ML20198G836

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Sser Covering Uhs.Applicant Committed to Using 40% Nozzle Efficiency in Transient Heat Analysis of Uhs.Design of UHS Acceptable.Safety Evaluation Complete
ML20198G836
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 06/28/1975
From: Tedesco R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Moore V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1074 NUDOCS 8605290784
Download: ML20198G836 (2)


Text

.._

1 l

l

> l l

DISTRIBUTION:

y- m, l

, l

4. Docket File._ -

l 3 381975 IN8~ l C8 Rdng i Docket Nos. 50-460 50-513 4 i M5 27-02 I j Voss A. Ncoro, Aesistant Ditector for Light Water Reactors, Group 2, RL SUFFLEMENT TO SAFETY EVALUATION PEPCRT, AUIILIARY AND POWER  ;

CONVE2SION SYSTEMS BRANC1; l Flant. Nana: Ueshir.gtori Public F(wer Supply System Nuclear ]

Projecta No.1 and No. 4 (WhT - 1 and 4)

Licesising Stage: CP

. Dockat Numbers: 30-460;30-513 Ea60cusille Branch? LWR 2-3 i Project Mr.onger: ThrXmas Cox Reque.st6d Completion DS.t6: Jo.17 3, 1975 l

This suppInne covers the ulticcte heat sink (Section 9.2.5), the only reeaininf, opea itess iu cur Safen Evalua. tion of the Washington Nuclear Projects 1 and 4 The applicant has coraitted to using a 40% nozzle aff/.ciency 1:1 thaf.r tTansient heat analysis of the ultimate heat sick.

This transtent heat' anal-rs .s evalustion, reviewed by the Site Analysis Erancts,.s discussed tu m?ra detall Ic, Sect 1on 2.4.3 of the. Safety Evaluation Rcrort. Ya now conclude that the design of the ultimate heac sink cenforma to all applicsMe rpSulations, guides, otaff positions, and indGatty standards ,sud, therefore, is acceptable.

This coe pletes our Safety 3valution for the Washington Nuclear Projects 1 and 4 as we " nave no other open items ranaining.

l l '

Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Containment Safety bivialon of Tech sical Review Office of Iluclear Reactor Regulation 4

8605290784 75062t!

[DR ADOCK 00000460 e- PDR APCSB: TR APCSB: 3:TR APCSB:CS:TR CS;TR n'

    • c * * -yy, - .

y ..

,,,,,,,,,,, W.LeFave/jo P.Matthews; _ V.Banaroya R,Tedesco *

,,,, , ,.,6/fyJ//75 6//q//75 6//V7//75 6//2Y//75 _ .

I Forse AIC 318 (Rev. 9 9H AF'M G240 W v. e eossawusser pnautuee omen targ.sae. nee

f $

]

l b

?

Voss A. Moore .s, i

JON 2 81975 e

/

sc: S. Hanaued,' TA D. Eisenht.t, NRR F. Schroeder, TR l

A. Giambusso, RL ,

W. McDona14 MIPC i

H. Denton, E1 .

i V. Benaroya, APCSB W. Ganaill, 343 '

  • A. Schwencer, AL -

T. Cox, RL P. Matthewa, APCSB-  !

D. Fischer, APCSB '

W. 'LeFave, APCSB G.,Staley, SAB J. Glynn, CS D. Eisenhut, NRR d

s

/

J i

orreas >

eunname >

  • oars h . _ ,

was ABC 3Is (Rev. F33) AICM 0240 W KYeervennummy ,n,mune opp,cas tera.sse.see L

Sep;o  ! .;

peu,- f 77 7 yc WWP l075- llgy ,

l T

l l

I hi J

L L ._

N N

s N UNITED STATES x NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W AS HIN GTO N, D. C. 2 0 55 5 Docket Nos. 50-460/513

\ dr; ; ' $$ -

Applicant: Washington Public Power Supply System (UPPSS)

Pacility: Washington Nuclear Proj ect Nos.1 an,d 4 (WNP-1,'+)

x /

- SIMMARY OF 182ND GENERAL MEETING OF ACRS TO CONSIDER THE UNP-1,4 APPLICATION \

On June 6, 1975, the full committ'ee of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) met with\represen6atives of the applicant J (WPPSSorSupplySystem)andtheNRCstaff/(staff). The purpose of the meeting was to consider the WPPSS application for a constru'ction permit k for the WNP-1,4 facility. A list of thode persons who participated in the meeting is included as Attachment A(to this report. Copies of the visual aids presented by the appli6 ant at the meeting are included in the transcript of the meeting. / \

\

/

The meeting is summarized in the following sections.

r '

/

1.0 Introduction and General Description by WPPSS - ~ ~ -

j ,

Q D. Renberger of WPPSS describe'd the Supply System status as a municipal

[_ corporation and a joint operating agency of the State of Washington.

- He described the WPPSS orgatiization, and in response to a question by  ;

Mr. Arnold, described which members of the current' organization would ro' ject as it moved into the operation and remainontheWNP-1,4p/

maintenance period. s

/

2.0 Repart by the Staff ,

1 T. Cox described the eight open items remaining in the review. He noted

/

that since the issue of Supplement No. 1 to the SER on June 2, 1975, all but three issues'have been resolved with at least verbal commitment on the part of the' applicant to meet the pertinent staff position.

{ i m-3.0 Discussio'n Items E 3.1 Contai ent Spray Additives W. Pasedag of the staff presented answers to questions raised by the ACRS Subcommittee at the May 16, 1975 meeting. He discussed the extent L

M..

=

- - - _ _ . _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - _ . .