ML20198B678

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Annual Certification of Generating Stations Emergency Plan.Generating Stations Emergency Plan Change Request 96-G1 Pending NRC Approval Also
ML20198B678
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1997
From: Vonk M
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML20198B684 List:
References
NUDOCS 9801070034
Download: ML20198B678 (2)


Text

Memorandum X?O6 DOCUMikT CONTROL, DESK U.S.

huCLEAR REGULATORY COMM.

WASHIhGION DC

.!0555 Date:

Dec6,nber 22,1997 To:

All GSEP Manual h Iders From:

Martin J. Vonk Emergency Pr6p'aredness Director

Subject:

Annual Certification of the Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP)

Per GSEP Section 8.5.(2), this memo certifies Revision 7K as the current approved revision to the Generating Stations Emergency Plan. The effective date of Revision 7K is January 5,1998.

An annual review of the GSEP was performed and the results are attached and on file with Emergency Preparedness. This review recommended administrative changes to be made in 1998. Also, GSEP Change Request No. 96-G1 (Central EOF) is pending NRC approval.

Please place this memo in the front of your controlled copy of the GSEP.

MJV/AP/mw Attachment

/

cc:

D. Stobaugh 3

,(

(f All Station EPCs

-/Q, -) 3 /

! /

FILE: EPG 00-P07 l

9901070034 971222 PDR ADOCK 05000010 F

png I

EPMISC/Chrorvpusztavt5

CEPIP 1000-01 Revision 5 August 21,1997 -

Attachment G P_ERIODIC REVIEW FORM PROCEDURE NUMBER:

N/A TITLE:

Generatino Stations Emeraency Plan (GSEP)

CURRENT REVISION:

Iti REVIEW ASSIGNED TO:

A. Z. Dusztal DATE DUE:

12/31/97 CHECKLIST:

YES NO 1.

Is the procedure still applica' le?

X o

2.

Is the procedure technically adequate X

3.

Are action-verbs capitalized?

N/A 4.

Do Notes and Cautions precede the steps to which they N/A apply?

5.

Are user references adequate and applicable?

X 6.

Are writer references appropriately indicated in the X

applicable procedure step?

7.

Does the procedure follow the proper procedure format?

X 8.

Are Forms, Checklists and Attachments current and legible?

N/A TYPE OF CHANGES (circle one): MAJO(@ Administrative Only)

RECOMMENDED CHANGES:

1.

Incorporate Dresden OSPs Resolution of Comments to Revision 7K (Reference Memo dated 12/4/97).

2.

Update GSEP to reflect recent reoraanization and new titles.

3.

Initiate chances for Central EOF Chance Reauest #96-G1 (pendina NRC approval),

PROCEDURE REVISION RECOMMENDEDhNO a.

If *Yes*, initiate Document Revision Form (Attachment C). (To be revised in ist Quarter 1998),

b.

If "No', forward to the appropriate EP Director for approval, Forward to the Procp oordinator.

c.

REVIEWER: das7,

, anD /

/ L/4 2/F >

f7MVW

/

A, y,

,2

,h2,/5 5 EP DIRECTOR:

EPMISC/Chron/punztavi6