ML20197D255
| ML20197D255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1997 |
| From: | Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 9583-100, NUDOCS 9712290016 | |
| Download: ML20197D255 (22) | |
Text
.
./
a hR Sar ger%%[ Lundy"*
- q
~ Don K. Schopter.
- Vee Presdent
$1M69 6078 December 23,1997-Project No. 9583-100 Docket No. 50 423 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Independent Corredive Action Verification Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Donument Control Desk
. Washington, D. C. 20555 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has requested that Sargent & Lundy (S&L) prepare and subm4 on the docket a report on the status and expeded completion of the Millstone Unit 3 ICAVP every two weeks. This is the fourth such report and covers the period ending 12/12/97.
STATUS The slides normally used during the monthly ICAVP status.nectings hav6 been updated to provide the status through 12/12/97 and are enclosed. A summary of that information is highli0hted below-.
Ilar_1 The System Review Group (SRG) has essentially completed their review of the service water (SWP) and the containmen; t, pray sysf. ems (QSS/RSS), with the exception of two modifications.
SRG work is progressing for the othe.r system groupings, HVX and DGX, and is approximately 95% complete for each system. Similarly, the Confi0uration Review Group (CRG) has completed the walkdowns of the SWP and OSS/RSS systems. CRG activities are approximately 68% and 97% complete for the HVX and DGX system grupings respectively.
- Operations & !Aalntenance and Testing Review Group (OR3) is also essentially complete with the SWP and QSS/RSS systems, w'th the exception of the modif!!ations. ORG !s approximately 180% and 85% complete with the HVX and DGX systom Groupin0s, respectively.
D(
(
D 9712290016 971223 qt PDR ADOCK 050004 3 Ij j
p 55 East Monroe Street
- Chicago, IL 60603-5780 USA
- 312-269-2000
a-y n
o
- Unted States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
. December 23,1997i Dnoumont Control Desk Projed No. 9583100 Pa0e 2 The additional scope identifled during the Unt 3 Special Topics meeting held on 10/22/97 and -.
the fulicwup aceting held on 11/20/97 is in proom and is expected to be completed by 1/15/96.
- A summary of the addnional soops associated is as follows
136 -
Cal:ulations not previously reviewed (82 of which are pipe support calculations) 72-
- Revised calculations which we's previously reviewed (15 pipe supports) 5-New SQ reports 117-.
New DCNs Programmatic Review Group (PRG) activities for Tier 1 include the corredive action document
! reviews and the review of thc Desi0n Deficiency Reports (DDRs). The corrective action document review is approximately 97% complete; however two significant issues and their associated activities must be completed. As praviously discussed with NU and the NRC staff, there still remain CA documerts for which NU has not completed their processing and closure.
- S&L will perform these CA reviews as soon as NU provides the documentation for resolution of these items, The other issue involves the NRC's request for S&L to review the implementaticn activities for contain types of the Tier 1 corredive adions, such as calculations, evaluations, 3
mod!ficatiew, and other similar engineering functions. C&L has developed.a criteria for selecting the appropriate corredive action documeids for implementation review and has screened the more then 1500 Tier 1 CA documents and soleded approximately 225 for more deteileo review. NU is in the process of pmvidin0 the approximately 250 closura packa0es requested for those CA documents. The DDR review is complete with the exception of one DDR for which an RFI is outstanding.
IltL2 Discovery for the Tier 2 review being performed by the S&L Accident Review Group (ARG) is complete. S&L issued 46 Discrepancy reports during this review. NU has responded to 37 of them and 25 are considered t.losed.
TM.h The Tier 3 review being performed by the S&L Programmatic Review Group (PRG) is also essentially complete. The review of the current change processes, the review of past changes, and the review of NU's implerr.cntation of their cunent change processes are complete. The
- review of the NRC sample of conective sction documents is complete with the exception of the final OIR and UIP resolution packa0es, five of which were received from NU on 12/22/97.' These five CA Items win be completed by 12/31/97. Two OIRs (101 and 102) have not been provided by NU.
Discrenancy Reoorts The last ttttee slides fiorr, the enclosed status summary provide details on the preliminary DRs,
}
- the NU piovided resolutions, and the S&L review of those resolutions.
+
E'-
f
t Unwed States Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 23,1997 Document Control Desk.
Project No. 9583100 Page 3
SUMMARY
MtLESTONE SCHEDULE Tier 1 System Review Comniete 12/31/97 e
RSS ModNications and SWP / MOV Calcs 1/15/98 e Tier 2 Review Complete Tier 3 Review Complete 12/15/97 e
Final Report issue' 2/01/98 e
- Dependin0 on DR resolution time Please direct any questions to me.
Youm very truly,
& !k Don K. Schopfer Vice President and ICAVP Manager DKS:spr Copies:
E. V. Imbro (1/4) Deputy Direc'or, ICAVP Oversi0ht T, Concannon (1/2) Nuclear Energ Advisory Council J. Fougere (1/3) NU m:veaponwww1m.a. doc
l MILLSTONE UNIT 3 1
INDEPENDENT CORRECTIVE 1
ACTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM STATUS REPORT e
DECEMBER 12,1997 1
gf lp es-ry-isim Lamdy -
4 Project Milestone Schedule Tier 1 System Review 12/31/97 RSS Modifications & SWP/MOV Calcs 1/15/98 Tier 2 Review Complete Tier 3 Review 12/15/97 Final Report Issue
- 2/01/98 1
- Depends on DR resolution time 1
i
i Tier 1 Schedule Activity Scheduled Completion System Reviews 12/19/97*
New Mod Scope 1/15/98 System / Mod Walkdowns 12/15/97 O&M and Testing Reviews 12/31/97 Corrective Action Reviews 12/15/97**
1
- Assumes NRC acceptance of MOV sampling plan
- Corrective Action implementation review not included t.. -,,.--.. _. _.
k,
~
i Tier 1 - System Review Status 1
1 SWP QSS/RSS l
Pop.
Comp Pop.
Comp _
System Boundary Definition N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
1 Document Gathering (RFis)
N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
~
7A
~iOO 5
~
~
Screen NU CMP Firidings N
N/A 100 %-
[
Identify System Require. ~
6
~
)
~
5~5 ~~iUUVo i455-100 %
Calculation Reviews 457 100 %
448 100 %
~Uomporient5eviews
~
~
1543 160 %
1681 100 %
Drawing Reviews
~
~
1UUVo 56i~
100 %
173 Topical Reviews 2
88 %
0 N/A-. -. _
Disposition System Require.
653 99 %
1485 99 %
M L...
j "d Reviews 71 97Fo 7
j
-- y.-
ans.
Tier 1 - System Review Status i
I HVX DGX Total Total Pop.
Comp Pop.
. Comp _
System Boundary Definition N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
Document Gathering (RFis)
N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
~ /A ~
~
~
~
N 100 %
N/A 100 %
l Screen NU CMP Findings Identify System Require.
485 100 %
611 i 100 %
~
Calculation Reviews 365 95 %
375 93 %
~
1093 91 %
1376 90 %
Component Reviews Drawing Reviews 267 1dO% l 269 I 93 I~
~
~
~
~
Topical Reviews 3
SUol 2
0%
Disposition System Require.
485 53%
611 70%
j;_.
...... l23 Reviews 64 %
47
Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Status SWP QSS/RSS
_ _. _.. Pgp,_ Cpmp Pop.
Comp _
Scope Walkdown Boundary 1726 i 100 %
1497 100 %
Dwgs Redline Walkdown Dwgs 603 i100%
414 100 %
Physicail5wg Review vs.
731 100 %
734 100 %
Upper Tier Dwgs Functional Walkdowns l 1148 ~ 100 %
857
' 100 %
(No. of Dwgs)
Modification Walkdowns 48 100 % ~
6 100 %
(No. of Mods).
i
.f JR)y
~9 "'~~ ~
Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Status HVX DGX Total !
' Total Pop.__CompiComp, Comp Scope Walkdown Boundary 1825 100 % ~
868
! 98 %_
Dwgs t
Redline.Walkdown Dwgs 121 84%
79 i
87 %
Physical Dwg Review vs.
417 100 %
306
'100 %
. Upper Tier Dwgs
_ _L a
Functional Walkdowns I
543 94 %
655 76 %
-(No.:of D~wgs)
. }..
Modification Walkdowns 14 86 %
i 35
' 85%
_(No. of Mods)
_ _n _
)
Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status SWP QSS!RSS
_ + _
Pop.
Comp Pop.
Comp _
System Boundary Definition N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
~,
Document Gathering (RFis)
N/A 100%
N/A 100 %
Screen NU CMP Findings N/A 100 %
N/A 100 %
Identify System Require.
102 100 %.
175 100 %
OPS /Maint/ Testing / Training
- 294 98%
435 98%
Procedure Reviews
~
Disposition 5ystemiequire.
102 98%
175 98%
f60%
Mod Fieviews
~~
33 3
80 %
- OPS and Maint. Training reviews conducted on Wave 1 & 2 Systems i
i t
Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status.
HVX DGX
...._....._.....4.
Total Total
_.J Pop..
Comp _, Pop._ _. Comp _
System Boundary Definition N/A 100 % ~
N/A 100 %
Document Gathering (RFis)
N/A 85%
N/
85 %
~
~ ~/d-100 %
NA
'100 %
~ ~~
Screen NU CMP Findings N
Identify System Require.
79~
~ ~
5
~
~
95 /o 140 100 %
-.. J; 9
t OPS /Maint/ Testing / Training 117 60%
398 91 %
Prc dure Reviews Disposition System Require.
79 -
73 %
131 78%
l Mod Reviews 26 15%
58 10%
4 I
I
i I
Tier 1 - Programmatic Review Status
~
Corrective Action Reviews UIRs ACR/CRs o
_. Pop.
Comp _ Pop.
Comp SWP 210 96 %
254 i 98 % _
l QSS/RSS 286
~
98 %
116 95 %
.. ~. _..... _..
t DGX 340
' 97%
238 99 %
r TOTALS 861 97 %
673
~
98 %
i 1
)
.l i =-
-I o
l
Tier.1 - Programmatic Review Status l
l Corrective Action Implementation Review-1534 CA documents were screened to determine-which ones would be reviewed for implementation 225 were selected I
NU has provided 80 closure ~ packages j
S&Lreview is in. process i
1 h
I i
I
.:,q' M "'
{
q i
Tier 1 - Programmatic Review Status DDR Reviews
- 35 DDRs selected for detailed review
- All reviews complete d
del
?
\\
O <
Tier 2 - Schedule Tier 2 is complete.
i l
i
Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status q
- Additional Corrective Action items for Review.
i 71 Documents.(LERs, OIRs, ACRs/CRs, UIRs) j Review complete except for:.
t 4 of 8 OIRs not completed by NU
)
3 of 14 UIRs not completed by NU 35 E&DCRs - 100% Complete A
~~
t i
Em_ _ m z_,
_. _._m.
Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status
?
i Past Change Reviews Sample Docs Size
. Comp, Needed?
j Procedures _ _.. _
i 70 100 %
No Temporary Alts.
25 100 %
No Licensing Documents 24 100 %
No a...
,,.,.....,,~...,...n...
- -. ~. -.,.
+-
s-Vendor Manuals 3
l 100 %
No Like-for-Like Replacemen'3 16 100 %
No
~
. Setpolnis
~
40*
l 100%
No
- DCNs 32 100 %
No MEPL Determinations 16 100 %
No
_. _._ n.
i Comm. Grade Dedications 16 100 %
l
.No i
No j
Section XI Repairs and Repimnts 10 i
100 %
No T Sample of 20 changes has been ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
obtained. Letterissued to NRC.
j a
a
t Tier 3 - PRG Schedule i
Current change process - Complete Past Change reviews - Complete l
\\
Current change implementation - Complete i
NRC Sample of CA Documents - TBD 7 CA documents not completed by NU 1
6..
W W "*
7
Discrepancy Summary 4
'i 770 Preliminary DRs initiated 556 Valid Preiiminary DRs issued to NRC/NU/NEAC j
96 Preliminary DRs considered invalid i
118 Preliminary DRs in process f
197 NU Resolutions entered into database 94 NU Resolutions reviewed by S&L
- 76 Accepted and Closed
- 17 Not accepted - Returned w/ Comments 1 Pending review of implementation of NU. corrective action i
)
}
~
u
~
Discrepancy Summary Of the 77 Acceptable and Closed resolutions
- 39 Confirmed Discrepancies
- 21.Previously Identified by.NU l
- 17 Non-discrepant conditions.
i
?
Of the 38 Confirmed Discrepancies
[
2 Level 3 l
l 37 Level 4 a
l
,j l.
[
i I '
l-
+
1.3.,!
7 L
i l.
i i
[ p; i
Discrepancy Summary NRC Significance Level for the 556 issued
[
Preliminary DRs I
-r r
1 C
. Level 1 1
Level 2 l
161 Level 3 1
l 394. Level 4 i
l l
)
_h
~~
.. -