ML20199D347
| ML20199D347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/30/1998 |
| From: | Lohaus P NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | GENERAL, MINNESOTA, STATE OF, OHIO, STATE OF, OKLAHOMA, STATE OF, PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF, WISCONSIN, STATE OF |
| References | |
| SP-98-100, NUDOCS 9901200074 | |
| Download: ML20199D347 (7) | |
Text
- .
e ALL AGREEMENT STATES !
MINNESOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN 30 M TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP-98-100)
L Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:
' INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION........
. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION..XX FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA-201 REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS TRAINING COURSE INFORMATION.............
l TEC H NICAL' I N FO R MATI ON..........................
l-OTHER INFORMATION..................................
I l-
' Supplementary informatiob: For your information and use, the final OSP Procedure, Review of State Reguletions, SA-201, dated November 10,1998, is posted at the OSP Website at OSP i
Procedures. SA-201 supercedes OSP Procedure D.7, dated September 8,1997, (SP-97-069, October 2,1997).
' SA-201' provides: (1) guidance for recommended use by States on preparation and submittal of
- proposed and final Stato regulations for NRC staff revie'w; (2) procedures to be followed by NRC staff for review of State regulations including the scope of review, staff responsibilities, timeliness, and products to be prepared and communicated to the States documenting the results of the review; and (3) guidance to NRC staff on whether differences identified in State regulations are significant.
i Please review in particular the recommended guidance described in Appendix A. The guidance requests that the Program Director, when submitting regulations for review, identify whether the regulations are proposed or final, identify the changes being made through line-in/line-out text, or similar identification, provide a comments due date, and finally, provide a determination whether the Agreement State believes its regulations satisfy the compatibility and health and safety component criteria of OSP Procedure SA-200. Following this guidance will help expedite
- NRC staff review of proposed changes to State regulations.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me or the individual
. named below.
l l
POINT OF CONTACT:
Stephen N. Salomon TELEPHONE:
(301) 415-2368 FAX:
(301) 415-3502 INTERNET:
SNSO NRC. GOV 9901200074 981230 OriginalSigned By:
1
-PDR STPRO ESGOEN PAULH.LOHAUS N
Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director
(
ND Office of State Programs l\\
Distributxm:
DlR RF DCD (SP03) -
400033 c
SDroggitis:
PDR (YES.g).
l A/S File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SNS\\ SP98100.WPD
- See previous concurrence.
Ta veoeive e cop r of this document. Indicate in the box: "C' = Copy without ettechment/ enclosure "E' = Copr with attachment / enclosure
'N' = No copy OFFICE OSP l
OSP:DD 'l OSP:D l
l l
NAME SSalomon:nb/gd:kk PLohaus RBangart DATE 12/16/98*
12/23/98*
12/28/98*
l OSP FILE CODE: SP-A-d i
-n
.,1_.
s
nau i
gy i
UNITED STATES j
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20565-0001 December 30, 1998 ALL AGREEMENT STATES MINNESOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP-98-100 )
Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:
INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION........
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION..XX FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA-201 REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS TRAINING COURSE INFORMATION.............
TECHNICAL INFORMATION.........................
OTH ER IN FORMATION.................................
Supplementary information: For your information and use, the final OSP Procedure, Review of State Regulations, SA-201, dated November 10,1998, is posted at the OSP Website at OSP Procedures. SA-201 supercedes OSP Procedure D.7, dated September 8,1997, (SP-97-069, October 2,1997).
SA-201 provides: (1) guidance for recommended use by States on preparation and submittal of proposed and final State regulations for NRC staff review; (2) procedures to be followed by NRC staff for review of State regulations including the scope of review, staff responsibilities, timeliness, and products to be prepared and communicated to the States documenting the results of the review; and (3) guidance to NRC staff on whether differences identified in State regulations are significant.
Please review in particular the recommended guidance described in Appendix A. The guidance requests that the Program Director, when submitting regulations for review, identify whether the regulations are proposed or final, identify the changes being made through line-in/line-out text, or similar identification, provide a comments due date, and finally, provide a determination whether the Agreement State believes its regulations satisfy the compatibility and health and safety component criteria of OSP Procedure SA-200. Following this guidance will help expedite NRC staff review of proposed changes to State regulations, if you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me or the individual named below.
POINT OF CONTACT:
Stephen N. Salomon TELEPHONE:
(301) 415-2368 FAX:
(301) 415-3502 r
INTERNET:
S@NR V
(hM
\\
44 D l
Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs
~
i I
ALL AGREEMENT STATES
/
MINNESOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN
/
TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP )
~l Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:
INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION........
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION..XX FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA 201
/ REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS TRAINING COURSE INFORMATION.............
/
/
TECHNICAL INFORMATION......................... /
/
OTH ER I N FORMATION.................................. /
/
Supplementary information: For your information and use, the final OSP Procedure, Review of State Regulations, SA-201, dated November 10,1998, is posted at the OSP Website at OSP Procedures. SA-201 supercedes OSP Procedure D.7, dated September 8,1997, (SP-97-069, October 2,1997).
//
SA-201 provides: (1) guidance for recommended use by States on preparation and submittal of proposed and final State regulations for NRC staff review; (2) procedures to be followed by NRC staff for review of State regulations including the scope of review, staff responsibilities, timeliness, and products to be prepared and communicated to the States documenting the results of the review; and (3) guidance to NRC staff on whether differences identified in State regulations are significant.
/
/
Please review in particular the recommended guidance described in Appendix A. The guidance suggests that the Program Director, when submitting regulations for review, identify whether the regulations are proposed or final, identify the/ changes being made through !ine-in/line-out text, or similar identification, provide a commentsfdue date, and finally, provide a determination whether the Agreement State believes its regulations satisfy the compatibility and health and safety component criteria of OSP Procedure SA-200. Following this guidance will help expedito NRC staff review of proposed changes to, State regulations.
/
if you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me or the individual named below.
/
4 POINT OF CONTACT: /
Stephen N. Salomon TELEPHONE:
/
(301) 415-2368 FAX:
/
(301) 415-3502 INTERNET:
/
SNS@NRC. GOV I
/
Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director f
Office of State Programs Distribution:
DIR RF
/
DCD (SP03)
SDroggitis
/
PDR (YES/)
A/S File WN DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SNSiSA201.SNS-
- See previous concurrence.
T* receive a copy of this document,Indicek in the box: *C' E Copy without attachment / enclosure 'E's Copy with attachment / enclosure
- N* e No copy OFFICE OSP l
OSP:DD l
OSP:DO g l
e NAME SSalomon:nb/gd:kk PLohaus RBangart /%l6 DATE 12/16/98*
/12/23/98*
12/Jf) /98
/
ALL AGREEMENT STATES MINNESOTA, PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, AND WISCONSIN TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP )
i Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:
INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION........
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION..XX FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA-201 I REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS TECHNICAL INFORMATION..........................
I i
OTH E R I N FO R MATI O N.................................. !
l I
Supplementary information: For your information and bse, the final OSP Procedure, Review of State Repu/stions, SA-20f, dated November 10,1996, is posted at the OSP Website at OSP Procedures. SA-201 supercedes OSP Procedure D.7, dated September 8,1997, (SP-97-069, October 2,1997).
l' SA-201 provides: (1) guidance for recommended use by States on preparation and submittal of proposed and final State regulations for NRC staff review; (2) procedures to be followed by
- NRC staff for review of State regulations including the scope of review, staff responsibilities, timeliness, and products to be prepared and communicated to the States documenting the results of the review; and (3) guidance to NRC staff on whether differences identified in State regulations are significant.
l Please review in particular the recommended guidance described in Appendix A. The guidance suggests that the Program Director, when submitting regulations for review, identify whether the regulations are proposed or final, identify the changes being made through line-in/line-out text, or similar identification, provide a comments due date, and finally, provide a determination whether the Agreement State believes its regulations satisfy the compatibility and health and safety component criteria of OSP Procedure SA 200. Following this guidance will help expedite
~
NRC staff review of proposed changes to State, regulations, if you have any questions regarding this corres ndence, please contact me or the Individual named below.
/
POINT OF CONTACT:
St phen N. Salomon TELEPHONE:
(301) 415-2368 FAX:
(301) 415-3502 INTERNET:
SNS@NRC. GOV l
Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director
, Office of State Programs
Enclosure:
l As stated j
Distribution:
DIR RF
[
DCD (SP03)
- SDroggitis j
PDR (YESS A/S Fils j
- See previous concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SA201.SNS r=,
i.
, nhi.e. cum.ne.insie inin.non: c.m m d ut seinehm.au.nei ur.
e.coer ween ii. chm. nil.ncio.ur. N N copy OFFICE OSP GC l OS$d@f l OSP:D l
l l
NAME SSalomon:nb/od PLohads fV\\ '
RBangart DATE-12/16/98*
12/ 2 3 /98 12/
/98 laMAf)7 OSP FILE CODE: SP-A-4
e.
~
ALL AGREEMENT STATES-3KLAHOMA,' AND' WISCONSIN MINNESOTA, PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMEbTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP-98-XXX)
Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:
. INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORNATION.........
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION...XX FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA-201 REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS TECHNICAL INFORMATION.......................
L OTHER INFORMATION..............
l l
Supplementary information: For your information and use, the final OSP Procedure, Review of State Reguistions, SA-207, dated November 10,1998, is posted at the OSP Website at OSP Procedures. SA-201 supercedes OSP Procedure D.7, dated September 8,1997, (SP-97-069, i
October 2,1997) and was perfected basod on one year of practical experience.
SA-201 provides: (1) guidance for recon mended use by States on preparation and submittal of g
proposed and final State regulations for iIRC staff review; (2) procedures to be followed by l
NRC staff for review of State regulations including the scope of review, staff responsibilities, timeliness, and products to be prepared and communicated to the States documenting the results of the review; and (3) guidance to NRC staff on whether differences identified in State regulations are significant.
During the one year time period, we noted that a number of States were not following the recommended guidance described in Appendix A. In particular, some submissions lacked a l
cover letter than identifies whether the regulations are proposed or final, at what point in the l:
State's regulatory process NRC's review would be of most benefit, a due date, and finally, a comparison in the form of a table that coripares the provisions of the State regulation with the i
amendments from the Revision of the Ch 'onology of NRC Amendments. Generally, this type of information is required before the State completes the necessary changes to its regulations and only has to be transmitted to us. Following this guidance would speed up the NRC staff review.
)
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me or the individual named below.
l l
POINT OF CONTACT:
Stephen N. Salomon TELEPHONE:
(301) 415-2368 FAX:
(301) 415-3502 f
INTERNET:
SNS@NRC. GOV Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs As stated D stribution:
D R RF DCD (SP03)
SDroggitis.
PDR (YESj_.) (NO_.)
A/S File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SA201.SNS
' 'o reenha a ces r at this encument. "* in th i box: "C' = Conv without attac vnent/ enclosure "E' = Coov wth attachment / enclosure
- 4' = 10 cooy OFFICE OSP $7D OSP:DD l
OSP:D l
l I
NAME SSalomon:nb PLohaus i RBangart
[
DATE 12/ / ff/98 12/
/98 i
12/
/98
[
i f
PLEASE FORWARD IMMEDIATELY l
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS FAX: (301) 415-3502 i
NUMBER OF PAGES: 9 including this page l
DATE:
DECEMBER 30,1998 TO:
RADIATION CONTROL PROGRAM DIRECTORS IN PENNSYLVANIA AND RHODE ISLAND FROM:
PAUL H. LOHAUS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS
SUBJECT:
SP-98-099 UPDATED TRAINING COURSE LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 l
.SP-98-100 FINAL OSP PROCEDURE: SA-201 REVIEW OF STATE REGULATIONS f
VERIFICATION - 301-415-3340
i.
l l
<- TRANSACTION REPORT >
12-30-1998(WED) 15 19 p
l l
C BROADCAST 3
ND.
DATE TIPE DESTINATION STATION PO.
DURATION MODE RESULT 2786 12-30 15212 PA 9
0'03'32*
NORM.E OK r
l 2787 15 16 401 277 2456 - T 9
0*03'32*
NORN.E OK 18 0*07'04" 1
l-I i
I i
l I
f I. -
I i
i 1
I-h
_