ML20198L271
| ML20198L271 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000356, University of Illinois |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1998 |
| From: | Zalcman B NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Michaels T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| TAC-M99366, NUDOCS 9801150212 | |
| Download: ML20198L271 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _
l -January 7, 1998
?
4 's MEMORANDUM TO: Theodore S.M!chaels, Genior Project Manager Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Pranch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Barry Z21eman, Acting Chief Tigimi signed by:
Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Health Physics Section Emergency Preptredness and Radiation Protection Branch Division of Reactor Program Management -
Office of Nuclear Reartor Regulation
SUBJECT:
REVC.W OF THE FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGEb'CY PLAN, REVISIOM 16 (TAC NO. 99366) in response to your request, the Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Health Physics Soctbn (EP&EHP) has completed a review of the changes to the Ford Nuclear Reactor Emargency Plan, Revision 16, University of Michigan. The plan changes in Revision 16 were submitted in a letter dated July 2,1997 from Ronald F. Fleming, Director, Michigan Memorial Phoenix Project. The licensee did not state in the letter that the plan was submitted in accord.:nce with 10 CFR 50.54 (q). However, the licensee stated that the changes did not decrease the effectiveness of their emergency plan.
The changes in Revision 16 included conection of minor typographical errors, organizational changes, telephone number changes, and several substantialissues. In general, these changes do not decrease the effectiveneas of the plan. However, the deletion of self-contained breathing r nratus (SCBA) from the plan appears to be a decrease in the effectiveness of the plan. Not .
L.mg SCBA would impair the licensee's ability to respond to a radiological emergency.
The licensee needs to provide the technical basis nor removing respiratory protection from the plan and demonstrate why this change does not decrease the effectiveriess of the plan under Part 50.54 (q). This appears to be a violation of 10 CFR 50.54 (q) and Part 50.4.
Docket Nos. 50-151/50-356
Contact:
Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923 f kN[~~ gp l 0 DISTRIBUTION JRoe LCohen i g Docket File - C M ller PERB Reading PUBLIC - BZaleman DOCUMENT NAME: G:LKC\ MICHIGAN 1- T .w . ..n .e w. 4 d ina. in m. s. i *c - cool w hmn n on.ch-.+.ncio.or. T - copy ==* riechm.+.ncie.ue. *w - No copy OFFICE NRR:PEHB , -l 6 SC:PERB 7 L l 2[ l- l l NAME LCohen M BZalemaF /jl F/:~ay Ic DATE 1/1 198 1/4 /98 QR 9001150212 900107 PDR ADOCK 05000151 F PDR
>ut*A . t t 3 0 t 3 '
, . January 7, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Theodore S.Michaels, Senior Project Manager Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Barry Zaleman, Acting Chief original signed by:
Emergency Preparedness and Environmentaf Health Physics Section Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch Division of Reacto. Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF THE FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN, REVISION 16 (TAC NO. gg366)
In response to your request, the Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Health Physics Section (EP&EHP) has completed a review of the changes to the Ford Nuclear Reactor Emergency Plan, Revision 16, University of Michigan. The plan changes in Revision 16 were submitted in a letter dated July 2,1997 from Ronald F. Fleming, Director, Michigan Memorial j Phoenix Project. The licensee did not state in the letter that the plan was submitted in i accordance with 10 CFR 50.54 (q). However, the licensee stated that the changes did not
{t decrease the effectiveness of their emerger":y plan, t
k The changes in Revision 16 included correction of minor typographical errors, organizational changes, telephone number changes, and several substantialissues. In general, these changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the plan. However, the deletion of self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the plan appears to be a decrease in the effectiveness of the plan Not .
having SCBA would impair the licensee's ability to respond to a radiological emergency.
The licensee needs to provide the technical basis for removing respiratory protection from the plan and demonstrate why this change does not decrease the effectiveness of the plan under Part 50.54 (q). This appears to be a violation of 10 CFR 50.54 (q) and Part 50.4. ,
Docket Nos. 50151/50 356
Contact:
Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923 DISTRIBUTION JRoe LCohen Docket File CMiller PERB Reading PUBLIC BZricman DOCUMENT NAME: G:LKC\ MICHIGAN
_ v. + . ..n w. . wei. w w., e - e.a ,*.u. .n.c-e.u r - e.,y .c .n.cewn.e,4.nelosure *N* = No eeev OFFICE NRR;PERB , l 6- SC:P"_RB % l ff l l l NAME LCohen M BZalemeF //\ gfay I-oATE 1/4 198 1/l/ /98 QN OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 1
b-
, g3CE:vq g4 % UNITED STATES 3
j
'4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2065&4001
%y # January 7, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Theodore S.Michaels, Senior Project Manager Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Branch Division of Reactor Program Management 7 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Bany Zaleman, Acting Chief Emergency Preparedness and Environm a Health Physics Section Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Raactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF THE FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN, REVISION 16 (TAC NO. 99366) in response to your request, the Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Hes.ith Physics Section (EP&EHP) has completed a review of the changes to the Ford Nuclear Reactor Emergency Plan, Revision 16, University of Michigan. The plan changes in Revision 16 were submitted in a letter dated July 2,1997 from Ronald F. Flem'ng, Director, Michigan Memorial Phoenix Project. The licensee did not state in the letter that the plan was submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54 (q). However, the licensee stated that the changes did not decrease the effectiveness of their emergency plan.
The changes in Revision 16 included correction of minor typographical errors, organizational changes, telephone number changes, and several substantialissues, in general, these changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the plan. However, the deletion of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the plan appears to be a decrease in the effectiveness of the plan. Not having SCBA woutri impair the licensee's ability to respond to a radiological emergency.
The licensee needs to provide the technical basis 'ar removing respiratory protection from the plan and demonstrate why this change does not decrease the effectiveness of the plan under Pa:t 50.54 (q). This appears to be a violation of 10 CFR 50.54 (q) and Part 50.4.
Docket Nos. 50-151/50-356
Contact:
Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923