ML20198G101

Submits Site Analysis Branch Review of Util Response to Request for Addl Info Re App I Compliance Demonstration Provided in 751017 Suppl 6 to Environ Rept.Applicant Response Inadequate.Simpler Compliance Procedures Needed

ML20198G101
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	12/17/1975
From:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1254 NUDOCS 8605290236
Download: ML20198G101 (2)

Text

__

d. e u ,

ltovu m f *..

' UNITED STATES -

r. 5 ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.VMISS:

b WASHINGTON, o. C. 205!5

{ jE

%yv4[

DEC 17 $75 A .. *****

t l , .

l .

D. R. Muller, Assistant Director, for Environmental Projects, RL r

REVIEW OF APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO APPENDIX I QUESTIONS - METEOROLOGY PLANT NAME: WPPSS Nuclear Projects Nos. 3 & 5 LICENSING STAGE: CP DOCKET NUMBER: 50-508 & 50-509 MILESTONE NO.: N/A RESPONSIBLE BRANCH: EP-4 The Meteorology S5ction, Site Analysis Branch has reviewed the applicant's response to the Requested Information for Appendix.I Compliance Demonst.:ation provided in Supplement No. 6 to the WPPSS 3 & 5 Environmental Report dated October 17, 1975.

Of'the 16 separate items identified in the five requests for additional meteorological information, the applicant has provided complete responses to only eight. Incomplete responses were provided.for two items, while no information was provided for six items. The missing information included data on regional (within 50 mile.s of the plant) meteorological conditions characterizing expected atmos-pheric transport processes, as well as the applicant's calculated deposition (D/Q)svalues for radiciodines and particulates.

Because of the inadequate response of the applicant to these requests, it will be necessary (as stated in the third paragraph of the letter from the Commission to the applicant requesting the information) to use a less complex meteorological calculational procedure, comparable in conservatism to that used in the past to demonstrate compliance with Appendix I guidelines.

This review was prepared by R. Kornasiewicz, Site Analysis Branch, TR.

Harold R. Denton, Assistant Director for Site Safety Division of Technical Review Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ec: See next page 8605290236 751217 0 PDR ADOCK 0500 A

. p.

Harold R. Denton - -

e cc: - R. Boyd W. Mcdonald J. Panzarella S. Hanauer t-R. Heineman R. C.-DeYoung D. Crutchfield -

SS Branch Chiefs

0. Parr

- A. Bournia -

R.' Kornasie'wicz J. Goll R. Klecker '

D. Eisenhut . _

Mr. Williams S. Varga E.'F. Hawkins W. Burke W. Hewitt T. Essig -

E. Markee J. Youngblood F. Miraglia J. Long e

e e

f

_ .