|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARNPL-99-0564, Forwards Response to NRC Request During 990720 Meeting,To Provide Addl Details to Several Questions Re Amend Currently Under Review by Staff Pertaining to CR Habitability1999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Request During 990720 Meeting,To Provide Addl Details to Several Questions Re Amend Currently Under Review by Staff Pertaining to CR Habitability ML20217A5911999-09-30030 September 1999 Advises of NRC Plans for Future Insp Activities at Facility for Licensee to Have Opportunity to Prepare for Insps & to Provide NRC with Feedback on Any Planned Insps Which May Conflict with Plant Activities.Plant Issues Matrix Encl 05000266/LER-1999-007, Forwards LER 99-007-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 1. Condition Would Be Outside App R Design Basis for Plant.New Commitments within Rept Indicated in Italics1999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-007-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 1. Condition Would Be Outside App R Design Basis for Plant.New Commitments within Rept Indicated in Italics ML20212J7431999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-15 & 50-301/99-15 on 990830- 0903.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Concluded That Util Licensed Operator Requalification Training Program Satisfactorily Implemented NPL-99-0555, Discusses Rev 1,suppl 1 to GL 92-01, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity. Calculation That Provides Evaluation of New Surveillance Data for Assessing Integrity of Unit 1 Reactor Vessel1999-09-29029 September 1999 Discusses Rev 1,suppl 1 to GL 92-01, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity. Calculation That Provides Evaluation of New Surveillance Data for Assessing Integrity of Unit 1 Reactor Vessel ML20212K7651999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-13 & 50-301/99-13 on 990714-0830.No Violations Noted.Operators Responded Well to Problems with Unit 1 Instrument Air Leak & Unit 2 Turbine Governor Valve Position Fluctuation ML20212D5771999-09-15015 September 1999 Discusses Review of Response to GL 88-20,suppl 4,requesting All Licensees to Perform Ipeee.Ser,Ter & Supplemental TER Encl ML20211Q6451999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Operator Licensing Exam Repts 50-266/99-301OL & 50-301/99-301OL for Exams Conducted on 990726-0802 at Point Beach Npp.All Nine Applicants Passed All Sections of Exam ML20211Q4171999-09-0606 September 1999 Responds to VA Kaminskas by Informing That NRC Tentatively Scheduled Initial Licensing Exam for Operator License Applicants During Weeks of 001016 & 23.Validation of Exam Will Occur at Station During Wk of 000925 05000266/LER-1999-004, Forwards LER 99-004-01,re Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Cable in AFW Pump Room Being Outside App R Design Basis.Suppl to LER Provides Corrective Actions to Address Concerns Re Fire Disrupting Electrical Power to Fuel Oil Transfer Pump1999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-004-01,re Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Cable in AFW Pump Room Being Outside App R Design Basis.Suppl to LER Provides Corrective Actions to Address Concerns Re Fire Disrupting Electrical Power to Fuel Oil Transfer Pump ML20211K5261999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-14 & 50-301/99-14 on 990726- 30.Areas Examined within Secutity Program Identified in Rept.No Violations Noted ML20211F6941999-08-27027 August 1999 Provides Individual Exam Results for Applicants That Took Initial License Exam in July & August of 1999.Completed ES-501-2,copy of Each Individual License,Ol Exam Rept, ES-303-1,ES-303-2 & ES-401-8 Encl.Without Encl NPL-99-0473, Informs of Change Being Made to Plan Third 10-year Interval ISI Long Term Plan.Change Extends Interval from Current End Date of 001130 to 020831,due to Operating Cycle Being Increased from 12 to 18 Months1999-08-27027 August 1999 Informs of Change Being Made to Plan Third 10-year Interval ISI Long Term Plan.Change Extends Interval from Current End Date of 001130 to 020831,due to Operating Cycle Being Increased from 12 to 18 Months ML20211E8791999-08-24024 August 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits, for Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2.Licensees Provided Requested Info & Responses Required by GL 96-01 ML20211F1501999-08-24024 August 1999 Submits Summary of Meeting Held on 990729,in Region III Office with Util Re Proposed Revs to Plant Emergency Action Level Criteria Used in Classifying Emergencies & Results of Recent Improvement Initiatives in Emergency Preparedness 05000266/LER-1999-006, Forwards LER 99-006-00 Which Describes Discovery That Postulated Fire in Central Zone of Primary Auxiliary Bldg Could Result in Spurious Operation of Pressurizer Porv. New Commitments within Rept Are Indicated in Italics1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-006-00 Which Describes Discovery That Postulated Fire in Central Zone of Primary Auxiliary Bldg Could Result in Spurious Operation of Pressurizer Porv. New Commitments within Rept Are Indicated in Italics NPL-99-0477, Forwards Revised Procedures to Point Beach Nuclear Plant Epips.Revised Procedures Dtd 990723,should Be Filed in NRC Copies of Manual IAW Attached Instructions1999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Revised Procedures to Point Beach Nuclear Plant Epips.Revised Procedures Dtd 990723,should Be Filed in NRC Copies of Manual IAW Attached Instructions NPL-99-0426, Requests Relief from Section II of ASME B&PV Code, Nuclear Vessels, 1965 Edition,No Addenda.Detailed Info Attached1999-08-16016 August 1999 Requests Relief from Section II of ASME B&PV Code, Nuclear Vessels, 1965 Edition,No Addenda.Detailed Info Attached ML20210L9141999-08-0404 August 1999 Informs That Versions of Info Re WCAP-14787,submitted in 990622 Application for Amend,Marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954,as Amended ML20210K5221999-08-0404 August 1999 Discusses Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 Response to Request for Info in GL 92-01,Rev 1,Suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity NPL-99-0436, Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for six-month Period Ending 9906301999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for six-month Period Ending 990630 ML20210G6011999-07-30030 July 1999 Discusses 990415 Complaint OSHA Received from Employee of Wisconsin Electric Power Co Alleging That Employee Received Lower Performance Appraisal for 1998 Because Employee Raised Safety Concerns While Performing Duties at Point Beach NPL-99-0406, Provides Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal1999-07-29029 July 1999 Provides Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal ML20210H0211999-07-28028 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-09 & 50-301/99-09 on 990528-0713.Two Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20210G2441999-07-26026 July 1999 Discusses 990714 Meeting with PRA Staff to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PRA Staff NPL-99-0408, Forwards Pbnps,Units 1 & 2 Plant Simulation Four-Yr Rept, IAW 10CFR55.45(b)(5)(ii).Rept Describes Certification Program Tests Conducted from 1996-1999,identifies Test Discrepancies Still Outstanding & Schedules for 2000-20031999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Pbnps,Units 1 & 2 Plant Simulation Four-Yr Rept, IAW 10CFR55.45(b)(5)(ii).Rept Describes Certification Program Tests Conducted from 1996-1999,identifies Test Discrepancies Still Outstanding & Schedules for 2000-2003 ML20209H5471999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-12 & 50-301/99-12 on 990614-18.One Violation Noted,But Being Treated as non-cited violation.Long-term MOV Program Not Sufficiently Established to close-out NRC Review of Program,Per GL 89-10 NPL-99-0395, Forwards Partial Response to NRC 990512 RAI Re TS Change 204 Re Control Room Habitability.Meeting Is Planned with NRC to Discuss Issues Related to Control Room & Primary Auxiliary Bldg Ventilation Sys Modifications1999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Partial Response to NRC 990512 RAI Re TS Change 204 Re Control Room Habitability.Meeting Is Planned with NRC to Discuss Issues Related to Control Room & Primary Auxiliary Bldg Ventilation Sys Modifications NPL-99-0390, Projects Listed Major near-term License Amend Requests That Could Be Expected to Impact Staff Resources Into Fiscal Years 2000 & 2001,in Response to Administrative Ltr 99-021999-07-0808 July 1999 Projects Listed Major near-term License Amend Requests That Could Be Expected to Impact Staff Resources Into Fiscal Years 2000 & 2001,in Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02 NPL-99-0388, Forwards MORs for June 1999 & Revised MORs for May 1999 for Pbnps,Units 1 & 21999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards MORs for June 1999 & Revised MORs for May 1999 for Pbnps,Units 1 & 2 NPL-99-0381, Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. GL 98-01 Requested Response on Status of Facility Y2K Readiness by 990701.Disclosure Encl1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. GL 98-01 Requested Response on Status of Facility Y2K Readiness by 990701.Disclosure Encl ML20196J4161999-06-30030 June 1999 Discusses Relief Requests Submitted by Wisconsin Electric on 980930 for Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program,Rev 5. Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Requests VRR-01,VRR-02, PRR-01 & ROJ-16 Encl NPL-99-0379, Documents Telcon with Hg Ashar of NRC Re Licensee Intentions & Basis for Reselection of Control Tendons in Pbnps Containment Structures.Plants Are Currently Completing 28th Year Tendon Surveillance During Summer of 19991999-06-29029 June 1999 Documents Telcon with Hg Ashar of NRC Re Licensee Intentions & Basis for Reselection of Control Tendons in Pbnps Containment Structures.Plants Are Currently Completing 28th Year Tendon Surveillance During Summer of 1999 NPL-99-0376, Forwards Errata to Pbnp 1998 Annual Monitoring Rept, Originally Submitted by Ltr Dtd 990427.List of Corrections, Provided1999-06-28028 June 1999 Forwards Errata to Pbnp 1998 Annual Monitoring Rept, Originally Submitted by Ltr Dtd 990427.List of Corrections, Provided NPL-99-0353, Forwards June 1999 Rev to FSAR for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2, IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e).Each Package Contains Revised FSAR Pages That Are to Be Inserted IAW Instructions1999-06-23023 June 1999 Forwards June 1999 Rev to FSAR for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2, IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e).Each Package Contains Revised FSAR Pages That Are to Be Inserted IAW Instructions ML20196D4931999-06-18018 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-08 & 50-301/99-08 on 990411- 0527.No Violations Noted.Operator Crew Response to Equipment Induced Challenges Generally Good.Handling of Steam Plume in Unit 1 Turbine Bldg Particularly Good ML20195J9471999-06-16016 June 1999 Discusses Ltr from NRC ,re Arrangements Made to Finalized Initial Licensed Operator Exam to Be Administered at Point Beach Nuclear Plant During Week of 990726 ML20196A2931999-06-16016 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Changes to Listed Sections of Point Beach Nuclear Plant Security Plan & ISFSI Security Plan,Submitted IAW 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required Since Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness ML20195J9251999-06-14014 June 1999 Discusses 990610 Telcon Between Wp Walker & D Mcneil Re Arrangements for NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant for Week of 990816 05000266/LER-1999-005, Forwards LER 99-005-00,re Failure of Shell of 4B FW Heater Which Resulted in Significant Steam Leak & Manual Trip. New Commitments within Rept Are Indicated in Italics1999-06-11011 June 1999 Forwards LER 99-005-00,re Failure of Shell of 4B FW Heater Which Resulted in Significant Steam Leak & Manual Trip. New Commitments within Rept Are Indicated in Italics NPL-99-0336, Forwards Unit 2 Refueling 23 Inservice Insp Summary Rept for Form NIS-1, IAW ASME Section Xi,Subsection IWA-62301999-06-10010 June 1999 Forwards Unit 2 Refueling 23 Inservice Insp Summary Rept for Form NIS-1, IAW ASME Section Xi,Subsection IWA-6230 NPL-99-0330, Forwards Revs to Pbnp Security Plan Sections 2.1,2.4,3.1, Figures A,D & T & Pbnp ISFSI Security Plan Section 2.0, Dtd 990604.Plans Withheld1999-06-0404 June 1999 Forwards Revs to Pbnp Security Plan Sections 2.1,2.4,3.1, Figures A,D & T & Pbnp ISFSI Security Plan Section 2.0, Dtd 990604.Plans Withheld 05000301/LER-1999-003, Forwards LER 99-003-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 2. Rept Is Provided in Accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), as Any Operation or Condition Prohibited by Plant Tech Specs1999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards LER 99-003-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 2. Rept Is Provided in Accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), as Any Operation or Condition Prohibited by Plant Tech Specs NPL-99-0319, Provides Main Control Board Wiring Separation Project Status Update Rept for Pbnps,Units 1 & 21999-05-28028 May 1999 Provides Main Control Board Wiring Separation Project Status Update Rept for Pbnps,Units 1 & 2 ML20206T3691999-05-17017 May 1999 Ltr Contract,Task Order 242 Entitled, Review Point Beach 1 & 2 Conversion of Current TS for Electrical Power Systems to Improved TS Based on Standard TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20206N5561999-05-13013 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization,Div of Licensing Project Mgt Created.Cm Craig Will Be Section Chief for Point Beach Npp.Organization Chart Encl ML20206P2551999-05-12012 May 1999 Forwards Handout Provided to NRC by Wisconsin Electric at 990504 Meeting Which Discussed Several Recent Operational Issues & Results of Recent Improvement Initiatives in Engineering ML20206N5331999-05-12012 May 1999 Forwards RAI Re & Suppl by Oral Presentation During 980604 Meeting,Requesting Amend for Plant,Units 1 & 2 to Revise TSs 15.3.12 & 15.4.11 ML20196F3211999-05-11011 May 1999 Requests Proprietary WCAP-14787, W Revised Thermal Design Procedure Instrument Uncertainty Methodology for Wepc Point Beach Units 1 & 2 (Fuel Upgrade & Uprate to 1656 Mwt-NSSS Power), Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20206K0391999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-06 & 50-301/99-06 on 990223- 0410.Ten Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217A5911999-09-30030 September 1999 Advises of NRC Plans for Future Insp Activities at Facility for Licensee to Have Opportunity to Prepare for Insps & to Provide NRC with Feedback on Any Planned Insps Which May Conflict with Plant Activities.Plant Issues Matrix Encl ML20212J7431999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-15 & 50-301/99-15 on 990830- 0903.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Concluded That Util Licensed Operator Requalification Training Program Satisfactorily Implemented ML20212K7651999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-13 & 50-301/99-13 on 990714-0830.No Violations Noted.Operators Responded Well to Problems with Unit 1 Instrument Air Leak & Unit 2 Turbine Governor Valve Position Fluctuation ML20212D5771999-09-15015 September 1999 Discusses Review of Response to GL 88-20,suppl 4,requesting All Licensees to Perform Ipeee.Ser,Ter & Supplemental TER Encl ML20211Q6451999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Operator Licensing Exam Repts 50-266/99-301OL & 50-301/99-301OL for Exams Conducted on 990726-0802 at Point Beach Npp.All Nine Applicants Passed All Sections of Exam ML20211Q4171999-09-0606 September 1999 Responds to VA Kaminskas by Informing That NRC Tentatively Scheduled Initial Licensing Exam for Operator License Applicants During Weeks of 001016 & 23.Validation of Exam Will Occur at Station During Wk of 000925 ML20211K5261999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-14 & 50-301/99-14 on 990726- 30.Areas Examined within Secutity Program Identified in Rept.No Violations Noted ML20211F6941999-08-27027 August 1999 Provides Individual Exam Results for Applicants That Took Initial License Exam in July & August of 1999.Completed ES-501-2,copy of Each Individual License,Ol Exam Rept, ES-303-1,ES-303-2 & ES-401-8 Encl.Without Encl ML20211F1501999-08-24024 August 1999 Submits Summary of Meeting Held on 990729,in Region III Office with Util Re Proposed Revs to Plant Emergency Action Level Criteria Used in Classifying Emergencies & Results of Recent Improvement Initiatives in Emergency Preparedness ML20211E8791999-08-24024 August 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits, for Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2.Licensees Provided Requested Info & Responses Required by GL 96-01 ML20210K5221999-08-0404 August 1999 Discusses Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 Response to Request for Info in GL 92-01,Rev 1,Suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity ML20210L9141999-08-0404 August 1999 Informs That Versions of Info Re WCAP-14787,submitted in 990622 Application for Amend,Marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954,as Amended ML20210G6011999-07-30030 July 1999 Discusses 990415 Complaint OSHA Received from Employee of Wisconsin Electric Power Co Alleging That Employee Received Lower Performance Appraisal for 1998 Because Employee Raised Safety Concerns While Performing Duties at Point Beach ML20210H0211999-07-28028 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-09 & 50-301/99-09 on 990528-0713.Two Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20210G2441999-07-26026 July 1999 Discusses 990714 Meeting with PRA Staff to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PRA Staff ML20209H5471999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-12 & 50-301/99-12 on 990614-18.One Violation Noted,But Being Treated as non-cited violation.Long-term MOV Program Not Sufficiently Established to close-out NRC Review of Program,Per GL 89-10 ML20196J4161999-06-30030 June 1999 Discusses Relief Requests Submitted by Wisconsin Electric on 980930 for Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program,Rev 5. Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Requests VRR-01,VRR-02, PRR-01 & ROJ-16 Encl ML20196D4931999-06-18018 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-08 & 50-301/99-08 on 990411- 0527.No Violations Noted.Operator Crew Response to Equipment Induced Challenges Generally Good.Handling of Steam Plume in Unit 1 Turbine Bldg Particularly Good ML20196A2931999-06-16016 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Changes to Listed Sections of Point Beach Nuclear Plant Security Plan & ISFSI Security Plan,Submitted IAW 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required Since Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness ML20195J9471999-06-16016 June 1999 Discusses Ltr from NRC ,re Arrangements Made to Finalized Initial Licensed Operator Exam to Be Administered at Point Beach Nuclear Plant During Week of 990726 ML20195J9251999-06-14014 June 1999 Discusses 990610 Telcon Between Wp Walker & D Mcneil Re Arrangements for NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant for Week of 990816 ML20206T3691999-05-17017 May 1999 Ltr Contract,Task Order 242 Entitled, Review Point Beach 1 & 2 Conversion of Current TS for Electrical Power Systems to Improved TS Based on Standard TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20206N5561999-05-13013 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization,Div of Licensing Project Mgt Created.Cm Craig Will Be Section Chief for Point Beach Npp.Organization Chart Encl ML20206N5331999-05-12012 May 1999 Forwards RAI Re & Suppl by Oral Presentation During 980604 Meeting,Requesting Amend for Plant,Units 1 & 2 to Revise TSs 15.3.12 & 15.4.11 ML20206P2551999-05-12012 May 1999 Forwards Handout Provided to NRC by Wisconsin Electric at 990504 Meeting Which Discussed Several Recent Operational Issues & Results of Recent Improvement Initiatives in Engineering ML20206K0391999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-06 & 50-301/99-06 on 990223- 0410.Ten Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy IR 05000266/19990041999-04-28028 April 1999 Discusses Insp Rept 50-266/99-04 on 990105-0222 & Forwards NOV Re Failure to Ack Validity of Temp Alarm & Appreciate Significance of Low Temp Readings for Unit 1 SI Pumps Min Flow Line ML20206B8121999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards FEMA Evaluation Rept for 981103 Emergency Preparedness Exercise at Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant. Deficiency Identified for Manitowoc County as Result of Exercise.County Corrected Deficiency Immediately ML20205S7041999-04-20020 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-05 & 50-301/99-05 on 990222-0312.One Violation Noted & Being Treated as Non-Cited Violation.Expresses Concern Re Timeliness of C/As ML20205R4651999-04-19019 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-10 & 50-301/99-10 on 990329- 0401.No Violations Noted.During Insp NRC Observation of Licensee Activities Showed Emergency Preparedness Program to Be Adequately Implemented ML20205R6081999-04-19019 April 1999 Confirms of NRC Routine Mgt 990504 Meeting in Lisle,Il to Discuss Progress in Implementation of Improvement Initiatives in Engineering Area,As Well as to Discuss Challenges Faced by Operators ML20205P0311999-04-13013 April 1999 Refers to Various Changes Received by Region III in Jan 1999 to Portions of Point Beach NPP Emergency Plan.Informs That NRC Approval Not Required Based on Determinations That Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Emergency Plan ML20205N4221999-04-12012 April 1999 Discusses 990326 Predecisional Enforcement Conference with Util Re Apparent Violation Concerning Operator Response to Low Temp Alarm for Minimum Flow Recirculation Line for Unit 1 Safety Injection Sys.Handouts Provided by Util Encl ML20205C4701999-03-26026 March 1999 Discusses Review of Various Changes to Portions of Plant Emergency Plan.Informs That Revision Was Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(q) ML20196K8731999-03-26026 March 1999 Advises of Licensee Planned Insp Effort Resulting from Plant Ppr.Plant Issues Matrix & Insp Plan for Next 6 Months Encl ML20204E5561999-03-16016 March 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-07 & 50-301/99-07 on 990216-19.No Violations Noted.Three Weaknesses Re Chemistry Program Were Identified ML20204D8161999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-266/99-04 on 990105-0222.One Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violation,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20207L9191999-03-11011 March 1999 Discusses from Util Informing NRC That Bases References for TS 15.4.4 Revised to Correct References to Point Beach Nuclear Plant FSAR Related to Reactor Containment Design.Revised Bases Page 15.4.4-7 Encl ML20207L1161999-03-10010 March 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-02 & 50-301/99-02 on 990105- 0222 & Nov.One Violation Associated with Program for Implementing Abnormal & Eops.Other Two Violations non-cited Violations ML20207H8661999-03-0808 March 1999 Ack Receipt of ,Which Transmitted Changes to Pbnp Security Sections 1.2,1.3,2.1,2.4,6.1,B-2.0,B-3.0 & Figure T,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required,Since Util Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness ML20207D6661999-02-22022 February 1999 Forwards Assessment of Design of Restraints on Main Steam Piping & Primary Loop Auxiliary Piping Systems at Point Beach Nuclear Plant.Staff Concludes That WE Unable to Retrieve Original Analyses That May Have Been Performed ML20203F2541999-02-10010 February 1999 Informs That Beginning 990216,DE Hills Will Be Chief of Operations Branch Which Includes Operator Licensing Function ML20202H6601999-02-0101 February 1999 Discusses Evaluation of Wisconsin Electric Power Co Response to NRC GL 97-05, Steam Generator Tube Insp Techniques ML20206U2981999-02-0101 February 1999 Informs That by 980811 & 1223 Ltrs,Nrc Responded to WOG Positions Re Corrective Actions to Address Generic Aspects of part-length Control Rod Drive Mechanism Housing Issue Resulting from Leak at Prairie Island,Unit 2 on 980123 ML20202G5321999-02-0101 February 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/99-03 & 50-301/99-03 on 990111-15.No Violations Noted.Cooperation,Communication & Effectiveness of Security & Maint Staff to Ensure Equipment Effectiveness Has Been Successful ML20199H5491999-01-15015 January 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/98-21 & 50-301/98-21 on 981121- 990104 & Notice of Violation.Violation Being Cited Because of Repetitive Nature & That Violation Could Reasonably Have Been Prevented by C/A for Previous Finding ML20206R8891999-01-13013 January 1999 Forwards SER Accepting Util 981116 & 30 Proposed Revs to Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Implemented at Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 ML20199D7751999-01-0808 January 1999 Documents 990105 Telcon Issuing Notice of Enforcement Discrection for Wisconsin Electric Re Point Beach,Unit 1 ML20198K6911998-12-24024 December 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-266/98-22 & 50-301/98-22 on 981208-10.No Violations Noted.Concludes That Licensee Carried Out Properly Addressed Findings of Maint Rule Baseline Insp ML20198J6061998-12-22022 December 1998 Discusses Plant,Units 1 & 2 Licensed Operator Staffing Requirements 1999-09-08
[Table view] |
Text
. .- . - . - . . . - . . . - ~.
13Y 18 GE ,
Docket No. 50-266 Docket No. 50-301 Wisconsin Electric Power Company ATTN: Mr. Bob E. Link Vice President Nuclear-Power 231 West Michigan Street - P379 Milwaukee, WI 53201
Dear Mr. Link:
SUBJECT:
OPERATOR AND SENIOR OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS In a telephone conversati- between Mr. K. Draska, and Mr. J. Walker,--arrangements were made for the administration of licensing examinations at the Point Beach Nuclear Station.
The written and operating examinations are scheduled for the week of-September 28, 1992.
In order'for us to meet this schedule, it will be necessary for the facility to furnish the approved reference material listed in Enclosure 1, " Reference Material Requirements for Reactor / Senior Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations" at least 60 days prior to the examination date. Any substandard.or incomplete material or. delay-in receiving approved properly bound and indexed reference material may result in a delay in administering the ,
examinations. Mr. K. Draska has been advised of our reference material requirements, the number of reference material sets that are required, and the examiners' names and addresses where each set is to be mailed.
The facility management is responsible for providing adequate space and accommodations in order to properly conduct the written examinations. Enclosure 2, " Requirements for Administration of Written Examinations," describes our requirements for conducting these examinations.- Mr. Draska has also bean informed of these requirements.
Enclosure 3 contains-the Rules and Guidelines that will be in effect during the-administration of the written examination.
The facility management is responsible for ensuring that all applicants are. aware of these rules.
The facility staff review of the written examination will be conducted in accordance with requirements specified in Enclosure 4, " Requirements for Facility Review of Written Examinations." Mr. K. Draska has been informed of these requirements.
I I
l 9205210025 920518 /r PDR ADOCK 05000266 /g V PDR
Wisconsin. Electric Power Company 2 MAY 181992 To-better document simulator examinations, the Chief-Examiner will have the facility simulator operator record predetermined plant' conditions.(i.e., plant pressure, ter.perature , pressurizer level, etc.), for each simulator scenario. The applicants will be responsible for providing this information with any appeal of a simulator operating examination. Therefore, the facility-training staff should retain the simulator examination scenario information until all applicants who took the examinations have either passed the operating examination, accepted the denial of their license, or filed an appeal.
Preliminary reactor operator and senior reactor operator license applications should be submitted at least 30 days before the first examination dates so that we will be able to review the-training and experience of the candidates, process the medical certifications,-and prepare final examiner assignments after applicant eligibility has been determined. If the applications are not received-at least 30 days before the examination dates, it is likely that a postponement will be necessary. Final signed applications certifying that all training has been completed shall be submitted at least 14 days before the first examination date. However, if processing of a license application is not completed in time to make a determination of applicant eligibility, the candidate shall not be permitted to sit for the examination. Therefore, it is recommended that license applications be provided as soon as possible to ensure an appropriateLlevel of review.
This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number 3150-0101 which expires-May 31, 1992. The estimated average burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response, including gathering, xeroxing and mailing the required material. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or.any other aspect of l, this collection of-information,- including suggestions-for reducing this burden, to the Information and-Records Management Branch, Division of Information Support Services, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory i
Commission, Washington, D .- C . 20555; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0101). Of fice of Informatic 7 and Regulatory Affairs, NECB-3019, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503.
i I
l l
1.
.- j
Wisconsin _ Electric Power Company '3 MAY 181392 Thank-you:for your consideration in this matter.- If you have any questions regarding the examination procedures and requirements,
'please contact Tim Reidinger at (708) 790-5551.
Sincerely, QMQiHit 5104E0 BY oI0FFEEY C. WRNRT Geoffrey C. Wright, Chief 4 Operations Branch
Enclosures:
- 1. Reference Material Requirements for Reactor / Senior Reactor Operator Licensing-Examinations
- 2. Requirements for Administration of Written Examinations
- 3. NRC Rules and Guidelines For Written Examinations
- 4. Requirements for Facility Review of Written Examinations cc w/ enclosures:
G.~J.'Maxfield, Plant Manager DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB ResidentLInspector, RIII Virgil Kanable, Chief Boiler Section
- Charles' Thompson,-Chairman Wisconsin Public Service Commission Robert M. Thompson, Administrator WI_.Div of Emergency Govt.
R. Seizert, Plant Training Manager cc w/o enclosures:
R. B. Samworth, Project Manager, NRR R.-M.-Gallo, Branch Chief, OLB I.1N. Jackiw, Section Chief, DRP RII RI III N
Wa ker/cg Burdick right 05//y/92 05/pb/92 05/[ /92
ENCLOSURE 1 REFERENCE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REACTOR /FENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS
- 1. Existing learning objectives, Job Performance Measures and lesson plans (including training manuals,_ plant orientation manual, system descriptions, reactor theory, thermodynamics, etc.)
A copy of the facility Job and Task Analysis (JTA),
specifying the knowledges and abilities required of an ,
operator at the facility. .Each particular knowledge and/or ability will include an importance rating correlating it to ensuring _the health and the safety of the public. If a JTA is not furnished, the Knowledges and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators, NUREG-1122 (1123) will be used to establish content validity for the examination.
All Job Performance Measures (JPMs)'used to ascertain the competence of the operators in performing tasks within the control room complex and, as identified in the facility JTAs, outside of the control room,_i.e., local operations.-
Training materials should include all substantive written material used for preparing applicants-for-initial RO and
.SRO licensing. The written material'should include learning onjectives and the. details presented during lectures, rather than outlines. Training materials should be identified by plant and unit, bound, and. indexed. FAILURE TO PROVIDE COMPLETE, PROPERLY BOUND AND INDEXED PLANT REFERENCE MATERIAL MAY' RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE MATERIAL TO THE-PERSON WHO IS THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF CORPORATE MANAGEMENT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANT OPERATIONS (E.G., VICE PRESIDENT OF NUCLEAR OF-NUCLEAR OPERATIONS). ACCOMPANYING THE-MATERIAL WILL BE A COVER LETTER; EXPLAINING THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE REFERENCE MATERIAL AND-THE FACT THAT THIS WAS THE REASON THE EXAMINATIONS WERE CANCELLED OR POSTPONED. Training '
materials-which include the following should be provided.
System descriptions including descriptions of all operationally relevant flow paths,' components, controls
_and instrumentation. System training material shoulel draw parallels to the actual procedures used-for operating the applicable system.
.- 1.-
~ OPERATOR LICENSING ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont'd)
Complete and. operationally useful1 descriptions of'all safety-uystem interactions and, where available, BOP system interactions under emergency and abnormal conditions, including consequences of anticipated operator' error, maintenance error, and equipment failure, Training-material used to clarify and strengthen understanding of' emergency operating procedures.
- 2. Complete Procedure Index (including surveillance procedures, etc.)
- 3. Alliadministrative procedures (as applicable to reactor operation or safety)
- 4. All integrated plant procedures (normal or general operating procedures) i 5. All emergency procedurcs (emergency instructions,_ abnormal _
or special: procedures)
- 6. Standing orders-(.important orders that are safety-related and may supersede the regular procedures)
- 7. Surveillance procedures (procedures that are run frequently, i.e.,l weekly or that can be run on the simulator)
- 8. Fuel-handling and core-loading procedures,-(initial _ core-loading procedure, when appropriate)
- 9. All annunciator / alarm procedures
- 10. Radiation protection manual (radiation control manual or-procedures)
- 11. Emergency plan implementing procedures L12. Technical Specifications (and interpretationa, if available) for all units for which licenses are sought.
13 . - System operating procedures
- 14. Piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical single-line-diagrams, or_ flow diagrams
-15. ' Technical-Data Book, and/or plant curve information as used
.by operators and facility precautions, limitations, and set points (PLS) for the facility J
t OPERATOR LICENSING ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont'd)
- 16. Questions and answers specific to the faci ~lity training program which-may be used in the written or operating examinations (voluntary by facility licensee)
- 17. The following on the plant reference simulation facility
- a. List of all preprogrammed initial conditions b.- ListLof all preset malfunctions with a clear identification number. The list should include cause and effect information. . Specifically, for each malfunction a concise description of the expected result, or range of results, that will occur upon implementation should be provided. Additionally, an indication of which annunciators are to be initially expected should be given,
- c. A description of simulator failure capabilities for ,
valves, breakers, indicators and alarms
- d. Where the capability ex.ists, an explanation of the ability to' vary the secciity of a particular 1
malfunction shall be pre.'. led, i.e., ability to vary
, the size of a given LOCA or steam leak, or the ability to cause a slow failure of a component such as a feed pump, turbine generator or major valve (e.g., drifting shut of'a main feedwater control valve)
- e. An identification of modeling conditions / problems that .
may impact the examination
- f. Identification of any known performance test discrepancies not yet corrected ~
- g. Identification of differences betveen_the simulator and the reference plant's control room
- h. Copies of facility generated scenarios that expose the applicants to situations of degraded pressure control
, (PWR), degraded heat removal capacility (PWR and BWR) .
and containment challenges -(PWR and BWR) may be provided (voluntary by licensee)
- 1. Simulator instractors manual (voluntary by licensee)
_j. Description of the scenarios used for the training class (voluntary by licensee)
- 18. Additional material required by the examiners to develop examinations that meet the requirements of these Standards and the regulations.
f OPERATOR LICENSING ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont'd)-
TT abo'*e reference-material shall be approved, final issues and s .1-be so marked. If a plant '.s not finalized some of the material, the Chief-Examiner sha21 verify with the facility that the most complete, up-to-date material is available and that agreement has been-reached.with the licensee for limiting changes before the administration of the examination. All procedures and reference material shall-be bound with appropriate indices or tables of contents so that they can be used' efficiently. Failure to provide complete, properly bound and indexed plant reference material could result in cancellation or rescheduling of the examinations.
l-u l
i
l ENCLOSURE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS
- 1. A single room shall be provided for administration of the written examination. The location of this room and '
supporting restroom facilities shall be such as to prevent contact with all other facility and/or contractor personnel
- j. during the written eramination. If necessary, the facility ;
should make arrangement for the use of a suitable roca at a local school, motel, or other building. Obtaining this' room is the responsibility of the licensee.
- 2. Minimum spacing is required to ensure examination integrity as determined by the Chief Examiner. Minimum spacing should be one applicant per table, with a three-foot space between tables.
- 3. Suitable arrangements shall be made by the facility if the applicants are to have lurch, coffee or other refreshments.
These arrangements shal? _omply ; with Item 1 above and shall be reviewed by the examiner and/or proctor.
- 4. Tne facility licensee shall provide pads of 8-1/2 by 11 inch t lined paper in unopened packages for each applicant's use in completing the examination. The examiner shall distribute these pads to the applicants as needed.
- 5. Applicants may bring pens, pencils, calculators or slide rules into the examination room. Only black ink or dark pencils should be used for writing answers to questions.
- 6. The licensee shall provide one set of steam tables for each applicant.- The examiner shall distribute the steam tables to the applicants. No wall charts, models, and/or other training materials shall be present in the examination room.
No other equipment or reference material shall be allowed unless provided by the examiner.
- 7. .The facility staff shall be provided wi=.h a copy of the written examination and answer key after the last candidate has handed in-his written examination. The facility' staff shall have-five working days to provide formal written comments with supporting documentation regarding written
-examination questions and answers to the Chief Examiner.
I
,. . m >_ _ . _ . _ . _. . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . . ,
n ENCLOSUBE 3 PROCEDURES FOR.THE ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS
+
- 1. Clieck' identification badges.
2.- Pass out examinations and all handouts. Remind applicants not to review examination until instructed to do so.
-READ THE'FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS VERBATIM:
During:the administration of this examination the following rules apply:
- 1. Cheating on the examination means an automatic denial of your application and could result in more severe penalties.
~
- 2. After the examination has been completed, you must sign the statement on.the cover sheet inuicating that the work is your. own and you have not received or given assistance in completing the. examination. This must be done after you complete'the examination.
READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS:
.1. Restroom trips are to be limited and only one applicant at a
- time may leave. You must avoid all contacts with anyone outside the examination room to avoid even the appearance or possibility of cheating.
- 2. Use black ink or dark pencil-only to facilitate legible reproductions.
- 3. Print.your name'in the blank provided in the upper right-hand-corner of the-examination cover' sheet and each answer sheet.
- 4. ' Mark your answers on the answer sheet provided. 'USE ONLY
.THE PAPER PROVIDED AND DO NOT WRITE ON THE-BACK' SIDE OF THE PAGE.
l~ 5. Before you turn in-your examination, consecutively number each answer sheet.
. = 6. Use abbreviations only if they are commonly used in facility literature. Avoid using symbols-such as < or > signs to
-avoid a simple transposition error resulting in an incorrect answer. Write it out.
l
LICENSE EXAMINATIONS ENCLOSURE 3 (Cont'd)
- 7. The point value for each question is indicated in (brackets) after the question,
- 8. Show all calculations, methods, or assumptions used to obtain an answer to any short answer questions.
- 9. Partial credit may be given. Therefore, ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE OUESTION AND DO NOT LEAVE ANY ANSWER BLANK. Partial credit will NOT be given on multiple choice questions.
- 10. Proportional grading will be applied. Any additional wrong information that is provided may count against you. For example, if a question is worth one point and asks for:four responses, each of which is work O.25 points, and you give five-responses,_each of your responses will be worth 0.20 points. .If one of your=five responses is incorrect, 0.20 will be deducted and your total credit for that questions will be 0.80.instead of 1.0; even though you got the four correct answers.
- 11. If the intent of a question is unclear, ask questions of the examiner only.
- 12. When turning in your examination, assemble the completed examination-with examination questions, examination aids and answer sheets. In addition, turn in all scrap paper.
- 13. Ensure all.information you wish to have evaluated as part of your. answer is on your answer sheet._ Scrap paper will be disposed of'immediately following the examination.
- 14. To. pass the examination, you must achieve a grade of 80% or greater.
- 15. -There is a time limit of four (4) hours for completion of the examination.
- 16. When you are done and have turned in your examination, leave the examination' area (DEFINE THE AREA). If you are-found in this area while the examination is still in progress, your license may be denied or revoked.
~ ... _ _ . _ . _ - .. -
t ENCLOSURE 4 REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITY REVIEW OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS
- 1. At the option of the Section Chief, the facility may review the written examination up to two weeks prior to its administration. This review may take place at th? facility .
or in the Regional office. The Chief Examiner will I coordinate'the details of the review with the facility. An NRC' examiner will always be present during the review.
Wnenever this option of examination revlew is utilized, the facility reviewers will sign the following statement prior to being allowed access to the examination. The examination or written notes will NOT be retained by the facility.
- a. Pre-Examination Security Agreement L
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge concerning the examination scheduled-for at as of the date of my signature below. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information concerning this examination te any unauthorized-persons. I_ Understand that I am not to participate in any instruction involving those applicants scheduled to be administered the above
. examination from.this date until after the examination
-has been administered. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may ,
result in.the examination being. cancelled and/or enforcement. action against myself or the facility licensee by whom I am employed or represent.
Signature /Date In addition, the facility staff reviewers will sign the E following statement after the written examination has been administered.
[- ,
i
[
REQUIREMENTS FOR LFACILITY REVIEW OF -WRITTEN EXAMINATION (Cont'd)
- b. Post-Examination Security Agreement I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge-any information concerning the examinations administered during the week of at to any unauthorized persons. I did not participate in providing any 2
instruction to those applicants who were administered
- the examination from the date I entered into this t
security-agreement until the completion of examination administration.
Signature /Date
- 2. Regardless of whether the above examination review option is exercised, immediately following the administration of the written examination, the facility staff shall be provided a marked-up copy of the examination and the answer key. The copy of the written examination shall include pen and ink changes made-to questions during the examination administration.
If the facility did-not review the examination prior to its administration, they will have five (5) working days from the' day of the written examination.to submit formal comments '. -If the facility reviewed the examination prior to its-administration, any additional comments must be given to an examiner pricr to his/her leaving the site at the end of the week of the~ written examination administration. In either case, the comments will be addressed to the 4
responsible Regional Office by the highect onsite level of corporate management'for plant operations, e.g., Vice Presidentffor Nuclear Operations. . A copy of the submittal will-be forwarded to the Chief Examiner, as appropriate.
Comments not submitted'within the required time frame will be considered for inclusion in the grading process on a case-by case basis by the Regional Office Section Chief.
Should the comment submittal deadline not be met, a long
-delay in grading the examinations may occur.
- 3. .The following format should be adhered to for submittal of specific' comments:
- a. Listing of NRC Question, answer and reference
- b. Facility comment / recommendation
- c. Reference (to support facility comment)
- - ~ ; , , ..w. n..v -
c , ,.----r-
. ,,,,-,,-+n- , - , , - + -v- , - c - --
4 6.
1
--REQUIREMENTS 1FOR: FACILITY-REVIEW OF-WRITTEN EXAMINATION (Cont'd)
NOTES: 1. No change to the examination will be made without submittal of a-reference to= support-thm facility comment. Any supporting documentation-that was not previously supplied, should be-provided.
- 2. Comments made without a concise facility recommendation will not be addressed.
- 4. A two-hour post examination review may be held at the x discretion-of the Chief Examiner.- If this review is Deld, the facility' staff should be informed-that only written comments that1are properly supported will be considered in the grading of the examination. ,
I
- - . - -.-- ., , , . - - . , . . ,, . . - - , - - .