ML20198N820
| ML20198N820 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/09/1998 |
| From: | Kozak T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Myers L CENTERIOR ENERGY |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9801210226 | |
| Download: ML20198N820 (4) | |
Text
m
,=
- ' i f.;
p e-
-d. p an9y'(
untre3sTATasJ
. NUCLEAF MEIULATORY COMMISSION
}_
o neocu tw L
act wAnnewwt noAo
_ usu!. swNOS 80632-21
- ...+-
January 9, 1998 Mr. Lew W. Myers I
Vice President-Nuclear:
j Centerior Service Company :
P. O. Box 97, A200 Perry, OH 44081 -
1
SUBJECT:
PLANT PERFORMANCE REVIEW (PPR)- PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
Dear Mr. My~ 3:
ion October 21,1997, the NRC staff completed the semiannual Plant Performance Review (PPR) t of Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The Region conducts these reviews for all operating nuclear power plants to develop an integrated understandmg of safety performance. The results are used by regional management to facilitate planning and allocation of inspection resources.- The PPR for Perry Nuclear Power Plant involved the participation of all Region lli technical divisions as well as responsible NRR staff, in evaluating inspection results and safety performance _ '
information for the period from April 1997 throuch September 1997. PPRs provide regional management with a current summary oflicensee performance and serve as inputs to the NRC E
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) and senior management meeting reviews.
Plant performance was similar during the past six months to that during the previous PPR period.
Operations performance was good during the shutdown and startup for refueling outage 6.
However, operator errors continued to occur, especially toward the end of the outage.
Maintenance activities were generally well handled which led to very good plant material condition. System Engineering, while still do'ng well, appeared to have declined somewhat most notably in assessing potential unreviewed safety questions. Plant Support continued to be good.
This letter advises you of our planned inspection effort resulting from the Perry Nuclear Power z
Plant PPR review. The informat ;n is provided to enable appropriate consideration of the resource impact on your staff, and to permit scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues to be resolved in advance of inspector arrival onsite. The enclosure details our inspection plan
. for approximately the next 6 months. The rationale or basis for each inspection outside the
" Core" inspection program is provided so that you are aware of the reason for emphasis in these
, program areas. Resident inspections, as well as periodic inspections by other assigned members of our staff, may occur at any time in support of the Core inspection program.
f l
9901210226 990109 PDR ADOCK 05000440 G
PDR i}\\,$$$h!,5l$!I!!I,Si. w sw
-~; l L. Myers -, - We are interested in feedback on this program, including the need for any changes in the inspection plan, and we invite your questions or comments. If changes are necessary, you will be informed. If you have any questions, please cor<act me at (630) 829-9866. Sincerely, Th as ozak, Chief Rea Projects Branch 4 Docket No. 50-440 -
Enclosure:
Inspection Plan cc w/ encl: ' H. L Hegrat, Manager Regulatory Affairs T. S. Rausch, Director, Quality and Personnel Development R. W. Schrauder, Director Nuclear Engineering Department W. R. Kanda, General Manager Nuclear Power Plant Department N. L Bonner, Director, Nuclear Maintenance Department H. W. Bergendahi, Director Nuclear Services Department Ohio State Liaison Officer Robert E. Owen, Ohio Departrnent of Health C. A. Glazer, State of Ohio Public Utilities Commission
[ PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT g3 WSPECTION PLAN L l: o I' ' IP-Inspec6cn Procedure i - Ti-Temponwy instruchon l' Core inspechon - Minimum NRC Inspec6on Program (mandatory aN plants) INSPECTION TITLE / NUMOER OF PLANNED TYPE OF INSPECTION PROGRAM AREA INSPECTORS INSPECTION DATES IP 84750 Chem!stry/ effluents '2 1/5-9/98 Routine core inspection IP S2301 Exercise Evaluation 4 2/23-2//98 Rout!ne core inspection IP 82302 Scenario Review 1 2/23-27/98 Routine core inspection IP 84750 Effluents /REMP 2 5/18-22/98 Routine core inspection 1 IP 83750 Radiation protection 1 7/20-24/98 Routine core inspection i ~ IP 46500 Effectiveness of Licensee 3 1/12-30/98 Routine core inspection i Controls in k%diiring, Resolving, and Preventing prm. 4 e i i l i =
e. ~J' - e L L Myers 42 = r i We are interested in foodback on this program, including the need for any changes in the _ inspection plan, and we invite your questions or comments. - if changes are necessary, you will. i be informed. If you have any questions, please contact me at (630) 829 g666s _1 Sincerely. 1. - /s T. Kozak [ 2-Thomas Kozak, Chief. l _ Reactor Projects Branch 4 Docket No.~ 50-440 4
Enclosure:
Inspection Plan - cc w/oncl: H. L. Hegret, Manager Regulatory Affairs T. S. Rausch, Director, Quality - and Personnel Development R. W. Schrauder, Director - Nuclear Enginev'ng Department W. R. Kanda, General Manager . Nuclear Power Plant Department -? N. L. Bonner, Director, Nuclear . Maintenance Department H. W. Bergendahl,' Director Nuclear Services Department Ohio State Liaison Officer Robert E. Owen, Ohio . Department of Health C. A. Glazer, State of Ohio 'Public Utilities Commission Distribution: Docket File w/enci DRP w/end Rlli PRR w/end PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci CAA1 w/enci (E-mail) Project Manager, NRR w/enci . A. B. Beach w/enci Rlli Enf. Coordinator w/enci Deputy RA w/ encl: DRS (2) w/enci .TSS w/enci DOCDESK (E mail) _ SRI Perry w/enci p_ s DOCUMENT NAME:. G:\\PERR\\lNSPPLN5.PER v.
- s.. n.e w. 4
- n. i i m. w c. c.n se n n o a r - c.n wwi.n u
/ u. u. r OFFICE Rill l Rilj i,4/ - l4 Rllt, lTs Rill JW NAME LouolMed/Gardner:nhV Ga M T4$i V) W/SAstir'$kil@ KopkW DATE-124 49Y //f/fr 12/YC/97 12/" /97 ' 1// 9 V - OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Y f w.- ae,4a. u-r-4 =, r -}}