ML20196L223

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196L223
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: Murphy M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01486, 53FR16435-1486, NUDOCS 8807070301
Download: ML20196L223 (1)


Text

(sz se$LY N S()-

EbN i t, r37; 23 REeder Driv;t Stratham NH 03885 0

[ J.

June 22,1988 Secretary of the Commission JJN 23 P8 :44 Attn: Decketing & Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission O F' lR.

Washington, D. C. 20555 00CXEia,,,

.,1, SR M,t e

Subject:

Proposed Clarification of requirements for Lcw Power license

Dear Sir:

As a concerned citizen living within 10 miles of the Seabrcok station I support clarification of emergency plan requirements that must be in place for low power testing. ihe issue has become clouded with ambiguity.

I feel a full scale public notification is not necessary until a full power licens( is granted.

Experts have stated that any emergency would evolve slowly and the risk in the Seabrook plant is very low because of certain design factors.

Countless delays and distractions have cost taxpayers and ratepayers millions of dollars.

The plant is built and is a very safe and clean way to generate power for this area.

Please expedite the licensing process so that the nuclear industry can continue to contribute to energy independence for our area.

Sincerely, wy q he u Mary C. Murphy 090622 80070jo301 PDit eg33ebaas S-/0