ML20198F120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 741106 Request for Comments Re Des.Transmission Lines Associated W/Ash Substation Would Be Built Regardless of Existence of Plants & Will Have Capacity to Handle Plant Load
ML20198F120
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 11/08/1974
From: Loose R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Paton W
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
CON-WNP-1218 NUDOCS 8605280418
Download: ML20198F120 (1)


Text

-

.....~

,y

~

- ~ ~. _

~,

[

c t

as e

, w-DISTRIBUTION:

O (f.efitral File'

. l W -4 Reading RRLoose NOV 8 1374

,'l

~'

'5 Q

-q NOTE TO: William Paton '

^ y ;A: ng ~. ::-

o a. ^,.

' EFFSS 1 & 4

  • k. 'Mc% lr:$ % w.Y.,.

._ FN, -

-y [y y;ugy,:Q,;ff.p;p.gq, ?

v g'_,

W f.

v.

" 1.In resp e to your note of Novembee'6, 1974-I offer the following 7

t M ensaments:'

.n M.t!f/.8 D a-s.

m

. c s; w ' ;.n. s W' y.

q, e, s,

.M..

- e gg. m7

,.-2 j

.~ M 1.: In accordamse with st==dard " green cover" review procedures, of - Sections 1 thru 7 of the WFFSS 1 & 4 DES were reviewed at ANL

'M

' N.. - 9 'dm October 10 and 11, 1974. At that time, no substantial

'.k M.;

problems were identified in these sections except for your question i;

on tran==imaion lines which is addressed in item 3 below. Accor-i dingly, your cousments, as well as EP's have been incorporated into l,

t sections 1 thru 7 of the DES which is now ready for publication.

=

9 l

2.

At the time of the " green cover" review at ANL, complete drafts Q, U..of Sections 8, 9 and 10 were not available.

l

. v, --

Specifically, items

..;(a) thru (c) _of your memo were missing and itent (d) was identified

%y.-"_ as needing revision in view of intervention. I have been advised l.

a by ANL that complete drafts of Sections 8, 9 and 10, incloding a

, revised geothermal alternative discussion, will be available for OGC and EF review by November 15, 1974. At this time I would espect a normal 2 day " green cover" review of these sections. I

  • find no basis in your memo which would substantiate additional f

review time, esp =ef=117 since the review is already partially complete.

t 3.

I have had additional discussions with John McLeod of BFA concerning

~

l transmission lines. He has assured me that the transainsion lines associated with the Ash Substation.were p1 maned.before WNP 1 and 4,

[

s ai that fchey would be built regardless of the existance of WNP 1 and G.Ji. 4 and will have the especity to handle the load of VNP 1 and 4.

f l

v n Ee is sending me a Intter to document these facts. In addition I t

i have the BFA EIS's for these lines which were. issued in draft form l

'M on Jammary 14, 19744 Since the decision to move the WNP #1 site and l

'W-add WMF #4 was not.nede until July 1974, it 'is elaae that the 14naa l

in question are not being constructed due to the WNP projects. 'Ihere-l

'.s ' fore EP will only discuss those tran -fanion lines necessary to get t

the power from the Stations to the Ash Substation in the WNP 1 and 4 DES.

S 4

kkDN l

Ronal6 RM 8605220418 741108

'j -

I PDR ADOCK 05000460

1. R. Loose, Project Manager 4 g D

PDR Environmental Projects Branch 4 r fV M4 rac e ne n r.m nF T f a

-=4.ne L:EP-4 on, c g,

g,,

Wi1 hins RRLoose:sl

..,_Regan 4

Gallo 11/8/74 u,.,

e.n. Asc.na <a p.m As m ono

  • u.

......,,,i.,,

..u.

r.a. ~ mm..aw.2n.e.x.e,..ak:.. % ; w..

._-w.u.+..~.w.n. a u ~, -.. i.,J.2L w

. _ _ _