ML20197E207
| ML20197E207 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/24/1988 |
| From: | Cho J NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | Romano F AIR AND WATER POLLUTION PATROL |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197E212 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#288-6441 OLA, NUDOCS 8806080125 | |
| Download: ML20197E207 (2) | |
Text
1 YYi E(,'..,jo UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL COCKEIE0 WASHING TON, D.C. 20555 UbNHC May 24, 1988 24 f 2 28 0FF ICE Li '.u 4 tM '
00CHElmG t. SDWICI.
BRANCei Frank R.
Romano, Chairman AIR & WATER POLLUTION PATROL g{gyED MAY 241988 11 S.
Ridge Ave.
Ambler, Pa.
19002 In the Matter of Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-352-OLA (TS Iodine)
Dear Mr. Romano:
At the direction of the Appeal Panel Chairman, I am returning, undocketed, for failure to comply with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.701, your letter entitled "AIR &
WATER POLLUTION PATROL NOTICE OF APPEAL TO MEMORANDUM AND ORDER" of May 5, 1988.
Under that section, all documents offered for filing by mail must, among other requirements, be served upon the Secretary of the Commission as well as upon all parties to the proceeding.
In addition, the filing must b accompanied by proof of service.
Contrary to these requirements, there was no proof of service with your letter indicating any service made.
In this connection, your letter is dated May 12.
We note, however, that the envelope in which it was sent carries a postmark of May 19.
Thus, your letter conveys an erroneous impression of its filing date.
If you continue to desire to appeal the May 5 decision, I suggest that you refile your notice of appeal in compliance with section 2.701 together with a motion for leave to file out of time.
Of course, I cannot guarantee favorable action on such a motion.
We appreciate the fact that you are a non-lawyer.
However, as a long-time party to this proceeding, you should be aware of the repeated admonitions given by the Appeal 8806080125 880524 gDR ADOCK 05000:52 PDR 7/
34
Frank R.
Romano May 24, 1988 l
Board of its expectation that non-lawyers as well as lawyers will comply with the Rules of Practice.
- See, e.g.,
ALAB-778, 20 NRC 42, 46 n.4 (1984); ALAB-835, 23 NRC 267, 270 n.5 (1986).
Sincerely, (O
John Cho, Counsel Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel cc:
Dccketing & Service Branch I
l f
____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _.. _