ML20198N632
| ML20198N632 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1998 |
| From: | Grant G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Kingsley O COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9801210151 | |
| Download: ML20198N632 (33) | |
Text
_
f!,
January 32, 1998 Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley President, Nuclear Generation Group Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Regulatory Services Executive Towers West 181 1400 Opus Place, Suite 500.
Downers Grove,IL 60515
SUBJECT:
NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL MEETING
SUMMARY
Dear Mr. Kingsley:
The NRC Oversight Panel met with Commonwealth Edison and LaSalle County Station management on December 17,1997. This management meeting was open to public observation. Enclosure 1 contains the associated meeting summary. Enclosure 2 contains the handout provided to the NRC Oversight Panel by Commonwealth Edison during the meeting, In accordance with Section 2.7g0 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in NRC's Public t
Document Room.
Sincerely,
/s Geoffrey E. Grant Geoffrey C. Orant, Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos: 50-373; 50 374 License Nos: NPF-11; NPF 18
Enclosures:
- 1. Meeting Summary
- 2. Meeting Handout See Attached Distribution t
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\LASA\\t.AS12177. SUM
- e..
.e ve m, w,n.
w w t.u e - c.w o w.n w.,,a r - c.n *,..n w.w n. n...,y OFFICE Rlli d
R!l!
)
Ritt g
NAME Hills /co btO O'Brien Grant b s
l DATE 01/f /98 01(S/98 014%79
/h OFFICIAL. RECORD COPY N."18&Mif#,,*An
~
l.liI.lll.lL.ill.Ul. llll.
L ym agg
O. Kingsley 2
oc Wencia:
M. Wallace, Nuclear Services Senior Vee President G. Stanley, PWR Vice President J. Perry, BWR Vice President D. Farrar, Regulatory Services Manager
- 1. Johnson, Licensing Director DCD-Uconsing W. Subalusky, Jr., Site Vee President F. Decimo, Plant General Manager P. Bamas, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor Richard Hubbard Nathan Schloss, F.conomist Office of the Attomey General i
State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Qitiribution' Docket File w/oncis DRP w/enct PUBLIC IE 01 w/encls TSS w/encls A. Beach wlencls DRS (2) w/encls Deputy RA w/oncls Rill PRR w/encls R ll Enf. Coord, w/oncis RAC1 (E-Mail)
SRI LaSalle w/encls CAA1 (E-Mail)
Project Mgr., NRR w/oncat.
DOCDESK (E Mail)
F. Miraglia, NRR w/encls L. Gerke, OCA w/encls S. Collins, NRR Wencls R. Zimmerman, NRR w/encls E. Adensam, NRR w/encls T. Hiltz, OEDO w/encls
~
i l
i i
Eneiosure 1 Pubtle Meeting Summary i
NRC Overodght Panel for LaSalle County Station l
'MI summary:
The licensee provided the NRC oversight Panel with a handout # Wosure 2) and discussed portions of the information contained in the handout during the ni ing. During the licensee's F:::M:" -r., the licensee addressed NRC questione and commt..
The licensee provided a status of their restart plan, discussed the status of the matosial cond La. 8mprovernents, the progress made towards improving tte effectiveness of engineering support at the station, and an l
update on the implementation of the human performance improvemord initiat;ves. The licensee also addressed the status of license amendments required for Unit i restart.
- The licensee indicated the following with regards to the effectiveness of improvement actions and currerd plant performance:
l Progress was being,nade towards completing design changes, engineering requests, i-and dos;ng operator work-arounds. The number of design changes being completed included all design changes identified during the System Functional Performarum Reviews and emergent design changes identified prior to the meeting.
..tooedure upgrades were proceeding to support ongoing maintenance, surveillances, and operation of the pierd. The Quality and Safety Assessment orgardration at the plant ittentitled problems in this area that had been presented to plant management for resolution. A checklist was developed for use during procedure walkdowns that were being completed prior to the implementation of any new or revised procedure.
The current number of corrective maintenance items in the backlog for Unit 1 was 525, with a larget of 0 corrective items remaining in the backlog prior to startup. In addition, 1730 norHwtage work requests existed with a target of 500 to remain outstanding prior to startup.
During the *E-aaH of the status of the improvement initiatives to address engineering support, the licensee identified that in November igg 7,14 percord of the calculations were unacceptable. The licensee was taking action to address the problem.
The objective of the System Readiness Reviews was to ensure defmiencies are identified, documorded, and evaluated for their effect on syssam operability and reliability.
The licensee plans to review g2 systems, and the draft review process was complete.
Aspeds of the review indude an assessment of work requests., engineering requests, action requests, the status of '.he system with respect to the maintenanco rule, and a material condition walkdown, Action to andress human performance improvement initiatives were conglete; however, monitoring of human performance would continue for an additional period of time prior to closure.
O l
1 Bl:
7 l
l o
9 i
No protnems were idendAed with the licones amendments that have been requested. M known license amendments have been submitted.
During the discussion, the NRC staff communicated the following considerations:
I The licensee indicated that during the current outage 157,528 square feet of the plant was decontaminated. However, the leoensee could not describe the definition used to idenOfy the areas of the plant considered in determining the percentage of the plant decontaminated. The licensee agreed to provide the definition.
The completion rate of engineering requests was dooressing in early Dooomber 1997.
The NRC staff questioned the reasons and the licensee indicited that resources were shifted from the engineering requests to completion of design change packages.
The NRC staff reques;ed the definition of corrective maintenance and the licensee indicated that tha definition would be provided.
The NRC staff expressed concoms with the qualifications of the licensee's engineering staff. The licensee stated that a more detailed analysis of the qualifications would be provided.
e 4
f 4
4 2
...,.c m..
.c
,r
t t
i e
)
1 Atlandmas:
i i
Nudaar Ranidatarv Comminalen (NRC)
A. Beach, Regkmet Administrator, Region til G. Grant, Director, Division of Reactor Projeds (DRP) l R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate lil 2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
A. Vogel, Acting Chief, DRP Branch 2 M. HLeer, Senior Resident inspector, LaSalle E. Duncan, Reactor inspector, Division of Reactor Safety D. Shay, Prq)ect Manager, NRR Project Directorate lil-2 R. Crane, Residem inspector, LaSalle i
Commonweabh Edison (Comed)
- O. Kingsley, Chief Nuclear Offloor, Comed
\\
E. KreR, Vice President of Boiling Water Reactor Operations, Comed O. Subalusky, Site Vice-Presidsnt, LaSolle
= F. Decimo, Plant Genwal Manager, LaSalle -
O. Poletto, Site Engine:.ing Managw, Laswle
- 8. Smhh, Plant Manager, LaSalle W. Riffer, Quality and Safety Assessment Manager, LaSalle P. Bames, Regulatory Assurance Supervisx, LaSalle J. Bailey, Restart Manager, LeSalle D. Soone, Support Services Manager, LaSalle i
G. Bones, Lloonsing, LaSalle J, Schrage, WMD, LaSalle D. Evans, Liason, Comed T. Brocoolo, Corporate Assessment Manager, Comed l
A. Magnafici, Restart Test Team Manager, LaSalle D. Enright, Operations Manager, LaSalle D. Sheldon, Shin Manager, LaSalle T. O' Leary, Executive Staff, Comed P. Rosier, Site Communications Coordinator, LaSalle T. Wise, Quality Consultard, LaSalle J. Reynolds, Nuclear Operations Committee, Comed D. Jenkins, General Attomey, Comed C. Berry, Executive Assistant, LaSalle -
H. Vinyard, Electrical Maintenance Super'nh ndent, LaSalle
}
l.
l l
3
=.-
e
-,-w.vA
-,.-m m-
-,,- -,,,,w,,.,-.
N -
+,-N,.,-,,a.,-,new rm,.-,w m,
.rmw.,.--w.s,
---v,,
,--.m
.- n rw,,
er-
-r,
l b
, s I
Commonwealth Edison Management Meeting Handout 1
V I
Lt.
.._s.
...,._._...,_,.,,.,..-__..,-...-_.,...-.,...,,m,..___.,_
_o,,
EEmi LaSalle County Station World Class Performance l
1 Safe, Long, Uneventful Run i
Safe, Uneventful Startup NRC Public Meeting l
l December 17,1997 - Mazon EOF 1
l LaSalle
[
l NRC Public Meeting i
J December 17,1997 0900 - 1100 o
NRC Introduction Leach / Beach o
LaSalle introduction Subalusky o
Material Condition Update (Strategy 3)
Smith Design Change Packages Engineering Requests OperatorWorkArounds Corrective Maintenance Backlog Effective Engineering Support (Strategv 4)
Poletto o
Enginearl ag Capablllty (Action Plan 4.1)
Plant Operational Readiness (Action Plan 4.2)
- System FunctionalTesting(4.2.1.9)
- System Readiness Reviews (4.2.9)
HPCS DG Output Circuit Breakerissue o
Human Performance Update (Strategy 2)
Boone Strategy implementation o
Closing Remarks Subalusky o
NRC Closing Remarks Leach / Beach LaSalle
WERHfL1F35 Material Condition Update (November 21 - December 13,1997) e Design Changes j
l
> 36 issued 2 Implemented 3 Tested l
- Replaced U-1 "A" RHR Suction Strainer l
- 1 A DG Cooling Water Pump & Motor Base Plate
- Redesigned & Installed Lake Blowdown Valve l-l e Engineering Requests l
> 87 issued 123 C'esed l
1
- VE Operability in Purge Mode
- Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Level l
e Operator Work Arounds
> 3 Closed
- Diesel Generator VAR Indication
- CW Pump Glandwater Pressure Switches
- RHR Heat Exchanger Outlet Valve
~
LaSalle (MswT.,-
v.'. c"J7. A-c1 ppt
EERML1F35 Material Condition Update (Totals to Date) e Design Changes (299)
> 265 Designed 113 Installed 72 Tested e Engineering Requests
> 1,447 L1F35 1,223 Closed e Nuclear Work Request Tasks
> 8,500 Total 6,048 Closed LaSalle 2
u, _.. _ -..c m.<,,
A A
o o
6 o
o o
ENNNI Other Work Completed e 27,700 Labels e 1,784 Procedures Revised & Upgraded e 157,528 Sq Ft Decontaminated e High Intensity Operator Training e First Line Supervisor Assessment s
~
LaSalle 3
m_
..m.a.
(
n-.
u l
\\
Egg ll L1F35 Design Change Packages
- Remaining to be Submitted to Work Analyst 200.
.q.
sw _
l g
I 7
+
iso seo
\\
saa.. m n,.n w w
.- se n
)
120 -
100 -w.ww~uaa.~n
-E 80 9
L go
's
~44~
40 l
31 20
'f I
l' o
5 5
551.3 i_ g ggK g5 5
5 3
5 S
5 S
2 S
gg8 5
R sg$
s s e,s g
s
=
=
g s
s s
s week Endlas
+ - Schedule-DCPs Roma W to be Submitted
--e-Actuo64 cps Completed Por Week hard S
A5 7 12 79 25 52 89 erb M E
95 90 E
92F 1D TFt1 1FB M 1101 11EB 17 5 11Rd 11GP13B 1FD 1ED GF
- r ^-71EF 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 2
1 4
0 0
4 6
7 4
7 3
4 4
c -
8 2
0 1
5 1
4 3
6 3
1 6
3 S
M 8
9 9
7 2
M S
5 D
3 r__. m e
=
w e
3 m
a e
a e
s
=
w w
sz a
a a
e
=
n
=
m s
- n LaSalle 4
iT1supportimecengevrcW7rreidecruct ppt h
u Egggf L1F35 ERs Remaining to be Completed
~.
_~
m _.
2 1000g I
I i
l l
l l
l 1
t l
l l
l l
l l
l l
'I l
l l
i I
i i
1 6
{
}
j l
I 2
MO h
f i
600 l
I f
I l
i so0 -
l i
l f
I
?
t i
4o0 i
1~ *i yo l
l
'6 i
W 224 l
l j
I i
'4 l
g I
l
' ' + 133 l
o
'00 i
0 s
s s
s s
~
~
~
~
s s
s s
s s
s s
s s3ss
~
ss a
sss nss g
s E_ I !
a esR ss-E s
s s
a s9 s
i.s s:
s e
s Schedule-ERs Rementing to be Completed
-e-NRs W Per Week j
1 o
Igrd M
A5 7 12 79 EB 82 89 Sti E
E 96 90 E
927 1104 1 711 in5 6 1101 titB 1715 11Q2 19 13tB tFt3 m 0
ft 8
4 41 22 2
3 3
3 3
14 34 3
3 Mari 2
A) 3 3
5 3
SI 47 62 52 44 St 33 3
53 N
W W
5E 5F 6
46 36 3ET 312 35 21 3as M
M as
'-- -- wi,G,.e LaSalle s
m
. _ s. -_,,
t
o o.
ggggy L1F35 Corrective Maintenance Backlog t1F35 Current Target 525 (12/15/97) 0 (Startup)
Non-Outage Work Requests <' Unit 1/0?
Target 1,730 (12/15/97) 500 (Startup)
LaSalle IT1supraL. L.v.VwcW7rrcidectret ppt
m Effective Engineering Support
~
yyggy Action Plan 4.1 Engineering Capability
- Objective: Upgrade capability of Engineering to support safe unit restart and power operation.
e Measurements:
> System Engineer Qualifications - Complete.
> Engineering Assurance Group Quality Indicator -
Improving Trend.
LaSaIIe 7
M1=---_-T..._ _ _.,VwdO7i.-Ca.,1 ppt
v v
gggy Effective Engineering Support System Engineering Oral Review Boards 87
~
m Completed O RBs 80 79
+ 0 R B s R em a ining to A c hie v e 10 0 %
70 70 63 60 53 50 _
8 38 40 33 28 30 20 0
initia l A p r-97 May-97 Jun-97 J u l-9 7 A u g-97 S e p-9 7 O c t-9 7 N o v.9 7 M onth LaSalle
' l\\1swi..___.y.WeW7twcklocnrci ppt c
u Effective Engineering Support yyy EAG Quality Indicators Documents / Activities Monitored:
Design Changes e
Safety Evaluations e
Operability Evaluations e
e Calculations License Event Reports (LERs) e Responses to Notices of Violation e
Grading Classification - Target - A's and B's with 510% C's and 0 D's or E's A - No comments, product acceptable.
e B - Comments that would improve product gra!ity; however, quality is acceptable as presented.
e C - Changes required to achieve acceptable quality. PIF should be considered if the product is e
comp'eted.
D - Major deficiency, requires revision to assure adequacy for present use. PIF must be e
generated if product is completed.
E - Violation of design or licensing basis. PIF must be generated if product is completed.
e LaSalle IA1%L_.y.vreWLch 61 ppt I
-i
{
I yyggy Effective Engineering Support Design Change Quality 24 5%
20 16 Ew TEf D
13%
[C' -13%
A B
83%
g 3
27%
8 47%
39*
g.
g.
g.
l May July Se pt go, Apr-97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec-97 LaSalle
~
to m _t.=._, _,,
P v
ggggy Effective Engineering Support Safety Evaluation Quality, Design Changes so. _
D M
D 3
~
'g j
C 4%
si" l
I I
I p
l c
3 32 o_3 B
28
- c ac l
l 2e%
.3 c;
B
{-12%-
as 24 m
e 20 B
m_,
16 12 g
8.. _ _ _
w, o
i i
Apr-97 May-97 JuM)7 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nw97 LaSalle 11
,,4 _.. _... m m.c _..,.
i l
I 11li
- m..
D BA
- OoOg t
7 r
9-ce o
D p
4 4 3
p 4
1 1_
7 u
M'
-9v E
oN S
y 7
t 2
gi 7
l e5 9-na 8
tc O
i u
reQ e
t 7
n r p 9 e
n o
of e -p N
S e
ni o S
i t
gl 5
6 a
5 3
2 I
7 1
nu 9-C 3
gu El c A
i a
eC a
y 7 r
9 v
n l
o u -
af N
J lu i
J t
c 9
3 e
7 f
9 k
-n f
u J
K 7
e y
9 nroa of y
N M
a M
g e
2 7
3 1
4 l
7 l
g a
C 1
9 a7
-rp S_
A y0 a
L 0
5 0
5 0
5 o
5 0
y5 i
4 3
3 2
2 1
t f 1E$
\\
(\\)
i l\\l!f ff}
1 t
I'l!\\j<l
a v
ggg; Effective Engineering Support Action Step 4.2.1.9 - SFPR Testing l
c e ' Objective: Identify functional testing. requirements to
-l
- confirm problem resolution and/or to provide additional discovery for problems.
e Results
> Identified 483 testing related issues.
LaSalle IT1s%.v.i..._; wi.JG7..,h1 ppt E
i l
C7 E
I No. of Testing Related issues -
i m
~
~
O E
b
{M 6/1/97 H
r---4 6/8/97 _
g
_y in.
6/15/97 6/22/97 _
f O"=
6/29/97.
7/6/97 _
g E
7/13/97 __
[
7/20/97.
7/27/97 8/3/97 _
8/10/97 -_
g
^
E Q
8/17/97 -
8/24/97 _
O 8/31/97 -
t 9/7/97 _
9/14/97 -
g j
9/21/97 _
k, 9/28/97 -
l 10/5/97 _
O t
gl 10/12/97 -
10/19/97 N.
10/26/97 _.
D h
11/2/97 _
11/9/97 _
d f 11/16/97.
==,g c
g%
O M
11/23/97 _
g l
g 11/30/97 __
12/7/97 l
g l
12/14/97 _
12/21/97 _
D 12/28/97.
Q 1/4/98 _
9 1/11/98
\\
- ],
1/18/98 _
1/25/98 -
\\
D 2/1/98 -
N h 2/8/98 -
2/15/98 _
g 2/22/98 -
3/1/98,
1 O
l 3/8/98 h
3/15/98 -
N l
3/22/98 -
l 3/29/98 -
wo I
J,7,;8 -"
N i
4/19/98 l
4/26/98 l
l e
l g
g a
8
,. - - -_. ~ -. -. - -. -
. ~ - - -
o u
Effective Engineering Support yy Examples ofSFPR Tests Completed DG IUIR
- DG Operability Runs
- RHR Suction Strainer Replacement.
- Div II DG 24 Hour Run
- RHR SW Keepfill Integrated R.T.T.
VCNE EHC
- MCR Positive Pressure Test
- TBPV Position on Loss-of-Power
- AEER Positive Pressure Test
- TBPV Fast Acting Solenoids LaSalle 15 m.
r., _ __,,
w
u c-u.
a
~
gyggy Effective Engineering Support Example SFPR Tests To Be Done AP HD
- UAT/ SAT fast bus transfer
- Test trips and actuations
- HD Drain tank low level pump trips CD
- CB min flow viv control VC/VE
- CB pump impellers
-CR Ventilation ductinleakage
-VC Boundary leakage measureinents EHC
- Robotic inspection
- TBP System response time
- Systems preoperational test
-TBP Loss of hydraulic pressure
- EHC Calibrations with & w/o hydraulics
- EHC System integrated functional check
- EHC System Flush LaSalle t\\1suppornmeebngeWe\\9hJA c1 ppt
m__
Effective Engineering Support yyy Action Step 4.2.9 System Readiness Reviews 1
- e Objective: Assure deficiencies are identified, documented and evaluated for their effect on system q
operability and reliability (Review 92 systems).
e Status
> Draft Review Process Complete
>Two Pilot Systems Selected
- Standby-Gas Treatment System
- Diesel Generator Heating & Ventilation LaSalle IMoupportVnoctmgeWcW7,.Ch.1 ppt s
e
m Effective Engineering Support j
~
yyyy HPCS DG Output Circuit Breaker Issue Division ill SAT Feed Breaker
> During HPCS Diesel Response Time Test, SAT feed breaker to bus 143 failed to close upon demand.
e. Root Cause
> Deficiency in general maintenance requirements provided by Vendor.
Corrective Actions
> Revise Maintenance Procedure
> Review other Switchgear Maintenance Procedures
> Conduct Maintenance Training I
LaSalle w
I\\1s%.I..ua.VrcS97tucWM:nrci ppt v
o u,
\\
Human Performance Update
~
\\
EEEIl Event Free Clock t
Average Days Between Events 14 _ _
12 __
m t5 10 _-
1 S
8-g a
D 64 1
E*
4__
2__
0, 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
3 E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
g g
g a
ae a
a a
E a
a aa a
3 a
=
5 a
a a
=
a a
=
=
=
= gggga-a s== sass =ssa sa ag
=
=
LaSalle 19 1
n,
-d
o Human Performance Update EERIl Errors per 10,005 Work Hours l
1.8 1.8 1.6 -
l4-1.28 1.2 -
1.12 EM 0
1 0.91 0.87 0.83 llJ.lll1.llII i i 5
l s
s s
s 9
s s
s l
R i
g3 i
sl l
s 5
5 S
S S
5 S
S 5
5 5
Weekly LaSalle litsw.e.k.a37i.ch.c1. ppt n
v
o m
I Human Perfonnance Update 3ERI Secunty Events DeptiftITEft
'Bedge Badge Door Other Tofal P D
i Control Rernakes Control am 0
2 0
5 7
80 OnEd Security 0
0 0
2 2
l l
Omdma 0
0 0
0 0
g BectricalMaintenance 0
0 0
0 0
Estes 1
0 0
0 1
40.-
FuelHandlers 0
0 0
0 0
Heakh Physics 0
0 0
1 1
20--
Instnment Maintenance 0
0 0
0 0
0:
MechanicalMantenance 1
0 0
0 1
g $.. $ kk.E- $.
.g e.
e k>
g-g Mod Adnin 0
0 0
0 0
...s.
c.
n g
w NROVisitors 0
0 0
0 0
.2..< jw 2
Z Ocemtions 0
0 0
0 0
Raytheon 2
0 1
1 4
S&L 0
0 0
0 0
7DTAL 4
2 1
9 16 J
s LaSalle IT1suppu.fwe'.v-%wcW7..h.c1 ppt
O-EEmi Maintenance Indicators EMD EFC AnalytJs Statical Rework 20%
20 l
18 gg 10 s.e
.o a.,
i
" r m =, y,,,;,,
'a. C 4a
.o 0
o e.r,,, -
1 i
a 3
}
}
3
}
}
I I
I
...ti -
.-=-
l + 3.onth Rolling Average
-Goal l 00 - Design oeficiency - Misapplication orpart e r IMD Event Free Clock compor.em MD - Maintenance Deficiency - Inadequate preventive se maint: nance measures y
as as PD - Manufacturer Deficiency - Quality or compreent or equipment is inadequate n
I 38 ID -InadequateInstruenon-incompleteor 38 I
I I
I incorrect pticedure or wort instructions WD g
f=n 0%
I
/
/ /
/
/
OD Equiprr.ent Operanon -Improper start up or n
I I
I I
I I
opermion orequipmeni 1
15-i sa - skill Baud Personnet Error - Intended action L{
/g.(
h p not carried out successruity 1
i w
5u
--"x x
- R&hilW iD r
r
" ~ * = =, " - " " ' ' ' " " " " ' ' * " -
IUlllill}!ljii!;1]Ill!!!!!}!llp!}p;}lllll1 LaSalle i\\1sunx-ri.e ewe \\A7.schict ppt v
u u
ENEIl operations Indicators Out of Sennce PIFs p
- pgg, l
I l
lill Ill J
lill lli lill Ill o
is f
RIl Ill i
IEl lli i
N h
n (EUR n
f i
N J n b I b i
l l '
1111 111 f
l i
j t
n L
a r
i r r p.,
j s n i
V
' w
/
i liri lit u l'y
< &n r
/ k l 7q h
\\
1
.b l
- /
q
/
U l{
ll[l p 1}
lV[f 1
l Illifillifi!iliiijillfillfillii filfliliffi!!!ilijillil!!ifflII PIFs By Werker - Crew 3 Pre-Job Bnef/HLA Swim d
- 7c
^
o,(s.
i D;g,._.
II i
- j. _ _
f E
11 l
1 i ll i
r A. 11 1
.l
,1 I. 4 lilA
. Il
~--
r t
i itEJ
! V L 11
}w_.
iBD;--
l
, fMN 1 i l /@
/ v II111111 II!!!!IIll!!
LaSalle
~
1 I
23 t\\1sw. 4vWei97..-C %.%1 ppt s
4
ygggy License Amendments Requiredfor Unit 1 Restart NRC Am endm ent S u b m itte d R e q uire d A p p ro v e d LAR 262: D elete reference to Reactor S team 12/12/97 3/13/98 Pressure from Condenser Low Vacuum Isoiatir; n per D C P s 9700461/2 L A R 2 55-01: H E LB. Lea k D etection in 11/24/97 03/13/98 S econdary C ontainm ent L A R 178-02: VC /V E Filter Testing u 9 /26 /9 7 01/23/98 LAR 258: P o st-LO C A H yd og en instru m e nt 10/15/97 02/27/98 C hannel C alibration G as 10/09/97 L A R 214: C ontrol R oom R ad M onitor 07/01/97 instrum enta tion 09/15/97 f
LAR 254: C hange D efinition of C hannel 07/02/97 C alibration to E xem pt R T D s and T h erm ocou ples 07/29/97 LAR.252: Feedwater/M ain Turbine Reactor 04/04/97 Vessel W ater Level High Trip O T H E R LIC E N SIN G A CTIO N S NRG A ctio:n S u b m itted R e q uire d A p p ro v e d S ubm ittal of position on vTiting of leak chase 11/26/97 3/13/98 channels during CILRT. N." C S E R to b e iss u e d.
12/4/97 Clarification of S B O S E R regarding battery 10/03/97 capacity m argin f
.LaSalle IT1sw.e-@WcW7.-C.A dc1 ppt n
- = - - -
u L
EENNI LaSalle County Unit 1 Status
~
~
~~
~
L~
~ ' Unit 1 Lin'e Complete Documentation
~
Total Package i
~ ~ ~ '
0 StrategpT! Pisnt~OperatI6n ~~~ ~
[ ~ 202 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 1'65
~
. Stratsgp 2 - Humsn Psrf6rrnsnce
~22
~
22 ~ ~ ~
22
~'
l~Strstegp ~3 - Mhtsrihl C6nditidn~
~28 ~ ~ ~
~ 21 ~
~~
0
~
~~
' S t rs ts g p~4 ~ - E n g i6 e e rin g~S u piio rt
- ~
~ 56
~~
~~'53~
~
0
~
~9 29 29 2
~ Strategy 5-Corrective Action ~
~
~
16 17'
~~
~~
~Strstsgp~6 'Trsinin~g~ ~ ~
~ ~
]~~~~~17 ~'~
20~ ^
'O Strategy ~7TProcs'ss Improvsment
~
~'20
~
~
~7
'33 33 TServics~Wdtsr PIF
~
~
3
~
FCorp6 rate 50.54f' ~
'~~ ~ 3 8 28 28
~
Dssign 50.54f~
~~
~5
~~
0
~
0
~
~
^
NR'C Generic issues I
~^ 5
~
0 0
'NRC~lR/LER
~
~~
~ ~ ' 57 14
~
14
~
l Q&SA' Prog' ram Re' iews
~
~ 17 0
0
~
v t Total
^
'584
'~
401
~
143 LaSaIIe 25 hisupponvi=ehngsWct97nrchcrwc1 ppt k
...v..
...m z
-..z.
.....s
...