ML20196L205

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196L205
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: Desiree Davis
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01483, 53FR16435-1483, NUDOCS 8807070289
Download: ML20196L205 (1)


Text

DOCKET NUMBER -

< n0 POSED RULE k.Q

$ 6 y p R I b 4 & 5,)

r,y,

t -

DAVID R. DAVIS 562 Province Road Strafford, New Hampshire 03884

'88 JN 23 P8 :43 ON NE,r

.. y i.,.,

00CVC1 m SE.,;;u' Bi< A h t y June 22, 1988 Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing & Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20F55 Re: SUPPORT OF NRL PROPOSED CLARIFICATION OF EMERGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW-POWER LICENSES.

Dear Sir:

I would like to express my suppor*, for the above referenced p oposed rule. Those in the political arena have incorportted various stalling tactics against completed nuclear plants purely for personal political gain. This political maneuvering does not increase public safety, nor does it benefit ratepayers or taxpay-The operation of Seabrook Station is not 'maybe' or a 'per-haps someday' senario, but a MUST. The economic future of New England is depen 3cnt on local produced power, not expensive fos-sil fuels importad from other regions in the U.S. and the world.

I suppor; any attempt by the NRC to clearify its requirements l

for testing and 1.i ensino nuclear power plants. The NRC is well t

qualified to evalu' the adequacy of plant safety measures and evacuation plans, a is in a position to place the public welfar i

above the aspirations of local politicians.

I l

Sir [ rely, t

(

Ivid R. Davis 8007070289 880622

$R S3 16435 PbH 1

l O S-/0

<