ML20198J570
| ML20198J570 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, Braidwood, Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1988 |
| From: | Bamford W, Lee Y, Yanichko S WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20046D900 | List: |
| References | |
| WCAP-12046, NUDOCS 9710210141 | |
| Download: ML20198J570 (140) | |
Text
.. .
Attachment C WCAP 12046 i
9710210141 PDR 971015 "
0 ADOCK 030004S7 PDR i
.. s WCAP-12D46
- WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 CUSTONER DESIGNATED DISTRIBUTION
. . 1 l .i
/ /.+ '
HANDBOOK ON FLAW EVALUATION FOR ZION, BYRON, AND BRAIDWOOD UNITS 1 AND 2 i
O '
ex i:. t !REACTOR r.- 3:..-V.,ESSELS e '.
. *.. ,.t' ) . it, y '
. ;; g.
o attaebee. .s -:;,
pc:t, W , pg , . .: e i
Jovember.1988 W. H. Bamford Y. S. Lee 4
Verified by: , /M
- 5. E / anichko Approved by: / h
/ 5. 5. APusamy, Manager Structural Materials Engineering Although information contained in this report is nonproprietary, no distribution shall be made outside Westinghouse or its licensees without the customer's approval, r,f'.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division P.O. Box 2728
. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 c
.,22mmimie e
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE -
PAGE EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
iv 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 CODE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 1-2 1.1.1 Criteria Based on Flaw Size 1-3 1.1.2 Criteria Based on Stress Intansity Factor 1-4 1.1.3 Primary Stress Limits 1-5 1.2 GEONETRY 1-5 l
l 2 LOAD CONDITIONS 2-1 2.1 TRANSIENTS FOR THE REACTOR VESSELS 2-1 3 FATICUE CRACK GROWTH 3-1 4 CRITICAL FLAW SIZE CALCULATIONS 4-1
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4-1 4.2 STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR CALCULATIONS 4-1 4.3 FRACTURE TOUGHNESS 4-2 4.4 RESULTS 4-2
~
5 REFERENCES 5-1 APPENDIX A FLAW EVALUATION A-1 A-1 BELT'.INE (LOWER-TO-INTERMEDIATE SHELL A-14 WELD,ANDLONGITUDINALSEAM. WELDS) -
A-1.1 SURFACE FLAWS -
A-1.2 EMBEDDED Fl.AWS
) A-2 N0ZZLE SHELL TO INTERMEDIATE SHELL WELD A-23 A-2.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-2.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS
. ~
ii m min. i.
e e-TABLEOFCONTENTS(Cont'd.)
SECTION TITLE .. PAGE A-3 INLET N0ZZLE TO SHELL WELD A-31
, A-3.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-3.2 EM8EDDED FLAWS A4 INLET N0ZZLE INNER RADIUS (CORNER) A 39 A-4.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-5 INLET N0ZZLE SAFE-END TO N0ZILE WELD A-43 A-5.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-5.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS A-6 0UTLET N0ZZLE TO SHELL WELD A-51 A-6.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-6.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS
~
A-7 OUTLET N0ZZLE INNER RADIUS (CORNER) -
A-60 A-7.1 SURFACE FLAWS A 8 OUTLET N0ZZLE SAFE-END TO N0ZZLE WELD A-64 A-8.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-8.2 EM8EDDED FLAWS A-9 LOWER HEAD RING TO LOWER SHELL WELD A-73 A-9.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-9.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS A 10 LOWER HEAD RING TO LOWER HEAD WELD A-80 A-10.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-10.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS A-11 TOP HEAD DONE TO RING WELD A-88 A-11.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-11.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS A-12 TOP HEAD RING TO FLANGE WELD A-98 A-12.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-12.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS A-13 LOWER FLANGE TO SHELL WELD A-107 Aa13.1 SURFACE FLAWS A-13.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS iii mwi==. i.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This handbook has been prepared to allow quick, yet accurate, assessment of indications which may be discovered during inservice inspections of the Zion.
Byron, and Braidwood Unit 1 and 2 reactor vessels. This assessment
} capability is provided in the form of charts for each region of the vessel, i
and these are contained in Appendix A of this document. Appendix A begins with a simple example demonstrating use of the evaluation charts, followed by '
a section for each region of the reactor vessel. Details of the derivation of the charts are provided in the technical basis document (1). The main body of the handbook provids: brief summaries of the various calculations carried out in developing the charts. To evaluate the acceptability of an indication, the user may proceed directly to Appendix A.
. ~
- a 9
9 g en m .mia. i. iv l
_m---
, s .
l a
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION i
1
^
, This flaw evaluation handbook has been designed for the evaluation of l
indications which may be discovered during insarvice inspection of the Zion, Byron, and Braidwood Unit 1 and Unit 2 reactor vessels. The tables and charts
] provided in the Appendix of this report allow the evaluation of any indication discovered in the regions listed below without further fracture mechanics
- calculations. The fracture analysis work has instead been done in advance, in accordance with the criteria of ASME Code Section XI, and is documented in a companion background and technical basis report (1). Use of the handbook will j allow the acceptability of such larger indications than would be allowable by
, only using the standards tables of Section XI (2). A schematic representation of the flaw evaluation process of Section XI Appendix A is provided in Figure i 1-1.
] The handbook is applicable to low alloy steel base metal and welds in the following locations in the Zion, Byron, and Braidwood Units 1 and 2 reactor vessels. The following regions are covered:
l i o Beltline (core region) [ Note that this region includes all the core '
regionwelds) o Inlet nozzle: nozzle to shell weld, safe end to nozzle weld and 3 innerradius(corner) o Outlet nozzle: hozzle to shall weld, safe end to nozzle weld, and innerradius(corner) l o Lower head: ring to lower shall weld and ring to lower head weld o Top head ring to dome weld, and the head ring to flange weld ,
4 o Lower flange to shall weld.
The geometry of each of' these regions is chown in Figures 1-2 through 1-6, and l repeated at the appropriate section of the Appendix.
i
- i L
e 1-1 wwmu. ie
[ . o ..
e The highlight of the handbook is the design of a series of flaw evaluation cha.-ts for both surface flaws and the embedded flaws. Since the characteristics of the.two types of flaws are different, the evaluation charts designed for each are distinctively different. The evaluations are organized according to the location in the vessel, as listed above, and for each location, charts are provided for both surface and embedded flaws along with worked examples as necessary.
The flaw evaluation charts were designed based on the Section XI code criteria of acceptance for continued service without repair as contained in paragraph IWB-3600. Through use of the charts, a flaw can be evaluated by the code analytical criteria instantaneously, and no follow-up hand calculation is
, required. Most important of all, no fracture sechanics knowledge it needed by
^
the user.
TheflawevaluationchartsareprovidedinAppendixAofthisdocilment,and have been developed using the methodology discussed in the technical basis document (1). For flaw evaluation of an indication discovered in an inspection, turn directly to the Appendix.
1.1 CODE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA There are two alternate sets of flaw acceptance criteria for continued service without repair in paragraph IWB-3600 of ASNE Code Section XI. Namely,
- 1. AcceptanceCriteriaBasedonFlawSize(IWB-3611)
- 2. Acceptance Criteria Based on Stress Intensity Factor (IWB-3612)
Both criteria are comparable in accuracy for thick sections, and the acceptance criteria (2) have been assessed by past experience to be less ,
restrictive for thin sections, and for outside surface flau in many cares.
In all cases in this handbook, the more beneficial criterion has been used.
Alltheembeddedtiawevaluationchartsinthishandbookwereconstructed using acceptance criteria (2), for ease of use, as well as to obtain the A
wwmwe 1-2
i maximum benefit, since these criteria will generally be less restrictive for embedded flaws. '
1.1.3 CRITERIA BASED ON FLAW SIZE The code acceptance criteria stated in IWB-3611 of Section XI. Namely, a
f 1 0.1 a c For normal conditions (upset &testconditionsinclusive) and af < 0.5 ag For Faulted Conditions (EmergencyConditioninclusive) where
=
af The maximum size to which the detected flaw is calculated to grow at the end of the next inspection time, as applicable.
=
a c The minimum critical flaw size under normal operating conditions (upset and to: conditions inclusive)
=
ag The minimum critical flaw size for initiation of nonarresting
~
growth ur. der postulated faulted conditiuns. (emergency conditionsinclusive)
To determine whether a flaw indication is acceptable for continued service without repair, both criteria must be met simultaneously. However, both criteria have been considered in advance before the charts herein were ,
constructed. Only the more restrictive results ware used in these charts.
e e
O m..m ia. i.
1-3
0 ..
1.1.2 CRITERIA BASED ON STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR The term stress intensity factor (Kg ) is defined as the driving force on a crack. It is a function of the size of the crack and the applied stresses, as wt H As the overall geometry of the structure. In contrast, the fracture to6gh m s (K g ,, Kic) is a measure of the resistance of the material to prcpagation of a crack. It it a material property, and a function of tcuperature.
To determine whether a surface flew is acceptable for continued service without repair, both criteria must be met simultaneously. However, both
. criteria have been considered in advance before the charts herein were constructed. Only the more restrictive results were used in these charts.
As mentioned in the prece, ding paragraphs, the criteria used for the evaluation of embedded flaws, surface flaws of the nozzle' safe-eni, and most outside surface flaws are from IWB-3612 of Section XI. The criteria are:
K K<S Fornormalconditions(upset &testconditionsinclusive)
I ~ 60 K
K; < For 'aulted conditions (emergency conditions inclusive)
.,e,e
=
K g The maximum applied stress intensity factor for the flaw size af to .vnich a detected flaw will grow, during the conditions under consideration, to the next inspection. -
K,j 9 Fracture toughness based on crack. arrest for the corre ponding crack +ip temperature.-
=
K;c fracture toughness based on fracture initiation for the cor' responding crack tip temperature.
- ~
m nnu i. 1-4
l I 1.1.3 PRIMARY STRESS LIMITS j in addition to satisfying the fracture criteria, it is required that the j primary stress limits of ASME Code Section !!!, paragraph NB-3000 be f
] satisfied. A local area reduction of the pressure retaining mortrane must be i used, equal to the area of the indication, and the stresses increased to i reflect the smaller cross section. All the flaw acceptance tables provided in S
this handbook have included this consideration, as demonstrated in the j technical basis document (1).
. 1.2 GEOMETRY j , The geometry of the reactor vessel is shown in Figures 1-2 through 1-6. The
- cladding on the inside of the vessel has been neglected in the stress analysis
! and heat transfer calculations for normal and upset conditions, and has been accounted for by adjusting the film coefficient for the emergenci and faulted conditions. The outside surfaces have been assumed to be insulated. The notation used for both surface and embedded flaws in this work is illustrated i in Figure 1-7, and repeated in each of the sections of the Appendix, i
d i
4 1
J 1
e-i w w m me ,e 1-5 I
e Lu j ! -
j[w, ED Ijilll; g ;
3 l
1 a g) L V > ,
- gy l 8 3
" I~
i j _
@q !!!li - I $I i 1
fz n
,1 1..I . i JN ? a i:- 1-6
.. o .
l TOP WAD RING TO 004 WLD TDP HEAD RING 08.16 R TO W W
./
/
k DIMENSIONS 167.13 DIA ~ i ZION 1.2 SYRON 1.'2 BRAIDWOOD 1.2 "Juni mm uns A 11.0 11.0 9.56 8 30.125 34.28 34.28
.. 167.0 DIA = 3 C 3.59 3.625 0.625 LOWER FLANGE TO SHELL ELD - r 170.98 DIA 2 BASE C A)
* *A fai'EMETAL)
S UPPER HEAD REGION LDnER HEAD RING . TO LO W R HEAD W LO LOWER HEAD R!W 16 TO loner SELL WLD %1SE CE)
5.5 NOTES
1.0!MNS10NS DO NOT INCLUDE CLA00!NG 2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES SELTLINE Ato LCNER HEAD REGIONS o Figure 1-2 Upper Head and Lower Head Regions
. o wwiiim i. I'7
_ .. , . .. . . - - .- . .= -_ . _ _ . = . _ - . ._. . -. - - _ ._-.. - ._ . _ _ - . . e e* S!DE V!EV TOP V!EV . IN =
=l71.4 JD.
fA l . c N ws 3 * "*-"kb!NG
/ _. e N ~ 29 0 a===
/ 1. Olm!ONS 00 NOT INCLLOC CLAD b 33.0e 2. ALL D!>ENE!ONE A81C IN INCHE5 95.0 l D! MENS!ONS ZION 1.2 SYMON l.2 BRA!DeC00 1.2 Inlet Nozzle A 11.0 18.12 s.se 8 44.5 42.5 42.5 IUE
. o L%~,ta-k{2.0 10'.e A
) %
NwL - (N ~ 23. 97 --
- l N o h I 3 -
l NOTES
- B : 1. O!>W SIONE 00 NOT INCLLCE CLAD 51.25 = 2. ALL D!)@S!QNE ME IN .!NDES o!MENSIONS
- Outlet Nozzle z!QN 1.2 SYMON 1.2 BRAIDsCOO l.2 A 11.0 11.12 9.89 8 34.16 34.06 35.16 C 40.3 39.5 39.5
.- Figure 1-3 Reactor Vessel Hozzles
~
ws.n n ne ,e
- 1-8 -
. -.= g I \
m: . '
- =
v. l s- g lu . s... l
.~*+- -
! I !
t 6 e .e mees
- rl ur*
M/A
.f
' r m.- . . ,,,. -'
A TT4 w" I _ i
! ?jj . . . . . , . . . ,
i
' 9.
3 t - lc !
, s
( . t / i h 1
.. . . . w p fy
, y -
d 4 13 CI.D Id Y t 1 0 L . u.. l f l Figure 1-4 Reactor Vessel Welds
~
me.,u im ie 1-9
i i I i i ! Wall Thickness t V _Well TMckness t i ,
- i
. . _ r
~ - '
^
.I l
l 4 I . 77 4 -* h
--h r g j 9.l g Y
.1 --
bh-i i ~
* *a <
~a 4
o - l '. i - ! I i i t a r i TYPICAL SURFACE FLAW IMICATION TYPICAL EISEDDED FLAN IWICATION ll 1 t Figt e 1-5 Typical Notation for Surface and Esbedded Flaw Indications -
.l ,
*{
.! _ . _v. Ta _ -
SECTION 2 LOAD CONDITIONS 2.1 TRANSIENTS FOR THE REACTOR VESSELS The design transients for the Zion, Byron and Braidwood reactor vessels are listed in Table 2-1. Both the minimum critical flaw sizes, such as a, under normal operating conditiens, or ag under faulted conditions for criteria (1) of IWB-3611, and the stress intensity factors, K g for criteria (2) of IWB-3612 are a function of the stresses at the cross section where the flaw of interest is located, along with the material properties. Therefore, the first
' step for the evaluation of a flaw indication is to determine the appropriato
' limiting load conditions for the location of interest.
It should be noted that the Zion plants were designed to a slightly cifferent set of transients than the Byron /Braidwood units, because of different construction dates. Although the design transients are not identical, as can ! be seen in table 2-1, they are very similar. Ir. general, the transients for the Byron and Braidwood plants are more numerous but less severe than those for Zion. The transiente for the later plants are generally more accurate, because they reflect greater operating experience. For this reason the Byron /Braidwood transients have been used in the evaluation charts for all six reactor vessels. - The selection of the most limiting transient for normal / upset / test conditions was straightforward. The transient with the highest surface stress in the area where the flaw was postulated was chosen as the worst case. Note that this can result in a different limiting transient for an inside flaw as opposed to an outside flaw, as may be seen in he detailed treatments of the ' individual locations. The transients listed in 6ese tables are the governing ones for the region involved, regardless of the .riterion used to construct the flaw evaluation charts, (either'the criteria on flaw size (section 1-1,1) or on applied K3 (section 1-1.2)). The selection of the most limiting emergency and fa,ulted condition transient is discussed in section 4 of the technical basis occument (1).
~
3379s/11t644 it 2-1
. l For flaws near the outside surface of the vessel separate considerations are required, since most of the thermal transients which occur affect the inside surface, not the outside surface, which is insulated. Therefore, allowable flaw indications at the inside surface are generally smaller than those on the outside surface, as may be seen in the individual charts to fo' low in the Appendix.
l 4 e se O e 4 e ) 33764/191940 10 i
4 TABLE 2-1 SlM ARY OF REACTOR VESSEL TRANSIENTS NUMBER OF OCCURRENCE 5 BYRON / NUMBER TRANSIENT IDENTIFICATION ZION BRAIDWOOD 4 Normal Conditions 1 Heatup and Cooldown at 100'F/hr (pressurizer coaldown 200*F/hr) 200 200 , 2 Load Follow Cycles 1 (Unit loading and unloading at 5% of full power / min) 29000 13,200
,3 Reduced temperature return to power -
2000 4 Step load increase and decrease of 10% ot full power 2000 2000 5 Feedwater cycling - 2000 6 Large step load decrease, with steam dump 400 200 l 7 Loop out of Service - 80 8 Steady state fluctuations (initial) - 300,000 6 9 Steady state fluctuations (random) 10 3 x 10 6 10 Baron concentration equalization - 26,400 _
- Upset Conditions 11 Inadvertent Depressurization -
20 12 Loss of load, without immediate turbine 80 80 or reactor trip 13 Inadvertent Startup, Inactive Loop - 10 - 14 Loss of power (blackout with natural circulation in the Reactor Coolant System 40 40 15 Inadvertent Fsfety Injection - 60 16 Refueling - 80 O 2-3 3379s/111544 10
TABLE 2-1 SIM4ARY OF REACTOR VESSEL TRANSIENTS (cont.) NUMtitR Of OGGURRENCE5
. BTRON/
NUMBER TRANSIENT IDENTIFICATION ZION BRAIDWOOD 17 Loss of flow (partial loss of flow, one pump only) 80 80 18 Control rod drop - 80 19 Excessive feedwater flow - 30 20 Reactor trip from full power 400 400 o with cooldown 230 o cooldown, no SI 163 o cooldown with SI 10 Eneroency/ Faulted Conditions 21 Large 1.oss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) 1 1 Small LOCA - 5 22 Large Steam Line Break (LSB) 1 1 23 Small Steam Break 1 5 Test Conditions 24 Turbine roll test 10 20 25 Primary Side Hydrostatic test conditions 50 280 26 Cold Hydrostatic test 5 10 4 9 O 3179s/111980:15
- .- . - - . - - . - . ~ - - - . . - . _ _ - - - - - . - - . - . . . - - . . . . . _ . . ; .. o ,
3- 1 s SECTION 3 FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH 1 In applying code acceptance criteria as introduced in Section'1, the final j-flaw size af used in the criteria is defined as the minimum flaw size to
- which the detected flaw is calculated to grow at the end of the design life, i _or until the next inspection time. In this handbook, inspection periods of 10, 20 and 30 years are assumed.
4 These crack growth calculations have been carried out for all the key regions l in the Zion, Byron, and Braidwood reactor vessels. This sectica will examine i the calculations, and provide a brief description of the methodology used as l well as the assumptions. A more detailed discussion is contained in the
- _ technical basis document (1).
! The analysis procedure involves postulating an initial flaw at shscific
- regions and predicting the growth of.that flaw due to an imposed series of l ' loading transients. The input required for a fatigue crack growth analysis is basically the information necessary to calculate the parameter AKg, which l depends on crack and structure geometry and the range of applied stresses in
) the area where the crack exists. Once AKg is calculated, the growth due j to that particular stress cycle can be calculated by equations given in Figure - 3-1. This increment of growth is then added to the original crack size, and
- - the analysis proceeds to the next transient. The procedure is continued in j this manner until all the transients expected - occur in the period of l evaluation have been analyzed.
l The transients considered in the analysis are all the design transients
- i contained in the vessel equipment specification, as shown in Section 2. These transients are spread equally over the design lifetime of the vessel, with the exception that the preoperational tests are considered first. Faulted conditions are not considered because their frequency of occurrence is too low j to affect fatigu,e crack growth.
4 4 em O l ! 3379s/111500:10 3-1 i I
Crack growth calculations were carried out for a range of flaw depths, and three basic types. The first two were a surface flaw with length equal to six times its depth and another with length equal to twice the depth. Next was a continuous surface flaw, which represents a wirst case for surface flaws, and the last type was an embedded flaw, with a range of shapes and locations. For all cases the flaw was assumed to maintain a constant shape as it grew. The expressions used for calculating stress intensity factors for the various flaw types are documented in the technical basis document.(1) The crack growth rate curves used in the analyses were taken directly from Appendix A of Section XI of the ASME Code. Water environment curves were used for all inside surface flaws, and the air environment curve was used for
' embedded flaws and outside surface flaws. ,
The reference crack growth curves for water environments are shown in Figure 3-1, and growth rate is a function of both the applied stress intensity factor range, and the R ratio (Kain/Emax) f r the transient. The crack growth rate reference curve for air environments is a single curve, with growth rate being only a function of applied AK. This reference curve is also shown in Figure 3-1. This figure appeared in the 1980 edition of the ASME code, and review of current research results indicates it is unlikely to change for many years. S e O 3179s/111544 10 3-2
~s s 1000
~ I ~
~ e Unser interpeeeeen is ,ses, [
" moned to esseunt for rose meeneense of meter ennronment
[ [
$00 =
curwe, for 0.25 <A < OAS for [S /
~
wwi e.:
.h . (I AI X 10'I lon' a g136 e#
+ J
/
j
~
eN NQ 4 r 0 2e 3.75 A + DAS e 4 [ 300 nKnre eti S /
/
/
sweeurfe fie 100 - / g fair eneronnonti
~ e
.9. 4 1 A Kg j-m -
10A387 X W 3 'M f
/
. k-E ~
0 rm.ne i,,s i K at - ~ tow shenges W eseewistion of / c4
#/
g _ . in.rese,*, .e = to e g ourws. 8/ g4 Sudoes flous * (see.rresetor f 1 20 enwronment)
}
emphonelefor M402$ j c 4.25 < A < 0AS f R > 0AS 10 ~ _ MeKminIK,,,e 1 ~
,5 l g
. t j %*
(
.. unser in.r.o n i. roe.mr.,en p f to esmount for A reso esponense g g of esseer enwronens rt ourses, for g I 025 < # < 0.06 for s se secoe:
f ! d 8. = (1.02 X 10 4) Og AK 5DS e sw _ flI f til 0, assa .s.ns
,7 n-kmen IKme, I '
1 I I I I I I f il l I I I IIII 1 2 5 7 10 20 fic 70 100 Scree in.ns,ty Factor Range (AK g hai @ ) Figure 3-1' Reference Fatigue Crack Growth Curves for Carbon and Low Alloy Ferritic Steels m .n n s.. . 33 1 _a
SECTION 4 CRITICAL FLAW SIZE CALCULATIONS 4
4.1 INTRODUCTION
1 The key parameters used in the evaluation of any indications discovered during inservice inspection are the critical flaw depths required for the evaluation , j of an indication in any given location; first, that for the governing nor. mal upset and test conditions (a )g and second, that for the governing emergency-and faulted-conditions (ag).
- Critical flaw sizes have previously been calculated for postulated inside semi-elliptical flaws having a length equal to six times their depth. To allow the evalua' tion of indicatiens af various shapes, critical flaw sizes are calculated for embedded flaws as well as surface flaws of other shapes.
4
- The selection of the governing transient for normal, +pset, and test conditions can be done easily based on the highest surface stress in~the area of interest. For emergency and faulted conditions, this choice is not as
, straightforward as a result of recent developments on the pressurized thermal shock issue. Therefore the governing transients were chosen only after careful study of this issue, and the deteils of this work are provided in [1]. 4.2 STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR CALCULATIONS l One of.the key elements of the critical flaw size calculations is the determination of the driving force or stress intensity factor. This was done
- for ecch of the regions using expressions available from the literature. In .
4 all cases the stress intensity factor for the critical flaw size calculations utilized a representation of the actual stress profile rather than a 4 linearization. This was necessary to provide the most accurate determination possible of the critical flaw size, and is particularly important for consideration of emergency and faulted conditions, where the stress profile is
; generally nonli'near and often very steep. The details of these calculation procedures are provided in reference [1].
s e 4-1 3379s/111544 10
A 4.3 FRACTURE TOUGHNESS
. The other key element in the determination of' critical flaw sizes is the fracture toughness of the material. The fracture toughness has been taken ; directly from the reference curves of Appendix A, Sc tion XI. In the transition te'aperature region, these curves can be represented by the following equations:
l Kg , = 33.2 + 2.806 exp. (0.02 (T-RTNOT+100'F)) Kg , = 26.8 + 1.233 exp. (0.0145 (T-RTNOT+160*F))
- where K g , and K g , are in ks M in.
The upper shelf temperature regime requires utilizatien of a shelf toughness
- which is not specified in the ASME Code. A value of 200 ksi /in
, has been used here for unirradiated regions, which covers all but the beltline .- region. This value is consistent with general practice in such ev'aluations, as shown for example in reference [3] which provides the background and i
technical basis of Appendix A of Section XI. The value of RTNDT used in these toughness equations was taken from the limiting (worst) properties of materials in both vessels, along with irradiation damage trend curves used to I predict end-of-life values, and these determinations are discussed in i reference (1). The upper shelf fracture toughness after irradiation for the Zion units beltline welds was set conservatively at K3 , = 100
- ksi / in, as discussed further in [1].
i , 4.4 RESULTS
- The results of the critical flaw size calculations were used along with the fatigue crack growth results to determine the size flaw which is acceptable based on the criteria of Section XI. These allowable flaw sizes are shown graphically for e'ach region in the charts of Appendix A, with separate figures I for surface and embedded flaws in each region.
~
un.mo w o 4.g
4 SECTION 5 REFERENCES
- 1. Bamford, W. H., et. al " Background and Technical Basis: Handbook on Flaw Evaluation for the Zion, Byron, and Braidwood Units 1 and 2 Reactor Vessels" Westinghouse Electric Corporation, WCAP-12045, November 1988.
- 2. ASNE Code Section XI, " Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Cosponents," 1983 edition (used for updated code allowable limits);
and 1980 edition (Winter 1981 Addendum) (for revised reference crack growth curves.); 1980 edition (used for updated proximity rules for i embedded vs. surface flaws). 1
- 3. Marston, T. U. editor, " Flaw Evaluation Procedures, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI," Electric Power Research Institute report EPRI-NP7195R, August 1978.
4 l O 5-1 3U9s/Ill58410 4
l APPENDIX A FLAW EVALUATION INTRODUCTION TO EVALUATION PROCEDURE The evaluation procedures contained in ASME Section XI are clearly specified in paragraph IWB-3600. Use of the evaluation charts herein follows these procedures directly, but the steps are greatly. simplified. Once the indication is discovered, it must be characterized as to its location, length (t) and depth dimension (a) for surface flaws, (2a) for
' embedded flaws, including its distance from the nearest surface (clad-base metal interface or outside side) (S) for embedded indications. This characterization is discussed in further detail in paragraph IWA-3000 of Section XI. ,
The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts (see Figure 1-6 in the main text): o Flaw shape parameter, f o Flaw depth parameter, 'g , o surfaceproximityparameter(forembeddedflawsonly),f where t = wall thickness of region where indication is located (not , including clad thickness) t = length of indication, a = depth of surface flaw; or half depth of embedded flaw in the width direction A-1 mm.mim in
6 e ' distance from flaw centerline to surface (for embedded flaws only, 8 = S + a) S = smallest distance from edge of embedded flaw to surface Once the above parameters have been determined and the determination made as to whether the indication is embedded or surface, then the two parameters may be plotted directly.on the appropriate evaluation chart. Its location on the chart determines its acceptability immediately. Important Observations on the Handbook Charts Although the use of the handbook charts is conceptually straight forward, experience in their development and use has led to a number of observations which will be helpful. Surface Flaws ' An examt . edbook chart for surface flaws is shown in Figure A-1. The flaw indicativ.. .trameters (whose calculation is described above) may be plotted directly on the chart to determine acceptability. The lower two curves shown (labelled code allowable limit) are simply the acceptance standards from IWB 3500, which are tabulated in Section XI. If the plotted point falls below these lines, the indication is acceptable without analytical justification having been required. If the plotted point falls between the code allowable limit lines, and the lines labelled " upper _ limits of acceptance by analysis" it is acceptable by virtue of its meeting the requirements of IWB 3600, which allow acceptance by fracture analysis. (Flaws between these lines would, however, required future inspection per IWB-2420 of Section XI.) The analysis . used to develop these lines is documented in the companion technical basis document (1). There are three of these lines shown in the charts, labelled 10, 20 and 30 years. The years indicate for how long the acceptance limit applies, from the date that a flaw indication is discovered, based on fatigue crack growth calculations. e 3370s/1115M 10 A-2
.o. o. . As may be seen in Figure A-1, the chart gives results for surface flaw shapes
-up to a semi-circular flaw (a/t = 0.5). For the unlikely occurrence of l flaws whick the value of a/t exceeds 0.5, the limits on acceptance for a/t
= 0.5 should be used. J l
l Embedded flaws An example chart for embedded flaws is shown in Figure A-2. The heavy diagonal line in the figure can be_ used directly to determine whether the indication should be characterized as an embedded flaw or whether it is sufficiently close to the surface that it must be considered-as a surface flaw (by the rules of Section XI). If the flaw parameters produce a plotted point below the heavy diagonal line, it is acceptable by analysis if the point is below the appropriate a/t limit line. If it is above the line, it cannot be justified by analysis, and is, therefore, not acceptable. For cases where there are several acceptance limit lines, interpolation between adjacent lines is recommended. A worked example is provided as embedded flaw example 5. The outermost lines should be used as the limits, with no interpolation beyond them. For example, for a/t values greater than 0.333, use the line_for a/t = 0.333-in the figure, and-for a/t values less than 0.167, use the line S r a/t'= 0.167. Beyond these outer limits, the analyses have shown that the sensitivity to flaw shape is small. _ For cases where there are no branching limit lines below the hea~vy diagonal line (see Figure A-2.6 for example) then all flaws classified as embedded are
-acceptable. The only limitation is, as discussed in reference {1):
f<0.25 - Note that the embedded flaw evaluation charts are applicable for flaws near either the inner or outer vessel surface, and the parameters "S" and "6 are defined from the nearest surface. O
~
A-3 m mim in
a . Another important observation is the procedure to be used for an eabedded flaw whose plotted point falls above the heavy diagonal line, and must therefore be considered a surface flaw. An example of this is provided in " Embedded flaw Example 1" on Page A-6, but it is important to note that when this must be done, the depth of the flaw is redefined. The new oopth is aqual to 2a + S, as shown in the example, which becomes the effective crack depth a* to be used in the surface flaw chart in such cases. General Observations Detailed examples of the use of the charts for both surface and embedded flaws are presented below, for a specific cross section. Some points are worthy of note for locations between the cross sections which have .been analyzed. A flaw indication between two adjacent cross sections should use acceptance criteria interpolated linearly between the two appropriate charts. Surface Flaw Example 1 Suppose an indication has been discovered which is a surface flaw, and has the following characterized dimensions: a = 0.396 in, t = 1.98 in. - t = 8.6 in. The flaw parameters for the use of the charts are {= 0.046 { = 0.20 Plotting these parameters on Figure A-1 it is quickly seen that the indication is acceptable by analysis. To justify operation without repair it is necessary to submit this plot along with the technical basis document (1) to the regulatory authorities. O mwmm. A-4
. . _-. __ = -. = - . - . . . _ .. - . - . - . _ . .. .- . _ . - _.
Embedded Flaw Example 1 l A longitudinal
- embedded flaw of 1.75" x 5.00", located within 0.10" from the surface, was detected. Determine whether this flaw should be considered as an embedded flaw.
2a = 1.75" S = 0.10"
=
6 S + a = 0.10 + 1/2 (1.75) = 0.975
- t = 8.6" t = 5.0" .
9 4
- Note: longitudinal herein means relative to the vessel or nozzle centerline, not the weld length. For the nozzle inner radius, and other regions l of a nozzle, longitudinal is relative to the nozzle centerline.
I and, ' a = 1/2 x 1.75" i = .875" Using Figure A-2: 4 a 0.875 " 7
-=
g = 0.101 ( = Eg 9fE40.113 Since the plotted point (X) is abeve the diagonal line, the flaw must be considered a surface flaw instead. 2 Now, since the flaw must be considered as a surface flaw, the depth must be redefined as the distance from the surface to the deepest point of the flaw. This is equivalent to circumscribing the embedded flaw with a semi elliptic em A-5 us...m m a
surface flaw. Operationally, the paramet'ers are recalculated as follows. Defining a* as the corrected crack depth for the surface flaw,
u a* = 2a + S = 1.85' -
t = 5.0"
- d 8
7 = 0.215 h=0.37 . Referring to Figure A-1 for the surface flaw, it is quickly seen that this flaw is much too large to be acceptable, and must be repaired. Embedded Flaw Example 2 (Point A) Suppose an indication has been discovered which is embedded, and has the following characterized dimensions: 2a = 1.0 in, t = 1.5 in, t = 9.16 in. S = 0.75 in. - Calculating the flaw parameters, e have: {= 0.0545 y = 0.333 6 = 5 + a = 1.25 in. (=0.136 Plotting these parameters on the embedded flaw evaluation chart, Figure A-2 it may be quickly seen that the indication is embedded, and is acceptable by analysis (point A), since it lies below the a/t = 0.333 limit case.
~
3379e/11154410 A-6
.. o .. 'i Embedded Flaw Example 3 (Poing Suppose an indication has been discovered which is embedded, and has the following characterized dimensions-j 2a = 1.47 a = 0.73 t = 2.20
} t = 9.16 S = 1.33 3 Calculating the flaw parameters, we have: 0.08
=
g {= 0.33. 6 = S + a = 2,06 f
= 0.225 Plotting these parameters on Figure A-2 (point B) we see that the indication l is acceptable, since it falls below the line which is applicable to a/t =
l 0.333. (Note that if a/t = 0.167, for example, the indication would not be I i acceptable, since point B would lie above tha line, as may be seen in the figure.) , 4 4 0 A-7 337Ds/11 tl4010 i
Embedded Flaw Example 4 (Point C) A longitudinal embedded flaw of 1.50" x 5.38" was detected at a distance S = 1.40 in, underneath the surface. Evaluate the flaw for code acceptance for continued service without repair. The flaw geometry parameters are determined as follows: t = 8.63" S = 1.40" 6 = S + a = 2.15" t = 5.38" and a = 1/2 x 1.50"
= .750" -
6 2.15 7 = (B 53)
= 0.25 a 0.750 7 = g 3g
- 0.140 a
7 = 0.750g g3- = 0.087 Evaluate the flaw by referring to Fig. A-2 and plotting the point (as point C). This is above the code acceptance limit line for a/t = 0.167, which should also be used for a/t < 0.167; therefore, the flaw is not acceptable, - and must be repaired. O 3379./111544 10
_ _ . . _. . . . . _ - - ~ _
.. . _\
Embedded Flaw Example 5 (Point C) _ Use the same characterizing dimensions as example 4, except that the length of the flaw to be 2.6 inches. This example will illustrate the method of linear l interpolation to be used with the embedded flaw charts. 4 The flaw geometry parameters are: t = 8.63" 2 T S = 1.40' , c 6 = S + a = 2.15' ' t = 2.6" a = 0.75" The flaw parameters are therefore: i (=0.25 l a 0.750 7 = g = 0.29 {=0.087 4 Plotting the point as before (Point C) we tae that it lies between the two limit lines in Figure A-2, and the aspect ratio (a/t) is also between the two limiting lines aspect ratios. Therefore, linear interpolation is done, as illustrated in the sketch on this page. Interpolation shows that the flaw is acceptable. A j . A-9 3179s 4 30309 10
l UPPER UMtTS OF ACCEPTANCE SY ANALYSIS INDICATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE l AB0VE THE ANALYSIS LlHIT LINES ! 10
- x. yx."./ yA \p.". T s, . .
. .'. w.
y,!ar s- - 'e ~' IN THIS ZONE INDICATIONS 8
- '~
\. "It p0- ye irs 7],/h- , ,
p G y :, , ,- f ARE ACCEPTABLE BY ANALYSIS 5
- / y .
PER IWB 3600 y / A: <.- y . .
+. -
.:. .:. yy. -
y. y
'? - # 7 di .. .
at - ~ '
/ 4 x. :L. .:.: :
~ .:- -
Q. . ^-
. @% p.- ~
~
8
* . . f. .. r .s .*
- x ,'- /
- = .: a )
s l.
.. ---/ . - ... .
, ~ ~
d CODE ALLOWABLE LIMIT e n. 9
~
/ SINCE 1983 WINTER U [
- K*.: .:
$ )[;.)./y ":...
ADDENDUM
].
y r .
* "~ '~
? *. ..-
$ '. - id f."
- - *; i; m, . .
.:. w - .
- . f. .. .i.h p., Mg3_ 1
.:: FLAWS PLOTTED BELOW THE APPLICABLE
/. :-: .-.:. -.. .:::.
*j
,sissp8,gs . . . .
-: CODE ALLOWABLE LIMIT :-
" CODE ALLOWABLE LIMIT" LINE ARE 2 --u W # s.
W .
'.sa'
~
- PRIOR TO 1983 WINTER *" ::
7
- ACCEPTA8LE WITHOUT ANALYSIS OR FUTURE MONITORING.
. . i .:
- .. - ' A.DDEN. DUM. .. .
~
. . l 0.10 0.20 0.3C 0.40 0.50 O
FLAW SHAPE (a/fl Figure A-1 Example of Surface Flaw Evaluation 3379s/08:588 le .
's,
*. $l n. -
+ 4 d SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEM ARCATION ! UNE i 0.13 ..,
=-__.'_......h_..h"..
. :a = is Ei sanss o oa o rLA w !=R. : .- i..- 4. .9 e
,-g .g - FLAWS WITH
.. . .:: ggy.s ..:cowesoonations 9 7
0.12 __, _ ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
._ . = . "I: . D..- _=., g -
- Z- 7 _
. _5..:~. - -..; .
NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11 ' --- - - - ---- --
, -. =: : :.- .=. p=.:=--=' =a,- - - - -
m - -- -
- .= := _. -=_ --
=._. .
_a_4
=
m f.; E
='
O.10 *=a*- .::; =r -- -
- =:"=.=_:.
<=- -
= . .__ ..= -. - .
aa E __ ._
- '?....=.= '
e p. 0.09 ._=:.= ...
=::
- =
..-E
=m
_ __ e s, . .--- - ___ =
.~ . .
w C a/t = 0.333 g 0.08
~ w
...e ,. m.;pr- ..
. a=,,,
~
a/ = 0.
= ==i:a m. . . . .s ongs.
._ r . .
w_.. . J. _ . M- ..
- E M_.ouara~c's --# '
0.07 r -E g: g - . . . _ , _ . , _ _ -.
,- -,;;d_ y ---
E. 0.08 ::PLAws ser ines fil:J@.=:W A:. - .I : . =_ k _me .__.i
%asonowmousisaE:==
icowsiosaao -* = := 1 --
-:= >
,1:suaract
.e=.ra=>:
.r. :=_ .
m O.
".-i ;. _ .
s ..._._.s....
!.PLA Ws
.. =
$ 0.M ~~Z ESE NIid*2E--:= 2: .z* EEE
- r. .; -
5 - . .
=
; H:p.= ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS g_3:r: _
_=. . _ 5 (ON THIS SIDE OF
~TJ "p".Z S;; .T. E .-J G : N-~ T=q=& DEMARKATION LINE)
~
4 0.03 .TTV -Z 55.. . T:_. .; :. :.. . ..:: "i. ARE ACCEPTABLE PER _akA.-- m __ -r __r=s..=.s 5:=._ :r ':= in
= ,= . _:== == := =: -
- =. --:= =
CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 O.02 E E*.
.7 .* __
'_t :~f" *f '.' _T 2 2: :--
AS LONG A$ .2a.f,0.25 E:E3 /I. .?:' .5..".=.:- :- : :.- Gi- _; .. .s!!- :: is t
= r *-
- -- "".m-.-- -*=*= =: "
=-:_.;
,=. --
0.01 N. ='# : E:---'#:- i*
-- ~-
iJ/i s=l= ~ '.;sM2.Y_W :Tsi :s n-- = 4E'" .i.9-2
=" 5:~ I'"E* ' -iEUE I"*i =' - -5 E i = I# iE 0
o 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 1 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) i 1 Figure A-2 Example of Embedded Flaw Evsluation i i e .s i e A-11 i 3179sI%11S'S 19 i
e e*
~
A _ '3 l 4 . I U~ D 1 ICTE: Y={
.14 ,
- q. ,-
... . .::: . c . .
.. i
. up . .
.13 .
jg * *
.N :'. . .* *
- 1 l
.11 .. .. . . . .:;- -
1 i L .. ;G . . ?: ;;. l. :1 : ;*:4 1.:: 42. :: .. . . . . 4.. .I I
.10 .
.09 . .
. . . i -
% .08 .
_.y . j*g 3 q' g- -
. i /
E
/ _
- q. .. . .
y . ,-
-y = 0.C E *3 -
d i '
/ \_.s")-
.05
# l##
f., ,f :
,y' 1
22# f e , , , -- Y c 0 C-s grN .. sens- yF. AT 2
,** " a ,** " t ;
.03 - _ i = 0'C g.= am nsed e p.ed d mM ----
h _"'_ _- ad -
.0 -l j~ ,e __
, .h__ __ . em.
A. = = = T33*""""w
,a -== i""" "", .i
~
M 19 Ed' tion l WL3 Md. AM "' " -
. 01 ; Prior to Sunner ~
3 t .I 79 Add. r . l . 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FU W SNAPE (a/1) Figure A-3 Acceptance Standards for Embedded Flaws, for Section Thicknesses 4 Inches and Greater (From Tables IWB 3510 and g IWB 3512.) , wwmmi. A-12
.. c i
~
l .15 , , , , i , : . i
.. y . 1,(,
.14 l
l l . .. i ,
+-l : , .
.-.)
.l i .
l
, l
--[
j d . : . . I
~ i ! l
.12 4
i U - i. - 1 e
, i Y 0.(
- I , . 2 ! i. , ! /
.ll -
l j . . ; ; - ; ./*. . i
.10
- i- i : ; ii/ /-
- x ! ! . , . .
1 !/ , /_.. j .S " f f 1 f .
/
< f* E .06 i 1 i i
- i i . l il'i l .
fl.l /
*/ ,
- /_ -.
Y = 0.6
; ;f ;.y
- g ,oj ! ! : ' . , .
t/ - if /~ i i if. X i / g i : I f. ./ l / ~ ] ?,'
, ; : . /. .
/ .f: . Y . 0.
i t
; i I '/ . fi i
/. 7 ,s '
.05 f g , g ,7 3 j- ,
1 . 7 .
~ ' '"
fi fi I f1M ' i f ./l : Z f, s/ i ,X ! gE "I
~
i { 1, / . ; i
--'--]
i 7
~
""~ ~ ~
i ~i I# I i ! ~ ! .02 l i 'V -
' i I -
i
- 7 i .4 -
4
- p .
l 01 i - 1 ' - 1983 Edition W83 Add _ i . l . : i . I u Prior to Summer i 0 l ! - - l . t i 79 Add.* i 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 i . FLAWSHAPE(a/L) s Figure A-4 Acceptance Standards for Embedded Flar , for Section Thicknesses Less than 4 Inches (From Tables IWB 3510 and IWB 3512)
- Note: Prior to the Summer 79 Addendum, no specific standards were available for these section thicknesses, but the standards for thicknesses of 4 inches and greater were generally used.
I' A-13 3379s/111544 10
A-1 BELTLINE (LOWER-TO-INTERMEDIATE SHELL CIRCUNFERENTIAL WELD, AND LONGITUDINAL SEAW ' ELDS) p A-1.1 SURFACE FLAWS ' The geometry and terminology used for flaws in the beltiinw region is depicted in Figure A-1.1. The following parameters must be determined for surface flaw evaluation with the charts. o Flawshapeparameter{
. o Flaw depth parameter g*
where a - the surface flaw depth detected, (in.) 1 - tho' surface flaw length detected, (in.) t - wall thickness at the beltline (t = 8.625") The surface evaluation charts for the bsitline are listed below: o Figure A-1.2 Evaluation Chart for Zion Reactor Vessel Beltline (RTNDT < 200*F) X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw . o Figure A-1.3 Evaluation Chart for Zion Reactor Vessel Beltline (RTNDT<200'F) 1 Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-1.4 Evaluation Chart for Byron and Braidwood Reactor Yessel Ealtline X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw 1 Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-1.5 Evaluation Chart for Byron and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Beltline X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X ".ircumferential Flaw u n. m in.i. A-14
o Figure A-1.6 Evaluation Chart for Byron and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Beltline Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded. Flaw X Circumferer.tial Flaw A-1.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometry and terminology used for embedded flaws at the beltline is depicted in Figure A-1.1. l Basic Data: , , t = 8.625 in. 6 = Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) a = Flaw depth (Defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) 1 = Flawlength(Majordiameter)(in.1
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization criteria. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw
~
, o Flawshapeparameter,f
- o Flaw depth parameter, *g e surfaceproximityparameter,f The evaluation chart for embedded flaws in the beltline is shown in Figure A-1.7. Any embedded flaw in this region will be acceptable regardless of its a
size, shape and location (as long as g < 0.125) as shown in Figure A-1.7 and discussed in [1] and in the introiuction to this Appendix. This determination can be easily made by plotting the indication parameters on' the figure, to determine if it lies below the appropriate demarcation line (i.e. embeddednotsurface). 4
~ "
22n.n nue io
I i 1 4
- wiciass t is
= vie I ese m\
i, su 8 ' us l
}
r.e s,m J -
; .L ! '
' ' .c.. .. m.
-r e si,e v.e se '
l p 2 l 1 vMa} r
, ino- r.e se i NA.i ;
,_ p !
)[ , 6 i
( 1 ) ! r.s ym ' w v ,e t n r\ - . ' z j ,..,,,e i v .e y- ,////r, , s- -
._ _ n - -
s - y TYPICAL EH8EDDED
,, FLAW INDICAT!DN
- v. ...e I ~
3 wtcT= es t
- I ._
- I e
I
,e..s sm.
i t 5-
) -
' . )
. E (ID E -. I
~ ~'
E , 7 \ g I i .
% Dj / TYPICAL SURFACE FLAW INDICATIDN 1
4
- Figure A-1.1 Geometry and Terminology-for Flaws at the Beltline i
[ . A-15b me.n nu. i.
i b f w mits.
- u me e EM
ffu
,,: .kI:NI v
- !':o Allmai E l
- .A. wane!!!!!!r' "73!$53E"~!335$ 15355:5!7~ -
- 4. .. - .i..
~
-l LEGEND I,
a e ab f w its. 8 - Within tiils zone, the 20 , a t a
.jg .
C- C e all b ince
lL i :1 L; ,
;i L lm - - -
_,h i 04 l killl! l IlllH "1n =10 :2 2 12 l} to ' 'I ' ' "' "'
~ ,, ii! ' ! !!!" !!!!!!!J " "! !! ! ..! '! !. .!! , ! !!! ! .!' !'! h A 2 k!!!% j$hl,$l bd! $$$f$$$NO = -
,$dh N EEN
'kg eqm
- , )" qEqR FLAW SHAPE fa#1 figure A-1.2 Evaluation Chart for Zion Reactor Vessel Beltline (Rigg < 200*f)
X Inside Surface X Surfacc, flaw X . Longitudinal flaw i Dutside Surface Embedded flaw Circumferential flaw
- e. ... ,: .- _.
LEGEND b f aw its. r ce law $cceptable
"'IT'#
WlMhllplillilWlMl?ll Mll Milt 1 $hhMhs MlWMMMlill nll '~= 'M ic'a'~
' I 14 i
,, l [TU HilBlqtlMW
> 10 I -
g i ! 2'fl. N, $ $ $.
!!'.. !" !!""'" !!.'" ' ! '$$$$$h$ffI -
i h4amd e m m m a-0 - FLAvr SHAPE (a#) Figure A-1.3 Evaluation Chart for. Zion Reactor Vessel Beltline (RTE T < 200*F) X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw , Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw we.num se
- h. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . .
t LEGEND A - The 10, 20. 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable by ASME Code analytical
'e
- 20l l.- criteria in 11d0-3600.
18 - l C - ASME Code allowable since 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 0 - ASME Code allowable prior 14 to 1983 Winter Addendum. 2 l 5 12
?
> g 10 ;
' ^
! s :
N 6 7(! ,B ~
'C 4
I D ! 2 o l 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.5 j FL AW S11 APE (a#) i figure A-1.4 Evaluation Chart for Byron and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Beltline X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw mwiiism n !
* * '0s - _ - _ _ _
LIGCND e b f aw its. r e law Ecce table l l.. I'
,0 l ll' {lilllll[Hlj!!Mi$lRitl1'1 = M : T '~
_ i4 , o in r i ,,
!l !WLtl]lFlbMHjlEgIld!-4 Ei 10 :- =
h l ,, ..!! ! ! "' !'!'! .' ' " !! ' !!"" '! """"! ' !'
'l } A
! l ' 8 ~ ~
0 4l h , i '
~
,EllWilHililll!l ll!MilitiidWWsiisEWiiiii" 0 -
0 0.1 0.2 03 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#1 Figure A-1.5 Evaluation Chart for Byror. and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Bettline _X _ Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw , Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Fiaw we.m,m so
~
l 1 LEGEND ; A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flew is acceptable
', ". 20 Ig by ASME Code analytical criteria in IWB-3600. [
l 18 - C - ASME Code allowable since i 1963 Winter Addendum. 16 l D - ASE Code allowable prior l to 1983 Wtr,ler Addendum. 14 l . 10 k 8 6 , C
'D l 2
Ol i ' O 0.1 02 03 ., 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE idi Figure A-1.6 Evaluation Chart for Zion, Byron and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Beltline Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw
- f. . - ,
e e. 4 l l l SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- LINE , .
. r.
0.13 . ... . . . . . _ -
"'== **.,
- b. #
m: .,: ur = li=.1.'~.i -irW:EMSf DOED rLAW E 8
...._, .. up u , ii,iiiiigi !!:commoumanow
; = - -
a_ . s. = . . . . _w..:
- x
=. FLAWS WITH t 0.12
., =. , ,,,,,,,=.:;= : p = ==;=:=-=_ .-
ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
. . = . .= . . = 4.
. . i u
. =. . .3 w_ . . ...- =_.:=, _r~~ =_
NOT ALLOWABLE
.., ., ... =..=
. . . =.
= . ... .. .=
. =. ..=k_. = ==.. a,...=. . . .=..j. .
= . .=.,ya_=.. .,. -
=== . . . .= . .=- - ..
.1 =: =
= , . -.. . , . ;, ... ,. . . . . . -
u y.+ ..
. , .=
=. apr-w . .
2
"- - i -si i==n ==
'E :iH= = 5:1 s-0.10
. =-:' ' ="s -"".
- ~' ~ "~"
' ~-
~~
".:. -u ~. ~.
M.. " -= . " .
/
igg =- e--- .=:~==~ '~ 1 x- .,.v.= . w = ==
= = au -- -~ - -- -
.= 6:..m n- -m= :- m 4 -
0.09 ~ . ._. e=. . :.=== :4 eum - .-__ .. m
===== :E!. -E. . 5. a!.
..-6.. . ~
e.l - - .!ii..-ds TE:n== !=:er.:m-t i=- - E o . .- .. m. . . .. . _, p .-.. - . .
._ = "p = .= ===:t-=7 g:. .:
0.OS #.= =2". 5 =~ ~ y u " .
~~
g a y= .= .g. . .-.. .==m
. , . .-" . . . .". - _ .. . . . . - -w 4 2;:= :id gepp .
.n. =====;
= =
. ,; e;;
,J
-= . 2- - 7 -- " . -
.:== ;= -
0.07 "'_WsuneAct: T-m u. r r r~: . ..: 1 o T=8 = * --+ 0 - -- "Z = M ::=~ E!E
% 0.06 j, naws _= =.=.=2==:.: = &
en me Wp2 :. =- = n- .
. = == - -
==
= =
=== r,m .:= = = ==F.= . ::n..a.=
Q naosow must sE :g. " ~~' " "~ ~
#~ = = = ~"
i CONSIDERED g i suarAct gnHE as E r~~ := - -- -
=E * =
u._._._.-.,.: r r z : 2 _: r x +.T ::: 0.05 4 PLAws ~~ -
"I _ ..
.- . - .. _ . .===._ = . . =.= . _ -_=x=d=
. . =. . =. = . ==.
$ 0.04 -
=
-M..~. : T.1=:E "= r:.i:
f:7". C':ii Ff i:=3 '* ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS f.:..J= _ . . . .
. .:=. .. ==. . . . =_=. . .u._.m.:. =.. :.=.._;
.. (ON THIS SIDE OF I=K ~=~[:j i.~ R = i'.E :1 s2 ~ .: Z E_T 1
.' "J DEM ARKATlON LINE) i5 ~~ .
0.03 5 ~~: 5.5.. . "M:~ i":. . '.T.T. .T ARE ACCEPTABLE PER E5:I=/il: q= === r
- .51== ==i ::= == r- :- ~_= iE i= m = = = ~-.= =u = m. = CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 f:.
=*.-m=:=:.-== 2 0 02 ~~~ '
- r=. ".e.2=k='= ~ ~ ' x=a . ... ".: _ . '.: 2 $.=, AS LONG AS _at. 0.25
.#~'.="} m.
-. .m =. : .- =
..= :== . =..~=:=.:....-
= . . = :. .._-.=:-.::: .-;. .---= =. ._. . . = . ._ . ==_... ..
. :: = . =. 1
.. ._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~...
m d= ::{ ~ : =~
?; =:=:n = =- r 40,6 ~
-- --?'= - - '- - - - - - - -
J =-9 := r =ssi m~.ir ;- = . _ i = ::i 0 F~N"' ' N IIIE ! f "" ' '
- : " "ii
* = ' ~
0 ' O.05 0.19 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE (f) Figure A-1.7 Evaluation Chart for the Zion, Byron and Braidwood Reactor Vessel Beltline X Inside Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw . X Outside4urface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw A-22 me.nnue n
l
. l ; A-2 N0ZZLE SHELL TO INTERNEDIATE SHELL WELD A 2.1 SURFACE FLAWS -
The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the nozzle shell to intermediate shell weld is depicted in Figure A-2.1. The following parameters l must be determined for surface flaw evaluation with the charts i o Flawshapeparameterj j o Flawdepthparameter{ i where a = The surface flaw depth detected (in.)
- e e The surface flaw length detected (in.)
l t a Wall thickness at the inlet nozzle to vessel weld (t = 8.625")
- The surface flaw evaluation charts for the nozzle shell to intermediate shell i
weld are listed below: l o Figure A-2,2 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld ! X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw l _ Outside Surface _ Embedded Flaw _ Circumferential Flaw o Figure A 2.3 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Wald l ,jL Inside Surface ,_X._ Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw i i o Figure A-2.4 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld
- _ Inside Surface _X._ Surface Flaw 1 Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw 4
o Figure A-2.5 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to intermediate Shell Weld _ Inside Surface X Surface Flaw ,_ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw mwn a.e is
A-2.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometrical description of an embedded flaw at the nozzle shell to intermediate shell weld is depicted in Figurar A-2.6. Basic Data: t = 8.625 in. . 6 = Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) a = Flaw depth (defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flawlength(majordiameter)(in.)
=
a, Maximum vmbedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use - the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw ; e o Flawshapeparameter.{ o Flawdepthparameter,{ o surfaceproximityparameter,f - The evaluation chart for embedded flaws: o Figure A-P.6 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld X Inside Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surfacs X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw A-24 m .miu i. l 1
. . . j l
l l Wikgg g g entpe l tw.as \ l yg-
- 3. . ,
o... !
- y. ,
s ; k... '
.. .,,e . . . , .
, j u,a} $ -
r ,...
.. .,e
_l,-,a__ _. e t r+"~. k , 1, TYlh .. I ,. hw# l
,X s
,e ,,,e
.. w m"r
~
l I I d i I
- d TYPlcAL [Ml[0D[D 1
z f FLAW IN0icATION
... ,e,e , .~
Nf BS 9 0 I
/ \
h
/
.. . . . w f -
, d 3 -
- e. / ._ r
> f .- J dI E
Q.D E I
'/
I
- l Typical sustrAct k gj M FLAW INDicAfton figure A-2 1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld me.,ms . ie A-25
LEGLND a ab e t w its. 02030 #*C' 'I * 'CC"E*DI' 3'=' '=
'- ~-
ll llylll
~l[l[f'khlllllll lI '
j = = = = 'm '"" '
- 14 t nt e 12 I' o liil i I .gi li i ,
i l q1 1 6 l l l : I I g 4 1 ll il
, lf lllllIlli Ill l' '
e l ll! I 11 ll l FLAW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-2.2 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld X Inside Surface Outside Surface X Surface Flaw X Embedded Flaw Longitudinal Flaw .' Circumferentiai Flaw i nn.niisse se
. t. o -
LICEND a ab f w mits. 8 - Within this zone, the 2e , .
^A 1 Y "a ?t ll l criteria in IWB-3600.
1 I " = : :'===:'- I " i n ,S a :" - fe',: t " e j 12 g
- m s
} ,
6 - D o o 0.1 0.2 03 o.4, 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-2.3 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw nmmism . l' '
~ t- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l l LEEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the 10,20*30 surface flaw is acceptable 20 - . A by ASME Code analytical l' criteria in IWB-3600.
~
e, ., l 18 f C - ASE Code allowable since i 1983 Winter Addendum. D - ASE Code allowable prior _ g _ to 1983 Winter Addendum. 2 5 12 [ l T Ei 10 - 4 . I i G , C 4 . = D 2 I l 9 I l o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FL AW SHAPE (a#3 Figure A-2.4 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal F1aw X Outside Surface Es6edded Flaw Circumferential Flaw nm.m.m. -
- e. .
LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the 20 - - , , , by A C analytical
- s. -
criteria in 145-3600. I er
" - ^"!e':i H
- 'd' :4 '
N i ! 12 !
]
l ' Y b 10 O! l 0 5 6 c l D i o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 i FLAW SHAPE (a#) l Figure A-2.5 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Interm diate Shell Weld l Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Es6edded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw nmn esm .e ! I
.la . ,._
g P I SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
. LINE BEQlNNING WITH 1980 CODE 0.13 . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E 1.:_:r - M. ..li :n. d:liEMSEDotD PLAW irl. : - : E*=. _ .3~ 8
,..q .,, .; cowreoumanow ..s - - .. ' - p:*..
m l :a= . . .
- _ FLAWS WITH 7 T* U..'! .. ..c ...a... E .- * ~ ,'t l
'a O.12 c::=p***
- = ;.. u .. -. a =
- .:=
.=
~
*w, .- r-.=i , 3.. ar-a
= -:;.n. . ..;.:: __ .--
- ,a ... ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
- - um .._ :: .
g ..;..::
.r. .._ -:. r. u. .
..:.=. 1-
-..i
"".1..
.c : 8,. ,
NOT ALLOWABLE p
. .:.u.n. :-
.. ..i.. .
0.11 ...: :-
- .n .rf: ":n 1 m_ :n. . .- _::- .;=.
._ .. : P...- . . - . . -
=.. :. .".=. :.":~:::
fa.. .u=. ::.n==.. t.. . .. . . - .v. .. 0.10 5 f5 4 tie Ei'a 5 f- 5: E Nii :-
'".. " .M.hi
'N'/,d.
r.... ..
= =: = =_ = :. u:
{: =u= -== -* : r.
=- :l
- : == =- :r- ~ ~ =
0.09 an -.=:= .n . . ::r .
.. m -
2
-- = , :: ::: n= ri., . . .r .n el= =re $ ;.: .-. 2. u .-- ..
-. 4:
- -: .= 1 : = .. r n: ,.
-- :=r =u .:: .g. n: nr :. ""=' : .. u-- r n= -
g 0'08 *-"
~ ~ '
' 4.s '* ' " ' "" "" '"
~~
&v- i *se e a ei ;fi:f ;iii .ii; :: .=J i M ii i- -
- . :ru: r":: . j ~. . g . .n ::.: a .n= a n .a: : :: :L .:n = =
- -m -~ sun t A"ct.: naF: .: .,= t- ~~
.m _.n a: .: :u-~ ;. - ~- -
0.07 _. h !:EIr~ i ~:Ol:::tu *-- .
. #- : =
- _.w -
er= 3: it. E. - PLAWS tw THIS a: : .: :---_- -=.-:= 3 P 0.04
==]r. .. :~ - .: u; asosow must at :s ..u . x -
- ._ ~~ : .. . .: ::: r ...
O icoustomato r *- -
- -= 2" ==" " "' ~~
iSuRFACE y EiM:: :: ai- 9~ 3" Si;. .!:2 d*i"in ud l 0.0s ri.aws
"" ~
$ Y :-
'T J: ?"" ;" :
- ~~ir-.?:i U 3: "* i :~ ._--
'i 9:'*lT j :2 . :;;; tf;:d nh .- du sF u : ; E dii Hii :i:- 6
= :::- f~ : l.: -.
... .=. . .:.un :- . . _
- _::. : r. r:. .:.
0.03
--' ' ,:p ::
-f :.:: i E" "- . :;p i!h = :-- r . .
r;p = :~../g. .:!; ~.
- j [ r
~
.33 c.:. t. ::r .
;6: :* - -
.. .,, g 7, a.:.a. - -
. a.. . ::; .: .. .... ... l 0.02 ' ~.:
, ._ . . . . . . . . .: :: : I
' i' !i!! " .::i ~I: :lini? ?
' ~ ' '
- udU u is
.J. .: . . ,. . . . . . .
a:."- :: un ::: . . r.- n:: - :: n-- ur
. .: . -~
..= ::.
0.01 ...:
- 1 .c
.-)
. -V .. . .
.x a.;
O I NU ' ifi "' ** 5 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 j DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) 1 l l I 1 Figure A-2.6 Evaluation Chart for Nozzle Shell to Intermediate Shell Weld
~
X Inside Surface Surface Flaw - X Longitudinal flaw X Outside'hurface a X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw l A-30 wwwmn l l l i
A-3 INLET N0ZZLE TO SHELL WELD A-3.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flawa at the inlet nozzle to shall weld is depicted in Figure A-3.1. The following parameters must be determined for surface flaw evaluation with the charts l o Flawshapeparameterf o Flawdepthparameter{ i where a = The surface flaw depth detected (in.) t = The surface flaw length detected (in.) t
- Wall thickness at the inlet nozzle to vessel weld (t = 10.75")
The surface flaw evaluation charts for the inlet nozzle to vessel weld are listed below:
, o Figure A-3.2 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld l X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-3.3 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell t' eld X- Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw
_ Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw e Figure A-3.4 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-3.5 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw 4 O mwmne is ^~ I
A-3.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometrical description of an embedded flaw at the inlet nozzle to shell weld is depicted in Figure A-3.6. Basic Data: t = 10.75 in.
=
6 Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) a = Flawdepth(definedasonehalfoftheminordiameter)(in.) t = Flawlength(majordiameter)(in.)
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flawshapeparameter,{ o Flawdepthparameter,{ j o surfaceproximityparameter,f The evaluation chart for embedded flaws: o Figure A-3.6 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld X Inside Surface Surface Flaw 1 Longitudinal Flaw - X Outsid,a Surface X Embedded Flaw 1 Circumferential Flaw 33mmises to
.. o ,
4 4 Witimss t 4 i %_ _ I a l SIDE VIEV TOP VILd
. g.- p 1 N!h*- -171.4 10.
- e o 1.t
=== ha 1 s
- u. q , i r
- I"
\wa !
5 L TYPICAL EM8tDDtD 4 FLAW IN0!CAfl0N 4 i n
---29.0 * *10" as t 33.00
- r 55.0 __ _
- 1. O!MIONE DO NOT INCLLCE CLAD
- 2. ALL DI m !CNE AME IN INCHCb i 9- 3 I "
DIMENSIONS [ ZION 1.2 emoN I.2 emAIDucoD 1.2 i A II.O it.12 S.88 ,, ,, a 44.5 42.s 42.5 I I TYP! CAL SURFACE FLAW INDICATION Figure A-3.1 , Geometry and Terminology'for Flaws at the Inlot Nozzle to , Shell Weld (Penetration) ws.n.me ,o A-33
LtGiMD A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 3 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable by ASME Code analytical e, 20 ' * * * '" ##
, sA
{ C - ASME Code allowable sinc <e 18 l 1 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 g ; D - ASPE Code allowable prior j ; , j ji to 1983 Winter Addendum.
*; ;; P l l i f g" l :
J ; i e E 12 i i l
'i n,
)3 ;
- l. j i,!
3l 1
.l i
1 i j i j 1.f
;'. g O
^ k I ! i l '
! ! I i
~
l' E k:i I ..' i {'
; ;i I""l ,v i
! j' '
; , i l;l R I '
3
- p l .
- cd : jiy j l : b;
* :ii ! ! ! -l i ;
.~ l' l l ! +l l ; !! !!
4 ! j il I . .idin{ l! U lfl l: $ c
; i,cm i."'
i D ll N b c.4 ', o 0.1 0.2 03 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (.a#) Figure A-3.2 Evaluatio.i Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw
~
Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw !
>>w us ,
LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the go ' yA hEa
,f
- I' criteria in IWD-3600.
18 '
, C - ASME Code a11cwable since g 1983 Winter Addendum.
l [ I i l ,
]l i
l f ll I!
" - t'"isnal'""A' C"'
5 12
' 1 3-a i !!
I s '- l lh q':l L j;
$ a -
l
- 'I
' ~
G I ^ Il I li l l 4} I ! 'I - ll 'll
!!}l#
C 2 !I l1 l ll ~ ' o Ill!I l 0.1 llr o_2 ll [!ll 03 l..3 0.4 I!!! 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-3.3 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw
~
Outside Surface Esbedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw I , , , , , , , .
LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits.
.8 - Within this zone, the 10,20,30 surface flaw is acceptable 20 A
!'- i !
l; ! l' .'i j 'i l by ASE Code analytical
% . .! [ : -
0 N dlh ,ii[i.!}> { l Ify!!]lF'a' ! ![;j!! $ l criteria la 168-3600.
; ! ! C - ASME Code allowable since l!! ... ;
fl 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 .
) ;
{p l } ;, ! ! j .I i jl l .: l r l' il ;1 D - ASE Code allowable prior g" '
] l j l
; l to 1983 Winter Addendum.
I I l ll" f !' . l a- l; I- i MN i i ;. !
,> i'
> 0 !l) l:
;! [ lj . ..h 6 l 1-.fl .J'}. .fkl ti l [ ; llN},[ l w 3 .
l ; llJ)' l
- 8
$ ; i l[ !
pt :-:L 5 = l )i ! !i : ;, I 6Y
~
b , ( il i i ihjl0lldIMlhlllil## IO c N i ' - " 4!- """""""an""'" o i j ' y y g$Ulllllii n!u""""u-""i"'"L' MNI i 2l-'b >l' ~ ' !' WII N - 0 - 0 0.1 02 0.3 0.4 05 FLAW SHAPE (a#1 , Figure A-3.4 Evaluation Chart for Inist Nozzle to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw - X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw sm.o . .s .. , !
~
LEEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw Ilmits. 10,20,30 B-W n this zone. tk surface flaw is acceptable 3 ' by ASME Code analytical lj g l l . ' l[:y j U 1 l j b " criteria in 115-3600. 18 l. j h i
.;jpl.[]l*;
. n l l-ll) l t
l : j kl : '
; . C - ASME Code allowable since -
1983 Winter AddendJa.
!lI
'i I j
16 ! !
!I iif .j l
! j l l J
lp! ! { j
! l i[
4 l ! D - ASE Code allowable prior g 14 to 1983 Winter Adde;ukam.
- l. j j j;l ! I ll l i ,
1
% l i! 6 j -
1 l t
;f ll I 12 j i' l , , !
J-lI! T [ D o to
}
- i J
i
! U' j I.
- ll I
l l 1 R: 3: I 1 ! -j .f _: :. , lt b i I ! [ ! l ! ! !. l l
! j i i l! ! ! ll j l 1 : ! j[ll[I ht IlliiULil I b < l ...l , stilHlli llIlN i ll b N l 4 .
" m su i ununi n um i n4ai i
g j j j tilli ni!!! 2 l l i ! I ! .. . . mm 4 IIllNIlll 0 - 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#) ' Figure A-3.5 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface M 1 Flaw X Circumferential Flaw sm.n . .s
. 8.
I l SURFACE /FMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION UNE. FLAWS WITH at 0 13 == :..: u: :v
= .
.: . a . . d:n 2. .
- . suotoOto
- - - - = - rtAw._--../,...
- ... . . . . 4..
A OVE THis LINE AR'
. .:= .
q a3 n.p. .r CONFIGUR ATION . . . .. .
'".;' ..i " ..4
^'" "# ' ' ' ' ' " ~ " ' " ' " " ' ' ' ~~ - ~'
NOT ALLOWABLE 0*12 -
#Iif '
."ii!t i #8N "** M i;' R ii f n ur=laes : 20 0.11
- I '
U
#Eik : dr : $ s 4E# 5 :: :1@!!##i-! =
is tim 0.10 h hI *
,.6kk I . i 3 i i f
=; ue
.=. :e.: :. .:w_ ._. . r. - P.r..=.-. = . , . - - - -
. = . . .=. . . tu. ., . _ . . . . .
h~ fh
- IF L. : L' *-
._' d:I
~
b h . . F... .:= . . .::. eT 0.09 A.- .-. :. .
.. . .: ,=.. .u. -
. ...n.
. . . .. . . . .::=.= ...-.
-- . _ . = .:r.
.. . .. .... _ ..,a. :
= =:. ::: .... . ..L J. C ia=== = : .:- x - -
. - = n- . .m. . , m:1=:
.- u . -: ::..
g 0.08 . J y ay
= su
- 2:- g a em = . . .J m. .is:... r ch. .-
.e 111_Er.i:
3 "i ' ' . r: .n;
!E in: N "" dii
~
g lisiif5Ei; -Ei::-: ii Sii{u2 0.07
.L- sumeact: :..::* f:::.r: .: :-
- t: :.. . 'I
'. L.. . --<
4 :n. O
- ' - - - - -- - -. ' ~. l . . . l ....~
. .. 8. .._- -
E w 0.06 j rLAws IN THis 8n! 5 d5Y 5 E1:!:.'!5 5 i-5s S5E
.;.neGION MUsf st :fz. . . .= nr 6- ..c... .. ar -
=-
o yeousiogngo --
- -5:e u. ._. ._ = . ._=. . .i..a w li sunt-ca f....:~. : ife dii ni slii ~:LI E " "--"iEi.. "iE "
E : - "'. ~: "' 0.0f - PLaws . . :: . ~:: i. ... b I: : - :- ~~. -* /-. =-: =. -
... ::: -:. -::: >:- .h5= ;in 'i!
j 0'M =
.fuidii i :i"i": :' i-- i:. . .if fi ;i : m-
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS
..i a: -
/r y .,_3;; y; , 9, : g + :: ig ,, .i (ON THIS SIDE OF
- 7. .i_. .
. .I.s... :. .. ....G. ... '.' ...... .....i.E.l.: = .a, . DEMARKATION LINE) k- . . . . . .
0.03 :: :.:
;: : f.;
T:. . n _. .'. .n -
- :-u ; .. ..
R AB E PER
.: n- p_u :r: :n- -
.: ;;-g :
- .,- CRITERIA OF IWB 3600
. . .: .:u : =:. r .a: . : .: au :- .= u ..
7 '.e .. 0.02 5. n ;4. ' 2 : 'T '.T ". 25 "1
.:"a' AS LONG AS .2a.4.0.25
..m. .:n. n =. ' . =.. .:. .".E : :. :.._. .:. :_:.::.n.:. =. :::. :
. . . 1 "i :ipe . ai a:n-ri ..'. ..: -ur = c w : iiii .: ,, in-0.01 =. :.. .:~: ::=x"q:. : ::- ..
a; =4;. ~
# u;. .:. . . e . .: -
m o sr.- p 4 .:iv iqu t . aa + 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE (I) t Figure A-3.6 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle to Shell Weld X Inside Surface ,_,. Surface' Flaw - X Longitudinal Flaw .. X Outside" Surface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw wwmme A-38
.c . A4 INLET N0ZZLE INNER RADIUS (CORNER) A 4.1 SURFACE FLAWS l The geometry of surface flaws at the inlet nozzle corner is depicted in Figure A-4.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw avaluation charts. . l o Flawshapeparameter{ o Flawdepthpa'rameter{ where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) t-thesurfaceflawlengthdetected(in.) - t - wall thickness at the inlet nozzle corner (t = 15.12")
- i The surface flaw evaluation charts for the inlet nozzle corner are listed below:
o Figure A-4.2 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Inner Radius (Corner) X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw ' Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-4.3 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle inner Radius (Corner) Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw em' A-39 mwniu. i.
. l wicians t i SIDF VIEW TCP V!EV i
1
- -171.4 10.
i' [h 1, c cA 3 i e-f si *
.. t f o NM ;
~ I*
s s - 1 I f - U
. N ==-- as. n """" 4 TYPICAL EMBEDDED M ss.co q FLAW INDICATION
= 35.0 W1ciuas t ports.
- 1. DIMIONE DO Nov INCLtCC CLAD
- 2. ALL Dire 410NE M4E IN INCDC DIMEhs!DNS -
220N i 2 evmoN 1.2 emAIDucco 1.2 A. II.C l1.12 9.00 I a 44.s 42.s 42.5 5 t . h
.- J l
- =a I
I TYPICAL SURFACE i FLAW INDICATION i .- l Figure A-4.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Inlet liozzle Inner Radius (Corner) ~ me.mia. i. A-40
l . , l 1 - LEGtl80 A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw Ilmits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable by ASME Ccde analytical t, , 20 . ; . .
; ., , . . , , ., criteria in IWB-3600.
l,j ! l l,!-[ l ! y '
; ,j I ;
ll .
, l 'i i: } l }j b' lH. C - ASME Code allowable slxe l "
! ; ; ; iI l l !' l t 1983 Winter Addendusa.
i 16 ' i i, lt 1 a-1 : I 4 e 4 I i l
% 12 ! ' -
i [ l i;L 7 I E l T
- S o
to l l! ! t i '
' l h'l I lb f,l[
i g , 1 i 1 l ; i yl .r I!l l li'yb }A .. i I i:"
'iif h:
I H! : Hj AL i j ! ! i -
, i o .
a.l ! lllilg? .. l m!
- I J l [- i -l h ll lll Ij 2 ' ' ' ;' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '"' ' '' '
O - - - - - -- o 0.1 02 03 c.4 o5 FLAW SHAPE (a#)
~
Figure A-4.2 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Inner Radius (Corner) ! X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw w risim i. I 0' __ _ .
1 LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw Ilmits. 8 - Within this zone, the j surface flaw is acceptable '
. . .by ASPt[ Code analytical e, - 20 .
criteria in IldB-3600.
.h.
la
, :d C - ASME Code allowable since
,ll 1983 Winter Addendum.
- f -
16 - f;
'j 1 ;
I :i i ! I t i i{ h ' l 1- ; . I l ,
% 12 '
L ; !;! ! l T I i lj ;
!l l[ } ll i!
U i ji I !l .! l li , j ; jji 20,30 A O o ; i i l 'l ll l l[ [fU'fl l E
- I I
! Il l ;ll' -ll{lt: ;
5 : .
,1 q:si ;j ti
'j
"- =
- l ! l ! i :
.}j 6 l}
, l , ; , ,
4 2 I j l r l '':"'>> l ll ;!l 0 o 0.1 0.2 0.3 04 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#1 Figure A-4.3 Evaluation Chart for inlet Nozzle Inner Radius (Corner) Inside Surface X Surface flaw X Longitudinal Flaw . X Outside Surface Fabedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw mamsee se L 9. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _. . _ . _
A-5 INLET N0ZZLE SAFE-END TO N0ZZLE WELD A-5.1 SURFACE FLAWS 1 The loometry of surface flaws at the inlet nozzle safe-end is depicted in Figure A-5.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts, o Flawshapepartmeterj o Flawdepthparameterf where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in) 1 - the surface flaw length detected (in) t wall thickness at inlet nozzle safe-end (t = 2.585") The surface flaw evaluation charts for inlet nozzle safe-end ars listed below: o Figure A-5.2 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-5.3 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld X Inside Surface 1 Surface Flaw ___ Longitudinal Flaw - Outside Surface Embedded flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-5.4 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-5.5 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld _ Inside Surface X Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw O A-43 we.iwus so I
4 , A-5.2 EMBEDDED FLAW The geomtery of enhedded flaws at the inlet nozzle safe-end is depicted in Figure A-5.1. . Basic Data: t = 2.585" ,
=
6 Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the
' surface (in.)
a = Flaw depch (Defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flaw length (Major diameter) (in.) a, a Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flawshapeparameter,f o Flawdepthparameter.{ o surfaceproximityparameter,f ; The evaluation chart is given in Figure A-5.6. In view of Figure A.6.6. similar to that of the beltline, all embedded flaws which meet the criterion { < 0.125 will be acceptable regardless of their size, shape, and location. - e me.,ma. ie A+
.o- .
i I ) l
=Ts. '
i, SIDE VIEW TCP VIEW I
- Nth *.- -171.4 10.
i i - e .c .- F h ' l I lA i === ht I
- r Jiin*2o i- -
! . l. d 811-I
- I 1 I j *
- TYP! CAL EMIEDDED ; i FLAW thDICAT!DN o , as.o f h( =- 33.00 "
W.0 wy, % e icTts. - - I
- 1. DIMNBlow DO NOT INCLLCE CLAD
- 2. ALL DimHBIONs AM IN INCMS 1
O!MENSIONS - zt m 1.2 r m 1.2 ImAIDe00 1.2 v g a ll.o it.12 8.88 : ..r s 44.s 42.s 42.s - J l
.- a 1
TYPICAL SURFAtt FLAW INDICATIDN i Figure A-5.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Inlet Nozzle
, Safe-End to Nozzle Weld ~
A-45 w .mwo .
LEGtm) A - Th- 10. 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 A by ASME Code analytical
'e l I- j l criteria in IWB-3600.
18 f _ lI : ! C - ASME Code allowable since i
'l '
! i 1963 Winter Addendum.
16 - - 18 - I I D - ASE Code allowable prior _ 34 l' ,
. to 1983 Winter Adoendum.
N
)
s
'2 i g T Ei 10 -
l s -- ll j I I s
'C g
] I o
o l 0.1 ll-l 0.2 bl c.3 0.4 lD 0.5 Ft.AW SHAPE (a#1 Figure A-5.2 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe end to Nozzle Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Lor.gitudinal Flaw .
~
Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw ' we.nmee se , _O I _ . - __ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
LEGtMD A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable
,* . 20 , A by ASME Code analytical
^ I, '
,,,- criteria in IWB-3600.
18
; C - ASME Code allowable since 1983 Winter Addendum.
16 {
$L D - ASME Code allowable prior g 14 to 1983 Winter Addendum.
E= 12
?
E' O Y $ 10 L 0 0 3l: I .
< s ,.
6 s l C 4 l D 2 0 !!I I ll . I I IH 0.1 0.3 O 0.2 0.4 0.5 FL AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-5.3 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe end to Nozzle Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitiafinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw m w i s ..
- 8. . .
LEGEND 1 A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 by AsNE Code analyticai
'A criteria in IWB-3600.
e, 18 fM 'f C - ASME Code allowable since'
'i M6(M. 1983 Winter Addendum.
16 i-t , i I "$[h' lr
. !!dj, D - ASME Code .Ilowable prior
- 14 I I- J' 0l(i!!
. ! to 1983 Winter Addendum.
g +v i 12 I $ l t-T Ei 10 e o B:
<t 8 6 .
C 4 D 2 0 h ! 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 f FL AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-5.4 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw . X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw CircumferentiaiFlaw w , ,. . . 4 8 -- g p,g ,
t t[GEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 s A by ASME Code analytical b - I -- criteria in IWB-3600. 18 l C - ASME Code allowable since 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 . D - ASME Code allowable prior .
- 14 to 1983 Winter Addendum.
\$
1
'2 ,
Y 10 l 5 a n' . G , t C D 2 i 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FL AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-5.5 Evaluation Chart for inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld : Inside Surface X Surface flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X CircumferentiaiFlaw 3379s/091508 le
. Il e 't.
o e. SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- LINE , .
. p.
0.13
--+ rzn ausanoto ruws-l=- n ._ . . -.- - - =-s 0.12 m . ,.: g-cowriounATION - e- --- "
r -'-
- g. '
-FLAWS WITH t F -_ -r
= -' " ASOVE THIS LINE ARE
~~
f ~ tr~; ._.._ .. 2:f NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11 ~ ~~ Z r: .Z . - _ ar5.- . -- - Zf
..- .-._. .-n. .
.~ _
;;n --
1_T 0.10 _ .. _
/r: _ _- - - .
= ----
4 - _= -- -
.=.;
0.09 x b _~- . . . 3, ..g - 2 .u.
.i ._..
g O.03 "
~
==,= 4gg; g ej _
5 - ev -
- 0.07 n:N sunrAes: -
O - = ^ Z H O.06 j ruws IN Ms - nsaiou uusi se -+ x._
~
0
==
g consioenso *:- - - - g : sunFAct ,- 0.06 i . Laws = , . 5-w. g .
.f _:=- =uL;_;
a _. ._ _ _ . _ 333. 4 -
=J: -
-c- Z 1:i- E
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS Z O.04 -- ----
- - . -r
;- =
z
- 3 __
T (ON THIS SIDE OF
-~Z21 Y 55-
- a.
.:r-j,~F Dide &JJ -"
- m. ..;
lisa DEMARKATION LINE) 0.03 =l =ff =* ' M-: =___= '" =
"fE
_. . E=- -
- - i..
~
Z -. a
= E ARE ACCEPTABLE PER CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 0.02 N ~'
ZZ.'b Y . ) AS LONG AS 2a f 0.25 s=E2 .m =a-r-4==
.a= 22-= ==== -
.m. = ;:nss t 0'01 ~~ ---- '"
fs?#Ji T_._. . _ . If=iiEldi! E iii: :+; -4 ~Ci :. !$5 0 N E " 0 ' O.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE (SI t Figure A-5.6 Evaluation Chart for Inlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld __X,,_, Inside Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw _ A-50 3379:4 11544 10 l
A OUTLET N0ZZLE TO SHELL WELD A-6.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the outlet nozzle to shell weld is depicted in Figure A-6.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts. o Flawshapeparameter{ o Flaw.depthparameter{ where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) 1 .the surface flaw length detected (in.) t - wall thickness (t = 12.52) - The surface flaw evaluation charts for the outlet nozzle to shall weld are listed below: o Figure A-6.2 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld
-X* Inside Surface -X Surface Flaw- X Longitudinal Flaw '
Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw - o Figure A-6.3 Flaw Evaluation Chart - Outlet Nozzle to Shell Wald X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-6.4 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld _ Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Circumferential Flaw Outside Surface _ Embedded Flaw _ o Figure A-6.5 Flaw Evaluation Chart - Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld Inside Sur face X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface _ Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw A-51 i nn. min io
A-6.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometry of embedded flaws at the outlet nozzle penetration, Orientation No. 1 is depicted in Figure A-6.1. Basic Data: t = 12.52 in. 6 = Distance from the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) a = Flaw depth (Defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flaw length (Major diameter) (in.) 6 = Distance of the flaw to surface. (in terms of wall -thickness e.g. 6 = 1/8 T, etc.) a, = Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw 4 o Flawshapeparameter,f o Flawdepthparameter,{ o surfaceproximityparameter,f l 9 Evaluation chart for embadded flaws: Figures A-6.6, A-6.7 1 I j
~
- A-52 im.n um io l
l
4 l
*15Yss I
- .i 1
- i M.se TO 4- )- 1 VESSE2. ( IPNEM RADIUS f -
lCCf9ER) ,, a 4 0.156 MIN. y , CLADOINg - 2.O ' p 9F s- - 10* + .
-+
A , 4
" x\ VESSEL FL ND C
- O.25 CLAD
. (TYP) %
- 28.'97 * ,, g ,
\ \
U D h l t i , i c 5 1 1
= 51.25 NOTES: ' ~
t
- l. DI>ENSIONS DO NOT INCLUDE CLAD
- 2. ALL DI!ENSIONS ARE IN INCES g Qj i
DIMENSIONS -
-a ZION l.2 BM l .2 BRAICMOOD 1.2 A 11.0 ll.i2 9.89 5 34.16 34.96 35.16 -
C 40.3 39,5 39.5 TYPICAL SURFACE FLAW INDICATIDN t d Figure A-6.1 Geometry a.i Terminology for Flaws at the Outlet Nozzle to
' Shell Weld A
A-53 3179s/111544 10
LEGEND e b f w mits.
!h!b'!!!!!!"i;!!!!t
" ^
1"
- : I g,..::
t
. i - .
O a1 02 0 , OA 05 n eS Sur c F1 to t al Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential flaw - unuisia. . -
- f. _
- c. ,
LEGEND ac b f aw mits.. e law Ecc table
'- ' U'=#'#
llll"Ll lj
'ls TlF LIl lHllll ll j H H blT Hlik!llliM l $' ~ $2 2$ ;' a$ i [
i , 10 i-4 ll l fhhl s ' - 6 .I' L . I 4 ' ' 2 ' ,! O FLAW SHAPE I X s ae X r c F1 t al Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw D. - - -
l l ttGEND ce ab f w mits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable , h .
! cie a n1 -
18 C-M e al owa ince 16 14 i 12 [ k 8 l N l 1. 4 lC I ; I I 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-6.4 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded flaw Circumferential Flaw
>>mnessee se
..h . "i:
LEGEND
^~ N h,iN',,li" s .
IIlH lHU ^ hI! m e a i: I $llSlMlurllIl$1I$ldl L du
,= =
e l obl0 Hl lllI 1MlR H IM I HH M fill N E M E Nlllllidll d 'u n 2: ! llMH l HHllHl1 MlfMMlf ' M M E P
~
l lllMll H
@ m Fy M R idHE i
. Ili mMAlulMMbl]INEll' dli smle i l s
FLAW SHAPE (a#) ,,
\
ns u ae r c F1 t al Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw
- 4. .
- . t - , -- - - - -
J 42 i i 4 SURFACE / EMBEDDED i FLAW DEMARCA. TION * ' LINE . .r 0.13 . EfEi s -: Eik :h:i:Tusanoso ptaw : f '
.- : = ="
zu = . . . . ,.+. :: ..a,. e. nat ru -- .... .
~ (. LAWS WITH a
4 _- :- a . co..w.ri.e.u.m ion,:- r. =- .
- a . I
; 0.1 .:.;: ..:: .a m:u. . w .a: :. . _._ . . - '
ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
- ,F%m. --,uwr ::A.: u := = .- -
==: . r <
NOT ALLOWABLE
=-- u= a.
! =. ;= .a =:.s .. :.1 . .:: . .;z =: = u
" -- Eu= '" ' ' "
" ~" ~~ ' ~
O*11 'u.';= *'.;'" '- .. . '.:
.'r. m.: u I ="
- u ::?.:
- :'.:J r.d'
- n.: :
3': :!ii:"3 "*: 'l:..
~
.e n
-iE .6. .i.. ..;-i: :.il. I:E H. i.!=. -.E. . .-5. . :a
.E : '
i it. .ii.i.in:: . . . .
~. =.:~s i * ... : ..". "*
. 1 P.: . :.,*
-- " *' *". :=- -
4 *- ,T-
'- * . .::: W. :*-3 ""
.*-.'2 ?:S L . . .e . * *: at*. **d!
4. l;.2::*:: .: .::: 2". j.jg M:"l l 1 =='. " -- -
- . .' . , . "er.. .
M.j . ' :1
- 3= : *'
._: ".: .:"* * =. t :.
- *: L. .;.::- :d 0.0
? e , 9 es n. . e. = . . , : _= nwr. ,.. :.r. i
. . = .= . .= . . .
. sc. .=.=..
L,. J .:p I-- ;: ::.:. -
- - - - .+ .u -
~*
-: - ::'Jf,. , ; . . .-
i )> I - m .- .g e ,s' omg a es
=. :-
- a. ;u. .= :;.; .: , a-r: = ... . .. .
a a a..L
. . = =
I i;3.5 33uruH
.. J _. T : I T. .35;::.yf..a
. ..w . .
y 3. :l: g! -
- ... .w_ - - -
;.. . -:: e.: - -
.- .:a =
- = ::= .u.1:.:* umr :. =- -- t m : .:n=
4 . . -. .~. . . . . . .
.:. . ::-r . - - - - .:_ -=:- .:: . : .. . ' -- --
p { .u: :r. gPLAws in twis :-d 4 046 .:.nEGeoN MuST BE - pr:: .n 6 .- := = =:. . ' = .a =
=. . .= -- --
.ifconsioenso :
" == :: = ="
r "= ~~ ~ "" "-
- suneAce ": -'
', t d . :n-=ar=--=-- :: : .: * --.c.a .. . - :- m -: 0.05 Ptaws
, = =;. .= s ---.;== u : yu.u: ::: .: 1:
5
- :=-:, = =..=. . . .=r = , : :-.~. _. , - == -u =u. ..
4 .- ., n: .= ::i .: a.: .. - -
- . .- :: =* ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS
' E 0.M - - af.. -
. .au.: .=:; =. : n -
.:.:.:. -.- .a. a (ON THIS SIDE OF
.p::.
, === ; .. -
.- m: . . - =- -. . . .: = - -
===;.. = . . . = ...- . . . .
. - === -.= , . .
DEMARKATION LINE)
.. = .o,: =. . . :
0.03 . = . I :J T
~ '-" "
~ :- J. . ARE ACCEPTABLE PER
.; :.if.;
. .!!- :d:(--g ::d r. .. .;:- :- = :..
=E . :s . .- :-- --- -
CRITERIA OF IWS 3600
- .... ..= .= = . - n
- : .:- : .u: .- -:. .::: :._ :... .:.a a:
7.
--v : : -
-. .= . =r : ==
- .: u.:.. -:". .. AS LONG AS _2a60.25
, = r. -
...a -
y_ : : .. . : -
*? .'.
. : ** 3" ..*1 * *- ': '?a;;.; ;g .3, r- ::'
. . . . ,'.;.r.,
.t .; ..d... = . . .= . . .=. . .-..- .== . . . ..= u.. a .a.... . . .= . . .= .. .. = . .. :rr
,,,3
- ::: 5=h= =. :Hi "i: ":-' ?; i- 19+ :=?"U ii: = i:!
, !in 5: :q: .a di=l:9- e . = .
- r O 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 i
DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) Figure A-6.6 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld J
; Inside Surface Surface Flaw _X Longitudinal Flaw
_ X_
. X_ Outside Surface _X_ Embedded Flaw _ , ,
Circumferential Flaw . S
'l 3379t#11154410 A-58 i
SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- LINE , .'
O 13 ..~. . -- _:
'-~~ ausaposo rtAw- , 1-
- -2:= ,. a
., - _ .mp.mga s.:cowroounAnON *p - - ----
;-- _' ' ; L,AWS WITH 7 0.12 Z
~
92 T Z
~ -
ABOVE THIS LINE ARE MZ 5 x F- ' NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11 . _ -.& __ . . .w .
..=,..
. _ ._ . . _ ._.. _ _ =
=_=
__g. .:I. a =- = =- 0.10
.=m
~
.-e ef g=;= _ . . _ .
---=._ :
f
=ri.:n 0.09 _.-. Z 1. ;
=s .
_.J g..
.= _a...w
- _ : = m-._ _-_=
,,9,,,,,
3 :. - _. .? -E* .,w .n.. g 0.08 _ ..;.. m. s g!gan._ -
-= -
h -w=t - _ __.p - - O.07 r:2 :sunrace: -m _-
- u. _
- ~_:n__.
o t- ~ - :- --=
,Z,. 0.06 3 FLAWS IN TMis / - _ .. . -I_. --
- 1=
EReasoN MuST SE -- ---:: -- -- -- O
' CONSIDERED # -"-- - # -- "#}n:
g EsuneAct g __.
~~.1--- .-__ _"_ .2. . .. irs 0.05 97 Laws "i a: -
g._. . - W =. - ..__ . ....
. . '?
< ==-- : _. =r. -
- =nu -- -
*=~
J.= i.=E.
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS I O.04 "
. . .___";. . ~;._ .
- ~ -
=g (ON THIS SIDE OF wts . . . .
.___. .r ; J ,. --._.. ... ; .J .
;Z"-- ;T. T. DEMARKATION LINE) fE =.g~
0.03 55ff2 5 .._ ~"
.. n:-- .Z .". ARE ACCEPTABLE PER
- -'~~'"O, - - ...
ilu= I..us= _ . . . =_=_=..F . E.
.CRITERIA OF IWB 3600
="* ~' . ~ .~.
.E .
._#' u u=~=
- _#- AS LC,NG AS _2a&O.25
~"
0.02 I~'._.393y=:=u
=: ..
' _m2~- ..._~ - u *nwn=~.a:='
....=E.
= = :n _ . .
-r:._ .. _.
2 -- -
._ -2 ua --_-n' .
= t 0*01 Eif- fii{iEE}'.~- " - " _~nd---
-~-
iE =:--Elmi =E==31:15-E 1i 51
" ~ ~ -' " -
if:i - ::if-- M.i.:gji_E ti;Tj g n ..
- =}"E:- pEi- : 3:ij
~ii "" ="
0 F'Ii= =I I" ~ #I i '5iN! Ii "i "' ~ O 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 . DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) Figure A-6.7 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle to Shell Weld X Inside Surface - Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface X Erbedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw - A-59 3379s/1115M 10
A-7 OUTLET N0ZILE INNER RADIUS (CORNER) A-7.1 SURFACE FLAWS - The location of surface flaws at outlet no nle corner is depicted in Figure A-7.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts. c Flawshapeparameters{ o Flawdepthparameter{ where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) 1 - the surface flaw length detected (in.) f
' t - wall thickness (t = 15.385')
The surface flaw evaluation chart for the outlet no nle corner is listed below: o Figure A-7.2 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nonle Inner Radius (Corner) y X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-7.3 Flaw Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nonle Inner Radius (Corner) Inside Surface X Surface Flew 1 Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw 9 S A
l 4 _ %1kst t *
---1 _ I 4- l=. I a
W.88 TO VESSE2. ( !>eetptAprug -- La I L C019ER) s O.ISS NIN. CLADDING - 2.O 1r , p 9F 10'- , 7 A I l TYPICAL EMBEDDED FLAW INDICATION N _OZ2LE _TO _u_ w , 2 .
,(TYP
. ,, ) _ N
(\ -+--- as . s7 ---.- ( _ i8 l \ l U h e b l l a
= i
= 51.25 1 3 -
t -- y
. J NOTES: ,
- l. DISENSIONS DO NOT IEWE CLAD - --a
- 2. ALL DI>ENSIONS ARE IN INC6ES i
DIMENSIONS I z!ON 1.2 SYRON 1.2 BRAID 6 1.'2 8 A II.O 11.12 3.sg - TYPICAL SURFACE B 34.16 34.86 35.16 FLAW INDICAT!DN c 4o.s se,5 so.5 f
.f
- Figure A-7.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Outlet Nozzla
# Inner Radius (Corner)
A-61 uos.mnu so i
~ -
LEGEND t a e Eb f w mits. f e 1 1 $ceptable
~
, . 2e .
,, , .r M5a'id"f2
i ll . l I i" l Hl;ti1MUi$lhllklMbIM r' e l l l m i . i l;10 !wcunnn llll H l H 1 m H U Hlll E H H -
~
2l h Hi i ll B M M ! E M i!
^ -
4 -
! ' ' I '8 ll .L .
...,N s :
ih.hk i'C o
.HMBRENsMitstMWRi 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5
, 0.4 FLAW SHieE 4#1 l
! Figure A-7.2 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Inner Radius (Corner) l X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X' Longitudinal' Flaw ,f Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw I
=m . .. I
. .!i 6 _. , 1 -
._. . I
' ~
E LECEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable by ASME Code analytical
'e .
20 l criteria in IWD-3600. i l ij.. l 18 C - ASME Code allowable since l 1983 Winter Addendum. r 16
- 14 at
% 12 !
> ?
h S 10 t n I 4 8 j ' l
\'
lll )g o }h 6 8 f u '
!! lll 4 ,
,, l ll ,
s
' C 2 , l !
0 8 ' ' O 0.1 0.2 0.3 e,0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-7.3 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Inner Radius (Corner) Inside Surface X Surface Flaw x Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Fl'aw m.m. i.
-lt e '4
~
A-8 OUTLET N0ZZLE SAFE-END TO N0ZZLE WELD A-8.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the outlet nozzle safe-end is depicted in Figure A-B l. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts, o Flawshapeparameters{ o Flawdepthparameter{ where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) t - the surface flaw length detected (in.) - t - wall thickness (t = 2.895) The surface flaw evaluation charts for the outlet nozzle safe-end are listed below: o Figure A-8.2 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld - X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X -Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface ___ Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-8.3 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Wald _X_ Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw , Outside Surface ___ Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-8.4 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld Inside Surface _X_ Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw
~
mwwses ,o A-64
A o Figure A-8,5 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nczzle Safe end to Nozzle Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw ___ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw 'X Circumferential Flaw A-8.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometry of embedded flaws at the outlet nozzle safe-end is depicted in Figure A-8.1. . Basic Data: 2.895 in. t = 6 = Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) - a = Flaw depth (Defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) 9 1 = Flaw length (Major diameter) (in.) a n
= Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI _
characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flawshapeparameter.f - l o Flawdepthparameter.{ o surfaceproximityparameter;f Evaluation chart for embedded flaws: Figures A-8.6, A-8.7. i O A-65 34cle/11188810
- w e5Yes I
.- si iPee,tRADIUS cO > .- -
O.ISS MIN. CL.ADOINg - 2.O it 1 p I O'-e. '9 F I h f l / n
.A TYPICAL EMBEDDED
. FLAW INDICATION c
,\ Nb m w15Iss e
- .25)cuo M N l
- as, s7 - =.
(\
~ -
Q (
\
U h ._ b
= n '
= 51.25 = g , 1 a J NOTES: 8
- i. Di>ENSIONS DO NOT INCLLUE CLAD
"" ~*
- 2. ALL DI>ENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DIMENSIONS '
i 22ON i.2 BYRON I,2 BRA! WOOD 1(2 - A II.O II.12 9.69 TYPICAL SURFACE B 34.16 34.96 35.16 FLAW INDICATION c 4o.3 3e,5 se.5 Figure A-8.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Outlet Nozzle Safe-End to Nozzle Weld 3.n.,mn. i, A-66
-- l
LEGEND e ab e f aw its. 10,20,30 8 - Within this zone, the lI I l [ l [ a I - 9 W er e i I I I o 98 int A nd v j ! t
(
T 5 S 10 I I i lil l* 4 8 I c ; 4 , , jj l f D D - - 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4, 0.5 FLAW Sif APE (a#) Figure A-8.2 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld X Insida Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal D aw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw 3405s IIIS88 IB
LEEND ac e at f w its.
'" ' - "dia"eia' "itJea.i.
I q j l[ l [f ,
- 4:"fa'n'a%
,, !li l[ l -;mst:n:::'a:.:-
g m . l "-il"isni:"""d:,%'.!'
;'2 j j] :.
ll
! l
{jl ; e 'i
. ii l
;. L, .
llb..,J;l!HHul!llll' 4 lll
- abla M; hl! GENRlll!Illi Figure A-8.3 Evaluation Chart for Dutist Nozzle Safe end to Nozzle Weld
* " '" " " ~
5 desurae a x ni iaw a e he ~f
LtGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flat. limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable
, , 20 ,A by ASME Code analytical
,,I e . -
criteria in IWD-3600. l8 C - ASME Code allon ble since 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 0 - ASME Code allowable prior
- 14 to 1983 Winter Addendum.
6 i 12 I @ e-T on 0i o 10 ; ! C 4 a ' d l l . 6 , l 4 l D 2 l 0 ' l l 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FLAW SilAPE (a#) Figure A-8.4 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw I X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw i ses.. . . ,m . s 9 'L.
LtGEND a ab f aw its. 8 - Within this zone, the - ! 20 byIN bI[tcaI
~
M l llll E ll)l @ !l [ A
~
,, ll l Il} l l H I L l 16
"-:neni: = : e 1l @lO{HjuMil(IMlj l
12 10 i ;lh LB W' 6 qMUHN'I s
- . 1Hl Illl[lii U R M J S yll W O -- ' ' I-0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 !
i FLAW SHAPE la#) Figure A-8.5 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe end to Nozzle Weld j
- Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw ,
X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw mes..... .
- i. a :. . .
d i 1 a 1 1 SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION UNE a 0.13 u .n , n.
...: FLAWS WITH 7
==r=
=:,=
av .:
.ui:r m ..
3=.. Eu sEcoEn Pt4w.--.::.f g . . .pc. ---- - , - A80VE THis LINE AR
= w =.3. .. : , .CO, N FIG UR AT.nO.N. :m: .:f-NOT ALLOWABLE 0.12 =:=:-- ,2 ,a
=a_ - --..: --=2i
, .=m.= .:
- p.% %-
.n m :n :
- -.- .nJ4... = .--r 10 YRS 0.11 =%W ==
W"#
. . .. . .: r. =
W L f"
.=.v'=:...:n:
if# E:= M"-E : # 30 r#",==~ =:r- .: =.==::=:
. . =--. . ::= .: :, ; = =-+ in :: uj .
a. ll : ::=:4l ~* 40.J .! C. = yJ P:.*"-*:-:
.n. .r ; :::.: .1: ;F *T. .
aqg :r -c .- *
.=.* .; :: ', :: ap. .: u
=ll: l ..
W.sw * . .=' . . .
- .:= .
.c..- :. ..n.a. ;
...w.
- = ::.n::. ._
- p. .g gjf.: _..
. . _ --- . =. -.:= ::
..- d. . .,
, . .. . . _ .. . . . -... . . . _ = .: X:'=...":. J.i. .4 C=.:. p.
*== :n_. . 2- ...
F.C ' . ' '*4. :
.. 1 ..-
3.2aa '...
- p ;:* ..*-:.=.;
4 S es .:1* 1. . :*.F .:'
' * - '.=: .- ::*4 !!*T
= .: ::..n. :::: .; -.
%end,. ;:F,.,5.h =.:=.:.
.= ..:.2 :
.:.= , ,:-
-.; - .- t=. .
.: r..d g 0.08 ..
,,s. _y .a.
*.s e nf u:.:.: . _ = ..e:
_2. .,=.;u.,,.,_ a-f . , g.:a::=:::- em. . . . g.. g 0.07
- =
' - ~
- 1....
-" h _--...-- - -=....=. -m=..={...
.m.
- .._=
n :r E 0
- ' .' .3--SURFACE-2:=3""8=8""
-r r
-"I' :.. :--
- =
.:=
m.: 7 a:
==
=
=: : ..
E
-J w 0.06 ,3 FLAWS IN TMis =. = r: - - - = -
.u: - .. . _- .=
.:. AEGION MUST BE :f.p:.: = +: :== 25 =n.. ..: =
O
. .:.n . .'..= --
- #= =~1 CONSIDERED g 4:s SURFACE ".:-.
P - -- - - -
- n= . :- ----- --
E 0.05 HPLaws .
.:221 2 :~ .
" ~'"
Z"- ... a .n. . ._. . ._
- f'.:l .=::n. :. :.. = . . ...=.-.
. =..
. - ... - - .: = . . .:::: :. = . = . .
4 = 7 af. :-a-- ndsi}.si! ':: 1 - i.+- : as i w ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS 2 0*M -- - - - - ---- - -- --- -- -
-. _ . .-- d.ijiir.p) .;:a:.:= u. .s.. u.. -J. ::: E s- + ie.:e. ii.: =.. = (ON THIS SIDE OF 7...
- ,a: u a = u n:" a .= ..:. z- :- . = DEMARKATION LINE)
- :'pf
"" ~
0.03
"" ~"
"E ARE ACCEPTABLE PER
= .pf.
- i ~.. . . _ .._ . . .. ... 4. ..;; . . - . , . ..g - - -
- n CRITERIA OF IWB 3600
... ..: : :. . .- . = n .. :.=r'- -
="'
- . . .u .
=I" ~ ..
,n = = :. ~ u. =
m= ~ ASiONG AS2a40 25
= = :- :-'
0.02 :=.:.=:
- r. - ;- u-- "_*== :
.u
..-= =: ..-=
2 . -. : r-4=. u.==: = ---- : --na: =.: 1 4 RbN k*.. ' *
-. d*.-;;U ' :*:. .15~ $*i ? - -
- d 0.01 . h .5 :rrr' . . -
~.,
J
.-..: =. i...
. .. .l::: = :.=. .:..:.-i =. . :::1.: g
= . . .= . . =. -
=..
m :p: . q=ph ={=:P -
=;= .- ='
O 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 ( DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) i i i Figure A-8.6 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld X Inside#Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw _X_ Outside Surface X Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw 4 A-71 340$s/111M410 L l l
n l l SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION \ LINE '. t 0.13 ' ull b 0.12
'O'Q -
I m all upllie
+-FLAWS WITH f ABOVE THIS LINE ARE NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11
.--.y :-.. .
w ,_ y q gg. .
*g lEK O.10 ,,,
Z
~ ~
~ x.
_ 0.09 _ J~' ' Z el = g 0.08 :. .. 5 ' ~ f -
~ -
' O.07 -
sunpace- - l 0 - <- - l
- z. PLAws m Tms 0.06 ]nsomwmustsa-- 4.- - -.
.--- - - :- ==
c =
. : cowssoenso E--- -
sunpaca
~'
.! ~.;
) 0.05 w !,i PLAWs 5 - , i.
a -_ _. = : .---- ; 4 =-- - _-- r._ u-- I + Ad EMBEDDED FLAWS Z 0.04 g , . . . g:- .; rc..:.-
;;5A (ON THIS SIDE OF
.. T : ..
r:: -: r. z- _ . . . z. DEMARKATION LINE) 0.03 --~- i :b~: ZZT 2-. 3 ARE ACCEPTABLE PER -
-.--4m r-- : w E CRITERIA OF IW8 3600 0.02 Z:: " ~ .xr-
- :[ 5573 _ d AS LONG AS 2a&O.25
% == .;;
... t g'g3 :i
==FiETNN:- ----.. . - .
=+ ~~~-m-~t Wi 5
- Jh==-1 .1 ----
=M =1M i=i : .fi EHE 5! s iih:E
, r_p.5s-p .::+:.g2::s == =3s. . iu; =i; s i: ! +- ya l 0
- 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 .
l DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) ' l Figure A-8.7 Evaluation Chart for Outlet Nozzle Safe-end to Nozzle Weld X Inside Surface _ Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface X Embeddec Flaw X Circumferential Flaw e A-72 mwmas ia
.. e A-9 LOWER HEAD RING TO LOWER SHELL SHELL WELD A-9.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the lower head ring to lower shell weld is depicted in Figure A-9.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts.
a Flawshapeparametersj 1 o Flaw depth parameter { where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) a - the surface flaw length detected (in.) t - wall' thickness (t = 8.625) The surface flaw evaluation charts for the lower head ring to lower shell weld are listed below: l - o Figure .A-9.2 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Wald I X Inside Surface 1 Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedaed Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-9.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld X Inside Surface 1 Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface __ Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-9.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw A-73 3405s/111848 10
A-9.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometry of embedded flaws at the lower head ring to lower shell weld is depicted in Figure A-9.1. Basic D( 'n t
- 8.625 in.
=
- 6 Distance frot the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.)
a = Flaw depth (Defined as one half of the minor. diameter) (in.) t = Flawlength(Majordiameter)(in.)
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw e o Flawshapeparameter,f o Flawdepthparameter.{ o surfaceproxiuiityparameter,f Evaluation charts for embedded flaws: Figure A-9.5. . O A-74 340Se/11184410
)
I 1 1
.m noras
} l W194tl I m: f i = r a. l 4 d r g ; L I i / . , , , , i
. . . , , , i 'r'****
k i I 2 l r ... r ie ; 4- }- I q, y,w r,.. $,,,,,y _. t;, i 2
, r.. ,,ie e .-
y- ,
' ~ ~
, % ,- l i TYPICAL EMBEDD!D
- r. suic FLAW INDICATION I
wtNes I l_ _ i i
.s w
/
I 9- 5 e - L
. E O_D E - i
- E I J -
- ~'
-u u .
I l l , I I i s M TYPICAL SURFACE FLAW INDICATION Figure A-9.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Lower Head Ring
~
to Lower Shell Weld - i - A-75 340$s/11184410
l t ( LEEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 ' 10241 . q by ASME Code analytical T-e . i 0 '! !! ! j. q criteria in IWB-3600. 18 f , 2 f f . f f h. C - ASE Code allowable since 16 l l i] !
' l lh }Pj- l f4 IM3 Winter Addendum.
fh.; lfli f i
- .- I l 4 l . [u. ti D - ASE Code allowable prior I ** I 3 "I"E'" A ae 14 Id I i
'f i I.t t
- i. l .
, jl i
{ 12 i ' I y I
- f. l f! - fi hN !, I"!
3 J.! ig t ii W :i eh a i g '; ! !
,i 'l ljh il; l4 .
6 i ! I 'I N I! ! N;! ' i l' > ; ; ; I
. q }l : I l' i l il : -
4 ! ! ! ;,,,. lilil!d! f f f h h
, li!o'muhmMlH H MT QllHlf' o
o 0.1 . o.2 c.3 0.4 o= FLAW E.iAPE(a#) Figure A-9.2 Evaluation Chari for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw .
- u. *O 4 j
~;
LEGIND A - The 10. 20, 30 year acceptable flew limits. ce flew acceptable C
- g g al 20 - -
A
%A 3
i [ ' - IN *M='2.""
=
- l
!! -=i=e i
} 12 '
g [
.- } &
l1 g i io
;; , I k a 6 _
l , C ll D D ! I o 0.1 0.2 03 c. o.5 FLAW SH APE (a#1 Figure A-9.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw 2 s.n . . ..
LEGEND A - The 10. 20. 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone. the , surface flaw is acceptable 20, . by ASME Code analytical
. f;{.].'A
, i ,
criteria in 114-3600.
's - l l l
, f j:, f , ' [
,.m9 I di 18: i" I l' t !' ' li ! ' '
l i
}
!: ill - 'l C - ASME Code allowable since l: '
l . f1 i j lq 1983 Winter Addendum. f! f' l lffl D - ASE Code allowable prior
- 14 Ii l- I to 1983 Winter Addendum. ;
e lo
'L ij :;
; l j :
- E 1 .
l h t
;. l i ,
,L
,t i!. ! !
. T Ei 10 I I ! i M O l l l .'lI i l! !! I k ; '
!"I-l ;;'
a 6 j i i i l
?
f !I ,ill!ff:f!{ l i i i !l I
-{ {l!
'I !
~
4 H I 4 i v.
....u n umo e' ' tonu or I !
2 .-
, E E 1idH 101% SH$!!!N!I!'IIMMII Mi lb$lhlY 0.4 ill H o 0.1 0.2 03 e5 FLAW SHAPE (a#)
Figure A-9.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface En6edded Flaw X Circumferential F1aw .! m s.n u m .. ,
4 SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- UNE, .
.p.
0.13 .. _ _ . . .... O 9x = ini.. .. = = m auseooso PLAwi I =:= =- ~a..:= a 0.12
, = .. e, gg ycowresunAnow .. ,... v. ..q FLAWS WITH 7
=r
- ABOVE THIS UNE ARE C--:-.S
, su 4: x .: r_.; 7.. ,_.. I NOT ALLOWABLE 0'11 ._ .
.2 ._
1 - _.i
- 4: . . _ =w.u
- =. . . :....
* ;Tl : *CP r ", "-* **
.P', n. '!{J.:%
,-.:- l 2 :.
- + +"
= t-- : . *-i '/
pe. -,.
-.s
.~
'. ::. .:.*. .::t .. .:::.... =.r.
"g'~..m -
- r. .I.35*. 0 01 0 0'10 .. :. , . .
- e 1 ius, l 1* : i;.
- .U:!*:0.i 4.. -
L-ll;3::rT =. --*; :* ;;;; ~~~
. . .'i.4 . .i .".-* :0 -*C : " * ~~1T.
== --= .: 22 -
ut : :::: :.w ---- g: =,.
. -.:: = :- _.
. 3..:== = = 1. .. er e .,, m e.T O.09 ==:=:-- < < "i
-r
;= -
an
-m
- a. 1 a==v= ._
~=:y n .e. .-- -
.g :n u-.
=: = = > :::
- a
=
= --
3 0.08 =.:..
;::;.: :t?-=
; -:_rz..
l .. zu==
- id 9 app ... gay ==. .J. m. . ., . ;m, m.
.y .
.n =._=
a:: e=an y== =na ._. 3
. = =- t..: n =:= -
0.07 H 8nasun?Acedssir.]:" .. i t 5f. .. S T h t=1u * = __. 5 .
. ._.; ~-E
.. =._=. -
r
. m:
iiE1 E ,iPLAWs IN TMis d7=, , :- = :- a m. = = = -- :- m-
> 0.06 = == x; "na.: =
o !5 3en mesi.o,w o, om,u,sTru st := :K. =-: - -=_==-===a-. n= :n
=
_ =
=
i suntAct giu E= Ei! =! s~itEE E9:1 E rii :- - E
) 0.08
- PLAw 3 :. s.e 4
. . . .r,._ _. . . .=.= = = =ar
- = -
. . . .= .n;-p::; -. .
N O 04 - N iI E ' :: iN =i l.- e qu !! =I i il c: =i 5 ALL EMSEDDED FLAW 8 fa. i'.~.I=.
.u. = =:2. = .: . _. ._.: :. = . . .
(ON THl8 SIDE OF
. .. . . . . ... .-= . .=_= r :.~=. .
. ..J.- .".'. ....n.- . .w-. = ..
. z.r- .rg:- ."- .1. .-::::: .z~ " .. ". . " - - - 2.. :.:-
0.03 E5 5 j? - N5 T . . ."I:'. I. T' 5 P P ".. . I. "
.- . DEMARKATION ARE UNE)
ACCEPTABLE PER
!= s ut/E :-E3Ea s1 *: = = :E:::li
=ii E =He
- CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 0*02 AS LONG AS 2,,et. ,0.25
#:ifi qu+ t(si !#ii ifili W M Ei M iig:ig'Eli % e i:5 t im "" ::E: E. is F ini Ili! mi Fi~ Ei i-il 0.01 n~:f- @IiE , . . . . . . . .
!#i i: 4 :: @
- . :: . .- = . . .= . . u.
r f: .+. i. = . . .:; , . . .r.:..
.. ...J. . . . .:n. : . :n.
F S:b =p.
- se.fi ..ppii . . . He - .. . r . . s 0 '
O 05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE (f "gure A-9.5 Evaivation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Shell Weld _X Inside Surface _ Surface Flaw _ X Longitudinal Flaw X
======
Outsideg Surface K Embedded flaw X
**-8" Circumferential flaw .
C mwman io A-79
. . .. l A-10 LOWER HEAD RING TO LOWER HEAD WELD A-10.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the lower head ring to lower head weld is depicted in Figure A-10.1. The following parameters must be prepared for surface flaw evaluation with charts.
o Flawshapeparameter{ o Flawdepthparameter{ where a - the s9rface flaw depth detected (in.) l t - the surface flaw length detected (in.) ' t-wall' thickness (t=5.375': The surface flaw evaluation charts for the lower head ring to lower head weld are listed below: , o Figure A-10.2 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Wald
,_X, Inside Surface ,jL Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw i
o Figure A-10.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld X Inside Surface _]L Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw
,__ Outside Surface _ Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-10.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Wald Inside Surface ,]L Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface _
Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-10.5' Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw L,ngitudinal Flaw _ X Outside4urface Embedded Flaw X Ci cumferential Flaw . A-80 m n nu. i. i
.. c A-10.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometry of embedded flaws at the lower head ring to lower head weld is depicted in Figure A-10.1. Basic Data: t = 5.375 in.
=
6 Distance from the t eterline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) - a = Flaw depth (Defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flaw length (Major diameter) (in.)
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, boyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o flawshapeparameter,f o Flawdepthparameter,{ o surfaceproximityparameter,( Evaluation chart for embedded flaws: Figure A-10.6. O A-81 mwwsss se
l l 4 SwtEYss e l es,sesI eseass\ ^
' \
as 3 . i 8 I
% ..e J Y-y >..
2 u r.e ,,,e e..e ,e l*****'*'
,, , g
.N,.0/%Z$,.,...
l
.. .e ,,
MY . b t
- -- - - , l ,s 11 i
. ... ., \, , ,- -
2 :,.e ,, .e.
' ...I wwrr M" I e..e ,,e 7 , i.
-' 7' . .. l t TYPICAL (MIEDDED .
. FLAW INDICATION !
$ \
- e. . . ...e , ,
, , y,, ,
t - sv.s s<. f l *~ i t .-%. I W- / f 5 - -. n cw e E A i e
'} '
'l TYPICAL SURFAtt FLAW INDICATION W .' $ l l
Figure A-10.1 Geometry and Terminology for Flaws at the Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld . O A-82 sm.rm... io
LEGEND a b f aw mits. s rf e f aw cceptable 2a j" . q a c garnai*,='e' ji g I f er dde _ j j t 98 int A 12 g 4 10 if I 6 l . . e i . l C O 0 Ill 1l. 0.1 ill l ll 0.2 03 0, .4 llD 05 Ft.AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-10.2 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw ' Outside Surface, Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw sees. nome e ,e l
.s. . ..
i i LEGEND l A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. t 8 - Within this zone, the t ,> surface flaw is acceptable I 20 by ASME Code analytscal A I i- criteria in IWB-3H)0. 18 ' C - ASME Code allowable since I . 1983 Winte:- Addendum. 16 - I - j D - ASME Code allowable prior
--. 14 ;I - - .
to IM3 Winter Addendum. E i 12 I J T m 03 O 10 f; . '
^
3: 3 *
- u. -
6 - C D 2 ! li O 0 l! . 0.1 I 0.2 l 1 0.3 I l- 0.4 l 0.5 Ft.AW SHAPE la#) i Figure A-10.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower liead Ring to Lower liead Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw .i
~
Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw m s.n n m .. ,
%- _ _ _ _. 0 ; _ _ m .
LtGIND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits.
' 8 - Within this zone. the.
surface flaw is acceptable
, . 20 -
A by AsNE Code analytica1 f- criteria in 114-3600. 18 C - ASME Code allowable since 1983 Winter Addendum. D - ASE Code allowable prior 14 to 1983 Winter Addendum. g 2 12 l-- 10 -- 8 f 3 ! in. l 6 , D 2 .
^
0 I l 1 o 0.1 c.2 0.3 c.4, 0.5 Ft.AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-10.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw mw. .m. ..
. LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptatie flaw limits.
8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 3 .. _.) 20 30 ,A by ASME Code analytital
,, ., i j 1 criteria in IWB-3600.
18 ! I -
' I '
,l C - ASME Code allow &ble since 1983 Winter Addendum.
l l 1 0 - ASME Code allowable prior f
, I [ , l to 1983 Winter Addendum.
E I
} 12 -
l l l g
'8 T
$ a l I e
6 i -- I , I I l 4 l1 D 2 Il o II I I p .
- i o 0.1 0.2 03 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#)
Figure A-10.5 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lower Head Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw - X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw w. w.. _0 0 A_ .- _ m
.e o SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION LINE , '.
.e 0.13 _..
_ . .=
- -:::::- :x i":EMSEDOED PLAW Eib * . .*'" *E 8 H.:-'lii'.-
r.-- .sii
, m .. :a
.+m-u - FLAWS WITH 7
-< ..acoweisuRanow ra_ w 0.12
. , , = ,
. ..;O
. . , -.r,. .=.r: _
, s.--
~ ..., r- ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
.z.E.' Z. NOT ALLOWABLE
,W =. _-
g-v . .n n=in:. un :
- M.r- _ " r_.._t_-
ll *
= l!:* ;O: 1 **-'
- . . . # =..En . ,
m: ::: :-m 'W --
- _-~ ~-
- .::: :n E
I _. .- -. cr.-* ; n n:
. . .; ;r .-r
= . . . ~~m /g n;-=-:t:: = n:=:r- =
0.10 ._.
.~- .-.
.tr--. . .riE
~
ilii. .Ei
. . _ ..r =
2 ;: ::: .. - -
.m
; : n;- 1 ..:; in:nn ==-m: - - -
_=a a . .: . a 0.09 m
..i . . .
.;. = .p .. ,-
g .m.....~..
.g -. _ .
aTw := i. :-
._- . . . .: :n. -. . i .x .._.::.: m
.=.=.,_.. :1 =-- = :nk.- ud m: 31 I- -- -
= :n.c u =* c-::.n a
.; ;r ;- = ---
n=.r: :.. .. g 0.08 . ..
.=
= . . ._
.~
he.a,su
.; m .
- ;J=.;; m;.;=_= .-.
1...
., m --
,. r. . . .. . ._ _.: --
=r
.J I:]E m3h sump Ar: .
h :::.e9 :- r- -- ---
;y 3n= t;;;
-;n-g;z S 0.07 _ '..-
.~.-.=
g --
. .+2.t:. _... . . . . .. = :n:. :::.
006 j nAws in ms C.. 6 Q
-. REoeow must sE :r=== c ,== ** ~;
~
i -.= = ==
= = ==
= = "
= =.
6 =
~~ ~=
- CUNsIDERED F -- ~2 jZ 2:iE EZT
~' ""
$ 0.05 ElsURFACE n:
"3 H ri,Aws it __ . ..
,+ir-= i:EE=
~ ~Z .ZJ. _ 7" r .: ..:: 2:. ..:: .:n
. .~r :n:1~ ii : EEE
.. .- JF -
I"ir; ;.: : it -ij E@ i i ALL GMBEDDED FLAWS l 0*04 ~n
...:_a pr. g..i. s. ;_i= . . .. =i.i_ri. _ - .:. ;.
..... r. . n. .. : s. =...i.sa.i-a .. n.: -
(ON THIS SIDE OF
== .= c -- -
- : ..a. m.. . . . .;: =u =t DFMARKATION LINE)
.. A. =f =. = : =.- = . . .. =. . - n = = . =.==
0.03 = . . . .=._ . __ . ._. .. . . .. -w..7.." .R:- . .. ARE ACCEPTABLE PER E= i=f ..E --a_. .m= E= =s ass s.. - CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 <
== = =-- ~~ -
== :. .= =- .:: : = =_ ;. -::
gI.=: 7.' 3.;u
= = A8 LONG AS .ya40.25
- 5 "" ::
~"
0.02 :M=.t.-j r.u.. ::. . 4.
. ..n.~'. N. =!:.T.
- .J.=._...:n.=..
- n. u = . !". .= . .0:_ . . un.==.= . . . .::.
t hb 0.01
- i ==
b bbb.". s m ie.= k d::' - = = .:n =i= :n: n:!"= = r n!' T.} .i::3 - #
,93.iiJE "ii Gi -
.: nii . 4 9 -
0 ' O.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACF. d) . Figure A-10.6 Evaluation Chart for Lower Head Ring to Lo'wer Head Weld _X Inside. Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X_ Outside Surface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw e O O A-87 mwwm so .
l A-11 TOP HEAD DONE TO RING WELD The stress distribution at the top flange junetion is unique since high boltup ! stresses are applied in this region in addition to the regular pressure and i thermal stresses. Moreover, the governing transient which creates the worst stresses at the inside surface is different from that for the outsida surface. The orientations of the maximum stresses at both the inside and the eutside surfaces are also different, not to mention in different environments. As a consequence, fracture mechanics investigation on both surfaces becomes necessary. (See Figure A-11.1) The governing normal and upset transient at the inside surface was found to be loss of flow, whereas that at the outside surface was found to be heat-up.
/-11.1 SURFACE FLAWS The following parameters must be determined for the surface flaw evaluation at both inside and outside surfaces.
o Flawshapeparameterf o Flawdepthparameter{ where a - the surface flaw depth detected (in.) 1 - the surface flaw ',ngth detected (in.) t - wall thickness at the top flange junction (t = 7.19 in.)
.=
A-88 un. min. i.
)
The surface flaw evaluation charts for the inside surface of the top flange junctionarelistedbelow: o Figure A 11.2 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld 4 _X Inside Surface 1 Surface Flaw X_ Longitudinal Flaw __, Outside Surface ,_ Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw o Figure A 11.3 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld , X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw ,_, Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw 4 Similarly, the surface flaw evaluation charts for the outside surface of the top flange junction are listed below: i o Figure A-11.4 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld l Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal, Flaw X Outside Surface ,_ Embedded Flaw Circumferen'tial Flaw o Figure A-11.5 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw A-11.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS As the surface flaw evaluation charts described in paragraph A-11.1, the evaluation charts for embedded flaws near the inside and outside surfaces have been constructed separately. The locatic,ns of the embedded flaws near either the inside or outsido surfaces of tho' top head dome to ring weld are depicted as shown in Figure A-11.1 t..so. . A-89 un.n nem ie
o .. The basic data used for the evaluation of the embedded flaws for either side of the top dome to ring weld are sumarized as follows: t a 7.19 in. - 6 = Distances of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surfaceconcerned(in.) a = Flaw distance (defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flaw length (major diameter) (in.) 4
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it o.ast be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules.' ThefollowingparametersmustbecalculatedfromtheabovedimensIonstouse the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flawshapeparameter,{ o Flawdepthpcrameter,{ o surfaceproximityparameter,f The evaluation chart for the embedded longitudinal flaws in the top flange to ring weld is Figure A-11.6. l l The evaluation chart for the embedded circumferential fla.re in the top flange to ring weld is Figure A-11.7. e" A-90 un.mine io j
TOP HEAD RING TO DOME. WELD
*W, TOP HEAD RING 88.I6 R TO FLANGE WELD -
/. I J
l 7.19 h i s p i
.O I67.13 DIA r l o.., __ _
. n
-- La i q, B- -
1G7.0 DIA 2 . 5 LOWER FLANGE _ U TO SHELL. WELD _ r I TYPICAL EM8tDDED 170.98 DIA -
' #" I"03C"IIO"
* *-- A wrMas ,
UPPER HEAD REGION I t ll M i
' 3 1 .- H a_ s a i
~ ~'
! DIMENSIONS ZION l.2 BYRON l.2 BRAID h ,2 ,
~
- A j
~
l1.0 l1.0 9.56 5 30.125 34.28 34.28 TYPICAL $URFAtt FLAW INDICATION d ( Figure A-11.1 Surface and Embedded Flaw Indications at the Top Head Dome
.- to Ring Wald -
A-91
. M05s/tt1H4 18
t
, ((GEND at ab f w mits.
face flaw acceptable l
' ~ l. I J le a I
l !Il d: i HIMEIU E: q@}$m dL ,! t
, l Ml M ilHELNHbMH '12:32'2'""
14 "
!,,h!lH}RsjihhllHMN{H 10 '
* : 0 ! E O W H HRH M M 6 '
4 'I ' '
, WWMllMME" !BP"iiis5MMMiliiiiiii" 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (af) Figure A-11.2 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Riveg Weld X Inside Surface X Surfacc Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw j Outside Surface Embeddel Flaw Circumferential Flaw
-. I
. .- l 8' - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LEGEND a b f aw mits. r ce 1 cc table !
'l" %'I E ' O ' N
l bllhk l Wh L1 Wqy[j igN{iggglgglQ d!UtlilHi ' - t= ==r ' ~ 14 i Wint Ad i ,, J I ! I:Ih! lC,IWilllMIIf T 10
=
a i i lll i ! HI M11l1 UW 2 l l! l H! ' i l l l M ll M M h ($
' i! jl 0 ;llil.U I! . I'lfli 4 . I
!} !
f , . b .g Illl! !!!!lllllllllllf 2 . ! !! i 5I IhlOll00" ON! hl!II!!IIIIE o I l - - --I - ' - 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 FLAW SHAPE (a#1 Figure A-11.3 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw longitudinal Flaw l Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw I ww, . .. 8 . _ _ ._
I ((GEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 3.20,30 by ASME Eode analyticai I8 l j i f l' !i if I r C - ASME Code allowai, ; since J- l lHH ' H } I };l! ! ;f'i i j !! u , , l 1983 Winter Adden fue. I l D - ASE Code ailowable prior l- _ i, i . l i j 'lll
'!k.
- ; l to 1983 wir.:.er Addendum.
[!
$ l ! ,
, l l :
% 12 ;I 'l , [ l .l .
- l ', , !
E il ll ! ll ;gitU T S 10 i : l I 1 . i i
'I llIl i!
T O I i l ' !l l' 1 f l!h ! 5 : I !
,'IlJf,I f:)!l I
s - 2
- t ""
l . jij i p illllEn. 4
!l) l O' . $!
2 i l
' i3 I IIIIf c -- -
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 05 l FLAW SHAPE (af) l Figure A-11.4 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld l Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw .
- X Outside Surface En6edded Flaw Circumferential Flaw i
__ m _
i n ttrino A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 .. . . .,........m.... ... , , . . '
,! , , ,, mu,,
A by ASME Code analytical 8, * ' ' ' ,
'i, , , ,
. .,..} ' ' '
%, criteria in 116-3600.
18 C - ASME Code allowable since 1983 Winter Addendum. 16 0 - ASE Code allowable prior _ g i te 1983 Winter Addendum. 2-1
- % 12 r , . $
t- t Y $ 10 um O w y L ' s t- i
- u. .
6 s u o m ."
,, t C
4 n"
,, , i u
giiiii ll o
, , ,, , m in m , , ,, ,u ,,,
illll D tiilii 2 .,iniii i 4', , i,o ""o" : l 1 g . i . ..; ,. a l o 0.1 0.2 03 0.4 c.5 ; FL AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-11.5 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld ' Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw ! i
SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION UNE
- a 0.13 : .= .c =_, : .
-- - -- - - .:: . :. . ..:: .m FLAWS WITH i
- !: swetooto rtAw ,-- /,..- ~: --
.a
~
- . d :n ABOVE THis LINE ARl
=.:.: :3 q ag .pm
- ..C.O.NFIGU..R . A.T..IO..N. ]3- 1nr
- - .t a .. NOT ALLOWABLE
sliti F m .!!! N u,. :
A """ T"3;iR:n(9M: :::i i@ M si!i;f 10 YRS g*g g % N f- ' ni. NT Ili WiM :!'i: 4!E if[5 i :5Si !E'iEin iIi' 20 5Eii :1 ! S U E ni :1 5 5iliMS:: :55 'i5 5 :M1 30 _Ei EEE 7" .r:. 1 4 : Jif%! $WI ~ 1 = i!ENEdi 0.10 ... . . _ .... .
. = . .. r... . . _ -..."
. v. .:.= . . ..
. , . .. .s.u ..-::.:=_
- .m.
. - .. ..:-/ 4.V.u..
. - ::v.t r. = .: .
- n a= :.. : :a == :!; .: - - -- r
- == un: .: .
[. c:: :r- :t : v- : .: :n:n: = '- :
- -- : .e ~ g u: n- -:
0.09 =.- 8. . . . . =.. .
=
r- :- .a . . _.:7 A. . n:: n.. . r.. r.7.:. . .# t-.P mj.. _ . rx .... -. . ..=. :..=o. = . . :.n .- STes u. ? . . ., . i*!i b h ' f: ' .. . Iij !!h ri! c. : . gg
- s en g a en :--
- Y ' rMrditE :JE $M Ili s F#:iB EiilE f h.5r.- . .$ E' E.:!.iE! !!!!21 h 0.07 EWnVPsume Act :. . . ._.
E _. . __. .. .
.Y.
.: "**1"...l..l....$... :"_:*:. T*1 *: = . . .::: :.** 1". _-
.'r..*.**.*.. .._
g . . . . . . . . . .. 3r . . . . .. . . . . .....- - -
- l -
. . _ . J.
- t:
s 0.06 j PLAwS IN TMIS N"! N "*5 NNI.$ !5"N II Nf.
. ntoioN MUST St :fp*.r"" .r .
. .:c .: . .. :n- 2:: .n m ... ::
O .ijCONSlotRED
~ ** ;"'" #- - -- "" ": *' ~"
1SuntAce fniM :!!! -? is :pE tj:' "_W "fi : ".
) 0.05 B
3
'ly:nawtt : :- . - -/
i=E:ni = c' -
.. .'. . E
- !.:i :4P:: =! e: : .:ue :.i."
J:-
! 0 04 M
' IE E
_a .- '."=
- i.n .!= :ri "si ;-
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS
. .p:=. .
n._ .. A.. 2 ,n .-
. . . .:n.
m .r.- t .: . :p: :. (ON THIS SIDE OF _= ..u
. n .- . _
, .j DEMARKATlON LINE) 0.03 3 v ::f.: =:
1 .
-: MF..n._==7 =1
- ri. .iit:s
. .i:
.'i ii.t!
i
.I E f
ani-t- ARE ACCEPTABLE PER CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 gu!!/i:. , ::..!i- IEi 11: - a;i -
- i;ii!.x. 3 gi i .i ..'. a i.it AS LONG A5 D4,0.25
#ai iii: 5 43c i!E :Qisi m ii-'J Id!! !@ 5 ::i : t
= m.i.
- m. ... r. r:
. - . -.a r ..8.. .;
~1. avl.m :.::r..e. . = . .:n. . =. .:: :nu. F. 2:: r: .=.
0.01
. . . :r..l:n. .
.. =.:. . .e..:_:. _. . . , . . ,:.4 :- :!:; .
- a. n. =. s -t: .
V "t.ii !;l !!
..ris ii ::'
H r. -
. . t . .
w O - 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE h Figure A-11.6 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Rini, Weld X Inside Surface Surface Flaw - X 1.ongitudinal Flaw . X Outside4urface X Embedded Flaw ,_, Circumferential Flaw A-96 mwmm i.
SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- UNE, .'
.r 0.13 - .
@.-i s :::emosooso ruw =-F. 1 = *-
=: ::= := g =ggg!4;;jg: - FLAWS WITH t 0.12 =japgpeowgounAnow
= :: .> -
-. a.: :jp=: - -- -
r=r ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
.".." =_ 5 :. 2::.5 En 2~- ~
"' "~ ?.. .T .T'_~.~7.Fij:
.. NOT ALLOWABLE O.11
.-. : e tr ::- - - 1 .. _- -
'-e-r : cr- =
g g_.. .e g .. . gggy -
----m = :: r_= == ; - - " - - -- . .... . .:.: ,=ua un =
=- : -u:= = lE:= := tt= = . -.--" ::'
O.10
.:. m ; .
n:lr*.
.-m -u u.-=- .:27
.:: =
.:2n::e ---e :
._.n-=:tr ---
m :- --
- p. ni .i c-=: = :!= ;
._ - - . .=_*_ E i'a....
=
g,, 0.09
. :=
.;. 3
-a
. . . . . . .... ~. :
= 3.;
=
_ , , , , , , g, -, , .y-- .
.. =t--- -
_- :=, g 0.08 . . _ - . . . . . . . . 94 gu..:, :p.-.h,:n_._
.a g
iiii E:: EM 98s 9 _ _ . . . E !=.; ..:1
.. ,;g . ..p-y- .
~ . . .p -
. ...-. ;n =., tu: ..: .n. .;2 E
s 0*07
~' - sunpacari-
="==*==8 -~C
-~
~ "g*--
-=; -
==
==== =
-" ~
;;:--..=::=
'~
=
- 0 --
6~ilp=;. = =
--t =-= _ . --
=:n rLAwt IN TMis := = = ::. w .- r-
.0 i 2
= ~= 2r7" ~ ^ -
O Pnaciow cowsioanto uust at :8: :. - - " - - r= = - -=-- g dsunrace JL-aE Esi: := = s EEEE".',- EMi O.06 a!ruws :ZT" Z ::: Z 7- =.: "i ~.:: :: :"- :::
?! & ~.e-.--~ f.;. ==v = -.E=! 5=Em2 1
*} E &2 2 2 NNi
$ 0 04 ._..:=_..2.. .. ;.;. .::_. ==.=_=* "- :- .+ 5
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS
_.. : : ._;u :.. = . . ..a.
. . . . .= . . _ ON THIS SIDE OF <
- .:n :,... .:r.:.~..-
- ~ ~
r.x_ .. q-- -.~
. _ . ..r_ . _2. .... E.1- . .. -.
_ . . .. "._. DEMARKATION LINE 0.03 5-5 Z :Z '. 1 2 7 T
~"
.: T ~ "7 J.. . " - ARE ACCEPTABLE PER ms i::f-! -.."TIE . . .
E= =!: =: ::erii s W 7 i= CRITERIA OF IWB 3600
._ . , , ~q. .
.=..=. .. .. - . . . .. .. . . ... " . . .. :. .
". # =E *" " ~~;' '"
=r "" = '= = = :-"
0'02 AS LONG AS .2._st,0.25
""li&ii k=tditMig Eiiii Wsr34jiii & 't=i Si ir. i:!.
t
= au r : : .r. . _ . = . . _ . = _ = . .=a.::. .. ... . .t:.u.:-=
.. c ..
=.. ..:.. u.. e.n:.. :: . . :. a.:.
0.01
,:: -:n. . = . . . :- :n.:.= . . . . = .. . . .:. . !. .; .::; =.
,:::: ..,t.-. u: -
- a. ..
N' ' "' ' 0 ' i 0 ' O.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) Figure A-11.7 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Dome to Ring Weld X Inside Surface Surface F1 w Longitudinal Flaw .
.X Outsid( Surface _X Embedded Fiaw X Circumferential Flaw un.n u n. - A-97
A-12 TOP HEAD RING TO FLANGE WELD A-12.1 SURFACE FLAWS The geometry and terminology for surface flaws at the top head ring to flange weld is depicted !n Figure A-12.1. The following parameters must be determined for surtice flaw evaluation with the charts o Flawshapeparameter{ o Flaw depth parameter { , where a = The surface flaw depth detected (in.) t = The surface flaw length detected (in.) t = Wa1.1 thickness at the inlet nozzle to vessel weld (t = 7.19") The surface flaw evaluation charts for the top head ring to flange weld are listed below: o Figure A-12.2 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw _ Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-12.3 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld Inside Surface ,jL Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw o Figure A-12*4 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw l X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw I o Figure A-12.5 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw )L Circumferential Flaw A-98 un.ima. ie
A-12.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS The geometrical description of an embedded flaw at the top head ring to flange weld is depicted in Figure A-12.6. Basic Data: t = 7.19 in. 6 = Distance of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the surface (in.) a = Flaw depth (defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) t = Flaw length (major diameter) (in.)
=
a, Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI characterization rules. The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flaw shape parameter, {
- l o Flawdepthparameter.{
o surfaceproximityparameter,f ' The evaluation chart for embedded flaws-g o Figure A-12.6 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Wald X Inside Surface _ Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw , X Outside Surface X Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw e Figure A-12.7 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Wold X Inside Surface _ Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface 1 Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw O mwm.= io A-99
o .. l I 1 TOP LEAD RING TO DCE WELD w W, , TOP HEAD RING - 88.16 R TO FLANGE W h
/
/
~ ~
7.19 A 8- F ' T r 167.13 DIA ; l "
,,,,j ,,, _
-" L8 8 6 == ==
gr 167.0 DIA ; 5 I m e i LOWER FLANGE ~ U TO SHELL WELD l(([Cf[gl[jj'jlD l
.- l 170.88 DIA
+A w,Was UPPER HEAD REGION _
i i 9- 3
- .. r a_ s i
DIMENSIONS i ZION 1,2 BYRON I,2 BRAIDWOOD I,2 - -- i A l1.0 l1.0 9.56 5 30.125 34.28 34.28 j(([C$ko!E[(fll Figure A-12.1, Geometry and 'erminology'for Flaws at the Top Head Ring to .
- Flange Weld A-100 un.n iin. io i
1 l - LEGEND a Ib f w mits. r e w c table
~
1 ' '
" l OllPL0 IIIP'^
f ;lIQ! l!lilk[4iM '- = 2 3' 'm'~ [lj[ ; t L M sggl}jj o - m,=,=-=:gr
'2 I i l
lg
; pl! mfly isiklkg r i gl .
.;'l i l .
[ llI
. . {
] w!" , 3 P f ,
l[ -l l!lIlll(!lehjll f, f~ l Ij i
}f}- h
~
. lIIIlhl , I li O MidtlW E' . '
! =: I lfh !
g . . C 0.1 02 , f LAW SHAPE (a#) j Figure A-12.2 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange nield X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Em6edded Flaw CircumferentiaiFlaw I we.ns. se Io o :w __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ __________f
l LICEND a ab e f w imits.
~
8 - Within this zone, the 20 - --
'A y a t$a
's t
fl l' ) } criteria in IWB-3600. I W er dde _ 4 .
, 1 o it de
- 1
-l ,
12 l l 1 g T us 10 ' I 5 a ' I . l 1! llIHll ll 1 I
'C I
; ! D ll O I .
0.1 IKl 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Ft.AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-12.3 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flan Longitudinal Flaw . Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw wm i.
.i. . ~>
LEGEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year accepiable flaw limits. 8 - Within this zone, the 10,20,30 surface flaw is acceptable
" 'A by ASME Code analytical ,s .
criteria in IWD-3600. HI iiilliill 18 jil I 1 g C - ASME Code allowable since
' ll111 1983 Winter Addendum.
16 D - ASME Code allowable prior 9 g 14 pillI iilllllllllillllIllIllI I l l[- to 1983 Winter Addendum.
% 12 I
I,igil0 g Y 10 5 w a g- ; r 4 8 - - J GA 6 , C , 4 uiu un
,,,gi ll o o m,mim o m o'"' '"'"'" ""
D u,u, innun 2 , ui. .ii..u." l 0 I ' " I ' ' ' O 0.1 02 03 0.4 0.5 FLAW 5HAPE (a#) Figure A-12.4 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal F'aw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferentiai Flaw 2ma.ii.w .. s.
LEGEND a e b t w mits. e law cc ptable
~
, l l I I I' lU; l
c., ,, _ f*, 1983 Winter Addendum. l 98 Win e 34 12 ', i !" l, . ! f j@l i l Sl! #il 2"hl
- .mu h
[ l L Muhu: ' Ft.AW SHAPE ) figure A-12.5 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flange Weld X e5 ae w X C n la law w w iii.w ie , _ _ . _ _ _ __ h
.e 4 SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION LINE
- 0.13 ... .
FLAWS WITH at M...ii .M,. euseposo
- d: _ _ -
m .../'w .= -" ..W=: F
. = .
, ABOVE THIS LINE Al u-3, .: .ccowesounatiow. Jr 0.12 ' ' ' ' .
.m- : =r --
- - ...n: =-
9 -9di 4 #W "" NOT ALLOWABLE ii!t 'Ef"I:iu #nf) I"' ..! "" i+. !d" 10 YR5 0.11 i ii T - i ! 5 -i! i C0 u; =' -
.u: :r.; ,pu: . :==. :
.; p: =r- =--l a- .: =:..:=
.= : . := : -Td=m: w .._ - - -
. .. = ura 30 g,y g .i.:i.H . i.! i;. 1F .:! di .:.. i.. ".ja: .: r- ". jg%. =-::;. ;.=.;. gr>.. .:p 7
=.. g:..
.:-- .=: ::-
.u:...
- .a. u,..-- : . .: i n. . : .-- au .a::r -- ::
- .: e il . - . -. . .:n- ::- u-- =:a. u =
. = ..: .n .:a: :n a:::::= =:n- '
0.09 .--.n=_:.:.e L ; = :a : [:. : "- en: u= = :: :
=2 r.:
3 Top r.r.. .:-- = . . . .:u A. n. . .:: .. . . .
= . =.... . . ...
7 m. . y7.:. .. u..gr .. . . . ,. . :.=..m. .re.--.= O:::.;;. . . . .. :"* l
.- -.![9. .::*J.".; .=:: :. * * * -* * * " '
- l::l..*J.* '
- . .*"- _ * .,=.
! I ' S :iles .ig segav Wi f tif
--; 4;"
*15 i!E !E nhF:s -
E =:= ru ~'t : 1 - ::
=.: : ,.:= :=_2n. .-
..= = =
0.07 .---a ;suarace. . . ..= y = f: -. .- . ::= ::- .
--=.=. n-5" =. - . a ,: ._:==. . ...- .. . .
- u. ...:r-=
.- -i= ' . ms . . . : .i .::-r . - : -== :-. =
6 0 OS p:
. um =
=
.n;:. . e n= - - - - -
- - :- re m= = == %==
===
f yeo s ng at :/d.n:- c:a., . : = =-
.:.nasio,n,,mus,t
- n: .- ..- -= :=2- :. --.= = .... .
- . = ,n,.
)
- sunrAct ':
r- ~~ E
=.
. = . . .... - v-
- . = . -- . =u-==
.".:..-:. r
- : :- :n g
g 0.05 .:..Pum s.
**F.:: .=. :.=. .:
= . ..: .=- -: e...- : .1- ..
~:=. : .:.n=. =. -.=.
$ 0*04 ^ I S' "" LM :- A BEDDED M WS
.. . --.. . _ . . .:is: fn n-
=. e. =-.u..u 7
e: i .:i.. :s::
.. - + :::.cc. .. . .
(ON THIS &lDE OF
;u.. = _ _ . .=.= ..-- =.. . =. . .= =,,. . _ ;, .
..:4]
=..u. -
l : DEMARKATION LINE)
=.
0.03 ..:. =
- uf :-s. .:-=... .u.. =.:e.=---- -=. . = . :u rr
.a
=
. .: .u: :. .2
. = . .,.- ... ARE ACCEPTABLE PER
. . . .. .=: .== --- = . :- .
. =m- ; .. .=
== ""= = : ... .= =
- r-CRITERIA OF IWR 3800
"=
- ~
= - "-
=u. nr 0*02= =ii-7.
"" ~
- -' u~
1: '; ~.d tu lii I + sjih i': l' < sni "- AS LONG AS .2a.40.25 m
' =:-= ..=u. . .. .f".isi"?i:t
.. . t
..:..j. r. .r)-t' =m: "=;..
m.a.. 0.01 '
- "^
=r
~~
- ::: 2 =i i := =!! :iEEi- t=1 . ': . . ..p .
Ein =! =2 "!i; i=' 0 h.et . '
- n p .
~
- -:... t.: e n-t 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 -
DISTANCE FROM SURFAf:E h Figure A-12.6 Evaluation Chart for Top tiead Ring to Flange Weld ' X Inside Surface Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside" Surface X Embedded Flaw _ Circumferential Flaw 3379s/111384 10 A-105 l l l __w
o .. SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEMARCATION
- UN.E. ,
0.13 _m _. - - .,
- c. -
.; l EE"mn*iiIEn r Inu aM mnu
- r_ ..
+-FLAWS WITH t
~.
0.12 ABOVE THIS LINE ARE i ,._ - ....._ ~
~'
~ ~~
_ NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11 - 0.t 0 _ .-. t/ . , l 2 eT. 0.De . --- s 2 g 0.08 "--
~; . . .
a.sw ge- .__ 5 ., I0 0.07 :'_ 2 : suarAce- - 5
~
f.: 0.04 9 FLA Ws a TMs i I;~a = = O i naosow must se ? cowsmanso g i sunFACs .= g _ ._. -
.-= : %
0.06 0 flaws
.=
----r--
Z 0.04 J:EE
- ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS
-_g_ . . . -
T:
.. (ON THIS SIDE OF z-
-T... .
._..T- T. r; DEMARKATION LINE) i 0.03 _~ _..g d ;...
I- - --
-:N ~- )- d .5
~- - ARE ACCEPTABLE PER
, . . _ -=E CRITERIA OF IWB 3600 0.02
=J:Ps-=.
$ b T-""" bbbb :-~ j@ AS LONG AS 2,,at.O.25
=m:s t
= fisp~ 2:"~_. '
= c ~
.:.- E"" EE 0.01
. . . . :z _ ~2" '"
'J.
im@E.- = . _==sr=EEE a
!!= =-:.+. _-! :E -::EE m
.n- .^' -s i=i= un s 0 "r.3=c I ~"
. ITi ." -
- =-[. .-- '-~ "
0 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 . l DISTANCE FROM SURFACE d) Figure A-12.7 Evaluation Chart for Top Head Ring to Flanga Weld X Inside Surface Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw
, X_ Outsid/ Surface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw 337Ss/1'.Ma 10 A-106
.o e 4 A-13 LOWER FLANGE TO SHELL WELD l As found for the top head dome to flange weld the stress analysis and fracture evaluation for this region are rather complex. (SeeFigureA-13.1) The governing normal and upset transient at the inside surface was found to be cooldown, whereas that at the outside surface to be heat-up, rerpectively. A-13.1 SURFACE FLAWS The following parameters must be determined for the surface flaw evaluation at
. both inside and outside surfaces with charts.
o FlawShapeparameter{ o Flaw depth parameter *g -
, where a-thesurfaceflawdepthdetected(in.)
l 6 - the surface flaw length detected (in.) 4 t wall thickness at the lower flange junction (t = 10.75 in.) The surface flaw evaluation charts for the inside surface of the lower flange to shell weld are listed below: c o Figure A-13.2 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded Flaw Circumferential Flaw uowonn ,o A-107
.- . _ _ _ .u -
o Figure A-13.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange to Shell Wald X Inside Surface _X__ Surface Flaw _ Longitudinal Flaw
- _ Outside Surface ___, Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw Similarly, the surface flaw evaluation charts for the outside surface of the lower flange junction are listed below
l o Figure A-13.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange to Shell Wald Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw l
~
A-13.2 EMBEDDED FLAWS l As the surface flaw evaluation charts d3 scribed in paragraph A-13.1, the evaluation charts for the embedded flaws near either the inside or outside surfaces have been constructed separately. The locations of the embedded flaws for both inside and outside surfaces of the lower flange ju'nction are ! depicted as shown in Figure A-13.1 also. l
- The basir data used for the evaluation of the embedded flaws for either side of the 'awer flange to shell weld are summarized as follows
t = 10.75 in, j
=
6 Distances of the centerline of the embedded flaw to the ' i surface concerned (in.)' i
=
a Flaw depth (defined as one half of the minor diameter) (in.) l t = Flaw length (major diameter) (in.) I a, = Maximum embedded flaw size in depth direction, beyond which it q l must be considered a surface flaw, per Section XI ' characterization rules. I l
.=
A-108 uowwwo
The following parameters must be calculated from the above dimensions to use the charts for evaluating the acceptability of an embedded flaw o Flawshapeparameter,f, o Flawdepthparameter,{ . o surfaceproximityparameter,f The evaluation chart for the embedded flaws in the lower flange to shell weld is found in Figure A-13.5. i I vowwwa A-109
. s, l .
l = W'tm 33 1 mese ear mg , l \ _ _ _ l
*l-.
J ; L r.e a m.
, , sr.s esm-
, v e er: , r* se g ,, I
.I rg//2 v.s <um.
l v e se NAL <- t
, .,( ; s .
8
-. La i r"'"** r.e se {\
, s- -
l"2
. v :r ,,ic r ie m" g r i. -
i TYPICAL EMstDDED FLAW INDICATION g .' r r e *'e I wicT= as t
/ -
l - i .
~ ~
er a no-g , 1 i h k / kt 7 I i - 1 TYPICAL SURFACE I FLAW INDICATION
% y $
Figure A-13.1 Surface and Erbedded Flaw Indications at the Lower Flange Junction to Shell Wald .- sm.n nwe A-110
*i LIGEND t
A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. I B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 by ASME Code analytical
'e A
l l i i i 3 criteria in IWB-3600. 18 i i C - ASME Code allowable since i
, , ', i 1983 Winter Addendum. ;
16 i i D - ASME Code allowable prior
- 14 ,
' i i
i 1 to 1983 Winter Addendum. at i i ,
% 12 '
i I i '
> 6- , .' S 10 i i
C O i l i 3: ,
< 8 ' ' '
g
.,' i 6
s C ! 4 D 2 0 ' I ' I O 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.,4 0.5 FLAW Sif APE (a#) Figure A-13.2 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange Junction to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw Outside Surface Embedded flaw CircumferentialFiaw mm i. - Da c - - - _ _ -
t[GEND A - The 10, 20, 30 year acceptable flaw limits. B - Within this zone, the surface flaw is acceptable 20 by ASME Code analytical e, s A I criteria in IWB-3600. 18 C - ASME Code allowable since 16 1983 Nf' '.er Addendum. 0 - ASME Code allowable prior
- 14 -
; to 1983 Winter Addendum.
f i 12 l r i 8 E ~
!= '"
8 3 u. 6
'c ,
4 ,,, D 2 0 ! 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.5 >
~
FL AW SHAPE (a#) Figure A-13.3 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange Junction to Shell Weld X Inside Surface X Surface Flaw Longitudinal Flaw , Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw 340Ss/ti1888 to a o w ,y
- t. . -.
s J
LtGEND a ce $b f aw mits. I r ef w $ceptable
^ 2a?nlT?,'" % "'
! i r il I j lll 9 er dde 98 int n
- 14 e i i
) '2 ;
l f a' \ \\ I I
\\\ll \ C
, i 11 I I l 'D O .. - - - - . -
0 0.1 -0.2 0.3 0.4 0- .5 FLAW SilAPE (aX) _ Figure A-13.4 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange Junction to Shell Weld Inside Surface X Surface Flaw X Longitudinal flaw X Outside Surface Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Fiaw
4 ,' -] SURFACE / EMBEDDED FLAW DEM ARCATION UNE - - ! 0.13 '.- - --
""-14 EusecoEo rLAw si E- - - - - - . *-
=
n._..g,. =._ .4. =-. rr FLAWS WITH t
- _ -... -2cONrl0URATION- 0.12 m '- - - -
~= ^
ABOVE THIS LINE ARE
=
_ NOT ALLOWABLE 0.11 "
~
- C
.- ==_=
-~~ -*
0.10 ZZ :T :-~- ~ :2 3/ --
-- Z
. _= :ii l
0.0s i., i -
=
.- _. Eid -
e ,, g 0.08 C . . - _ . . 7:2
, = ..py ge- .- 2
.2 -- e---: --
' 0.07 s :::.?rsunrAca: '
~~::f:
~
l z s 0.06 -
! etaws iN vms - - -- . - - - -
, ! REGION MusT sE =- "- --
-n=
0 i CONslDERED ? ' ~ ~ ~ j i suRPact = ::i:M
,f.I- . . . .
m 0.05 _ . . --- - -. a :!_PLAws
< =- r - 2- , .--
----. i=a + ALL EMBEDDED FLAWS I 0.04 r___ x _:: : .--gnC f--rrz rr 2 -T_r:-
2
- - .:.: T-"
3 Z (ON THIS SIDE OF DEMARKATION LINE) 3"~l "" 27 -- Z ARE ACCEPTABLE PER 0.03 : Z t: i:1 ___JE-gn==_ , ,_,
=E CRITFRIA OF IWB 3600
== - - --
==. -
un ;r
- .9:==. := = r-- ===rTu =-
" ;+ = = * = = . "= r 0.02
~
AS LUNG AS 2a4.0.25
-- - ~ -
.2iiGi._-P'~
' - - ~ '~ ~
=~2T:f?! ' -
. -: i- M t 5EfidiipE !=i;ii:: ~~" W W
~
-.. Z 0.01 l"j1s.is=Jr====i... iEl=:=""&sii25isiH=ililii
.:Z ' *z "1::- ~
~' '
r: ~_." '
- ' 2 lif:4:.. =T: =Osi imis"+:6 -i EHij
_ i G =iL H "" 0 U =? ' i 0 ' O.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 DISTANCE FROM SURFACE (f) Figure A-13.5 Evaluation Chart for Lower Flange Junction to Shell Weld X Inside Surface _ Surface Flaw X Longitudinal Flaw . X Outside4urface X Embedded Flaw X Circumferential Flaw uewmwo A-114 I .}}