ML20198G433

Forwards Comments on Des,In Response to J Norris 750428 Memo

ML20198G433
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	05/06/1975
From:	Oreilly P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Regan W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1307 NUDOCS 8605290583
Download: ML20198G433 (4)

Text

___

Distrilution:

Docket Fil# PCDeYoung I m 1-3 Filo IHaccFer MAY O 61975 PUO'Reilly CDParr VIMilson Locl.ct hou. Sni 50-50o masA Sni 50-509 d

\@*6 W.11. Egan, Chief,12wizus eLil Projects lacanch Ib. 4, E a i ' 1.10: Olan D. Parr, Chief, Light Water Reactors Project 'h IEt 12A'Oi 1-3 OCPN2FIU Gi LPPSS 70CI23R PHQJLCIC }D. 3 ND 2D. 5 IG M rctiucatol in J. !brric' Iqril 28,1975 rrsr, 72x:lomtre ;b. I at. lins car arAa nts on tru Erclosures to that Iwo. Le htvc also

rtNidd our ccrTccnts on tle DIF in Enclontre Io. 2.

Original Signed by Patrick D. O'Reilly lutrich D. O'Poilly I.ight 12tcr P,cactors 1rojcet.:ra.W.1-3 Division of I<anctor Liemsi.T D clo :,ren r

1. CLI a.n;1 ts Cr. UclO53rCS (D i, ril 21.,19751&r.o.

2. Ccarets or. brP:r: !.uclear hujccts !b. 3 ard Ib. 5 DLL.

)&1' 8605290503 750506 PDR U

ADOCK 05000508 PDR

• • *'a e g:ygt.1 3 ., ...g:ng 1,,3_ _

ewama-a , I1X)'Ecilly }g _0DParr _ .,

save > . . . . . . . . ... ..._

Forms AEG)l4 (Rev. 9 53) ABCM 0240 W u. e. sowasmusut paintene orriese 9074 8s6 000 o

f

,t- l 3

Et 06 575 i

ECCS.JPS !D.1 PISPITE ':0 Cnre.TS CP2:' rVUC'tCSL sr;ducir KPPSS WCIER PPNICTS NO. 3 A'D 10. 5

)

Iccation Cattents Page 4 of Attaci. rant The scope and depth of current IE review to EPA letter -

1 policies with respect to energency planning Dnergency Planning at the CP application stage provide assurarce that a responsible plan of action can be developed for protection of the public 1.n the event of a serious reactor accident.

Standard Review Plan provides a ocepleto description. EPA is apparently not aware of or latest criteria for CP applications. '

Page 9 of Attacinent Although the rneteorological data recovery to EPA letter - percentage was not cited in the DES, the Additional Ccr.Tnents - rcrv.inder of EPA's ocrt1ents are not gerraine Section (2)- to an ER. Such occTacnts are Inore appropriate for the PSAR portion of an application.

Depsrtment of the These ccrinents completely disregard !K Interior letter - siting criteria established b 10 / CFR 1

Outdoor Pacreation Part 100. Interior Department recomends i Section using the exclusion area as a public playgrcund.

Department of the Interior Departrient notes that the potential Interior letter - fer landslides in the site area has rot t Geology and been adequately addressed. The applicant Scismlogy Section has ccrpleted an extensive investigation i of existire landslides in the area and the potential for landslides at the site.

The results and conclusions are presented '

in Section 2.5, Appendix L of the PSAR.

Department of the The question of petroleum exploration on Intarior letter - the anticline referenced by t.he Interier  ;

Mineral Resources Departnant is addressed in detail in Sectien '

Section 2.5 of the PSAR, as part of the applicant's ,

response to our safety review questions.

5 I

-n..,-,, --.-,._.,-._-__-n,- ., ,

.~ _ . .,s ,.- . . - . _ . _ .

I'.f HAY 061975

- 1 Enclosure No. 1 ,

IIx:ation Carrants Department of the A Class 9 accident is not considered by Interior letter - the staff to be a design basis event.

Enviromental Inpact Cbnsequently, we do not require applicants of Postulated Accidents to analyze Class 9 accidents in their Section applications. hMH-1400 is considered a draf t hast and is still under review by the staff and other organizations.

None of-the results of the evaluations described in WASH-1400 are being used in licensing decisions.

HEW letter - As part of our CP application stage safety Itaa (4) review, an applicant nust sulnit evidence that at least two Mical facilities have irrlicated a capability and a willingness to treat patients resultiner fran radio-logical accidents. The finalizai ge<nents cust be subnitted for staff review at the OL application stage.

9

(j <

M *Y 0 61975 I

t DCIOSUPI 10. 2 Ila 1-3 CCIEntrS CN TIE DPMT E.VIPCEEL STATDET KPPSS 1.TJCLDa PROTETS NO. 3 AND 10. 5 Iccation Ccanents Page 1-2, Line 1 Project NLznber for this application was always S'Hi-501. Docket Nos. STN 50-508/

509 were not assigned until application was docketed.

Page 1-2, Line 2 Application (PSAR and General and Antitrust Infor: nation) was resubuitted July 15, 1974 and docketed August 2,1974, not August 23, 1974. ER was resubnitted August 15, 1974, ard accepted August 23, 1974.

Page 2-12, Line 9 Change " pleistocene" to " Pleistocene."

Page 3-1, Line 42 Change " auxillary" to " auxiliary."

Page 5-8, Line 17 This statement requires clarification.

Ibssible typographical error.

Page 5-12, Line 19 Change "Wahsig ton" to " Washington."

Page 7-4, Lines 6 & 25 Change "AEC" to "NRC."

i Page 7-4, general Has status of NASH-1400 been described accurately?

Page 8-3, Line 47 Cham e "M:C" to the appropriate agency.

Page 9-12, Line 44 Statment in parentheses needs clarification.

Page 10-2, Line 31 Change "curent" to " current."

0

- .- a .- - , - . , - - - - - - - - - - - --- -r - - n -