ML20202B523
| ML20202B523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1998 |
| From: | Grant G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Kingsley O COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9802120038 | |
| Download: ML20202B523 (34) | |
Text
_
February 3, 1998 Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley President, Nuclear Generation Group Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Regulatory Services Executive Towers West lli 1400 Opus Place, Suite 500 Downers Grove,IL 60515
SUBJECT:
NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL MEETING
SUMMARY
LASALLE COUNTY STATION
Dear Mr. Kingsley:
The NRC Oversight Panel met with Commonwealth Edison and LaSalle County Station management on January 28,1998. This management meeting was open to public observation. contains the associated meeting summary. Enclosure 2 contains the handout provided to the NRC Oversight Panel by Commonwealth Edison during the meeting.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's
- Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in NRC's Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
/s/ G. E. Grant Geoffrey E. Grant, Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos: 50-373;50-374
\\\\
License Nos: NPF 11; NPF 18
Enclosures:
1 Meeting Summary j
- 2. Meeting Handout
/
3 See Attached Distributioa DOCUMENT NAME:
G:\\lasa\\las01268 v.
e....r,., m. doeuen.nt imse.. in m. we *c. cor, smom.n.ew. net *ta. cor, weti en ev.nci y = No e.py OFFICE Rlli Rlll 1
Rill NAME Hills: nmo Mb O'Bbe Grant Cd$
DATE 01/tt98 QM$h8 0'!/ 198 2
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY llll,l lul ljl l,ll,l l,l I
9002120038 98G203 I
PDR ADOCK 05000373 ii i si i
Ie s,i i
p PDR
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ -- _ _ - _ _ _ - - ~
O. Kingsley 2
cc w/encia:
M. Wallace, Chief of Staff D. Hehulg, Senior Vice President G. Stanley, PWR Vice President J. Perry, DWR Vice President D. Ferrar, Regulatory Services Manager
- 1. Johnson, Licensing Director DCD. Licensing F. Decimo, Site Vice President T. O'Connor, Sta' ion Manager P. Bames, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor Richard Hubbard Nathan Schloss, Economist Office of the Attomey General State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Distribution:
Docket Fig plencls DRP w/encls PUBLIC hem 1 w/encle TSS w/encls A. Beach w/encls DRS (2) w/encls Deputy RA w/encls Rlli PRR w/encls Rill Enf. Coord, w/encls RAC1 (E Mail)
SRI LaSalle w/encle CAA1 (E-Mail)
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls DOCDESK (E Mall)
F. Miraglia, NRR w/encls L. Gerke, OCA w/encls S. Collins, NRR w/encls R. Zimmerman, NRR w/encls E. Adensam, NRR w/encls T. Hiltz, OEDO wlencls J
4 l
i Public Meeting Summary l
NRC oversight Panel for LaSalle County Station January 28.1998. Manaaement Meetina Summary:
l The licensee provided the NRC oversight Panel with a handout (Enclobure 2) and discussed the information contained in the handout during the meeting. During the licensee's presentation, the licensee addressed NRC questions and comments. The licensee discussed recent changes to the management structure at LaSalle County Station and key issues and accomplishments in the areas of engineering, maintenance, and operations. The licensee also addressed the status of l
license amendments required for Unit i restart.
[
During the meeting, the licensee communicated the need to ensure that considerable dialogue with the NRC staff will occurr before the NRC Engineering and Technical Support inspection i
currently scheduled for March 1998. The NRC staff noted that the licensee was still j
implementing and evaluating process changes in the engineering area, and that March 1998 may not be a good time for the inspection. The licensee responded that March 1998 may still be schievable; however, an ongoing scheduling process planned for completion within a week would provide further clarification as to the acceptability of the March 1998 inspection date.
l
' The licensee also indicated that a maintenance assessment identified a high percentage of work packages that needed revision after being issued to tha field. The licensee determined that this was not a problem for orttical path work, which reoolved increased focus, but was a concem with regard to the " bulk work." The licensee was reviewing methods to place a similar focus on the quality of the non-critical path work packages.
l The NRC staff noted that the licensee handout included a graph showing a planned work request completion rate that did not appear reasonably achievable. The licensee indicated that they would attempt to meet the workdown schedule by working more efficiently and ensuring sufficient i
manpower was available. The licensee indicated that the rate of increase in outstanding work requests would decrease once remaining final design change packages were issued. The licensee also indicated that the schedule may move outward to ensure proper work is completed.
i With regards to human performance in operations, the licensee indicated that the number of -
t events was decreasing. Although this area was not yet where they want it to be, it was on an improving trend. The licensee concluded that their human performance strategy had met its goals. This conclusion was largely based upon numerous interviews in which personnel expressed proper knowledge of expectations and appropriate attitude. The NRC staff questioned whether the licensee's evaluation of improvement effectiveness in this area should place such high importance on attitudes displayed during interviews. The NRC staff stressed the need to look at actual performance and noted personnel errors identified in recent NRC inspections. The licensee responded that their evaluation was also based upon meeting the corresponding numerical objectives defined in the LaSalle Restart Plan.
The licensee stated that LaSalle personnel understand what it takes to achieve high expectations and know that there is accountability. They were ensuring that their corrective actions to events reflected personnel accountability and their measurements were starting to show some 1
i 1
improvement in performance. The licensee also stated that there will always be some mistakes by personnel and that they must concentrate on changing the significance and rate of occurrence j
of these errors. The licensee felt that they had done that and, therefore, were achieving restart criteria in this area. In addition, the licensee stated that this doesn't necessarily mean they have good operators, that they won't know this until the plant operates and they challenge plant personnel. The NRC staff responded that there were performance measuromonts that were appropriate for the current shutdown status and how the licensee measures performance will 1
become more important as they approach restart. The licensee indicated that they would provide more detailed numerical data regarding personnel performance trends during the next meeting.
Attendees:
Nuclear Reaulatory Commission (NRC)
A. Beach, Regional Administrator, Region lil i
G. Grant, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), Region ill i
R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate 1112, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
(video conference)
K. O'Brien, Acting Chief, DRP Branch 2, Region lil M. Leach, Chief, Operator Licensing Branch, Ror! on lli i
D. Hills, Project Engineer, Region ill i
1 M. Huber, Senior Resident inspector, LaSalle, Region 111 E. Duncan, Reactor inspector, Division of Reactor Safety, Region ill i
j D. Skay, Project Manager, NRR Project Directorate ill 2 (video conference)
L. Rossback, Project Manager, NRR Project Directorate ill 2 (video conference)
Commonwealth Edison (Comed)
O. Kingsley, Chief Nuclear Officer, Comed S. Pony, BWR Vice President, Comed D. Sager, Vice President Generation Support, Comed F. Decimo, Site Vice President, LaSalle T. O' Conner, Plant General Manager, LaSalle G. Poletto, Site Engineering Manager, LaSalle S, Smith, Restart Manager, LaSalle W. Riffer, Quality and Safety Assessment Manager, LaSalle P. Bames, Regulatory Assurance Manager, LaSalle J. Bailey, Site Business Manager, LaSalle T. Broccolo, Corporate Assessment Manager, Comed J. Johnson, Licensing Director, Comed E. Evans, NOC Liason, Comed E. Shankle, Procedure Group Supervisor, LaSalle G. Bones, Licensing Administrator, Comed P. Rester, Site Communications Coordinator, LaSalle C. Berry, Business Planning, LaSalle F. Jones, Operations Engineer, Zion 2
Othem M. Stickney, Lloonsing Supervisor, lilinois."ower R. Frentz, Lloonsing Engineer, Illinois Power T. Poindexter, Attomey, Winston & Strewn J. Roman, Resident, Illinois Department of Nucioar safety C. Dellimore, Reporter, WBBM Newsradio 78 1
f l
t l
l t
i 4
- _ =, _,..
- Enclosure 2 Commonwealth Edison Management Meeting Handout
e EEEli Station Direction World Class Performance i
Safe, Long, Uneventful Run k
Safe, Uneventful Startup January 26,1998 NRC Region III-Lisle, Illinois LaSalle 1/26/98 Presentation Page 1 j
~
i I
'I
[
i NRC Public Meeting i
EEEE
.1----ar2e, sees l
0930- 1130 I
1 i
e NRC introduction Grant / Beach i
I e
LaSalle introduction Dacimo L1F35 Project Status indicators e
1 Engiroeering Poletto i
Maintanance Smith i
'e Restart Smith Operations Smith t
'e Site Business Bailey l
e Restart Action Plan Status
> Human Performance (Strategy 2)
O'Connor l
> Corrective Action /Self Assessment (Strategy 5)
Riffer i
I i
Closing Remarks
~Dacimo j
e l
i i
NRC Closing Remarks Grant / Beach j
i e
i i
i LaSalle l
1/26/98 Presentation Page 2 i
l h
I,'$k 1 i
5 -
l
-,l,-
I r,
I I
I n
y..
s
- .i
.l' j
1 we
+
j l
sja t
l
^
4 F}.
)
i 1
l t
rc.l i
s,,
f
,g i
a.
a 1
3:
j
!(.3 1 J
g.,>
(/){
s.c j
gy Iy i
il i
EEEIl Engineering e Key Activities Since Last Restart Meeting
> DCP issued to Replace Drywell Sump Capacitance Probes with Displacement Probes
~
> DCP issued to Protect Standby Gas Treatment From Potential Overpressurization due to LOCA While Purging Primary l
Containment
> DCP issued to Modify A,B/C RHR and HPCS Room Coolers to f
Autostart on Temperature Whether Pumps are Running or Not l
> Baseline Maintenance Rule Inspection i
j e Key Activities For Next 30 Days
> Preparation of System Readiness Reviews
> Completing Final Design Deliverables Dedicated Support for Field Activities l
> Program R.eviews by Q & SA (i.e., Appendix R, ISI/IST, VETIP) i l
LaSalle 1/26/98 Presentation Page 4 i
i
- h MEEIl Engineering i
4 L
e Key Issues l
i
> Maintain Focus on Quality vs. Scheaule j
> Prioritize and Manage Emergent Engineering Work
> Complete Control Room and Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room l
Ventilation Repairs t
> Resolve Potential Part 21 issue for General Electric SBM l
Switches I
> Q & SA Stop Work for DCPs issued in Advance of Completed l
l 10 CFR 50.59 l
i i
i LaSalle 1
1726/98 Presentation Page 5
.t1i:t l
iI,j>
Ii{,
!I f tIi[!il*f?
f)ilj.ti![l[#lj!I!i g
4 II e
P n
t II i
k-
!1I" 9
iy 6
n i
9 w
!iI m
/
2 C
a i
3 o
!I1
/
t mt 8
d l11 a
lI
!11 e
e l
s u
?
e
. o R ly 9
e s
S3 S
!lI
/
h N1 c
!lI
,l T
/
- a 87e n
1lI 7
o a
?
8 sA N
6' e
1lI l[
9
, o
/
s 1
i ek
/
1I M d-2 k
T.s o
gr Alio!
e
. e W
ao
. e TlI 8
kW 9
r
?
. '.I e,,
e
- d! /
i1 4
P T
/
c 9
1 d
9 e
ao
!lI t
T e
f 7
y Pt 3l i*
6 9
!li w
T
- e. e
/
ed e
C
/
!lI 2
T 1
s e
P
!l1
. n
. e gt g
C nt L'
n D
~
. =
7 i
9 d
l
!lI ai a
n u
T
/
m 0
8 E
hm
/
t 1
c
!ii 1
k A
1 T
m e
Cb k
e
!lI 7
W u
T s
n, 9
nS 1
/
g N(
1 Il1 T
.sa
/
0
!iI ie t
1 d
7 e
sb R
7 m
!lI e
y 7
o 9
/
b 3
u
!Ii Do 1
S m
7
/
e t
r 9
e
!1l b
5
?
-e e
o t
!1 9
g T
I 3
7 n
. o
/
n F
i 6
lil i
/
in 7
s 1
. e*
8 a
1l1 1
m 7
L e
R
?li
. n 7
!lt e
9 sP T
s
/
. e 9
1 C
!ll D
7 r
/
. e
,1 7
(-
le 1ll u
rll d
j
)wI T
. m 7
e
!lI e6 9
h e
/
c 7li la e
1 lg
.e 2
S J
P 0
0 0
0 0
0
- 0 0
0 0 /
0 8
6 4
2 0
6 4
2 6
an 2
1 1
1 1
1 o
r.
S j*o g
a t
aen Iil s
Lr l
e e
5e?.E 2 2 c3.cEEe% *y UC P
89
/62
/
1 i
- il1 i'
ji2 I
i : ' '
i;
i l
l 6
i l
i 1
f a
n.
eW9/C
.h l
^
g
- eW6/c j
l 4
I-i F
l eater /c i
9
~
l d-F ows tic f
+
A h-l estete 1
/
3
/'
j q
i a
- wire g
N
/('
wsen }
2 i
8 lL, e
f4 E*d l
w sus ti6 *
}
q s
witn t
{
e t
~
I k
l
$ 2 S
E i
b
~
l
-taert e
se ts m es
/
h3 3
I zustres 0
i E
es/ste "I
E lR N
1 o
46/Leel I
E R
8 8
8 a
1 mg l
1 L
L (/)%
' 1, A %"
ai n.
suolle!nsiva Bulpuvistnojo og
6
_ 8 9,,,,,
89/51/3 g
1 5
p o
-o 89/1/3 1
9 y 89/51/2
,g g
g s ag;1j2 1
/
y
-c 49/81/1 8
.f.
l Q
w..
i o._ 89l4/1
._ __= y 3
8 8 0 a
3 y d--o-79/12/21 4
I 1
-+-
79/6/21
, y j
t I -o-79/22/11J k
L }
a
[
79/8/11 ["
t
, 4 1
j l-3 t
1
, ti n
79/52/013
" ' I u I 79/11/01 79/72/9 g
u V I
/
79/31/9
.n L3 3 y o 79/03/8 l
--f w.LI 79/61/8 v I f
1M/8
$ LE u
79/91/7 g
0 y l 79/5/7 O
8 I g
,tg w
79/12/6 o
5 hh hhhhhh h
hh8o etelpmoC eb ot gniniameR sRE g.
D%}
detelpmoC eb gniniameR srE h
i I
f l
1 EEEIl Engineering QualHy j (Note: % Rework shown is a 3 months rollir>g anerage) 1
-1 Total Products l
t 250 40%
- - 35%
il 200 -
7 ei j
- - 30%
4 f
~
25 %
150 -
a
=
d-20 %
i m
w a
\\
5 100-l aq
- - 15%
~
~
10%
3 i
50 -
5%
0 l
0%
1 4
4 4
4 4
4 A
4 4
$$$A0$$hhh i # Rework e
% Rework i~ _ i # Total i
i LaSalle 1f26/98 Presentation Page 9 19 Responsible Manager: G. Feletto I
l
4 EEEIl
" ='"'*"="c=
Key Activities Since Last Restart Meeting
> Reactor Water Clean-Up Modification
> Lake Make-Up Blowdown Valve Key Activities For Next 30 Days e
> LPCS Strainer Replace.nent
> VCNE Modification
> Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Key issues e
> Backlog Reduction
> Schedule Adherence
> Quality of Work LaSalle 1/26/98 Presentation Page 10
i ggggf L1F35 Maintenance Scheduled Work l
l (r2nwas status 22 to ss)
.l l
t t
ALL L1F35 MWWR TASKS STATUS NOT COISPLETE IN P2 i
i K.
(
~..
t
\\
l l
_me 4
1 l
.3 i
I
.:m,:
o, h
1500-
.C I
^
6 CL
=.-
O i
4 2o00 -
\\
4 t
500 -
l 1.
t i'
O...
a 4
l
........o
, et
[
t ADOEDl 0!
448' 287 447 282 461 224 1106 3 78 cOWLETE O
483 462 3SS 257 385 283 478 20 l
me.c 2584 2se 23s.
2c3; 242s 2s24 24es 33331o u2, i
LaSalle 1
L t"26/98 Presentation Page 11 l
a i
i
ygggy wu vunit o non-outage sacuog (Withosat ARs and Unit 2)
NON OUTAGE CORRECTIVE BACKLOG UNITS 00 AND 01 1800,
1600 -
1400 -
1200 -
u 1000 -
m<
t-g 800 --
a eoo _
400..
200 -
0-
~
~
~
~
~
i s
=
s, a
s c
z E
i i
i i,
mm m unrrs o.n otn us 3 a uwrrs 0.1NEW 2n LaSalle 2<
w-
..a-
,_ _ wn
!tf, j: : i
![l IlIt[ltI
[
.l[
!l
'i =;
s! i if>i!I n
6 o
- E 2
/4 i
n 9
a t
1 m
- ?h l
/
4 r
a e
t 2
s i
t 1
e
- 2 H
/4 n
G 5
e c
/
4 r
o e
r g
m a
a s
9 n
e 2
a
- R s
3 M
s
/
e P
i x
E 2
l l
r.
2 n
/
p s
Mh e
3 n
io )t ss t
p e
m a e 5
c t
1 nD
/
R e
3 m r.
Sh i
lpg e
8
/3 d
mn it s
s n o
P' o 1
/3 CC M
De h
5t 22 3 o Ft 2
e Le 1
M 5
. r c
pig
\\
s 1
t o
2
/
N N
es s
n o
Ds S
a s
8 e s r
/2 a
c x
nP t
aC ts n
iag nD e
t 1
m
/
2 e
Min ed t
l u 52 l
a
/
n Sx 1
aE i
L(
$k 8
0 8
6 1
2 6 a
/
1 M
1 9
7 4
S 1
9
/
1 5
4 4
7 2
/
9 1
3F 8
5 4
5 T
2 9
/2 1
1 1
5 3
4 L
2 9
/2 1
3 f
4 O O 2 e1 g
1 9
e 6
/2 lg la 1
g P
an
~
d g
o I
e n Si t
u t
O o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O e
a J
g 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 dl ir "t
t pa n
e d mm ae e
t Eh.
- a d oe s
g 1Lr dACR e
P 89
/62/
1
- l, el l
I1
{
1 i
j p.2,
a
,l t as, 5
s G
1:
+
x g
4 j
%q 0
j f
azu
~
4 W
4nis h
M 46st g
i a
. w.,
9 i
l Bag
.,n.
{
fneg I
wie
' na l
~ ' *5 "
, win e
s 8g n
nsm u
rRRR j
' i&,ll Il 1
l&9ML ek g n,. R n
wivn g
- ,o
(
O sic $
g
- 4. w ii tv R j
g atuit 4wini 3
9'*E g
D U"!
4awi6 Q
lx~5 w uss gnag 4 ate 4 7646 gn 0 en.
1R8RS8888,88 gc-!
i
.,wm b
ga.,
8 8 wm a
@.8 67 ) v W m m N N e-
%IJ 'El i
sMsel dOO Su!uleweg o
l
,._,_._...s,,.
l EEEE Key Activities Since Last Restart Meeting e
i
> Reactor Water Cleanup - Logic, Flush l
> Div Ill Response Time Testing i
> CondenserVacuum Test I
Key Activities For Next 30 Days e
> OPRM Modification Testing
> Div i ECCS Response Time Testing KeyIssues e
> Human Performance i
> Joint Test Group
> Modification Scoping 1
l LaSalle i
1/26/98 Presentation Page 15 l
i 6
)
gggf Open Maintenance / Mod Testing i
j (PMTs;B'est MOD Tests, SurveiHances)
}
52= l I i i. i i i i
l i i.
- i. i. i.
wm 3
_L J_ 1 i ii
]
Tsi I ! !
I m
i i N_
1 e
- x'~~Tx;iii.. w!
o.,s
'W i
~,
i is I
'MA i
l m
\\l N.
i i
m s
ixi I--+-- Tetaf Roected f
i I\\\\
L lN \\
2eco l l Tot. Actues t
\\^ \\
I I
- - e mor*c'**
[
2eco
}
M I
rwr> Actuer 2400 E
l sur a.nc 3e,.cs.d I
2200 s
.m m
tem m
7,,,, no,,c,,,
l seco
%, 7,,,, 3,,,,
14o0 w
i i
,000 r
e-k-
eco_ %. _ _ _
iITTTTT hii!
l\\
2o0 ' I i i i
i>
,, - ------- _ _ _ _ _ 1 x 0
,- M sssssssesese re i
l Test,e.m Aesse i
LaSalle 1/26/98 Presentation Page 16 M
ResponsiMe Manager:J. Bailey i
EEEIl
- p*'" """'
Key Activities Since Last Restart Meeting e
> Two Workarounds Closed
- OWA 107 RMCS Trips on Startup
- OWA 145 Source Fr:nge Monitor Noise Key Activities For Next 30 Days e
> Completion of Annual License Operator Requal Module
> Training for installed Modifications
> Closure of Four Additional Workarounds KeyIssues e
> Continuing Human Performance improvemer'
> Operations Training Program Accreditation Renewal LaSalle 1T26/98 Presentation Page 17
k h
39/31/4 o
n I
~ * #
"o 80/6/4
- D d " C 55 2 = 5 2 a 2
- "se*
"a s" e u" g
89/03!3 o
b h
.E w
s 89/32/3 ]&
p o
D D
P 89/61/3 4
}
m o
89/9/3
.X y
)
o lt Wg 89/2/3 w
~
i s
l 89/32/2 o:
89/61/2 89/0/2 E
o 89/2/2 I
E 89/62/1 g
I 5
8 y
[
89/91f1 g o w C ij 89/21/1 g o o c 89/5/1
~
n 79/92/21 3 *
- U o
i 79/22/21
$_o o C o
79/51/21 "g
a o
w o ~
i 79/8/21 T
~
o
~
o-79/1/21 b
o -
~
i m
79/42/11 D@ k k ';;
i 79/71/11
.E 9.!E Q3 S $'O t
o 3 n y 79/01/11 h8
$Z$$$$GU$emsomaww-o smetI kroW fo rebmuN l
D g
Q 8-h 8
D
<,j, a
>r 8
8 8
8l 8
[
l.
8
/,,,
o
~ -
r r
r t
t v
v c
c c
n n
b b
y y
n n
n l
l g
g p
p c
c o
o e
e e
a a
e e
u u
a a
p a
a u
u u
J J
u u
e e
O O
N N
D D
D J
J F
F M
M A
J J
J A
A S
S M
M 4
8 6
0 3
7 1
5 9
2 6
9 3
9 3
6 2
6 0
1 2
1 5
8 2
2 1
2 2
2 5
9 1
3 1
1 2
1 2
2 1
, ugW
>0m~
Sw M"
w
~g
_9 8
g mn 5 _ tee gaE o
y a
pGyR w
m w
s9jE O
W U
w" t
e hWU)gg@
w"
- $gw yaA g9
$8%8kEsy*e i
l l
l, 1l
)Ili li:
1 pu t
n N
ra t
w
\\
S t
6 h
o g
1 i
h
/
r d
3 n
cr E
a k-a M
D 9
n
/3 e
r r
y n
o r
a a
2 M
W
/
u 3
r e
b b
l e
F l
is a
3 n
d tu 2
o
/
p c
2 se A
r y
R a
au 6
1 n
/
C a
2 J
n 9
r
/
e 2
b o
m i
v ec 2
t e
/2 D
u r
a e
6 9
b 2
3
/
C m
1 evo 9
m
/
4 N
5 1
0 3
1 d
r o
e e
t b
c 2
1 2
8 o
o e
4
/
1 4
t j
1 c
or R
o
/
0 2
O P
5 6
r 5
l 1
e b
o m
9 r
e 2
8 t
/
3 3 p
2 5
t e
1 S
n 2
o 2
8
/
0 0 t
2 5
s C
1 ugu 5
A 1
8
/ 0 2 2
5 1
0 e2 e
lg R
ly d
t e n la s
P u
t i an e n J
t d o a o
i d m m Si e
M2 ta d o e t
A C R aen 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Lse 0
8 6
4 2
W1 r
1 P
8 j$
9
/62
/
1
,i ll lll'
gggg; site ausiness Key Activities Since Last Restart Meeting e
> lssued 170 Operations / Maintenance Procedures Key Activities For Next 30 Days e
> Augmenting Procedures Staff Keyissues e
> Incorporating Engineering procedure Writers into Central Procedures Group i
i LaSalle 1/26/98 Presentation Ptge 21
i USN$$ Unit i Operations Procedure Work-down 1200 -
f 1000 l
^ -
=x__;
--==
i i
3 I
l eoo o
k h400
- x m
- - ~ +: +-_
w i
o
/////////////////////////
- -SchediAed Procedures
-e-Procedises to be Completed Wrk/Dwn
-.- PCRs Remoirung 10/27 11/3 11/10 l 11/17 11/24 12/1 12/8 12/15 12/22 12/29 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 l
Added 39 86 75 60 59 0
0 9
20 0
Completed 239 264 271 2%
308 315 322 334 356 360 365 370 387 Remaining 164 139 132 220 181 234 287 334 312 308 312 327 310 i
LaSalle 40 1/2t3/98 Presentation Page 22 Responsible Manager: D. Enright t
j I
, i I
I i
- i!
1l s
s mM rW e
e u
dN
, e e e
eN o
co r
R P.
.!s Is
!s
?
- -g s
. 5H aH m
.!a
.1
!a S
S r
E
-l R
-i-
-Ia E
u R
d U
U D
s D
.!s E
E
-!b C
m
[-
T
- .sg C
!s O
O m
R R
_.sg P
ssh P
L T
^
N
. neb x
A
- [
-%e E
,ae C
f M
P R
U T
R
' r_
._ s g msh g:g C
e T
c N
E vsh N
E S
- gsg L
L_s.
I sg A
~
n L
~
~
sg-gI.
- g-P g
a N
n W
-k gss uss
.ss r
f e
O
~ J
~
gss 4
2 t
D
,ss gss
^
K n
R s=
Lg gI cg i
O a
W
- ,ss gas M
i
- as U
' ~ :i 9 7a
/
S ll
- jd
[
5 N8
, 0 O 0
0 0 m0 D 0
.O 1
6 2
0 7 6 5 4 3
,0 0
9 6
U 4 3 3F 1
L g
s a
m m
m 5
S E
m s
m 2
I 0
8 7
5 E
m 2
4 D
3 0
2 E
o o
4 S
4 4
8 9
R a
i 1
1 I
1 I
R 6
S S
5 4
5 U
m R
m 1
I 1
1 1
1 e
U U
m D
D R R
e D
e R
E E
E C
C C
O O
O R
R d
R d d
P e
P e
P e
t t
t P
e P
e P
lp $
S S
s 8
9 9
2 3
e U lp 4 5
6 7
U lp 9 9
0 0
1 2
T 3
1 2
3 9
3 U
8 T
m T
m 1
1 2
2 2
m R
o R
o R
o A C A C A C T
T T
S d
S d
S 3
d e
e I
d 0
0 0
0 0
0 e2 I
e s
2 d
0 0
0 I
0 d
O 9 0
8 9
i i
4 T
I e
d f
d T
I d
N A f
A N A lg N
7 7
7 U
U la U
P 7
7 7
7 7
7 an M
9 9
9 9
8 3
8 s
M 4 9 S
8 8
8 a
1 2
2 4
I t s 9 9
8 e
r
/
/
9 9
9 M
e r
/
9 9
9 t
4 1
S e
l 4
9 e
/
9 i
8 o
E t
4 1
3
/
l 81 D
i 2
21 l
1 i
7 M
/
7 e
t 8
/
l 8
a 1
2 2
4 l
1 Si a
l 2
2 4
D
/
2 2
1 i
3 1
1 1
1 1
l 1
2
/
r i
l
/
7 r
l
/
D
/
2 2
1 i
/
t 1
1 1
t i
2 t
i 1
/
/
2
/
a t
aen Lse rP 89
/627 1
,l l
l'
WMgf License Amendments and SERs Required for Unit i Restart NRC Amendment Submitted Comments Needed A pp roved LAR 262: Delete reference to Reactor 12/12/97 Under review; no issues identified to date.
03/01/98 Steam Pressure from Condenser Low Vacuum Isohtion per DCPs 9700461/2 LAR 255-01: HELB Leak Detection i1/24/97 Conference call results in 2 questions. Answers 03/30/98 in Secondary Containment provided informally. Supplement required for revision of RWCU pump suction flow setpoint.
Will docket all issues in one submittal.
Submittal targeted is 02/13/98.
LAR 178-02: VC/VE Filter Testing 09/26/97 Conference calls held resulted in 5 questions.
03/15/98 Two have been discussed. Conference call planned for 01/29/98 to discuss allissues. Will docket any required inform ation in one submittal. Submittal target is 02/06/98.
LAR 258: Post-LOCA liydrogen 10/15/97 Under review; no issues identified to date.
03/01/98 Instrument Channel Calibration Gas LAR 214: Control Room Rad Monitor 07/01/97 10/09/97 Instrumentation LAR 254: Change Definition of 07/02/97 09/IS/97 Channel Calibration to Exempt RTDs and Thermocouples LAR 252: Feedwater/M ain Turbine 04/04/97 07/29/97 Reactor Vessel Water Lvl liigh Trip SER - Submittal of position on venting 11/26/97 Site identified another leak chase channel 03/13/98 ofleak chase channels during CILRT.
configuration. Preparing supplement. Target to NRC SER to be issued.
submit is 02/06/98. Submittal does not NOT affect what has already been submitted.
l SER - Clarification of SBO SER 10/03/97 12/04/97 l
regarding battery capacity margin LaSalle
=
33 Responsible Manater: P. Bames 1/26/98 Presentation Page 24
gMgf 350 Checklist Package Readiness d
CLOSURE TOTAL NRC SITE PACKAGE Q&SA CORPORATE SECTION ITEMS COMPLETE -
WORKING COMPLETED REVIEW REVIEW C.'1 AS'SES'8 MENT ll F ROOT CXUSE I,DENTIFICATION'XAb,[ CORRECTION {.
].
,{ ~~{.
^
~
...1...-,.....
..4,..._...
.m.i._, _ _..,...
C_.1.1_
-.. _ _ _ { _,,2_
_,. 4 _ _ _,_ _,,2........ ;_,__,O _ _i _,,_ N/A_...
N/A_,,_-
_ j___,_._, N/A 9
9 O
i N/A N/A N/A C.1.2 C.I!3 1
11 O
.[.'
5A _,.
_N/N ~~~"
~
N/A
_,,_4.,.
3,.,,.
C. 2'"%S 5 ES S M ENTb F "O C ENS EE" MNN^G EM E AT' EF F ECTI VEN ES S-
~~
~~
t' t'
C 2.1 j
3 O.
3
['.
3 3
3 C.2.2
~
8 0
8 3
1 1
C.2.3 3
0 3
l O
O O
[
I' C.3 ASSESSMENT OF PLANT AND CORPORATE STAFF EFFECTIVENESS I
5
~O'
'S 4
O
' T O
.O C. 3. 2...
... O..
..O...
...-...O..
.... O O..
.s.
... g.
..9....
. 9...
......9.-_.
9..
. j..
. 4.
..._.9_...
l CT SSES..S. MENT OF' PHVSIC, Al~RE_A._DINESS"OF THE PCkNT~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ -
[
~~'
~
.9..
C.4 11 0
11 O
O 4,.._, __ O 4
C.6~ ASSESSMENT"OF COMPOANCE WITH'IREGULATOR ' REQUIREMENTS
~~
C'.'S '
,[~
'6"
'~O" "O ~
~ O 6
O t
I C.6 COORDINATION WPTH INTERESTED AGENCIES AND PARTIES I
C.G 4
0
~ 4
^~ }
N/A N/A N/A 1
~
I ADDITIONAL PLANT SPECIFIC lSSUES'AND INSPECT, ION ITEMS C.7
.....e
_7_
l
,,,, c_..._ _ _j,,
- _ -._ _ _e.
y j_
.g_
l LaSalle M
Responsible Manager. P. Bames 1/26/98 Presentation Page 25
ggggl Human Performance (Strategy 2) e Fully implemented e Met Restart Criteria e Q&SA Review e Corporate Oversight Review e Human Performance improved l
l LaSalle l
1/26/98 Presentation Page 26
gggf Corrective Action /SelfAssessment (Strategy 5) l e Cornerstone of the LaSalle Recovery Effort j
e Program Now Successfully implemented and j
Working t
i e Three Initiatives Now in Progress l
1
>CARB i
> Closure Package Documentation Quality i
> Data Analysis LaSalle i
1/26/98 Presentation Page 27
gMgf CARB Acceptance Rate 120% --
l Percent Acceptable]
07 % 07"'
7%
3%
0%
7'A 80% --
, 80% SO% 80%
SO ' 69%
60% --
0%
40% +
20% --
4 0%
.0%;
//////// ////////////
Date 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/2s 1/4 1/11 1/Is Ir25 2/1 2/s 2/15 2/22 3/1 3/s 3/15 3c2 3/29 da Total Approved 4
I o
o 3
2 1
2 o
o 1
1 14 Rejected o
o o
o o
o o
o o
0 3
0 3
LaSalle 45 Responsible Manager: W. RifTer 1/26/98 Presentation Page 28
,