where appropriate, participation of consultants and subcontractors in the conduct of CNWRA work.
As shown in table 1, the CNWRA has 53 staff members. The available pool of approved consultants and subcontractors is 45.
This FYTD no capital or sensitive equipment was purchased with NRC funds (other than overhead, general and administrative expenses, and fees).
DWM JC The DWM JC cumulative cost variance was 19.2 percent. Expenditures in this JC decreased by 3.8 percent compared with period 3. Specific explanations for over/ underspending for COPS and each KTI follow.
The cost variance for COPS was 21.0 percent: 19.0 percent for the Management, Planning, and Computer Suppon subtask (158) and 29.0 percent for the QA subtask (159). Spending in both subtasks again fell relative to last period and reflects the lowest per-period expenditure since the beginning of this FY. Spending on labor declined from the previous period, as did Other Direct Costs expenditures. In the next period, spending in subtask 158 should remain close to estimates, contingent on acquisition of a clerical staff member, sustained use of computer-related consultant (s),
and participation of eligible staff in professional development activities. In subtask 159, spending should remain below estimates until preparations begin, usually in period 7, for the annual Q A audit.
Preparations are underway for scheduling the training of the NRC staff in accordance with the augmented scope of work in subtask 159.
The cost variance for the IA KTI was 3.6 percent. Spending declined slightly from the previous period, and modest underspending is expected to continue through the next two periods until expenses associated with planned field investigations are paid.
The cost variance for the SDS KTI was 0.3 percent. Spending for period 4 was about 10 percent below the estimate. It is anticipated that the spending rate will slightly increase in periods 5 and 6 as expenses and costs associated with period 4 field work and consultant time are paid.
The cost variance for the ENFE KTI was 31.0 percent, a slight decrease in percentage variance from period 3. Existing commitments not yet posted to the account reduce this variance to 2R percent. For at least the next several periods, a positive variance is expected. In the future, new t ark related to cement properties is anticipated to significantly reduce the variance. It remains uncenain when the contracts will be fully executed and at what dates the costs associated with this new work will be posted to the account; however, these matters are aggressively being pursued.
The cost variance for the CLST KTI was - 12.2 percent. The rate of spending decreased significantly from the previous period due to holidays and vacations. The VA review, addition of another staff member, and the need to order new materials and supplies to investigate corrosion of LA design materials are expected to maintain spending above the budgeted amount. It is anticipated spending will exceed the estimated budget at the end of the FY by about 8-10 percent.
16
The cost variance for the TEF KTI was 27.4 percent, with spending this period higher than that of the previous period. The total FY1999 cost underrun through this reporting period is due to temporary assignment of CNWRA staff from the TEF KTI to other projects. One consultant began working on a TEF KTI task during this period, and discussions are ongoing with several other prospective consultants regarding involvement in these tasks. The cost underrun will decrease during j
the next few periods because of anticipated increased consultant participation in TEF KTI activities and expectation of newly hired staff working on these activities.
The cost variance for the RDTME KTI was 8.2 percent. Spending rose substantially over the previous period but was insufficient to meet the 35 percent increase in planned costs associated with the augmented scope of work. Two consultants, one subcontractor, and one SwRI staff member were
)
selected for the augmented activities of the RDTME KTI; the consultants and SwRI staff members are conducting these activities.The subcontractor will be involved during the next reporting period.
Actual expenditures are expected to continue following the budget for this KTI, however, some cost underrun is expected during period 5 related to the probable lagging charges from the consultants and subcontractors.
The cost variance for the TSPAl KTI was 28.8 percent following a significant spending decrease.
Lower costs for labor and consultants due to several holidays and vacations during this period contributed to this reduced spending. The cost variance is expected to decrease during period 5 because of the anticipated increased expenditures associated with reviewing the TSPA-VA and conducting the augmented scope of work. Underspending will persist until staffing is completed; consequently, this activity is receiving high priority.
The cost variance for the ARDR KTI was 60.5 percent.This increased variance from last period is attributable to the low level of activity during the holiday season. There is still no indication the draft EPA Standard will be released for review in the coming months, so underspending will continue indefinitely. The augmented scope of work has the potential to control underspending, but timely actions regarding the public outreach program are essential to achievement of this goal.
The cost variance for the USFIC KTI was 11.7 percent. This increase in variance resulted in part from staff vacations and holidays during period 4 and an increase in the planned rate of spending beginning in period 4. Costs associated with field work planned for period 5 will tend to moderate the recent trend toward increased underspending. These costs, however, will lag the execution of the work. The positive variance is likely to continue until additional hydrology staff begin work.
The cost variance for the RT KTI was 35.6 percent. The increase in variance over period 3 spending resulted from staff holidays and vacations and an increase in the planned rate of spending that began in period 4. The addition of a new geochemist to the staff and the planned addition of a laboratory technician are anticipated to reduce the variance somewhat. Further reductions in the variance are envisioned with the introduction of a subcontractor to support actinide sorption work. Until the associated costs are realized, however, the variance is expected to continue.
The cost variance for the TWRS project was 35.1 percent. Spending was lower in this period because of holidays and vacations and also some staff time was diverted to the high-priority review of the VA. It is anticipated spending will continue at this rate in the next period due to continued activities related to the VA review, but will increase in subsequent periods. The staff effort is being 17
augmented through the judicious use of consultants and SwRI staff to achieve timely completion of milestones.
The cost variance for the TMI-2 ISFSI project was -34.3 percent. Despite reduced spending each successive period, this overspending resulted from concentrated efforts needed during the first three periods of FY1999 to prepare the draft SER and in period 4 to revise this draft. Approximately 90 percent of the FY 1999 activities within the TMI-2 ISFSI project were completed during periods I through 4. As a result, the cost overrun will decrease significantly in the next few periods because of reduced activities. FY 1999 total expenditures are expected to converge to the FY 1999 allocation.
The cost variance for the DTS project was - 1.9 percent, significantly lower than that of the previous period. The spending will continue to decrease until the DOE response to the first round RAI is received, which is expected during the next reporting period, and a positive cost variance is likely in subsequent periods.
The cost variance for the CISF project was 22.9 percent, which reflects sharply decreased costs following transmittal of a key report. This cost underrun will continue until CNWRA receives NRC instruction on the desired scope for revising the computer code RISKIND, revising the draft AR, and reviewing the High Seismic Topical Report on the HI-STAR /HI-STORM cask systems.
The cost variance for the PFSF project was 15.4 percent. Although spending increased substantially over the last period, this cumulative cost underrun is primarily due to the increased per-period budget. Although expenditures willincrease significantly to accommodate preparation of the draft SER, a temporary cost variance has occurred as activities and costs approach up to the higher per-period budget in the remaining periods of FY1999.
The cost variance for the SRSASF was 71.2 percent with essentially no costs incurred in the last period. Spending is expected to increase slightly in the next period as staf f revises the criticality review report to incorporate the NRC staff comments. The DOE is expected to transmit additional reports toward the beginning of the second quarter of FY1999, at which time the review activity is expected to increase.
i 18
~
.F t
1 Table 1. CNWRA Core Staff-Current Profile and Hiring Plan * (Period 4) i I
[
~
Pdh Open j
Emmeetleeksertence Currens No.
Professional Staff FYl999 1
ADMINISTitATION 4
H GARCIA. W PAT 1tlCK. J RUSSEIL B SAGAR j
CHEMICALPROCESSING 2
VJAIN. D.DARUWALLA ENGNO/ PHYS CHEM CODE ANALYSIS /DEVEtDPMENT 2
R J ANERKE. R. MARTIN I'
DATA MANAGEMENT / PROCESSING, I
P.MAlDONADO INCLUDING FIN ANCIAL DOSFJRISK/HA7ARD ANALYSIS 0
1 ElJrTROCHEMISTRY I
G CRAGNOtJNO ENGINIIRING 2
R.CHEN, G.OFOEGBU GFolOGYKiE01DGICAL ENGNG ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCFS 1
P taPt ANTE GEOCHEMISTRY 7
P.BERTETH, LBROWNING, W. MURPHY, R.PABALAN, E PEARCY.1 PRIKRYL D RJRNER GEOHYDROLOGY/HYDROGEOLDGY 5
D.FARRE1L R.FEDORS, R. GREEN, M. HILL, J WINWRtB I
GEOtDGY 3
P L AFEMIN A. LMcKAGUE. M MIKIAS f
HYDROIDGICTRANSPORT 3
A ARMST1 TONG. D HUGHSON. S PAINTER I
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT i
R.KOTARA SYSTEMS i
MATERIAL SCIENCES 5
$ BROSSIA. D.DUNN, Y M. PAN, l
1 O PENSADO-RODRIGUE7 N.SRIDHAR MECHANICA1.
0 1
INCI(JDING DESIGN & FABRICATION I
MINING ENGINEERING 1
S-M HSIUNG NIICLEAR ENGINEERING l
M J AR7E.MB A OPER ATION AL HEALTH PHYSICS 2
L DEERE. I WELDY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMEPrT 2
S MOHANTY. G WTIMEYER 2
.OUAt.rrY ASSURANCE i
B MABRITO I
R ADIO!SOTOPE GEOCHIMISTRY I
D PICKETT
' ROCK MECHANICS, 2
AOIOWDHURY, A.GHOSH INGUDING CIVillSTRUC. ENGNO l
SOURCE-TERM / SPENT FUEL DEGR AD 0
i SiltUCRJRALGEOLDGYI 3
D.FERRIIJ, D. SIMS, J.STAMATAKOS SE!SMO-RCTONICS 1
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 1
P M ACKIN i
VOlfANOLDGY/ IGNEOUS 2
C.CONNOR, B. HILL PROCESSES TOTAL 53 8
- See staffing plan for details 4
i
,4 1
19 e
Tl434.*
+
1s.
-+r7
.+
' Table 2. Summary of Schedule Changes (Period 4)
' MILESTONE ORIGINAL REVISED NUMBER TYPE DESCRIITION DATE DATE RATIONALE FOR CHANGE 1402-471-930 IM SDS Technical Input to Review of 01/15/99 Ties IM will be deleted because of the the DOE-VA-letter Report change in review procedure. The input to the VA review will be from KESAs.
1402-571-915 IM Grain Boundary Chemistry and 03/19/99 His report was added. It assembles work Intergranular Corrosion in done in previous fixal years for ajournal -
Alloy 825 publication. Only a small expenditure of staff time was involved in the preparation of the report. The other deliverables were not impacted.
1402-761-940 IM Review Final VA and Prepare 02/15/99 This IM will be deleted because of the i
Comments for Commission change in review procedure. The input to the Paper-Letter Report VA review will be from KESAs.
1402-771-910 IM Review Final VA and Prepare 02/15/99 This IM will be deleted because of the o
Comments for Commission Paper change in review procedure.ne input to the g
VA review will be from KESAs.
1405-031-920 IM llOLEC lil-STAR and 01/29/99 05/15!99 Due to the later than anticipated submittal of III-STORM TR Review report to NRC by llOLTEC Intemational, Report-Draft Letter Report NRC PEM suggested this revised schedule.
j l
1405-031-930 IM IIOLEC lil-STAR and 03/31/99 07/15/99 Due to the later than anticipated submittal of lil-STORM 1R Review report to NRC by HOL~lEC International, l
Report-Final letter Report NRC PEM suggested this revised schedule.
l l
t l
6 D
6
.e-----,
e-
~
y -.,,.,,
.y-,
e-v r s-r--
y e
e
- t,
,rw.rew-g
.w a m-..4
4 Table 3. Deliverables (Period 4)
ORIGINAL ACTUAL MILESTONE COMPLETION REVISED
- OF COMPLETIO REASON
. NO.
TYPE DESCRIPTION DATE DATE REVISIONS N DATE OF DELAYED) 1402-561-910 IM Revised MULTIFLO Version 2.0 01/I5/99 01/12/99 Software Requirements Document i402-561-920 IM ENFE Sensitivity Studies-Journa!
01/29/99 01/06/99 Paper 1402-671-940 IM Long-Term TM Effects on 01/22/99 01/14/99 Repository Design / Performance:
Continuum Model-Conference Paper 1402-871-940 IM Abstraction of Mechanistic Sorption 02/12/99 01/12/99 Models For Performance Assessment Calculations at Yucca M
Mountain, Nevada--Journal Paper 1402-871-950 IM Experimental and Modeling Study 02/05/99 01/12/99 ofIon Exchange Between Aqueous Solutions and the Zeolite Mineral Clinoptilolite-Journal Paper -
.~~ -. - ~,...
. -. ~. - ~ -.
_ -. _. _ _. _ _ - -... _. - -.... -.. _ -. 7.-..
4 Table 4. Financial Status (Period 4)
Funds Funds Funds Project Names Authorized Costed to Date Uncosted Conunitments
{
COPS-2.447,340 2.036.844 410,496 3.112 j
IA 1,073.415 893.807 179.608 19.059 SDS 1.450.568 1.208.827 241,741 37,545 i
ENFE 1.215.359 971.412 243.946 I14.601 CLST 1.107.003 970.585 136.418 9.285 "TEF 925.098 754.050 171.048 7.631 RDTME 796.544 629.836 166,708 1.000 TSPAI 2.540.1 6 1.891.359 648,790 1.960 ARDR 4'.3.051 249.359 163.693 0
i USFIC 1.558.736 1.309.492 249.245 6.455
{
RT 839.631 595.136 244.494 422 DWM Costs 14.366.894 11,510.706 2.856.187 DWM Award Fee 493.569 493.569 0
DWM Base Fee 574.676 447.605 127.071 l
TOTAL DWM 15.435.138 12.451.880 2.983,259 201.070
'IWRS Costs 993.386 970.149 23.237 1.922 TWRS Award Fee 46.214 46.214 0
TWRS Base Fee 39,735 36.699 3,036 TOTAL'IWRS 1.079.336 1.053.063 26,273 1,922
{
TMI-2 ISFSI S AR Costs 248,224 245.418 2.805 1,875 I
f.
TMI-2 ISFSI SAR Award Fee 15.223 7.711 7.512 TMI-2 ISFSI Base Fee 9.929 9.499 429 TOTAL TMI-2 ISFSI SAR 273.376 262.629 10.747 1,875 DTS Costs 199.932 185.998 13.934 1.875 DTS Award Fee 7.924 7.924 0
l DTS Base Fee 7.997 7.185 812 TOTAL DTS 215.853 201.107 14.746 1.875 CISP Costs -
308.627 274.905 33.722 2,015 l
CISF Award Fee 12.848 12.848 0
l l
CISF Base Fee 12,345 10.620 1.725 i
TOTAL CISF 333.820 298.373 35.447 2.015 PFSF Costs.
170,890 147.754 23.136 2,435 PFSF Award Fee 6.827 6.827 0
PFSF Base Fee 6.836 5.707 1.128 TOTAL PFSF 184.552 160.288 24.264
?.435 f.
SRS ASF Costs 94,102 76.296 17,805 0
SRSASF Award Fee 3,992 3,992 0
SRSASF Base Fee 3,764 2,952 812 l
'IUTAL SRS ASF 101.858 83.241 18.617 0
Grand Total 17.623,933 14.510.581 3,113,352 211,194 i'
l Note: All authorized funds have been allocated.
f 1
a 22
-v--
~-
v
~
Table 5. Private Fuel Storage Facility License Fee Cost Recovery Status (Period 4)
LICENSE FEE COST RECOVERY STATUS JOB CODE:
J5226 TITLE.
Private Fuel Storage Facility -
PERIOD:
December 19,1998-January 15,1999 TAC OR INSPECTION TASK-DOCKET IDENTIFICATION PERIOD CUMULATIVE COSTS NUMBER FACILITY NAME NUMBER NUMBER COSTS CONTRACT TO DATE 20-1405-041 Private Fuel Storage 72-22 L22462
$16,5G1.28
$160,288.37 Facility Note: Costs include 4 percent actual base fee plus FY1998 award fee in the amount of $6,827.
(
l APPENDIX Planned and Actual Costs, and Cost Variances i
Period 4-FY1999 1
1 I
l l
i 1
l l
I 1
l l
l l
l l
l
Ordil; COMI'05flE.
TOTAt EST1 MATE CMT TIEM 03 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 il 12 13
. Total Est N Cost 986.944 946,7tM 956.845-1.099.980 1.097,073 1.110.670 1.096.894 I,085.782 1.063.267 1,072.805 I,028,837 1<062.252 1.027,057 3.990.469 Act N Cost 889.018 927.852 727,663 668.662 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
-0 3.213.195 Vanance.$
97,926 18.848 229,182 431,318 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
777.274 Vanance %
99%
2.0%
24 0 %
39.2 %
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
19.5 %
EstFY Cmnul 956.944 I,933,644 2.890.489 3.990,469 5.087.542 6.195.212 7.295.106 8 380.889 9.444,156 10.516 968 11.545.798 12.608.050 13.63K107 Act FY Chmut 889,018 l.816.870 2.544.533 3.213,195
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
% Complete 6.5%
133%
18.7%
23 6 %
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Cumul Var. $
97,926 116,774 345,956 777.274 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
t Cumul Var, %
99%
60%
120%
19.5 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
i I
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGillENT(DWM) 1402400 ITEM H1 02 03 04 05 07 08 09 10 Il 12 13 Total Est N Cost L17.640 823.053 838.930 949.826 950.810 960.395 949.263
% I.691 947.859 964.337 946.971
% 9.966 946.113 3,429.449 Act N Cost 726,516 791.762 638.597 614,199 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2,778,073 Vanance $
91.124 31,291 200334 335.627 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
658.376 Vanance, %
II.1%
38%
23 9 %
353 %
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
192%
Est FY Chmut 817.640 1.640,693 2.479,623 3,429.449 4.380.259 5.340.654 6.289.917 7.251,608 8,199,467 9,163.804 10.110.775 11.080,741 12.026.854 Act FY Cumul 726,516 1.518.278 2.156.874 2.771.073 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
t
(
% Complete 6.0%
I 2.6%
17.9 %
23.0 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
Cumul Var,5 91.124 122.415 322.749 658516 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var, %
II.1%
7.5%
13.0%
19.2 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
CNWRA OPERATIONS (COPS) 1402-150 fint 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 II I2 13 Total Est N Cost 144.171 144.172 144 170 147,195 147.030 147,285 I46.962 147.528 I46.868 147,568 146.484 148.400 146,294 579,708 Act N Cost 117.636 131,806 110.960 97,671 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
458,074 Vanance. $
26.535 12,.366 33,210 49,524 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
121.635 Vanance, %
18.4 %
8.6%
23.0 %
336%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
005 21.0%
Est fY Cumul 144.171 288.343 4?2.513 579,708 726.738 874.023 1.020,985 1.168,514 I,315382 1.462.944 1.609,428 l.757,828 1.904,122 Act FY Cumul 117.636 249,442 360,402 458.074 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 6.2%
13.1 %
18.9 %
24 l%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
i Cumul Var. 5 26.535 38.901 72.111 128,635 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var, %
I 8.4%
13.5 %
16.7 %
2I.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
f
?
3 t
IGNEOtJS AC11VTlY(IA) 1402-460 IIIM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 48.257 48.370 48.100 50.322 49.496 30.438 49.184 50,440 49.323 50.558 48.975 51.139 48,944 195.049 Act N Cost 48,705 53.948 43.638 41.679 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
187.971 Variance. 5 (448)
(5.578) 4.462 8.643 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7.078 Vartaxe. %
-0 9%
-11.5%
9.3%
172%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
36%
EO FY Cumul 48.257 96.627 144.727 195.049 244.545 294.983 344.167 394.607 443,731 494.289 543.265 594.404 643.348 Act IY Ctimul 48.705 102.653 146.292 187.971 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 7.6%
160%
22.7%
29.2 %
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
Omtul Var. 5 (448)
(6.026)
(1.565) 7.078 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ormul Var. %
-09%
-6.2%
-I.1 %
3.6%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
STRUCTURALDEfORMATION AND SEISMICITY (SDS) 1402-470 T11M 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Total Est N Cost 67.808 67.809 67.653 69.787 68.731 70.062 68.421 70.123 68.338 70.211 68.244 70.563 68.211 273.057 Act N Cost 64.634 82.453 61.960 63.169 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
272.216 Vartance. 5 3.174 (14.644) 5.693 6.619 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
841 Variance %
4.7%
-21.6%
84%
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.3%
EG FY Cumul 67.808 135.617 203.270 273.057 341.758 411.850 480.271 550[394 618.732 688.943 757.186 827.749 895.959 Act FY Cumul 64.634 147.087 209.047 272.216 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
f
% Complete 7.2%
164%
23.3 %
30 4 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
M CumulVar $
3.174 (11.470)
(5.777) 848 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var. %
4.7%
-8 3%
-2.8%
0.3%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
EVOLIJi1ON OF11IE NEAR-FTEID ENVIRONMENT (ENFE) 1402-560 FTEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Il 12 13 Total Est N Cost 73,428 77,592 81.461 81.603 80.479 81.716 80.327 81.843 79.889 82.016 79.825 82.960 79,693 314.084 Act N Cost 40.%I 70.893 44.876 59.995 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
216.724 Vanance.5 32.467 6.699 36.585 21.608 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
97.360 Vanance. %
44.2 %
86%
44.9 %
263 %
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
31.0%
Est FY Chmut 73.428 158.020 232,481 314.084 394.563 476.279 556.606 638.449 718.338 800.354 880.179
% 3.139 1.042.832 Act FY Qtmul 40.% I 111.853 156,729 216.724 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 3.9%
10.7 %
15.0 %
20.8 %
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Cumul Var. $
32.467 39,167 75.752 97.360 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var. %
44.2 %
25 9 %
32.6 %
310%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
O 4
5 mn a w m a
r.
,o
-M
l CONTAINER LIFE AND SOURCE TERM (LUT) 1402-570 TcM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 II 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 62.502 62.588 63.460 85.848 85.152 85.973 85.092 86.0!!
85.090 86.072 85.057 86.329 84.847 274398 Act Pd Cost 78.364 91.542 73.552 64387 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
307.844 Varumce. $
(15.862)
(28,954)
(10.092) 21.461 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
(33.446)
Variance. %
-25.4%
-463 %
- 15.9%
25.0 %
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
-12.2%
Est IT Cumut 62.502 125.090 188.550 274.398 359.550 445.523 530.615 616.626 701.716 787.788 872.845 959.I74 1.M4.022 Act FY Omut 78.364 169.906 243.458 307.844 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
G Complete 73%
163 %
233 %
293 %
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
Cumul Var. $
415.862)
(44.816)
(54.908)
(33.446) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Cumul Var. %
-25 4 %
-35 8 %
-29.1%
-12.2%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
DIERMAL EITECTS ON E10W (TEF) 1402Mn HTJi 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 52306 52J08 54.269 57.046 56.424 57.220 5% =1 57.221 56.332 57.407 56.331 58.052 56.218 215.929 Act Pd Cost 36.405 46.851 34.955 38.525 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
156.737 Varumce. $
15.908 5.457 19,314 18.521 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
59.192 Variance, %
30.4 %
10 4 %
35 6 %
323 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
27.4 %
Est fY Cumul 52.30r) 104.614 158,883 215 929 272.353 329.573 385.964 443.185 499.517 556.924 613.255 671.307 727.524 Act fY Cumul 36.405 83.257 118.212 156.737 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
{
W
% Complete 50%
1I 4%
16.2 %
21 3 %
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
Cumt Var.1 15.901 21.357 40.671 59.192 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Yar. %
30.4 %
20 4 %
25 6 %
27 4 %
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
REPOSITORY DESIGN AND lEERMAl MECllANICAL EITECTS (RD7ME) 1402470 ITEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 49.201 49317 49.103 74.929 74.292 75.013 74.292 75.291 74.290 75.406 74.289 75.778 74.288 222.550 Act Pd Cost 47.865 44.034 49.942 62.401 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2M.242 Vanance.$
l.336 5.283 (839) 12.528 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
18308 Vanance, %
27%
10.7 %
-1.7%
16.7 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
Est IT Cumut 49.201 98.518 147.621 222.550 296.842 371.855 446.147 521.438 595.728 671.134 745.423 821.201 895.490 Act IT Cumul 47.865 91,899 141.841 204.242 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 53 %
103 %
15.8 %
22.8 %
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Cumul Var. $
1.336 6.619 5.780 18308 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var. %
2.7%
6.7%
39%
8.2%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
I TUTAL SYSTEM PERIORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND IMIEGRATIOM (TSPAI) 1402 760 TIEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 l
08 09 10 Il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 138.606 139.008 140.601 161.581 169.549 171.029 169.235 171.369 168.877 172.414 168.807 172.649 168.721 579.796 Act Pd Cost 317.639 126.973 94.240 74.149 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
413.003 Vanance.5 20.067 12.035 46.361 87.432 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
166.793 Varunce. %
15.I %
8.7%
33 0 %
$4 8%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
28 8 %
l Est iY Cumul 138.606 277.684 418.215 579.796 749.345 920.374 I.089.609 1.260.978 I.429.855 1.602.269 t.77 8.077 1.943.726 2.112.447 Act FY Cumul 117.639 244.613 338.853 413.003 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Cortplete 5.6%
18.6 %
160%
196%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
Cumul Var. $
20.967 33.006 79.362 166.793 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 Cumul var. %
15 1 %
II.9%
19 0 %
28 8 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
. AC11VmES RELATED TO DEVEl.DPMENT OF THE NRC HIGH-12 VEL WASTE REGULATIONS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (ARDR) 1402 770 I1EM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 32.067 32.186 32.006 40.932 40.268 41.016 40.207 41.016 40.174 41.258 40.083 41.580 40.083 137.198 Act Pd Cast 19.216 12.218 14.634 8.114 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
54.183 Vanance. $
12.851 19.968 17.372 32.818 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
63.008
)
Vanance. %
40.8%
62.0 %
543 %
80.2 %
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
60.5 %
EO FY Qunul 32.067 64.253 96.259 137.191 177.459 218.475 258.682 299.698 339.872 381.130 421.213 462.793 502.875 Act FY Cumul 19.236 31.434 46.069 54.183 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 3.8%
6.3%
9.2%
10 8 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
Cumul Var, $
12.851 32.819 50.190 83.008 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
[
I Cumul Var, %
40 1 %
SI 1%
52.1 %
60,5 %
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
UNSATURATED AND 5 ATURA110 f1OW UNDER ISOTHERMAL CDNDmONS (USFIC) 1402-860 IILM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 to il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 88.466 88.701 92.932 104.615 103.694 10s.675 103.517 104.880 103.483 105.400 103.482 105.820 103.422 374.714 i
Act Pd Cost 105.585 84.414 66.808 73.978 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
330.778 Vanance.1 (I7.II9) 4.287 26.124 30.644 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
43.936 Vart.ince. ",
-19.4%
48%
28 3 %
29 3 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
11.7 %
I t:m tY Cumul 88.466 177.367 270.099 374.714 478.408 583.083 6A6.600 791.480 894.063 1.000.363 1.103.845 1.209.665 I.313.087 j
Act FT Cumul 105.585 189.999 256.807 330.778 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l
% Complete 8.0%
14.5%
19 6 %
25.2 %
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
l Cumul Var. $
117.319)
(12.832) 13.292 43.936 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul var. %
-19.4%
-7.2%
4.9%
II.7%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
l 5
e 6
,m
~
- - 4.
e u
m-.
GADIONUQJDE TRANSPOT(RT) 1402-870 flT.M 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 60.843 61,002 65.175 75.968 75,695
- 75. % 8 75.635 75.% 8 75.394 76.033 75393 76.697 75.393 262.973 Act Pd Cost 49.505 46.630 43.030 30.138 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
169.303 Vanance. 3 18323 14.372 22.145 45.830 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
93,670 Vatance. %
18.6 %
23 6 %
34 0 %
603 %
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 6 %
Est FY Osmut 60.828 121.830 187.005 262.973 338.668 414.636 490.271 566.239 641.633 717.666 793.059 869.756 945.148 Act l'Y Cumut 49.505 96.134 139.165 169303 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Owpicte 5.2%
10.2 %
I47%
17.9 %
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
CumuiVa 5 11.323 25.6 %
47.840 93.670 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var. %
186%
21 I %
25.6 %
35.6 %
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
TANK WASTE RLMEDIAT10N SYS7EM (TWRS) 1401400 TIEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 67.552 68.311 68.530 85.186 83.654 86.541 92.269 64.649 60.818 48367 27.647 31.409 27,030 289.579 Act Pd Cost 71.452 41.013 46.843 28.700 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
188,007 i
Variance. $
(3.900) 27.298 21.687 56.486 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
101.572 Variance. %
-5 8%
40 0 %
316%
66 3%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
35.1 %
Est FY Osmul 67.552 135.863 204.393 289.579 373.233 459.774 552,044 616.693 677.512 725.879 753.527 784,936 811.966 f
Act IT Ctmiul 71.452 112.464 159.307 188.007 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
e
% Complete 88%
13.9 %
19 6 %
23 2 %
0.0%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
u Cumul Var,5 (3.900) 23399 45.086 101.572 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul Var. %
-3.8%
17.2 %
22.1%
35.1%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
i' THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 2 INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION (TMI-2 ISFSI) 1405410 ITEM O!
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 to II 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 43.923 15.908 10.650 11.279 10.634 9.284 3.557 4.285 3.557 4.416 3.497 4.559 3.464 81.760 Act Pd Cest 43.264 35.620 17.919 12.975 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
109.779 Vanance. $
659 (19.712)
(7.269)
(1.6%)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (28.019)
Variance. %
l_5%
-123.9 %
-68.3%
-15 0 %
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
OM 00%
0.0%
-34 3 %
Est lT Cumut 43.923 59.838 70.481 81.760 92394 101.678 105.235 109.520 113.077 117.493 120.990 125.549 129.012 i
Act FY Cumul 43.264 78.884
%.803 109.779 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 33.5 %
61.1 %
75 0 %
85.1 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
OM 00%
0.0%
00%
00%
Cumul Var. $
659 (19.053)
(26322)
(28.019) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Cwmd Var %
1.5%
318%
-37 3 %
.143%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
i i
. ~
DRY TRANSIT _R SYSTEM (D13)
+
1405 420 ITEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Total EO N Cost 10.601 10,601 10.601 16.604 16.451 16.880 16,365 16.993 16.206 17.318 16,206 173 tl 15.048 48.407 Act Pd Cost 12,332 24347 11,895 772 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
49.345 Vanance, S (1,731)
(13,746)
(I.294) 15.832 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
(938)
Vanance, %
-163 %
-129.7 %
-12.2%
95.3 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
-1.9%
Est FY Cumel 10.601 28.202 31,803 48.407 64.858 83.738 98.103 115.096 131.302 148.613 164.819 182,130 198.179 Act FY Ctmiul 12.332 36.678 48.573 49345 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Complete 62%
183 %
24 5 %
24 9 %
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
Ormul Var. $
(1.731)
(15.476)
(16.770)
(938) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Ormet Var, %
-16 3 %
-73 0 %
52.7%
-19%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
t CD41RAllZED INTERIM STORAGE FACIIJTY (CISF) 1404010 IIBl 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 to 11 12 13 Total EQ Pd Cost 27,787 13.122 12,687 14.531 13.888 14.614 13.804 14.933 13.53I 15,109 13.416 15,222 13.416 68.127 I
Act Pd Cbst 26,505 18.855 4.821 2.336 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
52,516 Variance, S 1,282 (5.733) 7.866 32.195 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15.611 Vwsance, %
46%
-43.7%
62 0 %
839%
00%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
00%
22 9 %
Est FY hd 27,787 40.909 53.596 68.127 82.015
%.629 110.433 125 366 138.897 154.006 167.422 182.M4 196,060 I
Act FY Osmul 26.505 45,359 50,180 52,516 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% Qwnplete 13.5 %
23.1 %
25 6 %
26 8 %
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
Cumul Yar. 5 1.282 (4.450) 3.416 15.611 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Onmd Var, %
46%
-109%
6.4%
22.9 %
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
PRIVATEIUEl STORAGE FACIl11Y(PFSF) 1405-040 17EM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 to Il 12 13 Total Est Pd Cost 10J48 7.012 6.997 13.622 13.187 14.024 13.186 14.216 13.040 14.249 12.844 14.249 12.731 38379 Act Pd ont 5.023 11.940 6.198 9.318 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
32.479 Vatance,5 5.725 (4,928) 799 4304 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5.900 Vanance, %
533%
-703 %
11.4 %
316%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
00%
0.0"b 00%
0.0%
15 4 %
EO FY Ormul 10.748 17360 24.757 38.379 51.566 65.590 78.776 92.992 106,032 120,281 133,125 147,374 160,106 Act FY Ormal 5.023
- 16. % 3 23.16l 32.479 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Complete 31%
106%
I4.5%
20 3 %
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
00%
00%
Cumul Var, S 3.725 797 1,5%
5.900 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cumul var. %
533%
45%
64%
15.4%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
t i
e b
I e
D 1.
t e
m m
c
-e m.-
.-.u,
.e,
4 an a e'
e e
k N
2 E
R N
h k b
a i
g g
o g
g i
e o
o o
S a
o o
o
=
I
$' R
=
2 o
Q o
o o
n 8
[
g s
o g
g s
o
=
a d
o a
e 6
. f F
g
=
o g
g s
=
=
o 3
o o
o o
f
=
g o
o s
Ec d
E.
e o
o g
e o
g o
b' y
o o
o E
g e
M 8
1 g
a 2
2 o
o a!
i s
s s
I-j' g
e o
g g
o o
a E
o a
o o
8 M
e d
G 5
g g e o.e g
o o
=
z o
a
=
W l.
GM
~
n
+
3 g
g.
S h
M
}
e q
0
=
s e
5 5
g g ;- ;
a a 2 a s 1
s s i
l I
5 e
n e
g m
~
E.
E,.
.E. E N
m 7
i i
M h
i i
i 1
I O
O
{
E E
.5 i
5 0
3 5
e I
l-
=A-7 i
L i
l
'