ML20198F120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 741106 Request for Comments Re Des.Transmission Lines Associated W/Ash Substation Would Be Built Regardless of Existence of Plants & Will Have Capacity to Handle Plant Load
ML20198F120
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 11/08/1974
From: Loose R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Paton W
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
CON-WNP-1218 NUDOCS 8605280418
Download: ML20198F120 (1)


Text

- ' ~

- ~ ~ . _ _

~, .....~ . . ,y l

[t . -.

, w-

  • , c as e DISTRIBUTION: ,

O

' (f.efitral File' ,

W -4 Reading RRLoose

.l

~'

. NOV 8 1374 . ,'l

'5 Q -q ,

NOTE TO: William Paton ' -

o a . ^ ,. ^ y ;A: ng ~ . ::-

' EFFSS 1 & 4

  • k . 'Mc% lr:$ % w.Y., .

._ FN , -

W y [y y;ugy,:Q,;ff.p;p.gq , ? v g'_, .

f. v.

t

" 1.In resp e to your note of Novembee'6, 1974-I offer the following ,

7 M ensaments:'

. c s; w.n' ;.n M.t!f/.8

. s W' yD. a-

s. m e, s, ,.-2 q, - <

. ,. - e gg. m7 .

.M.j .

.~ M 1.: In accordamse with st==dard " green cover" review procedures, of - Sections 1 thru 7 of the WFFSS 1 & 4 DES were reviewed at ANL 'M

' N.. - 9 'dm October 10 and 11, 1974. At that time, no substantial '.k M.;

problems were identified in these sections except for your question i;

' on tran==imaion lines which is addressed in item 3 below. Accor-  :  ;

, dingly, your cousments, as well as EP's have been incorporated into l, i

=

sections 1 thru 7 of the DES which is now ready for publication. 9 t

l -

2. At the time of the " green cover" review at ANL, complete drafts '

.- . v , -- Specifically, items l

..;(a) thru (c) _of your memo were missing and itent (d) was identified l.

Q, U. .of Sections 8, 9 and 10 were not available.

%y .-"_ a byas needing ANL revision in that complete draftsviewofofSections intervention. I have 8, 9 and 10,been advised incloding a

, revised geothermal alternative discussion, will be available for

! OGC and EF review by November 15, 1974. At this time I would espect a normal 2 day " green cover" review of these sections. I

, find no basis in your memo which would substantiate additional f review time, esp =ef=117 since the review is already partially complete.

t

>- 3. I have had additional discussions with John McLeod of BFA concerning ~

l transmission lines. He has assured me that the transainsion lines associated with the Ash Substation.were p1 maned.before WNP 1 and 4,

[

s ai that fchey would be built regardless of the existance of WNP 1 and G.Ji. 4 and will have the especity to handle the load of VNP 1 and 4. -

f l  !

t v n Ee is sending me a Intter to document these facts. In addition I i

have the BFA EIS's for these lines which were. issued in draft form l 'M on Jammary 14, 19744 Since the decision to move the WNP #1 site and l ,

' 'W- add WMF #4 was not.nede until July 1974, it 'is elaae that the 14naa l :in question are not being constructed due to the WNP projects. 'Ihere-l '.s ' fore EP will only discuss those tran -fanion lines necessary to get t

the power from the Stations to the Ash Substation in the WNP 1 and 4 DES.

S ,

4 l

kkDN 8605220418 741108 PDR Ronal6 RM 'j -I D

ADOCK 05000460 , 1. R. Loose, Project Manager 4 g PDR Environmental Projects Branch 4 r fV M4 rac e ne n r.m nF T f a -=4.ne on, c g , g,, ,_%, L:EP-4 _ . _ _

. . . . . . . , ..,_Regan Wi14 hins RRLoose:sl u,. ,

Gallo 11/8/74 e.n. Asc.na <a p.m As m ono

  • u. ......,, ,i .,, ..u. . .

w r.a. ~ mm..aw.2n.e .x.e,. .ak:.. % ; w.. ._-w.u.+..~.w .n. a u ~, -.. i.,J.2L

_ . _ _ _