ML20199E518
| ML20199E518 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1998 |
| From: | Heffley J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| JMHLTR:#98-0025, JMHLTR:#98-25, NUDOCS 9802020177 | |
| Download: ML20199E518 (2) | |
Text
Onnmonweahh lihum Compan) l Drevien Generating Station 6500 North Dresden Road
.wns. n.unso
,., Tel yIi 912-2920 C
January 26,1998 JMHLTR: #98-0025 U. S. Nuclear Reguluory Commission A'ITN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
1997 Commitment Revision Annual Report Dresden Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos.50-010, 50-237, and 50-249 Enclosed is the 1997 Report of evisions to commitments made in docketed correspondence f r Dresden Nuclear Power Station.
This report contians summary infonnation for the year 1997. Revisions to docketed correspondence were processed using NEI's guidance for Managing NRC Commitments, Revision 2, dated December 19, 1995.
If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact Mr. Frank Spangenberg,
)
Dresden Station Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 942-2920, ext. 3800.
Sincerely,
'J.
f t.
.e Vice Presi( nt Dresden Station Enclosure ec:
A. Bill Beach, Regional Administrator, Region III lf Senior Resident 'nspector, Dresden
'ffice of Nuclear Facili'y Safety -IDNS 9802020177 900126 PDR ADOCK 05000010 W
PDR A Unk om Compan)
_ __J
~
lire $ spen Nuclear Power Station January 26,1998 Regulatory Commitment Revision Heport Orininal Document:
NRC Inspection Report 237(249)-9200; Enforcement Conference Inspection Repon 237(249)-92012.
Sublect of Channe:
Use of a checklist similar to the one used by NED for 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluations and Screenings.
Original Commitment:
DAP 10-2 will be revised to require the use of a checklist (similar to that used by NED) to provide written negative confonnation of design issues when completing a 10 CFR 50.59 screening or Evaluation.
Revisedfemmitment:
Revised to state that the " Design Issues Worksheet" should be used for 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluations and Screenings.
]tasis:
The change to this commitment is to change the word shall to should. The revision does not preclude the use of the checklist, but no longer mandates usage for all Evaluations and Screenings.
Original Document:
TPJLTR: 95-0062, " Response to SALP 13 Report for Dresden Station".
Sublect of Channe:
Utilization of Peer Evaluators from industry top perfonners to perfonn quanerly reviews of Radiation Protection (RP) trends.
Original Commitment:
Peer evaluators from industry top perfonners will be utilized for quanerly reviews of RP trends.
Revised Commitment:
Deletion of Commitment Basis:
The original commitment was not specific with relation to time. Quarterly reviews were conducted until the time of this action. Due to improvements in the RP area this commitment was eliminated.
(