|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARLIC-99-0094, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code1999-10-0101 October 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code ML20216F6761999-09-17017 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & NUREG-1022,Rev 1 LIC-99-0082, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans1999-09-10010 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans LIC-98-0168, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments1998-12-0909 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments ML20248C0491998-05-21021 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R for Plant, Unit 1.Exemption Re Unpressurized Leakage Sites in RCP Lube Oil Collection Sys Granted LIC-98-0052, Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal LIC-97-0034, Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit1998-03-0202 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit LIC-98-0025, Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP1998-02-24024 February 1998 Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP ML20203B2031998-02-0606 February 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements. Exemption Granted ML20199E2941997-11-19019 November 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effectively Immediately).Fs Bandy Prohibited from Involvement in Activities Licensed by NRC for Period of 5 Yrs LIC-97-0136, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors1997-08-28028 August 1997 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20151L9901997-07-24024 July 1997 Comments on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML20217J6521997-07-22022 July 1997 Demand for Info Re NRC Question Re Arrest Info Supplied to OPPD in Mar 1993 for Unescorted Access to Plant ML20141B8821997-05-0606 May 1997 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements.Rule Should Not Be Limited to Designated Licensee or licensee-owned Vehicles,For Listed Reasons LIC-97-0052, Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies1997-04-17017 April 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies ML20128F6571996-09-26026 September 1996 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations LIC-96-0110, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements1996-08-0505 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20117P0961996-06-18018 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Any Addl Costs Imposed on Licensee Due to Change in Decommissioning Funding Will Aggravate Potential Investment LIC-96-0069, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment1996-06-11011 June 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment LIC-95-0193, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs1995-10-11011 October 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs LIC-95-0165, Comments Supporting Revised Salp1995-08-29029 August 1995 Comments Supporting Revised Salp ML20086T3911995-07-20020 July 1995 Comments on Proposed Generic Communications Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits LIC-95-0116, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-05-25025 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control LIC-95-0106, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial1995-05-22022 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial LIC-94-0236, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings1994-11-11011 November 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings LIC-94-0137, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program1994-07-18018 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program LIC-94-0072, Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area1994-03-31031 March 1994 Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area LIC-94-0047, Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code1994-02-18018 February 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code LIC-94-0035, Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications1994-02-0404 February 1994 Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications LIC-93-0300, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs1993-12-20020 December 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs ML20045H3231993-07-0606 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20096A0351992-05-0101 May 1992 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety ML20094K7831992-03-17017 March 1992 Comments Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-57 Re Insurance Requirements for Shutdown Reactors ML20092D2791992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Supporting & Endorsing Positions Submitted by NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Re Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys ML20086F8931991-11-11011 November 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-30-59 Re Rev of Decommissioning Regulations to Provide for Means of self-guarantee of Decommissioning Funding Costs by Licensees Meeting Stringent Financial Assurance Requirements ML20085K1581991-10-23023 October 1991 Supports Proposed Rule 10CFR50,requiring That NRC Evaluate Decommissioning Funding Plans for Power Reactors That Shut Down Prematurely on case-by-case Basis LIC-91-0063, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a LIC-91-0046, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept1991-01-25025 January 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept LIC-90-0820, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments1990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20012C6471990-03-12012 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Thermal Shock Events. Recommends That Use of Credible Surveillance Data Be Allowed to Establish Consistent Calculational Method W/Reg Guide ML19353B2091989-11-30030 November 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports NUMARC Position ML20246K2441989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Enactment of Generic Ltr 89-02 Requirements & Info Sharing Would Achieve Desired Results LIC-88-1031, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees1988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees ML20206C1081988-11-0404 November 1988 Requests for Renewal or Extension of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Regulations ML20204C1721988-10-14014 October 1988 Corrected Page 1 of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i), Increasing Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required by NRC Licensees ML20155F7021988-09-30030 September 1988 Temporary Exemption from 10CFR 50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Until Completion of Pending Rulemaking Extending Implementation Date Specified But Not Later than 890401 ML20236X6881987-11-25025 November 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(1) Requirements Re Util Maint of Min Insurance Coverage for Operating Plants.Exemption Extends Date for Acquiring Full Amount of Property Insurance Required to No Later than 881205,per Util 851005 Request ML20206C1341987-11-0202 November 1987 Requests for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Requirements Due to Licensees Inability to Provide Equivalent Protection in Lieu of Purchasing Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd Coverage ML20236F7601987-10-0202 October 1987 Request for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54.Util Will Not Be Able to Comply W/Requirements by Effective Date or within 60 Days Thereafter ML20238E0891987-09-10010 September 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Identified During Insps on 850916-20, 1001-08,1106-08,18-22 & 1209-17 1999-09-17
[Table view] Category:ORDERS
MONTHYEARML20199E2941997-11-19019 November 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effectively Immediately).Fs Bandy Prohibited from Involvement in Activities Licensed by NRC for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238E0891987-09-10010 September 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Identified During Insps on 850916-20, 1001-08,1106-08,18-22 & 1209-17 ML20132G6021985-07-30030 July 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $21,425 for Violations Noted During Special Insp on 840820-24 Re Failure to Adhere to NRC Regulations & Physical Security Plans 1997-11-19
[Table view] |
Text
. - . . . - _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ -
1
)
i UNITED STATES !
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ;
In the Matter of - ) !
-) 1A 97-087 l Finis Scott Bandy ) :
) ;
l ORDER PROHIBITING INVOLVEMENT IN NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES (EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY) :
... I Finis Scott Bandy was forrnerfy employed by Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) as an instrumentation and control technician at OPPD's Fort Calhoun Ctition nuclear power plant Blair, Nebraska. OPPD holds license No. DPR 40, issued August 9,1973, i
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part
- 50. The license authorizes the operation of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) in accordance with the conditions specifiwd therein. -
t 11 7
i
, in August 1996, the NRC inspected access authorization files during an NRC security inspection at FCS. The NRC reised a question about arrest information that Mr. Bandy ,
had supplied to OPPD during the course of 1993, in oc, wetion with his application for unoscorted access to the plant. The information in question pertained to whether Mr.-
l L : Bandy had been arrested for theft of personal property, as certain documents in his file i
1 9711210156 971119 PDR H ADOCK 05000295 pg -
appeared to indicate, or had been arrested for excessive speed while driving, as Mr.
- Bandy claimsd. As a result of the NRC's questions, OPPD agreed to interview Mr.
Bandy in the presence of the NRC inspector. During the interview, Mr. Bandy denied that he had Laen arrested for theft and asserted that the only charge he was aware of involved excessive speed while driving.
Based on further questions about the accuracy of Mr. Bandy's statements and the information piovided by him, Mr. Bandy's unescorted access to FCS was temporarily suspended on August 22,1996. On August 26,1996, OPPD terminated Mr. Bandy's employment and revoked his unescorted access to FCS. OPPD then conducted an investigation and determined that: (1) the only charge brought against Mr. Bandy in 1991 was a charge of theft of personal property; (2) copies of court records provided to OPPD by Mr. Bandy had been altered to make it appear that the charge had been for speeding; and (3) Mr., Bandy made false statements when questioned about his criminal hii. tory in 1993 by OPPD and in 1996 when questioned by OPPD and the NRC during its inspection. The NRC's investigation of this matter concluded that Mr. Bandy deliberately falsified criminal history information submitted to OPPD in 1993, and provided faise information to OPPD and an NRC inspector when questioned about this in August 1996.
On July 22,1997, the NRC issued a Demand for Information to Mr. Bandy, seeking, information as to why the NRC should not conclude that he engaged in deliberate l
l l
misconduct and, if so, why the NRC should not prohibit his involvement in NRC-licensed activities. On July 29,1997, Mr. Bandy contacted the NRC's Office of Enforcement, indicated that he had no interest in being involved in NRC-licensed actMties, and indicated that he would be willing to consent to an order prohibiting his {
involvement in NRC-licensed activities. On August 19,1997, the NRC sent a letter to Mr. Bandy formally seeking his contant to a confirmatory order prohibiting his involvement in NRC-licensed actMties for five years. Mr. Bandy failed to respond to ,
l this letter or to NRC efforts to contact him.
lli l
Based on the above, the NRC has concluded that Mr. Bandy engaged in deliberate misconduct in 1993 and in August 1906, by: (1) deliberately falsely stating to OPPD during the course of 1993 that he had been convicted in 1991 of excessive speeding while driving when, in fact, he had been convicted of theft of personal property, and by deliberately altering copies of court records that were provided to OPPD; and (2) deliberately falsely stating in August 1996 to OPPD and an NRC inspector that he had been convicted in 1991 of excessive speeding while driving. These actions constituted a violation of 10 CFR 50.5(a)(2), which prohibits an individual from deliberately submitting to the NRC or a licensee information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.
In this case, the information that Mr. Bandy provided regarding his personal history was i
(
, , - --- - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ~ ' ~
4 material because licensees are required to consider such information in making unescorted access determinations in scoordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.66.
The NRC must be able to rely on the licensee and its employees to comply with NRC requirements, including the requirement to provide information that is complete and securate in all material respects. Mr. Bandy's actions in deliberately providing false information to the licensee and to the NRC constitute deliberate violations of Commission regulations. His conduct raises serious doubt about his trustworthiness and reliability; particularly whether he can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirwments and to provide complete and accurate information to NRC licensees in the future.
Coinequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that licensed activities can be conducted in comp' lance with the Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public would be protected if Mr. Bandy were permitted at this time to be involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, safety and interest require that Mr. Bandy be prohibited from any involvsment in NRC-licensed activities for a period of five years from the dato of this Order. Additionally, Mr. Bandy is required to notify the NRC of his first' employment in NRC-licensed activities following the prohibition period, Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I find that the significance of Mr. Bandy's conduct described above is such that the public health, safety and
1 i
i
- 5-interest require that this Order be effective immediately. l l
IV Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103,161b,1611,161o,182 and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations ir.10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 50, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, THAT:
- 1. Finis Scott Bandy is prohibited from involvement in activities licensed by the NRC for 6 period of 5 years. NRC-licensed activities are those that are conducted pursuant to a spocific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but nM limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
- 2. If Finis Scott Bandy is currently involved with another employer in NRC licensed activities, he must immediately cease such activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address and telep hone number of the empicyer, and provide a copy of this Order to the employer.
- 3. For the five-year period after the above period has expired, Mr. Bandy will notify the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.,20555, within 20 days of the first time he accepts employment
>-c- -a ,- - . - - - - gym _*- r -+ -
1.;
. 6-in NRC-liconeed activiiles, as defined in Paragraph IV.1 above. In the notification, he will include a statement of his commitment to comply with regulatory requirements and address why the NRC should have confidence that he will comply with regulatory requirements, and the name, address and telephone number of his orpployer or entity where he will be involved in licensed activities.
- The Director, Omoe of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in writing, any of the above :
conditions upon a showing by Mr. Bandy of good cause.
V in accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Bandy must, and any other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this Order, and may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Omco of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifmally admit or ,
deny each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the matters of fact and law on which Mr. Bandy, or any other such person adversely affected, relies and I
'I E 1
^Fi-e* cv v vi - - v y w p -y he-t -e- v -w re m w , ei wa-y e e = -- w ew ~ e r e-e v---- -, . , - - ,*-e-- -s-,wwww--*w,w---ww-,-wer,-yew,- -r,er-i-
- w,- , ,, v- ,-v*-w=- --*---w,-wwwer,w-y-
t I
i the reasons es to why the Order should not have been issued.- Any answer or request I for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory i Commission, ATTN: Chief, Docketing and Service Section, Washington, D.C. 20555.
Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Omos of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Mington, Texas 76011, and to Mr. Bandy.
If a person other than Mr. Bandy requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with
, particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
If a hearing is requested by Mr. Bandy or a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission willissue an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order shouki be sustained.
d Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr. Bandy may, in addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move the presiding omoor to set aside the -
immediate effectiveness of the Order, on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on more suspicion, unfounded allegations, or error, f
-,+--.e-..e. ~ _ . - , . wwwp,..y,, , g r e. *- g,.e, ,-
8 In the absence of any request for a hearing, or written approval of an extension of tirne in which to request a hearing, the provisioni specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings, if an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specifed !
in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. AN ANSWER OR A REQUEST FOR HEARING SHALL NOT STAY THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDER.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p Nw = ~
ames Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement Dated a Rockville, Maryland thisf[ . ay of November 1997
-. _ _m .- . , _ , __._ . , . , . _ - , _ ,
j.-
~
, Mr. Finis Scott Bandy
^
' DISTRIBUTION: . p '
J PUBLIC
LJCallan, EDO - '
- AThadani, DEDE ,
'JLieberman, OE JGoldberg, OGC SCollins, NRR Enforcement Coordinators RI, Ril, Rill, RIV RZimmerman, NRR JGillilan, OPA HBell, OlG GCaputo, Ol TMartin, AEOD SRothstein, OE EA File Hard cooles:
RA Reading File RSLO-Hackney RWise BMurray RIV Files MIS Coordinator PAO Henderson ELWilliamson,01 E-Mall DISTRIBUTION:
OEMAll- JDyst (JFD2)
TPGwynn (TPG) WBrown (WLB)
GSanborn (GFS) GMVasquez (GMV)
BHenderson (BWH) MHammond (MFH2)
CHackney (CAH) - DKunihiro (DMK1)
Art Howell(ATH) DChamberlain (DDC)
KPerkins (KEP) WJohnson (WDJ)
KBrockman (KEB) BMurray (BX gM OE 4 RA:RIVD%OGCkYr D: 1 DE SRothst$in EMerschoff JGoldberg [Mrman ATkdani 11/[5 7 11/d97 11/M97- 11Ff97 11/ /97
- J Doc Name
% -g u 3-(
) S 4
y ,
+.
01 ' ' ' - -
._______._A_.___A__. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _