ML20202F487
| ML20202F487 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1998 |
| From: | Dacimo F COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 50-373-96-11, 50-374-96-11, NUDOCS 9802190212 | |
| Download: ML20202F487 (2) | |
Text
.
o,,nnionm.iini i a~ n o.nm.im l t%ille t.< ni r.unig wtion t
mn % nn ziu no a
% lam ilin 116l4419'O lt 1815 M*#'bl February 13,1998 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Clarification to System Operational Performance Inspection (NRC Inspection Report No. 50 373/96011(DRS); 50 374/96011(DRS))
LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License NPF 11 and NPF 18 NRC Docket Nos. 50 373 and 50-374
References:
1.
G. E. Grant latter to W. T. Subalusky, dated November 15,1996, Transmitting NRC Inspection Report 50 373/074 96011 2.
W. T. Subalusky to U. S. NRC letter dated December 20,1996, transmitting LaSalle County's response to NRC Inspection Report 50 373/374 9601'i 3.
W. T. Subalusky to U. S. NRC letter dated October 10,1997, providing a clarification of actions taken in response to NRC Inspection Report 50 373/374 96011 In reference 3, LaSalle County clarified ongoing corrective actions associated with NRC !nspection Report 373(374)/96011. In particular, we indicated that we would be combining surveillance procedures LTS 60019, LTS 600 23 and LTS 1000-4 inta a single surveillance procedura prior to Unit 1 restart. During the preparation for Implementing this action, it was determined that, given the nature of the work, the three procedures would not be readily compatible with one another due to work scope, precautions, and scheduling. Considering this, we will not combine these three procedures into one. The three survell!ance procedures will continue to be I
i done separately.
/ ;T^ 'l D
- \\).
9002190212 900213
_m-
1'*
During our closure documentation review of violation 373(374)/96011 14, we identified an error in our reference 2 response. On page 8 of the response, under corrective steps taken and results achieved, we indicated that
- Procedure LTS 1000 4 was revised to require inspection of all four quadrar,ts of a CW pump in!st bay." During our closure review, we verified that al; four quadrants of both unit 1 and 2 CW Inlet bays had been inspected as required. However, the revision to the LTS 1000 4 procedure was not implemented until June 23,1997. This information has been reviewed with the NRC Senior Resident inspector at LaSalle County.
If thern are any questions or comments concerning this letter, please refer them to Perry Bames, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 357 6761, extension 2383.
Respectfully, Y
Fred Dacimo Site Vice President
- LaSalle County Station ec:
A. B. Beach, NRC Region lil Administrator M. P. Huber, NRC Senior Resident inspector LaSalle D. M. Skay, Project Manager NRR LaSalle F. Niziolek, Office of Nuclear Facility Safety lDNS
..g,+-,ry.-3 yr-wig-gr*7--*-
-N t--
.P-
+2er.+=
et-e m--r--
--mt.t?f rm -
t
--rw---'mi--yM-rrw'----r'
~rw-q w
F**
y--M
- r4-W t
r"