ML20199G042
| ML20199G042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1985 |
| From: | Corbin McNeil Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Murley T, Varga S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NLR-N86086, NUDOCS 8606240643 | |
| Download: ML20199G042 (18) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. s' i e s t 1985 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) January 1 through December 31, 1985 i i t h SALEM GENERATING STATION I UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 Docket No. 50-272, 50-311 Operating License No. DPR-70, DPR-75 L f I i L i PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY i P.O. Box 236 l L Hancock's Bridge, New Jersey 08038 May 31, 1986 t i i r f I B606240643 851231 7 PDR ADOCK 05000272 hh, l i R PDR l i ?
SALEM GENERATING STATION 1985 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 GENERAL...................................... 4
1.1 INTRODUCTION
4 1.2
SUMMARY
5 t
1.3 CONCLUSION
6 2.0 BIOTIC MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS.. 6 i 2.1 DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN NESTING STUDY (ETS SECTION 3.1.2.1.2.1).................... 6 2.1.1 Study Area................................. 6 2.1.2 Materials and Methods...................... 7 2.1.3 Data Reduction............................. 7 2.1.4 Results and Discussion..................... 7 2.2 OS P RE Y AN D B AL D EAG L E SU RV E Y.................. 9 (ETS SECTION 3.1.2.1.2.2).................... 9 2.2.1 Study Area................................. 9 2.2.2 Materials and Methods...................... 9 2.2.3 Results and Discussion..................... 10 2.3 LITERATURE CITED............................. 11 1 I l 1 Page 1 of 16 e . m
t SALEM GENERATING STATION 1985 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) LIST OF TABLES 9 Section Title Page l Table 2.1-1 Summary of nesting, depredation, and i hatching data for diamondback terrapin on Sunken Ship Cove Beach, New Jersey in 1985.................................. 12 1 Table 2.1-2 Summary of nesting, depredation, and hatching data for diamondback terrapin on Liston Point Beach, Delaware in 1985.. 13 Table-2.1-3 Summary of osprey nosting activity near Artificial Island in 1985. Numbers indicate yound fledged; N= Nest present, may have been active or constructed as housekeeping nest A= Active nest, eggs observed or adults appeared to be incubating eggs and defending nest. Owl = Great horned owl nesting in former osprey nest.............................. 14 Table 2.1-4 Summary of bald eagle sightings made during the course of osprey, terrapin, and fisheries surveys.................... 15 I i J Page 2 of 16
4 j SALEM GENERATING STATION 1985 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) t LIST OF FIQURES 1 Section Title Page i Figure 2.1-1 Locations of diamondback terrapin study l beaches, osprey nests, and bald eagle l sightings in 1985........................ 16 i I i i I i i L t 4 L a l 1 t i t I i r l i i .i i d l i i 4 i d Page 3 of 16 i i l I 1
SECTION 1 GENERAL
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This report is submitted in accordance with the Environmental Technical Specifications ( Appendix B to Operating Licenses DPR-70 a and DPR-75) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station. Included are the results of non-radiological environmental monitoring programs required by the Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS). The reporting requirements of Appendix B to Operating License DPR-70 became ef f ective on December 11, 1976, and those of Operating License DPR-75 on August 2, 1980, when the respective units reached initial criticality. Much of the equipment and resources utilized by Salem 1 are shared by Salem 2. Although differences in ETS reporting requirements for both units exist, no distinction is made for the purpose of assessing environmental impacts. This report covers Salem 1 and Salem 2 for the period from January 1 through December 31, 1985. i 1.2
SUMMARY
During 1985, Salem Unit 1 generated 9,007,510 megawatt-hours of net electrical energy, while Salem Unit 2 generated 5,017,008 megawatt-hours. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 5.3 of the Salem Unit 2 ETS, all 1985 recommended design changes were reviewed for i l potential environmental impact. None would involve a change in i the ETS if implemented or pose an unreviewed environmental j question. l l The New Jersey Department ot Environmental Protection (NJDEP) l issued a revised final New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES)/ Discharge to Surf ace Water (DSW) Permit Number l NJ005622 to Salem Generating Station on December 1, 1985. The final NJPDES/DSN permit imposes several additional monitoring requirements and contains items that the Company believes are excessively restrictive. Accordingly, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:14A-8.6, a request was filed with the NJDEP, Division of Water Resources, for an adjudicatory hearing. No response has been i received to date. Both the NJPDES/DSW permit and the request for adjudication have been forwarded to the NRC in accordance with Section 5.4.1 of the Salem Unit 2 ETS. No changes to the other Salem environmental permits occurred in i 1985. i j i \\ 1 Page 4 of 16
Copies of monthly NJPDES Dicchargo Monitoring R0porto (DMRD) waro 2 submitted to the NRC for the year 1985. Construction of the non-radioactive liquid waste disposal system was completed and 1 Stage III Treatment Works Approval was received on May 30, 1985. The compliance date for discharge of the non-radioactive liquid waste disposal system was attained and notification was sent to USEPA on July 12, 1985. This item satisfied the final condition of the May 27, 1983, Consent Order between PSE&G and USEPA. l Eight environmentally related non-routine reports were submitted to the NRC during the 1985 year; six concerning the impingement l of Atlantic loggerhead turtles on the Circulating Water System (CWS) trash bars, and two concerning the impingement of Atlantic ] ridley turtles on the CWS trash bars. Five Atlantic loggerhead turtles and one Atlantic ridley turtle were found dead. In three cases the animal was freshly dead and resuscitation attempts proved unsuccessful. In all cases, the Marine Mammal Stranding Center (MMSC) was notified and the animals were transported there; the live animals were fed, observed for a few days, and released. Dead specimens were autopsied and disposed by MMSC. The proper authorities were notified of each event initially by telephone and written reports followed. 1 l
1.2 CONCLUSION
l No significant environmental impacts attributable to the operation of Salem Nuclear Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2 were observed during 1985. The required biotic monitoring (i.e., diamondback terrapin and osprey studies) was conducted in accordance with the ETS. No significant changes in terrestrial ecology in the vicinity of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station were observed. I i 1 l l l l Page 5 of 16
1 SECTION 2.0 BIOTIC MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS 2.1 DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN NESTING STUDY (ETS Section 3.1.2.1.2.1) The study objective is to monitor nesting by diamondback terrapin at typical beaches in the vicinity of Artificial Island. Northern diamondback terrapin, Malaclemys terrapin terrapin, inhabit brackish water along the Atlantic Coast from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras. Nesting usually begins by early to mide-June and continues through July. Hatching usually begins in mid-to late August and may continue into November. Cold weather may cause the young to hibernate in or near the nest and emerge the following spring (Carr, 1952; Lawler and Musick, 1972). l In 1985, diamondback terrapin nesting activity was monitored at I two beaches on the Delaware River within 4.8 km of Salem during l the period May 31 through November 5. Nesting was recorded from j May 31 through mid-July and evidence suggests greatest activity j in late June through early July. The level of activity varied greatly between sites but remained within the range recorded I annually since 1975. Number of females estimated to utilize each beach was 408 at Liston Point beach and 20 at Sunken Ship Cove beach. Four females were marked at Liston Point beach and none were l marked at Sunken Ship Cove beach. Age of captures ranged from 15 years to well over 20 years. No previously marked turtles were recaptured. t l Hatchlings from current-year nesting typically occur from mid-August through September, but tracks of hatchlings from eggs j laid in 1985 were noted only on October 9 at Sunken Ship Cove beach. There was evidence of overwintered (1984) eggs hatching j in May and June 1985. l Track evidence indicated a similar assemblage of predators as recorded in previous years, with raccoon and red and/or gray fox accounting for most nest depredation. 2.1.1 Study Area l Observations were made from May 31 through November 5, 1985, at Sunken Ship Cove beach, New Jersey, and Liston Point beach, Delaware (Fig. 2.1-1). For a description of these locations see. Volume 2 of the 1977 Annual Environmental Operating Report (PSE&G, 1978). l Page 6 of 16 i i
2.1.2 Materials and Methods Searches for evidence of nesting were conducted during daylight i hours weekly from late May through August, bimonthly from September through October and once in November. Effort was made to minimize site disturbance and to allow females to finish nesting before being examined. 4 Nesting females were caught by hand, and the length and width of a the carapace and plastron were measured.. Each turtle was marked with an individual binary-code which consisted of holes drilled in one or more of the 10 post-dorsal marginal laminae. These plates are situated so that they can be easily drilled with little or no injury to the turtle. The marking program provides information on nesting-beach tidelity, growth and movements. For further description of the study methods see Volume 2 of the 1977 Annual Environmental Operating Report (PSE&G, 1978). l 2.1.3 Data Reduction 1 j The following formula was developed to provide a relative estimate of the number of nesting females (N) utilizing each site: (S+R-S) D 2 N= i 3V where S is the number of turtles sighted, R is the number of 7 pairs of tracks counted, D is the estimated number of days of nesting activity, 3 is the estimated mean number of nests laid per female during the nesting season (based on Hildebrand, 1932), and V is the number of times the beach das visited over the nesting period. j 2.1.4 Results and Discussion Nesting, as interred from the presence ce tracks, in 1985 at Sunken Ship Cove beach was first noted on May 31 and last noted on July 2 (see Table 2.1-1). At Liston Point beach, tracks were j tirst noted on May 31 and were last noted on July 18 (see Table 2.1-2). ) Nesting activity, also inferred from the number of tracks, varied l over time but generally was highest in late June through early 1 July. Daily and seasonal nesting activity remained within the i range recorded in previous years. l l The annual estimate of nesting terrapins was, as in previous years, higher at Liston Point beach, with 408, while at Sunken j Ship Cove beach it was 20. These estimates are, by nature of the program, conservative (low). i Page 7 of 16
Tha date collected on nsating activity ct Sunken Ship Covo b20ch is quito sparse. Sunken Ship Cove beach is a popular fishing spot and this activity probably disturbed normal nesting behavior and may have deterred some turtles from nesting. An indication of egg production at each site can be inferred from egg shell counts from depredated nests and counts of eggs from viable nests. A total of 421 nests were recorded during 1985; these contained approximately 3,347 eggs and/or remnants. Liston Point beach had the higher egg counts, with ca. 3,319 from 418 nests, while Sunken Ship Cove beach had ca. 22 from three nests. Depredated nests, which are much easier to detect than viable nests, accounted for 99.5 percent of the observed nests at Liston Point beach and 0 percent at Sunken Ship Cove beach. Track evidence in 1985 indicated an assemblage of predators similar to previous years. At Liston Point beach, raccoon, l Procyon lotor; red fox, Vulpes fulva and/or gray fox, Urocyon cinereoargentous were common. Raccoon and Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus were common at Sunken Ship Cove beach. Other probable hatchling predators include gulls, Larus spp.; crows, Corvus spp. and herons (Ardoidae). 1 Four terrapins were marked with binary-codes, all at Liston Point beach. All captures were female, with mean carapce longth and width of 17.8 cm and 14.2 cm, respectively, and mean plastron length and width of 16.1 cm and 9.3 cm, respectively. The youngest female was approximately 15 years old; the oldest appeared well in excess of 20 years. Exact age determination of older specimens is dif ficult since the ridged annuli on the carapace scutes becomo less distinct with ago. Eventually, the shell becomes completely smooth which may indicate age to perhaps 40+ years (Ilildebrand, 1932). A total of eight sets of hatchling tracks were noted from May 31 to October 9; I at Liston Point beach and 7 at Sunken Ship Cove beach. The hatchling tracks noted on May 31 at both beaches and on June 7 at Sunken Ship Cove beach came from overwintered eggs probably laid late in the 1984 nosting season (Tables 2.1-1 and 2.1-2). One set of hatchling tracks was noted on October 9 at Sunken Ship Cove which came from eggs laid during the 1985 season. No hatchling tracks were found at Liston Point beach from nests made during 1985. Page 8 of 16
2.2 OSPREY AND BALD EAGLE SURVEY ( ETS S:ction 3.1.2.1.2.2) The study objectives are to record the occurrence of osprey and bald eagle and to monitor nesting of osprey in the vicinity of Artificial Island. The North American osprey, Pandion haliaetus carolinensis, had been federally classified as " status undetermined" (USDI, 1973) but has since been deleted from the list. It was listed as endangered by the State of New Jersey but has been down-listed to threatened in 1985 (NJAC 7:25-4.17 as amended May 6, 1985). The State of Delaware does not include osprey on its Endangered and Threatened species list ( DE DNREC 1981). The southern bald eagle, Halacetus leucocephalus leucocephalus, is federally classified as " endangered" (USDI, 1979). Osprey were observed in the study area from March 22 through September 26. Fourteen nests were occupied, 12 of which fledged a total of 23 young. Due to the absence of bald eagle nesting in the study area, no special study program was established. Records were kept of sightings, which in 198 5 totaled 16. 2.2.1 Study Area Observations were made at and in the vicinity of actual and potential osprey nesting sites in the general area shown in Figure 2.1-1. The region extends roughly 16 km north, 13 km south, and 8 km east and west from Salem Generating Station. The area features bay, riverino, marsh, upland field and wooded-habitats. Duck blinds, pilings, navigation range markers and powerline towers are common features. 2.2.2 Materials and Methods Known osprey nests were observed by helicopter monthly in March, April, May, July and September and twice in June. During flights the area was surveyed for new osprey nesting sites. The numbers of adults and eggs or young in each nest were recorded. To avoid undue stress on the birds, the helicopter approached to a discrete distance (>50 yds) from the nest and paused only briefly to allow the nest to be viewed with binoculars. Bald eagle sighted during the course of osprey nesting flights were recorded. Sightings of osprey and bald eagle were also recorded in the course of other field work throughout the year and are included in this report. Page 9 of 16
2.2.3 R;culta rnd Dircuenion In 1985, osprey were sighted in the area from March 22 through September 26, typically on or near nesting structures. The number of sightings of adults per day was greatest in April (n=27) at the height of the nesting season. Seventeen nests were located; 14 were occupied and appeared active, one was occupied by a nesting great horned owl with 2 young, while the remainder may have been constructed as housekeeping nests by sexually immature birds or as secondary nests by adjacent breeding adults (Table 2.1-3). Of the total number of nests, 15 were in electrical transmission-line towers, one was in a navigational rangelight tower and one was in a dead cedar tree (Figure 2.1-1). Of the 14 active nests, it is estimated that 12 were successful and fledged a total of 23 young. This compared with 12 fledged in 1984, 13 fledged in 1983, five fledged in 1982 and six fledge in 1981. The number of osprey fledged in 1985 represents a near two-fold increase of 1984. This is the most young observed to fledge in a single year since the survey began in 1974. Prior to 1985, the most young fledged in a season was 16 in 1979. A total of 16 bald eagle sightings were made from April through August 1985; all were observed along the Delaware shore (Table 2.1-4). Sightings were made in each month with most in June (6) and August (5). Bald eagle were sighted at a total of five locations from the Smyrna River Jetty area north to a beach just south of Silver Run ( Fig. 2.1-1). Most sightings were of bald eagle perched in trees along the Delaware River and upper Bay shoreline, while on two occasions eagles were also observed soaring over marshy areas just inland. All but one of the sightings were of a mature bird. The number of bald eagle sightings in 1985 was the largest in a single year since reporting began in 1971 and approached the cumulative total of 22 for the period 1971-1984. Page 10 of 16
~ 2.3 LITERATURE CITED Carr, A. 1952. Handbook of turtles. Comstock Publishing Assoc., Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY 542 p. DEDNREC (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environ-mental Control). 1981. List of endangered and, threatened species (potentially found) in Delaware. 1 p. Hildebrand, S. F. 1932. Growth of diamondback terrapins, size attained, sex ratios and longevity. Zoologica 9(15):551-563. Lawler, A. R. and J. A. Musick. 1972. Sand beach hibernation by a northern diamondback terrapin, Malaclemys terrapin terrapin (Schoepff). Copeia 1972(3):389-390. NJAC. 1984. New Jersey Administrative Code 7:25-4.17 as amended May 6, 1985. PSEEG (Public Service Electric and Gas Co.). 1978. Biotic environmental surveillance. Vol. 2 of 3, Annual environmental operating report (nonradiological). SNGS - Unit No. 1, January 1 through December 31, 1977. 679 p. USDI (U.S. Department of Interior). 1973. Threatened wildlife of the U.S. Bureau Sport Fish and Wildlife Resource Publ. 114. 289 p. 1979. List of endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. Federal Register 44(12). 4 i I .i i 9 i 4 'I J i 1 Page 11 of 16 i J i
Tcble 2.1-1. Summary cf nesting, drpridstien, cnd hatching d ta for ditmondbick terrepin en Sunken Ship Csve Berch New Jersey in 1985. I Non-Depredated Non-Turtles Turtle Tracks Period of depredated Nests depredated Depredated In Observed Cbservation Visits-Nests Partial Total eggs eggs Area Adult Hatchlings i Nesting Period May 16-31 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 2 1 June 1-15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 16-30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 July 1-15 2 2 0 0 15 0 0 4 0 16-31 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 10 3 0 0 22 0 0 22 6 Hatching Period August l 1-15 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i l 16-31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l September 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16-30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 October 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16-31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 November ~ 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 17 3 0 0 22 0 0 22 7 Page 12 of 16 G 8
Tcble 2.1-2. Summary cf nesting. d:predstion, cnd h:tching data for dierondb:ck tcrrapin on Licton Point Brach, Delaware in 1985. Non-D prtdctcd Non-Turtles Turtle Tracks Period of depredated Nests depredated Depredated In Observed Observation Visits Nests ?artial Total eggs eggs Area Adult Hatchlings Nzating Period May 16-31 1 1 0 2 11 15 0 2 1 June 1-15 2 0 1 122 10 (1) 870 (8) 0 42 0 ^ 16-30 2 3 0 57 36 475 0 152 0 July 1-15 2 0 0 94 0 776 1 187 0 16-31 3 1* 0 51 14
- 403 0
16 0 Subtotal 10 5 1 326 71 (1) 2539 (8) 1 399 1 Hntching Period August 1-15 1 0 1 4 0 (9) 33 (1) 0 0 0 16-31 1 0 0 81 [1] 0 657 [14] O O O Saptember 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16-30 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 October 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16-31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s November 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 7 0 1 85 0 (9) 690 (1) 0 0 0 TOTAL 17 5 2 411 71 (10) 3229 (9) 1 399 1 ( ) Number in parentheses indicate the apportioning of eggs from partially depredated nests. [ ] Numbers in brackets indicate data for one nest with eggs initially found non-depredated on July 18 (see *) but subsequently d:epredated on August 18 and so not included in the cumulative totals. Page 13 of 16
Tcble 2.1-3 Summary of onprcy nsating activity noor Artificial Icland in 1985. Numbsre indicato young fledgsdr N=Nset prc:ent, may have been cctivs or construqted as housekeeping nest; A= Active nest, eggs observed or adults appeared to be incubating eggs and defending nest. Owl = great horned owl nesting in former osprey nest. NEST LOCATION NEW JERSEY Transmission Line Towers Activity Salem-Keeney; Tower #12/1 1 11/3 1 9/3 3 4/3 1* 2/3 2* Hope Creek-New Freedom: Tower #6/1 N,3 4/2 1 4/1 Owl 3/4 1* 3/3 A Salem-New Freedom: Tower #5/3 A 5/1 3 3/3 N 3/2 A Raccoon Ditch / Stow Creek Dead Cedar Tree 2* DELAWARE Transmission Line Towers: DP&L #5015/46 2 Delaware River: Texaco-Rangelight Tower 3
SUMMARY
Total Nests 17 Active Nests 14 Successful (i.e., young fledged) nests 12 Fledglings 23 Fledglings / active nest 1.64 Successful / active nest 0.86 Young, not banded, assumed fledged. Page 14 of 16
Table 2.1.4 Summary of bald eagle sightings made during the course of osprey, terrapin and fisheries surveys. Date No. of Birds Life Stage Location Activity April 11 2 Mature Smyrna River Jetty Area Perched in tree 1 Mature Cedar Swamp Perched in tree May 31 1 Mature Appoquinimink River Marsh Soaring 1 mile west of Fennimore Landing June 4 2 Mature Smyrna River Jetty Area Perched in tree 7 1 Immature Cedar Swamp Perched in tree 2 Mature Peach House Ditch Soaring 18 1 Mature Smyrna River Jetty Area Perched in tree July 18 1 Mature Cedar Swamp Perched in tree August 13 1 Mature Beach near S'ilver Run Perched in tree 20 1 Mature Beach near Silver Run Perched in tree 21 1 Mature Beach near Silver Run Perched in tree 22 2 Mature Beach near Silver Run Perched in tree Page 15 of 16 E 9 e L
1 1 I l illgk_ g es ***"" g ( y ,'9 .~..., 2 5 bo Reech .3 e isiend ..a. - .M.Y.- r ..a -{ ,,) 4.. -(. 4., N g. 6-
- ..m.. :.50L E.; * :..
'Solem ";.. Delowere City iem itj,.c ..f,,,, >:.:- ' .f,'.f . : "C & O Canal = 1 .f ) Q .e t.n.=...g.q. t ,S
- y. f.. '
NEW JERSEY del. AWARE
- c. a
.[. 1,. s 1 a s j }: e.d, q aw hf- \\ v.e. tineCr Island ^ t "r Hancocks ..;l'.. 5 1
- '-[.'.
..d.r" .... %., M Bridge N r..,, lloway Creek p enga.mty FREEcom b., '.:' g w.EM0(ANS SA4 e e su.c,. . e,R o. .".. v.- 4 ' ...',*n-.. ' tp 1-q%- .g;-D ; .3.e .r c o,. Moodow Creek _ .,.g 5 e: ' - Ao g S9 .g .i w,,,.,49. r % uas,s- :. :, - J.. y - ., 3 t
- d.. "e, s.ke, sR4, d.1 8
- . :.".: ;; 5..
A 3l s., HoooCreek 4 3,rpy %:s, ; m .' O rs ' ' ^. [.[ t.ek,.i g.,g, ., g.. s.. , s ~-.. N .'&'"5each '?.;. V O Q ;,e p .3.. Hou,;-(.:. Liston f Horse .i. ( Nr**k. il..- W "' Ditb Y ' N stow ( -
- f.., [:1....',K
,. creek' e .'1-r :*
- s.. _,:
.s.. 4:
- P'.
?.'.:.." ' . F. m,,- .3,
- '.. _ q
- , y*
e OSPREY NEST kfM 9t*'? G BALD EAGLE SIGHTING d 3 ..t :- L> DI AMOND0 AcK TERR APIN SE AcH' ni:: 6:..,% s too; .?.,! Locations of diamondback terrapin study pras.Ic saavtcx st.acitIC Aan Gas couramT beaches, osprey nests, and bald eagle sightings - 1985. Figure 2.1-1 Page 16 of 16 ..a
e ~ !} f I Pubhc Service J Electric and Gas Company Carbin A. McNeill, Jr. Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609 339-4800 vice President - Nuclear June 16, 1986 NLR-N86086 Mr. Steven A. Varga, Director U. S. NRC PWR Project Directorate #3 l Division of PWR Licensing A 7920 Norfolk Avenue l Bethesda, MD 20014 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Administrator Region 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Gentlemen: 1985 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 OPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-70, DPR-75 DOCKET NOS. 50-272, 50-311 l The enclosed report is submitted pursua to Section 5.4.1 of the Envircnmental Technical Specifications (Appendix B to Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75) for Salem l Nuclear Generating Station. l Should you or your staff require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, b N Enclosure C Mr. Thomas J. Kenny Senior Resident Inspector Mr. Donald C. Fischer Licensing Project Manager / \\ -}}