ML20198G594
| ML20198G594 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/13/1986 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-2386, NUDOCS 8605290691 | |
| Download: ML20198G594 (11) | |
Text
-
/lcRs-R3 %
j t
CERTIFIED COPY DATE ISSUED: F;b.13,1986l PDA 69a84 ;
T"!]I "I saa u
February 13, 1986 MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 7, 1986 MEETING OF THE ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C.
Purpose:
The ACRS Subcommittee on Safeguards and Security met on January 7, 1986 at 1717 H Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20555 in Room 1046.
The purpose of the meeting was to review and discuss SECY-85-381,
" Insider Safeguards Rules".
This SECY covers three separate rulemaking actions: Access Authorization Program; Searches of Individuals at Power Reactor Facilities; and Miscellaneous Amendments Concerning Physical Protection of Nuclear Power Plants.
Notice of the meeting, published in the Federal Register on December 27, 1985, is shown as Attachment A.
The schedule for the meeting is Attachment B.
Sign-in sheets of meeting attendees are contained in Attachment C.
Attachment D contains a list of meeting handouts kept with the office copy of these minutes.
The entire meeting was open to the public.
There were no oral or written comments from members of the public.
Mr. John Schiffgens was the assigned ACRS Staff member 1.r the meeting.
Attendees:
ACRR NRC Mtaff J. C. Mark, Subcommittee Chairman G. McCorkle, NMSS/SG M. W. Carbon, Member P. Dwyer, NMSS/SG J. C. Ebersole, Member E. W. McPeek, NRR C. Michelson, Member K. Jamgochian, RES D. W. Moeller, Member G. A. Reed, Member Other D. A. Ward, Member J. P. Telthorst, IPC C. J. Wylie, Member A. Bivens, AIF C. P. Siess, Member D. F. Knuth, KMC J. Flack, Fellow S. Duraiswamy, Staff
- ^,
- c" ',
J. C. McKinley, Staff
""L J. O. Schiffgens, Staff MR5 %8@ "' "
l dibubidijk$
2386 PDR
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING
~
J,ANUARY 7, 1986 s..
1 1
Mgeting Highlights. Agramments. and Ranumsta:
l j
1.
Opening Statement C. Mark i
l Mr. Mark commented briefly on the purpose of the meeting, and said that he thought the Subcommittee would be uost t
interested in the Access Authorization Part of the rulemaking package.
He introduced Mr. McCorkle of the NRC Staff who i
{
briefed the Subcommittee on the Rules.
2.
Insider Safeguards Rules G. McCorkle l
Mr. McCorkle began by saying that the focus of his l
presentation would be to characterize public comments and to indicate those changes in the proposed rules that have been incorporated since the rules were published for public comment.
He said that the purpose of this rulemaking package is to provide increased assurance of protection against the l
insider threat at power reactors, a) Search Requirements Mr. McCorkle said that the current requirements include
- i. a 100 percent equipment search for all site employees i
l with 5 percent random pat-down search, and 11. a 100 percent equipment search for all visitors with 100 j) percent pat-down search.
i According to Mr. McCorkle, the proposed rule received i
i very little public comment; the final proposed rule is identical to what went out for comment.
The proposed
'Y rule requires 100 percent equipment search for all j
individuals with a pat-down search for cause or failed i
detection equipment.
Mr. Mark noted that an exception exists for on duty police, and asked if this was also true for firemen.
Mr. McCorkle said that it was.
With regard to police on-site, Mr. Moeller wondered why they would be there i
and Mr. Reed asked if they would be allowed on-site with their weapons.
Mr. McCorkle responded that the NRC does l
not want to discourage positive liaison visits by local 1
police who will provide support in case they are called i
during an emergency, and that police are not required to l
remove their weapons when they are on-site as a show of trust.
Mr. Reed expressed the view that it is insulting and a
i demotivating to subject employees to search procedures.
He said that he thought the insider rule should j
concentrate on psychological testing and the various i
2
-SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING JANUARY 7, 1986 evaluations, and that once regular employees have been screened and evaluated they should have free access to all equipment in the plant.
He said that he thought the guards should be there to protect against misconduct by contract workers and visitors, and to help regular employees who should be the chief guards of the facility.
b) Miscellaneous Amendments Mr. McCorkle said that the miscellaneous amendments include authority to suspend safeguards measures during emergencies, protection of specified physical security i
equipment, key and lock controls, and vital area access controls.
Mr. McCorkle said that the site superintendent, the senior man on the site, has the authority to suspend safeguards measures and the responsibility to suspend i
only those safeguards measures necessary to handle the particular emergency.
Mr. Mark wondered what would happen if someone on-site had a heart attack.
Mr.
McCorkle said that he would expect the superintendent to call an ambulance and the gate so that when the ar. balance arrives the guards would let it so right through.
Mr. Moeller wondered if vital areas are always within protected areas.
Mr. McCorkle replied that by definition, vital areas are within protected areas, and that there is a barrier around each protected area and
,j j.
another around each vital area.
.t i
With regard to a power failure, Mr. Ibersole asked whether a plant would fail open to everyone or closed to 1
everyone.
Mr. McCorkle responded that there is no NRC requirement and that the policy varies from plant to plant.
He said that if it. fails closed, operators must have keys for the mechanical overrides, and if it fails open, guards must be deployed to control entrances to restricted areas.
According to Mr. McCorkle, the present requirement is that when an employee leaves, all keys and locks to which he had access must be replaced.
The proposed rule requires that keys and locks be changed once a year and whenever an employee leaves for cause, i.e., when he is fired.
The proposed rule that went out for public comment included a vital island concept.
This has been dropped from the final proposed rule because there is a vital l
3
i 6.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING JANUARY 7, 1986 area committee studying the assumptions upon which vital equipment is identified and that, hence, define areas which are to be considered vital to the plant.
c) Access Authorization Mr. McCorkle began by pointing out that the access authorization program consists of three elements:
background investigations; psychological assessment; and behavioral observation.
This currently applies to guards but is being proposed now for all employees who require unescorted access to protected areas and vital areas at nuclear power plants.
Mr. McCorkle pointed out that a background investigation consists of inquiries into a person's personal references and employment, credit, education, military, and criminal history for the past five years.
The psychological assessment consists of written personality tests and clinical interviews for persons whose personality tests were invalid or indicated abnormal personality traits.
Continual behavioral observation is designed to detect changes in behavior that, in a nuclear setting, could be hazardous to the public health and safety.
Mr. McCorkle said that supervisory training for behavioral observation is directed at pointing out to the supervisor things he should look for; i.e.,
radical changes in a person's behavior pattern, not the fact that somebody comes in late one day or might be a little hung over.
With regard to provisions for temporary workers, Mr.
McCorkle said that temporary workers requiring unescorted access would have to go through the same screening program as permanent employees.
Mr. Michelson wanted to know if this applied to vendor personnel.
Ms.
Dwyer replied that such individuals would either have to be escorted or given a full screening; it would be a management decision based on the need frequency.
There i
is also a reciprocity provision if they have gone through the screening process and go to another plant with less than one year interruption.
During cold shutdown, temporary workers would be permitted unescorted access to the vital area concerned with the l
particular type of work they are doing.
Mr. McCorkle said that three component access authorization programs, similar to that proposed by the NRC, are currently used in varying degrees by industry; i
7
_ _ _ _ _.. _ _.~
,f SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING JANUARY 7, 1986
\\
1.e., most utilities have embraced, to varying degrees, elements of ANSI N18.17 or ANSI /ANS 3.3.
In SECY 85-381, the NRC Staff included, as an alternative for Commission consideration, a proposal sponsored by NUMARC.
sThe NUMARC proposal recommends a policy statement endorsing NUMARC guidelines rather tha'n the proposed Rule.
.The Staff worked with NUMARC in preparing the guidelines.
Mr. McCorkle pointed out that the NUMARC proposal does not contain appeal procedures.
He also said that, oversight and enforcement remain unresolved issues with regard to the NUMARC guidelines.
4 1
i Mr. Reed wondered if present procedures provide for the j
right of appeal.
Mr. McCorkle replied that_there is no provision unless there is a union shop and collective bargaining agreements.
Mr. Wylie said that every j
utility has a grievance procedure.
Mr. Reed pointed out, however, that a new employee is probationary and, j
in general, doesn't have this protec' tion.
]
Mr. Wylie asked if there was evidence to support an argument for.new programs on screening and access control.
He wanted to know if the. Staff considers programs currentlyiused in industry'as failures.
Mr.
McCorkle said that they have had problems in some areas i
and, although most utilities have some kind of program, i
there is no standardization.
He pointed out that the objective of the rulemaking was to increase assurance of I
protection.
Mr. Wylie said that'the question is whether current programs are adequate. cMr. McCorkle said that some utilities' screening programs consist of little more than a check of union membership.
Mr. Siens wondered if such utilities have a higher incidents of sabotage.
Mr. McCorkle said that they have had problems, but that he did not really have the necessary statistics to answer the question.
i Mr. McCorkle said that the Staff believes that consistsnt application o,f,'the Rule, with appropriate oversight, was the best means of assuring protection of privacy rights (i.e.,'as far as maintaining of records, l
etc. is concerned).
]
Mr. Carbon wondered if, provided the the NUMARC proposal could be brought to the. point of meeting the Staff's minimum requirem9ntn, the Staff could find the policy statement approach better than the rule approach.
Mr.
McCorkle thought that was possible provided certain things would be done in the areas of oversight, enforcement, and appeal procedures.
Mr. Mark wondered why the Staff had made no provisions for foreign nationals.
He pointed out that it may be j
5
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING JANUARY 7, 1986 very difficult to make a five year background check on most nonnationals, noting that if he must wait until he has been in this country for five years then, of course,he is capable of being a citizen and doesn't need a special provision.
Mr. McCorkle said that they did not consider it because there is only a remote '
possibility of foreign national applying.
Mr. Reed pointed out that he had two foreign nationals working for him when he was at Point Beach.
With regard to public comments, Mr. Wylie pointed out that KMC, representing 23 utilities, specifically recommended that the rule move forward in its present form, and that the Atomic Industrial Forum appeared to support the rule, at least by inference.
Mr. McCorkle remarked that the comments from all industry groups (i.e., EEI, AIF, KMC,and NUMARC) were dated the same day, the last day of the public comment period.
Enture_Hectings:
The Subcommittee is scheduled to make a brief report during the 309th ACRS meeting, January 9-11, 1986.
A full report, including presentations by the NRC Staff and representatives from NUMARC, is scheduled for the 310th ACRS meeting, February 13-15, 1986.
NOTE: A transcript of this meeting is available in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C.,
or can be purchased from ACE-Federal Reporters, 444 North Capitol Street, Washington, D.C. 20001, (202) 347-3700.
6
~
Feder;l Regist:r / Vcl. 50, Nr. 249 Frid:y, DecNnber 27,1985 [ Notices 53033 premature release of which is likely to members will continue the discussion of may be obtained by a prepaid telephone significantly frustrate the agency in the the proposed NRC safety research call to the ACRS Executive Director, performance ofits statutory function.
program for FY 1987.
R.F. Fraley, prior to the meetin. in view J:30 P.AL-4:30P.Af.: Genero/E/ectric This portion of the meeting will be of the possibility that the sche ule for StandardSofety Analysis Report closed to discuss information the release ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the (CESSAR /// (Open/ Closed)-The of which is likely to significantly Chairman as necessary to facilitate the members will discuss proposed frustrate the ageacy in the performance conduct of the meeting. persons comments s'id recommendations ofits statutory functions.
planning to attend should check with the regarding the request for an FDA for this amp.AL-a30P.Af. ACRS ACRS Executive Director if such type of standardized plant.
Subcommittee Activities (Open)-%e rescheduling would result in major Portions of this session will be closed members will hear reports of and inconvenience.
as necessary to discuss Proprietary discuss the activities of designated I have determined in accordance with Information applicable to this matter.
subcommittees with respect to safety-subsection 10(d) Pub. L 92-463 that it is 4:30 P.Af.-aw P.Af.: A CRS related matters, including the pre-and necessary to close rtions of this Subcommittee Activities en)-
post-operational inspections of nuclear meeting as noted a ve to discuss Chairmen and members of esignated power facilities and the resolution of Proprietary Information (5 U.S.C.
ACRS subcommittees will discuss the allegations with respect to nuclear 552b(c)(4)). detailed security information status of activities regarding safety-power plant design and construction.
related regulatory matters, including the (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3)), and information the handling and disposal of radioactive Saturday, January 11.19eg release of which would significantly wastes: characteristics of standard plant AJO A.Af.-12;J0 P.Af. and 1:30 P.Af.-
frustrate the agency in the performance of its statutory function (5 U.S.C.
designs, and ACRS procedures and 3:30 P. Aft Preparation of A CRS Reports practices for the conduct of ACRS to the NRCandthe U.S. Congress
$52b(c)(9))
activities.
(Open/ Closed)-The members will Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the meeting Friday. January 10,'Isos.
[,epQ has beeri cancelled or rescheduled, the s
g nmi o an e U.S.
830 A.AL-9:30 A.AL: Activities of the Congress regarding topics considered alnnan a ruhng on requests for 6e Office of Nuc/cor Reactor Regulation during this meeting and items opportunity to present oral statements (Open)-%e members will hear a report considered during the 308th ACRS and the time allotted can be obtained by regarding the activities of the NRC meeting with respect to the General 8 prepaid telephone call to the ACRS Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Electric Standard Safety Analysis Executive Director, Mr. Raymond F.
P.30 A.AL-10:45 A.Af.: Davis-Besse Report (CESSAR 11), the state of nuclear Fraley (telephone 202/634-3265).
Nuc/cor Power Station. Unit 1 (Open)-
power plant safety, proposed operation between 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
He members will hear and discuss a of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Dated: December 20.1985.
report by representatives of the NRC Station. and the Indian Point Nuclear lehn C. Hoyle, Staff regarding the status of the review Generating Station.
Advisory Committee Monagement Officer.
for restart of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Portions of this session will be closed.
Im Doc. 65-3o583 nled 12-26-45; EL45 am)
Power Station following a loss of all as necessary, to discuss Proprietary feedwater incident. Representatives of Information or detailed set.urity
- ea,,,,,
the licensee will participate, as information applicable to the project appropriate.
being discussed and to discuss Advisory Committee on Reactor JLW A.AL-12.m Noon and J.m P.AL-information the premature release of Safeguards Subcommittee on 1:45 P.AL: Reorganization of TVA which would be likely to significantly Safeguards and Security; Meeting Nuc/cor Activities (Open)-The frustrate the ability of the agency to members will hear a report by perform its statutory function.
%e ACRS Subcommittee on representatives of the NRC Staff Procedures for the conduct of and Safeguards and Security wil! hold a regarding the status of the participation in ACRS meetings were meeting on January 7,1986, Room 1167, reorganization of TVA nuclear power published in the Federal Register on 1717 H Street, NW, Washington. DC.
activities. Representatives of the October 2,1985 (50 FR 191). In De entire meeting will be open to Applicant will participate, as accordance with these procedures, oral public attendance.
appropriate.
or written statements may be presented He agenda for the subject meeting 1:45 P.AL-3:15 P.A7.: Reactor Pressure by members of the public, recordings shall be as follows:
VesselIntegrity (Open)-The members will be permitted only during those Tuesday, January fo sses-4:ee pas.
will hear and discuss reports of a portions of the meeting when a consultant and an ACRS Fellow trans:ript is being kept, and questions Until 5:3e p.m.
regarding the pressurized thermal shock may be asked only by members of the The Subcommittee will review and of reactor pressure vessels.
Committee,its consultants, and Staff.
discuss SECY-85-381 "Inside 3:30 P.AL-4:15 P.AL: Genero/ Electric Persons desiring to make oral Safeguards Rules," and related issues.
StandardSofety Analysis Report statements should notify the ACRS Oral statements may be presented by (CESSAR //)(Open/ Closed)-The Executive Director as far in advance as members of the public with the members will discuss proposed ACRS practicable so that appropriate concurrence of the Subcommittee comments and recommendations arra'ngements can be made to allow the Chairman: Written statements will be regarding the request for an FDA for this necessary time duing the meetingfor accepted and made available to the type of standardized nuclear plant.
such statements. Use of still. motion Committee: Recordings will be permitted Portions of this session will be closed picture and television cameras during only during those portions of the as necessary to discuss Proprietary this meeting may be limited to selected meeting when a transcript is being kept, Information applicable to this facility, portions of the meeting as determined and questions may be asked only by f:15P.AL-amp.Af. NRCSofety by the Chairman. Information regarding members of the Subcommittee,lts Research Program (Closed)-The the time to be set aside for this purpose consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring
$3034 Federal Regist;r / Vol.'50. No. 249 / Friday. D'ecember 27, 1985'/ Notices es*
to make oral statements dhould notify of NMSS/WM liigh-Level Waste or postulated accidents and to provide the ACRS staff member named below as Management Program. (4) the guidance to applicants concerning g
far in advance as is practicable so that organization, role, and activities of the certain of the information needed by the appropriate arrangements can be made.
Committee on Interagency Radiation staffin its review of applications'for During the initial portion of the Research and Policy Coordination permits and licenses.
meeting, the Subcommittee, along with (CIRRPC), and (5) waste management Regulatory Guide 1.153. " Criteria for any of its consultants who may be and radiation protection research.
Power. Instrumentation, and Control present. may exchange preliminary Oral statements may be presented by Portions of Safety Sygtems." describes a views regarding matters to be members of the public with the method acceptable to the NRC staff for considered during the balance of the concurrence of the Subcommittee complying with the Commission's meeting.
Chairman; written statements will be regulations with respect to the design.
The Subcommittee will then hear accepted and made available to the reliability. qualification. and testability presentations by and hold discussions Committee. Recordings will be permitted of the power, instrumentation, and with representatives of the NRC Staff, only during those portions of the control portions of safety systems of its consultants, and other interested meeting when a transcript is being kept.
nuclear power plants. This guide persons regarding this review.
and questions may be asked only by endorses. with certain exceptions and Further information regarding topics members of the Subcommittee,its modifications. IEEE Std 603-1980 to be discussed, whether the meeting consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring
" Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear has been cancelled or rescheduled, the to make oral statements should notify Power Generating Stations."
Chairman's rulmg on requests for the the ACRS staff member named below as opportunity to present oral statements far in advance as is practicable so that Comments and suggestions in connection with (1) items for inclusion and the time allotted therefor can be appropriate arrangements can be made.
obtained by a prepaid telephone call to During the initial portion of the In guides currently being developed or the cognizant ACRS staff member. Mr.
meetmg. the Subcommittee may (2) improvements in all published guides are encouraged at any time. Written John Schiffgens (telephone 202/634-.
exchange preliminary views regardm.8 comments may be submitted to the 1414) betw een 8:15 a.m. and 5.00 p.m.
matters to be considered during the Persons planning to attend this meeting balance of the meeting.The Rules and Procedures Branch. Division are urged to contact the above named Subcommittees will then hear of Rules and Records. Office of
.ndividual one or two days before the pmsentations by and hold discussions Administration. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
' scheduled meeting to be advised of any with representatives of the NRC Staff Commission. Washington. DC 20555.
, e hanges in schedule, etc., which may and other interested persons regarding Regulatory guides are available for have occurred.
this review.
inspection at the Commission's Public Dated. December 19.1E Fudhu infonnation agarding topics Documents Room.171711 Street NW.,
Morton W. IJbarkin.
to be discussed. whether the meeting Washington, DC, Copies of active guides has been cancelled or rescheduled, the
$,b((I Pn ting Off ce price.
ha d tth i:
Assistant Lecutive Directorfor Project Chairman's ruling on requests for the Re We"-
opportunity to resent oral statements Information on current prices may be O
lFR Doc. 85-30564 Filed 12-2&a5445 am) and the time allotted therefor can be Su erintendent fl o7uments. U.S.
bI db h
suseo caos ts ei-u obtained by a prepaid telephone call to the cognizant ACRS staff member. Mr.
Government Printing Office. Post Office
)
Advisory Committee on Reactor Owen S. Merrill (telephone 202/634-Box 37082. Washington, DC 20013-7082.
14131 between 8:15 a.m. and 5.00 p.m.
telephone (202) 275-2000 or (202) 275-Safeguards Combined Subcommittees Persons planning to attend this meeting 2n on Waste Management and Reactor are urged to contact the above named (5 U.S.C. 552(a))
Radiological Effects; Meeting individual one or two days before the Dated at Silver Spring. Maryland this 19th The ACRS Subcommittees on Waste scheduled meeting to be advised of any day of December 1985.
Management and Reactor Radiological changes in schedule, etc which may For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Effects will hold a combined meeting on
- ""#M 1
Jinuary 15.16. and 17.1986.1985. Room Dated: December 19.1985.
j UFPuty Director. Office ofNuclear Regulatory 4
I 1040.1717 }{ Street. NW, Washington, Morton W.1Jbarkin.
Research.
l DC.
Assistant Lecutive DirectorforProject
[nt Doc. 85-30681 Filed 12-28-85; 8:45 amj The entire meeting will be open to
- Review, suseo coce rses-et-m
)
public atiendance.
[FR Doc. 85-30565 Filed 12-28-85; 8.45 amj The agenda for the subject meeting sumo coes neo-et-as j
shall be as follows:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES Wednesday. /onuc.y 15.19ss--&Jo a.m.
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE jf,3 j
of Regulatory Guldes;issuan,ce and Ava!! ability Agreement of Government Thursday./on a#Y J, J O a m.
untilthe conclusion ofbusiness The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Procurement; Value of Special Drawing Friday. /onuary J7.1986--&Jo o.m. until has issued a new guide in its Regulatory Rights the conclusion ofbusiness Guide Series. This series has been Under the authority delegated to the
'the Subcommittees will review:(1) developed to describe and make United States Trade Representative by EPNs Low Level Weste Standards available to the public methods section 1-104 of Executive Order 12200, I (currently being developed). [2]
acceptable to the NRC staff of hereby determine that, effective on Proposed Revision of10 CFR 20 Implementing specific parta of the January 1.1986. the dollar equivalent of Standards for Protection Against Commission's regulations and,in some 150.000 Special Drawing Right units Radiation. including the suoporting AIF/ cases, to delineate techniques used by referred to in the Agreement on NESP effort. (3) other topics in support the staff in evaluating specific problems Government Procurement is $149.000.
1
ATTAONENT B e
4 December 20, 1995 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR THE JANUARY 7, 1985 MEETING OF THE SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE 3:OOpm Introductory Remarks C. Mark 15 min 3:15 Insider Safeguards Rules NRC/NMSS Staff 45 Access Authorization Rule Search Requirements Rule Miscellaneous Safeguards-Related Amendments 4:00 Discussion of Rules and Related Issues 90 Prepare a report for the ACRS meeting Draft a letter for Committee consideration 5:30 ADJOURN
$w Ke ~ < t ATTAONENT C
^
ACPS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON SAFE 6UARB9 Adb SECu# /Ty LOCATION Moom /6 4 f DATE
[AA).'l l$$ $
/
ATTENDANCE LIST NAME AFFILI ATION
.u. Ma h
nowa L L.
a
<ruln t M lO 2%,, 0.
E. Ill. ~Dlx ce h11$be(br-I A, /Le) ha u)v D a
o.
in, t, J v
l9-Eb AW Hfe to 4Au=
NQ1f-M-fN/k(
0 Af %' % AwyEit t/
1 Ettcses w.naYse/r'
/yp c /x-p,y KasTiN A ~5At4st91 A tJ d ec / Res P.l./e///roa'
/PC AKT BtVEpf Arf
-> D o u nt o F
t< w ad K m. c fw Du a c.y.
(? )
<fu/
LL 66 fr~ 4
\\
a Ud F 1,La
/// u f m A
,7:i uJc
/%fra v
l
ATTAOBEVT D t
HANDOUTS FOR SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MEETING January 7, 1986 1.
The NRC Insider Safeguards Rules 2.
Union Views