ML20197F510
| ML20197F510 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/01/1988 |
| From: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Keel B INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197F515 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8806140008 | |
| Download: ML20197F510 (17) | |
Text
,
5 01 198g Dr. Bennie C. Keel Departmental Consulting Archeologist U.S. Department o) the Interior National Park Service Post Office Box 37127 Washington, D.C.
20013-7127
Dear Dr. Keel:
This is in response to your March 17, 1988 request to the U.S. Nuclear Regula-tory Commission (NRC) for information needed to prepare the Annual Report to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program for Fiscal Year 1987.
The enclosed questionnaire has been completed with appropriate information pertaining to licensees authorized by the NRC to operate nuclear power plants.
The NRC does not require, maintain or restore any archeological or historic properties identified during the environmental review process. When NRC deter-mines that mitigative measures are required to protect such properties, the licensees are required to take appropriate actions.
These mitigative measures are formalized as a condition of the Appendix B (Environmental Protection Plan) attached to the licenses authorizing operation of nuclear power plants.
As a permitting Agency, the NRC does not incur any direct costs associated with pro-tection or enhancement of archeological and historic resources.
Sincerely, Original signed by James H. Sniezek Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Completed Questionnaire DISTRIBUTION:
I CentralFiles(w/ incoming)
PTSB e
PMAS Reading File k GJ
}*
ED0(2)
[.
c ~' A
-/"')fS 7g' /h.f/zcpy T.E. Murley
,^e J.H. Sniezek C.0. Thomas F
H.I. Smith f/
D.F.Mossburg(ED03604) d ' 6 'jO M.C. Bridgers (ED0 3604) 8806140000 880601 h,s SECY (CR-88-0281)
PDR ORG NRRD 5
,g 5% a%
,500 i' 0(i d I 1
0FC :P S PNRR
- PTSB:NRR
- D: PEAS: RR : MI
..d______:PJSBRg
......./.
- ....b......:..,/ _ p :.. s.:FP( le pie:
MtleMhfnas
' ley NAME :
Smith
- ELkD
.....:....____..__:___p....____:.______.....:...
.DATE :5/ [d88:bjd :5/X/88 2
SRM88
- S
/88
- 5/3 1/88 0FflCIAL RECORD COPY J J I
~
~
~
~
1 Department / Agency H A Nor Dat e Submitted June 1988 Contact Person wm1 %ns Phone ( M1 ) 492 1797 Date Received Anril loop Annual Report to Confess by the Secretary of the Intericr on the Fe&rtJ Archeology Progam for Fiscal Year 1987 A ntrnber of statutes, such as the tJationa! Historic Preservation Act, give the Secretary of the Interior responsibility to guide and coordnate Federal Nstoric preservation a ctivi ti es.
TNs is especially so regardng the Federal Archeology Program. The Secretary is required by Section 3(c) of the Archeological Recovery Act 16 US C 469-469c and Section 13 of the Archeological Resotrees Protection Aet (A RPA) 16 USC 470aa-ji, to report to Congress various activities of the Federal Archeology Program.
TNs questionnaire is designed to provide data for the Serretary's report. Under the
?Jational Historic Preservation Act 16 USC 470, as amended, Federal agencies have the general responsibility to cooperate with the Secretary by providng information concerning archeological activities as well as other Nstoric geservation activities. To some extent the questions here may also be relevant to wider preservation issues. The j
topics covered by the gestionnaire and the specific cpestions have been developed with 1
cornments by archeologists and Nstoric preservation officers throughout the Federal government. The format and cpestions below have been modfied based upon analpis of the FY 1986 questionnaire with the Intent of maldng the questionnaire easier to mderstand, complete, and data more comparable.
Unless otherwise stated, each question ref ers to activities in FY 1987.
A. Permitting, TNs section alms to stanmarize the amotrit of archeological activity undertaken using various legal authorities.
Ntmbe r 1.
Total nunber of permits issued or in effect during FY 1987 f or archeological activl ties, including i
active mul tiple authority permi ts issued during previous fiscal years (fGE: thi s val ue sho ul d be t he s un of 1. a. -l. c. )
NA
- a. titrnberlasued mder ARPA (f4OTE: Andudemdtiple authority permits) m
- b. titrnber issued mder the Antipities Act n
(tiOTE: Inelude mdtipie authority permits)
Not Applicable (NA) i 4
.- -.. - - -. -..- -.. x --
2 A. Permitting (continued)
Ntm ber
- c. Ntmber issued mder agency policy,procedtre, or guideline (e.g., special tse permit)
Na 2.
Ntmber and percentage of permittees field-checked
(
)na 3.
Ntmber of permits issued f or investigations related to compliance activities NA 4
Ntmber of permitsissued forinvestigations not related to compliance activities (research f or scientific or scholarly purposes) en 5.
Total ntmber of investigations begun or mderway dtring FY 1987 for which no permits were issued, but which ccrnp!!ed with condtions and standards recpired by ARPA (NOTE: this value stould be the stm of 5.a. pits 5 b.)
yA
- a. Ntmber of suchinvestigations conducted by agency personnel NA
- b. Ntrnber of suchinvestigations conducted by contractors NA 6.
Ntmber of permit applicattors received (all types)
NA 7.
Ntsnber of permit applications denied (all types)
NA 8.
Ntmber of permits suspended (all types)
NA 9.
Ntrnber of appeals of denial er stspension NA
- 10. Ntmber cd notificatiors toindan tribes of an application for a permit mder ARPA that may possibly harm er destroy sites having religious or cuittral importance f cr the tribes i
(as required by Sec. 7 of the Final ARPA Uniform i
regulations, based onSee. 4(c)of the Act)
None
- 11. Ntrnber of notificatters tolndan tribes of an archeological investiption by apncy personnel cr a cmntraetor being donein conformance with ARPA
{
recpiremerits, but without a permit, that might J
possibly harm cr destroy sites having rellglots or culttral importance fcr the tribes None
- ~
~
3 A. Permitting (continue d)
Caveats concerning permitting data B. Erdecement TNs section aims to strnmarize the am otnt of destruction of archeological properties due to vandalisn and looting that is detected, and the extent to which vandals and others are being apprehended and successf ully trosecuted f or their activities, Ntrn ber 1.
Ntrnber of &ctrnented vidatiors of ARPA, the Antiquities Act,cr other statutes protecting archedogical properties reportedduring FY 1987 on land administered or owned by yotr agency NA (As definedin Sec. 6 of ARPA, a vidationis any excavation, removal, &masp to, alteration, w defacement of an archedogical property on Federal Iand without a permitissued or an exemption ilstedinSec. 4 of ARPA. Exarnples of vidatiers are f resh holes duginto a site or veNde tracks.
2.
Ntrnber of arrests madein cases of cbctrnented vandalism cr looting NA 3.
Nttnber d dtationsissuedin cases of documented vandalism or looting NA 4.
Ntrnber of prosecutionsin cases of doetrnented vandalism er 1ooting nA 5.
Ntrnber of convictiors under ARFA duringFY 1987 (NOTE: this ntrnber should be the stm of 5.a.
pits 5.b. convictions may be the restit of arrests and dtations in previots iiscal pars.)
+
T
N B. Enfermment (continued) 1, Ntm ber
- a. tJtmber of misdemeanors
..n b tJtrnber of felonies ein
- c. tJtmber of second offenses included in 5.a. or 5.b.
. _. a 6.
tJim';e of cases of vandalism, destruction, thef t, etc.
of accheologital property that were Frosecuted using an authority other than ARPA
_._i n 7.
Amomt of money that was collectedin criminal fines
$ 9a 8.
Ntrnber of civu penalties applied (as permitted by Sec. 7 of ARP A or other authorities)
_ nn 9.
Amomt of money that was collectedin civil penalties
$ na
- 10. Costs for restoring or repairing archeological properties in cases in which civD penalties have been assessed for violations of ARPA or other authorities
$ ya i
- 11. Amount of money givenin rewards (as permitted by Sec. 8 of ARPA)
$ ea
- 12. Cornmerdal value of artifacts seized and retained by the government
$ na
- 13. Commerdal value of other personal property seized and retained by the goverrment
$ NA
- 14. Cost to yotr agency of 1aw enforcement ior erdieological resotrce pretect!on
$ nA
- 15. Percentage of the overall cost of law enforcement within )otr agency assodated directly with ARP A or the Antigalties Act NA 96
-Caveats concerningenforcement data 2
6 T
3 C. Agency I%rsonnel Education This section aims to collect inf ormation on the extent to which agencies are making their personnel, especially law enf orcement personnel, aware of ARPA and able to enf orce it ef f ectively and ef fid ently.
1.
Number and percentage (precent of personnel catagory)of agency personnel who have received ARPA enf orcernent training during the fiscal yean NA Law C ultw al E nf or ce.
R esotr ce Personnel Personnel Others
- a. FLETC or other comparable 40-hotr course
(
)
(
)
( No )
- h. other course cr portion (8-16 hotrs)
(
)
(
)
( NA )
Ntm ber i
2.
Ntrnber of Law enf orcem ent personnel on staff +
NA 3.
Ntmber of ctitural resotrce personnel on staff *
(non-ar cheof ogists)
NA 4.
Ntrnber of archeologists (GS/GM 0193) on staff +
0 e
i
+1ndude both part-time ed f ull-time employees Canats concerning agency education data s
1
~
5
6 5
D. Identification aid Evaltation Invesiptf ors TNs section aims to provide sta for the estimation of the level of effort put into identification and evaluation archedogical investigatiors by agency personnel or contractors working fer agencies.
Mmbe r
- 1..Hcwmany licensee undertakings included documented 1 I ter at ur e or map r es ear ch of ar cheol ogi ca l
)
properties in the project area (&ctmented res earch i s meant t o be res ear ch that resulted in a, letter to the files, a report, or another ' type of wri tten prodtet to cbesment
- 11. res ul ts )
2*
1
- a. Howmany 1.icensee FTE and how many dollars f or personnel servims were tsed f or these kind af activities Gn parentheses, give total salaryand benefits cost of FTE taed)
(NOTE:The costslistedin 1.ael.d.
shodd be muttally exclusive)
ND
($ ND
)
j l
- b. How muchin support casts was expended in conducting these activities with apncy personnel ND
- c. How much was expended by yotr apncyin contracting f cr these Idn&
of activitie ND
- d. Howmuch was expended byland use applicantsin
~
-contracting for theseldnd of activitis ND j
2.
Howmanyagency sndettaldngsindudedfieldstude to
-identifyand evaltate ncheological popertle NA
- a. Howmanylicensee FTE.and how many dollars for personnel services were tsed for these Mnd of activities On parenthmes, )
give tt'tal salaryand benefit cost of FTE taed (NOTE:The amounts 11stedin 2.ac2.d.
shodd be mtatally excitalve)
ND
($ ND
)
- b. Howmuchinsupport cests was expended in conducting thase activitim with apncy personnel ND
- c. How much was espanded by yotr agencyin contractingier thase Mn(s of activitia L ND
- d. Howmuch was expanded byland use applicants l
An contractingier thess idn& ci activitim ND No Data (ND) 9 Y
7 I
(
D. I&ntification ed Evaltation investiptions (continued) l Ntmber f
3.
Hou many a cr es wer e i ns pe cte d by t ir s e i &n t i f i ca t i on an d e va l ta t i on i nves ti pti ons 7nnn l
4.
How many neu archeological sites l
wer e1&ntified dtring F Y 1987 0
l 5.
How many sites were determined eligible l
by the Keeper of the National Register or consi dere d eligible through a gr eern ent between the agency and the appropriate SHPO dtring F Y 1987 n*a (NOTE: Itis recogrized that scrne sites may have been 1&ntified dtring Fevicts fiscal years.)
Caveats concerningl&ntification and evaltation &ta I
- Callaway Plant and Diablo Canyon
- The Keeper of the National Register has been requested to assist the NRC in I
resolving issues concerning potentially eligible sites in conjunction with the Callaway Plant.
l f
I 1
i e
I i
l f
4 o
8 E. D ata R ecavery This section aims to provide chta f or the estimation of the level of effort being
& voted to data recovery projects and the kinch of research topics beinginvestigated by these proj ects.
Ntmber 1.
Howmany licensees undertakings; begun or underway i n FY 1987 i nel (de d a r cheol ogi ca l ch t a recovery projects? Data recovery projects are meant t o be i nves ti gati ons desi gned t o mi ti gat e an adverse impact or to achieve a determination of "ro advers e" ef f ect (NNE: The tot al in 1.
u stould be the strn of the numbers of projects listed in 1.e.-l.g.)
- a. How many 1.icer)see FTE and how many dollars f or personnel services were used for these kinds of activitie's? On parentheses, give the tetal salary and benefits cest of FTE taed)
(N OTE : The ces ts liste d in 1.ac1.d.
should be muttally excitsive.)
($ g
)
- b. How muchin support cests was expended in condteting these activities with -licensee-personnel
$ nn
- c. How m uch was e xpended by yotr licensee in contracting for tnese activities
$ nn
- d. How much was expended by land tse applicants in contracting f cr these activities
$ nn
- e. How many data recovery projects were condteted solely by licensee personnel Nn
- f. How many data recovery projects were f mded solely by the.th:ensee throttgh: contract Nn
- g. How many data recovery prejeets were imded solely by Iand use applicants Nn
- h. How many data recovery prcieets were imded by any combination of 1.e.,1.L, or 1.g.
nn 4
1 x.
9 E. Data Remvery kontinued) 2.
The types of research q;estions investigated through data recovery projeets is an 1
ind cation of the iniormation that is considered important and can be derived irom archeological data. With this q;estion we are trying to identiiy the majer research topics beinginvestigated through deta recovery projects. The ilst of topics belowis admittedy crtde; we expect to refine it, but want to tse it to begin to identif y the major topics being emphasizedin inyestigatiors at the present. Record the ntmber of chta recovery projects that incitded major empiasis on a topic. Projects may haveinduded major emphasis on more than one topic.
N tm ber
- a. E conom y 0
- h. Site / Settlement a
- c. Cd ttral adaptation o
- d. Paleodemograp1y o
- e. Cdttral processes 0
i Social or5anization 0
4
- g. Cd ttral chronology o
- h. Technology 0
~
L Trade / Exchange 0
}. Rittal/ Ceremonial 0
- k. A rchitect tr e 0
L Cdttral ecology 0
rn. Significance / Management 0
- n. Paleo-erivirormmtal research O
Caveats concerning data recover y data
- Diablo Canyon plant has data recovery activity in process during Fiscal Year 1987.
This will entail closing the underwater holding pond as required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
+
1
,_-__.x__.______..
l 10 T. Unantidpated Discoveries
~
This section aims to provi& &taIcr estimation of the cxtent to which archeological properties are dscovered during the implemer'tation of an agency indertaking subsegaent to completion of the Sec. W6 review and compliance process.
_fJimbe r 1.
Su bs e c'Jent t o Se c. 106 conpli ance, how many licenMa u. der taki ngs resulted in 2he ci scovery o! tnanti ci pated ar cheological resources during.
FY 1987 0
- a. In how many of theselrstances were the resotrces judgedimportant enough f or data collection to be conducted or ded.gn changes made to avoid them 0
- b. H ow m any agency FTE 1md how many dollars f er personnel services were tsed for this kind of activity On parentheses, give the total costs f cr FTE tsed)
(f40TE: The amountslistedin Lbete.
sholid be muttally excitsive.)
0 ($0
)
- c. How much add tional costs were expended in condteting this activity with agency personnej
$0
- d. H ow m uch was e xpen de d by yotr agency in ontracting f or this activity
$0
- e. How m uch was expended by land tse applicants in contracting ier this activity
$0 Caveats concerningsmantidpated dscoveries data
11 G. E stimating the A rcheolop cal R esotr ce Bas e This is a totally new section. It aims to provich baseline inf ormation about the of archedogical resotrees within the lands contrdled by Federal agendes e xt ent and the QJality of otr Idowledge about them. it is recognized that the questions belcw call Icr estim ates. We as k a genc y s pe d alis ts t o ma ke t he best es tim at es possible ttrougn FY 1987 and write any caveats concerning them in the spce provided ier narrative at the bottcrn of this page.
? Arnbe r 1.
Tota! actes cent rolIed by the licensees 25.000 2.
Amount and percentage of total acres inves ti gat ed s uf fid entl y t o i chntif y:
(NOTE: 2.ac2.d. shod d strn to 100%)
a.100% of the archeological p'oprties
(
25,000
)
100 %
- b. More than 50% of the archedogical properties
(
_ )
0%
- c. Less than 50% of the archedogical 0
proprties
(
)
- d. Amount and percentage of land not inves tigat ed
(
)
0%
3.
Total ntrnber of known archedogical properties on land controlled by the licensees
- 486
- a. Ntrnber and percentage of the total listed on the NRHP
(
)
.01 %
~
(NOTE: Aa.-le, shodd strn to 100%)
- b. Ntsnber and percentage of the tetal determined eligible ior the NRHP by the Keeper er consldered eligtb!e ttrough doetrn ented cansdtation with the S HPO
(
29
)
.06 % **
r:, Ntrnber and percentage of tatal ade gaately evaltated, but not listed, censidered, or iormally determined eligible 0.e., fitting neither is. ror ab.)
(
135
)
30 %
- d. Ntrnber and percentage of the total determinedineligible icr the NRHP by the Keeper or through setrnented corsdtation with the SHPO
(
0
)
0%
a.
12 G. Estimating the Archeological Resowcm Bas- (continued) ta urn ber
- e. t4 umber and percentage of the total not evaluat ed
(
315
)
63 %
Caveats concening archeological resource base data See page 12a.
H. Narrative Questions (update F Y 1986 dsta or provide new data)
This section contains questions that cannot be answered with a number, dollar figwe, or percentage. These questions require narrative answers; they relate to several of the sections for which quantitative questions have been listed. The answers that are provided will be used as a means of sharing information among agencies about the methods, techniques, sof tware, etc. that are in use and those that have been particularly successf ul. Please type response.
t I
1.
Please describe any computerized systems that yow age::cy is using to recerd and monitor A RPA, Antiquities A ct, andor other pecmits for archeological Investigations. If this systern is part of a larger system, please note and summarize the other kinds of information included on the system, riote the kind of hardware and sof tware usedior any systems that are mentioned.
2.
Please describe any training courses that you use for ARPA training or general training in archeology for cultwal resowce specialists or program or land mana gers. We are familiar with the Fl.ETC courte on ARPA enforcement, the similar cowse that was offered by the Air Force, and the ACHP's cowse on Sec.106 procedwes; however, we would like to receive information about other courses. In addtion, feel free to offer opinions concerning what training would be usef ul. Be as specific as possible.
3.
Please describe effective cooperative projects, methods, ander technicpes that yow agency has toed toimprove ARPA enforcement. Examples might include the ute of remote sensing equipment for monitoring site locatiors or interagency cooperative agreements for combined swveillance of adjacent land units and conewrent jwisdction of law enforcemait personnel.
+
1
.--.-.--------J
12a Caveats concerning archeological resource base data The acreage reflected in this questionnaire response involve plants that have cultural resources requirements stated in the Appendix B (Environmental Protection Plan) for licenses authorizing the operation of the following plants: Millstone 3, San Onofre 2/3, Vogtle, Hope Creek, Susquehanna, Diablo Canyon, Bra'dwood, Palo Verde, Callaway and Waterford.
- 0ne cultural property consisting of a 1-mile transmission right-of-way (Vogtle).
- In regard to the Callaway Plant, there are about 25 sites (19%)
potentially eligible.
Reconmendations presented in the licensee's Management Plan are to carry out Phase II testing as an aid to determine eligibility when and if the archeological sites are threatened with adverse impacts.
No formal documented agreement has been received from the SHP0.
i O
O
~
13 H.Narratlye Questiors (continued) 4 Please cies cibe particularly effective, ef fici ent, or innovative m ethods and techniques that yotr agency has used toimprove archeological resowce preservation t hat are not related to ARP A enf orcement d rectly.
Examples might include fencing, stabilization, patrols, interpretation, and para-prof essional training. !! such program s and projects Mve already been stanmarized for the Ardieological Assistance Divisiorts Public Awareness clearing' nose, simply make note of this af ter the program /prejeet ca.ne.
5.
Please descibe any systems that yow,agen cy has developed for sharing archeological information with other agencies, SHPOs, and other archeological groups or speciallsts, f.
Please deselbe any system your agency has develcped for coordnating ARP A permits with Section 106 ccrnpliance and SHDO strveys and planning.
7.
Describe commtnication, cooperation, and exchange between private indvidtals having collections cf archeological resotrees and data (obtained beiare enactment of ARP A), prof essional archeologists, and associations of prof essional arche < 'o*;ists 8.
Ccrnments ior imp oving the ques:ionnaire ior FY 1988.
- 1. Departmmt/ Agency Hl$11$ts This sectionis designed to provide an opportmityior Departments and Agencies to highlight activities assodted with the Federal Areneology Program. Resporses will be includedin the annual report to Congresa.
NOTE:,Please typc on a separate sheet of 81/2 x 11 paper. Margins.
3, _i.?
,, ~
.r'
.7 should be 1 inch (top, bottorn, lef t and right). The Departments or Agendes name, f allowed by F Y 1987, should appear in the upper lef t 1
hand corner of the first page. Text shouldnot exceed two (2) single spaced typed pages and should be similar in type to this questionnaire. Highlights will be copiedas povidedandincludedas part of the annual report to Congress.
.1 k
-__..m. - -,,, * -
a-*--* - " - ' ~ " " '
- ' ' ~ " * *
~
l
?
[
j 6/e%
'o UNITED STATES
~,,
M
. [
c NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/,
- gg & ', y
(;
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\,
/
- c46 b5 l
c EDO PR7NCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL C
y.-
FROM:
DUE: 06/03/88 EDO CONTROL:
036 DOC DT: 03/' /8d DR. BENNIE C. KEEL FINAL REPLY:
U.S.
DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR HAIRMAN ZECH D
FOR SIGNATURE OF:
GREEN SECY NO: 88-281 MURLEY DESC:
RQUTINC):
[
j itEQUEST COMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE SECRETARY'S ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY PROGRAM LATCt 03/31/88 ASSIGNED TO: NRR CONTACT: MURLEY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
'( Q' '{3{6"JNE)
~'L 8
e* M e NRR RECEIVED: MARCH 31, 1988 ggp-A-
.msme,mysmT-s>
naa ROu m a:
MuRteusem o.
W h
MIRAGLIA MARTIN ACTION mssstro DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFIC BY A < '31> O --
I
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-88-0281 LOGGII!G DATE: Mar 29 88 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO AUTHOR:
B.C.
Keel AFFILIATION:
DOI (DEPT OF INTERIOR)
LETTER DATE:
Mar 17 89 FILE CODE: O&M-12 DOI
SUBJECT:
Questionnaire for the Secretary's Annual Report to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program ACTION:
Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:
SPECIAL HANDLING: None NOTES:
Note questionaire completion deadline DATE DUE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
Rec'd 6K (M Date -- J -4 0 - E'T Time-t:1 rp
.]
ECO---003004
.