ML20202C690
| ML20202C690 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/30/1986 |
| From: | Hawkins E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Themelis J ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| REF-WM-48 NUDOCS 8607110363 | |
| Download: ML20202C690 (2) | |
Text
,
9 DISTRIBUTION Docket. File WM-48 PDR/DCS l DBangart, RIV 1 WM-48/RFB/86/06/27/0 RBrich HRose T01sen MNE is LLW Branch, WMLU URF0 r/f URF0:RFB Docket No. WM-48 040WM48701E John G. Themelis, Project Manager Uranium Mill Tailings Project Office U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115
Dear Mr. Themelis:
Staff review of the Remedial Action Inspection Plan (RAIP) for the Durango, Colorado, UMTRA site has been completed. Our coninents are presented on the enclosure. Our concurrence is granted on the RAIP on the condition that the comments are incorporated into the RAIP. Note that these comments have been agreed to by Mr. Don Summers of MK-Ferguson and Mr. Randy Brich of NRC on June 27, 1986.
w Should you have any questions, please contact Randy Brich on FTS 776-2811.
Sincerely,
/s/
Edward F. Hawkins, Chief Licensing Branch 2 Uranium Recovery Field Office
! Region IV l
cc: w/ enclosure J. D' Antonio, DOE D. Summers, MK-F P. Ferraro, CD0H Case Closed: 040WM48701E
_ _ _ _ f _" _ ____f____
_ _f____________f____________f____________.____________f pNAME : RBrich/lv : EHawkins : : : : :
DATE :86/06/30 $g $ $ : : :
8607110363 860630 PDR WASTE WM-48 PDR
r i
ENCLOSURE NRC Staff Comments on Remedial Action Inspection Plan for Durango, Colorado, UMTRA Site
- 1. Page 2, Section 6.1.3 - This section implies that attempts will be made to correlate quality control sand cone density test results with the routine nuclear density gauge test results. However, this section does not state any acceptance criteria upon which one would judge the acceptability of the nuclear density gauge test results.
Therefore, please indicate that in the event of a significant
- s. difference between the two, the sand cone density test will be used.
Also, please state in this section-that all test results obtained since the previous correlation will be scrutinized and appropriate action taken.
- 2. Page 3, Section 6.1.6 - Please add the following phrase to the last sentence of this section. " ...but in no cases shall more than 10 field density tests be performed before a one-point proctor test is conducted."
- 3. Page 6, Section 6.3.7 - Please add the words "...and documented..." .
J after the word " performed" in both the second and third paragraphs of this section.
t L