ML20197G413

Summarizes Author 860514 Response to M Dardis 860507 Telcon Request for Meeting W/Commissioner Asselstine Re De Facto Absence of Evacuation Plan for Plant.Request Declined Due to Ongoing Proceeding.Served on 860514

ML20197G413
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	05/14/1986
From:	Davis P NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#286-137 OL, NUDOCS 8605160205
Download: ML20197G413 (2)

Text

"

ereeg u:;:r:C ME f s. .

f 7 NUCM,\R REGULAT OP.Y cot.W.!SC:ON 8v'

• 7, WASWNGTON. D. C. 20555

{ E

\...../ 9 ' :-

May 14, 1986 f h,h

- . j. -N '

I ,

c ,

1. ' U%. k8Ta2.36~3 M47 i !ggy f

\ ..j Files

,s j' InDBANDlN 'IO:

Patricia Davis s y! -*

FI O 1:

Iegal Assistant C,[F 3 "4,1/g % % %

Office of Camissioner Asselstine SUBIECT- CDINERSATION WI'III MS. MARGAIET DARDIS ABOUT DERGENCY PIANNING EDR LIMERICK On May 7,1986 Camissioner Asselstine's office received a call fran Ms.

Margaret Dardis who identified herself as a menber of a citizens group in Bucks County, Pa. Ms. Dardis told Ms. Diane Johnson that she and other nenbers of the group would like to meet with Cmmissioner Asselstine on the 21st, 22nd or 23d of May. She said that they wanted to discuss the de facto absence of an evacuation plan for the Limerick plant and interim protection for citizens pending establishment of a plan.

On May 14,1986, I returned Ms. Dardis' call. I told her that, because mergency planning is still pending before the Camission, Camissioner Asselstine thought it would be better if he did not meet with her group at this time. The Camissioner would be happy to receive whatever concerns they had in writing and to serve those on the parties to the Linerick proceeding.

Ms. Dardis expressed concerns about the adequacy of the Limerick Ms.

emergency plan, especially in light of what is happening abroad.

Dardis said that major flaws have becme evident in the plan since the close of the licensing board hearings, and that evidence of flaws had been excluded frcm the hearings. She She saidsaid that that it would not be possible she and her group to evacuate in case of an emergency. l wanted to discuss these issues, as well as nore general emergency l planning issues, with the Cmmissioner. She expressed concern about J waiting until the licensing proceeding was emplete to talk to the  !

Ccmissioner because the plan is inadequate to protect people in the i interim. i l

I told Ms. Dardis that the difficulty was'that if Cmmissioner l Asselstine discussed contested issues with them there was a possibility that he might have to recuse himself frcm participation in the proceeding. Ms. Dardis again expressed concern about protecting the public in the interim. I told her that if her group was a party to the 8605160205 860514 PDR ADOCK 05000352 G PDR Dsoz