ML20202B565
| ML20202B565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/21/1998 |
| From: | Diaz N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Travers W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202B568 | List: |
| References | |
| COMSECY-98-038, COMSECY-98-38, NUDOCS 9901290121 | |
| Download: ML20202B565 (2) | |
Text
_. _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _
},#
ypn-11-1999 11:34 E
- - ssa ggg g
f SSkUbN y
.:.jj,ir?,
m 5
l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM84SSION
'A i
h*sne /
WAeuimeten, s.c. meMan CONSECY 038 g
g Approved. See attached comments..
MEMORANDUM To:
Chairman Jackson
~
~
Dicus
.AdfnmissionerDiez jyg2,y,pgg Comm
,................g j \\. 799 g
ComrryMcos%s" l
RELEASEDTO THE PDR K M en15 eld FROM:
L I/ph?
.6W T
William D. Travers Esidnem 8=='N DimctorforOpensions,[,,3',,,,,,,hggw
SUBJECT:
WITS 9700191 and 9000044 REQUEST POR S MILESTONE CHANGES (Tasidng Memo item IV.9) - 10 CFR 50.se RULeMAKING in an SRM dated September 25,1999, the Commission diraded the sta February 19,1999 date fbr the submittal of a final rul o pubhc a
for the proposed nale closes December 21,1998.
ment period does not owpoet to recolve the bulk of the comm groups untR late in the comment period. From a published artide ' insich c n ernet 1998, NEl is quoted as saying that the industry m
EC'O GY g!argin of sesseyquesten alone The present o e
re
/
preferred opson.
c mments do not show convergenes to any a
~
EC $8 9 : 42 lr6 "_-,.L. issues, the staff will have subetontial diffic the agency, and in drafting the supporting positions g[g s ung the twood package by the February date. The stoff has spent consideratWe time e provide the commesion that would permit the Commission to participate dlWicult policy issues and yet continue to advance the progress of the rule putWicetion. The staff has developed the foRowing proposa!.
On the February 19,1999 date, the sts'lproposes to provide for Commis Commission paper containing proposed Enst rule lengua09. a sum issues ensing from the comments, and the staff's proposed resolution of
' a complete rule package because it will n t e
considerations, or speci6e implementation guidance. We beneve that
)
9901290121 990111 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
[p M
g g //-6 @I'fg' y
r.. e =
==
JAN-08-1999 'ig:33~
' fRC'
" " ~
" - -~
- - - - - -727 363 1339- =. -.... ~ ~ ~P.03263' ~ ~~'~
k,.
0 COMbiiEIONzu DIA2' COMMFWYS ON COMBRCY 98 038 I reluctantly approve the staff s proposed myy.M regardag the schedule for co Conunission's directive on 50.59 rulara=*!; coating =at upon a rulemaking pack delivered on February 19, lacking only the CRGR and ACR$ comments. I be regulatory analysis can be done even when there is no convergenc rulemaking package would have provided a ren. c ahi approach. Therefore regulatory analysis should be submined to the Commission as part of th A onFebruary19 O
e I
j TOTAL P.03
-