ML20198F841
| ML20198F841 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1974 |
| From: | Harold Denton US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Moore V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0984, CON-WNP-984 NUDOCS 8605290114 | |
| Download: ML20198F841 (2) | |
Text
..
DISTRIBUTION:
'/ Docket File L-AD/SS-Rdg.
L-Rdg.
JUL 2 51974 Voss A. Moore, Assistant Director for Light Water Reactors, Group 2. L ROUND T130 QUESTIONS AND POSITIONS - WPPSS NUG. EAR OttR PSAR Plant names WPPSS Nuclasr Project No.1 Licensing stage CP Docket Number: 50-460 Responsible branch: LWR 2-3 Project Manager:
T. Cos Data request received by RAB: Blue Book Requested completion date: 7/29/74 Description of response: Traman.'t.tal of Round Two Questions and Sf4 f Positions Review status: Continuing Raciceed are round two questions and positions of RAB which wars prepared af ter reviewing responses to round cua questions. Upon receipt of acceptable answers, RAB will be able to prepara the safety evaluation report.
This evaluation was performed by S. Block, RAB.
4 Art 4G
-'
- i., Harold R. Denton, Assistant Director for Site Safety Directorata of Licensing
Enclosure:
Round Two Questions and Positions cc g/o enc 1 A. Giambusso W. Mcdonald SS/BC's J. Panzarella ec w/ encl:
S. Hanauer S. Yarga F. Schroeder D. Eisenhut J. Kastner J. Carter A. Schwencer R. Klecker T. Cox S. Block MU 8605290114 740725
).
PDR ADOCK 0500 0
L:RA RRA
,g
.,,te.,
SBl
- ps ECanti ', o HDen ton..__
.u.N.N.
7/H/74
.. 7/19f74..
_.1/2.h74 Fusa AIC.)la (Rev. 9 93) AECM 0240 W u. s. eovsRNM ENT PRtNTINe OPPICBs lefd.Sae. tee
=
v.
2 RAB Q2 WPPSS 1 (1) Figure'12.148 " Health Physics Control Point" does not match the equivalent section in Figure,12.1-13'.
Resolve the discrepancy.
(2) The answer to question 12.17 indicates come misunderstanding of the question. Therefore it is reworded as follows:
Demonstrate that the vent airbotne radioactivity monitors are sufficiently sensitive so that they can detect 1 MPC 60 o, in any individual of particulates, such as insoluable C
compartment in a reasonable time (i.e., 2 MPC hrs which is state of the art). ' Assume dilution of the compartment radio
- activity concentration by the total exhaust flow in the vent.
If this cannot be demonstrated, propose additional monitoring systems that can ' perform in this manner.
4 (3)
Pg.12.2-5 states that the fixed filters for the airborne monitors are "normally changed every 7 days..." Describe the air moving system that will allow constant flow of air through the filters over 7 days of particulate collection.
(4) The answer to question 12.19 is unacceptable to the staff because whole body counting should be performed routinely irrespective of what the inplant air monitoring program shows. The staff requires that the applicant provide a conunitment to a routine internal dosi:netry program including whole body counting since this is a technique for demonstrating the eff,cetiveness of the airborne radioactivity monitoring program.
t O
0 4
e m, e e.
8 l
-.