ML20196K708
| ML20196K708 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Hendrix S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01220, 53FR16435-1220, NUDOCS 8807070085 | |
| Download: ML20196K708 (1) | |
Text
)kM
%cm nuverr
?5T00AF0 &utt,,, M
.,ipj,,II c
cssrAme) s aus 23 e6 32 Scott Hendrix F i
10coakleyRd.'yhl,,jl./,
p, t. N a portsmouth, NH 03801 June 22, 1988 Secretary of the commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Secretary,
I am writing this letter in response to the proposed "interpretive rule" change governing the 5% Operating License Requirements.
I strongly support the removal of the requirement of sirens f or the 5% License due to the maximum level in power to be achieved in this testing, and possible public hazard it may cause. It would seem intuitively obvious to the casual observer that a full power license should require such a precaution, but not for such a low power as PSNH is requesting. With the advanced dou' ole wall containment building, and backup safety systems to backup systems, the threat of a public hazard at less than 5%
would be close to impossible.
I am writing to you to urge the swift passage of the 5%
license for Seabrook to allow the plant to move forward in its goal of providing power to the New England area. This nonsense and game playing in Massachusetts must be stopped. The only threat which New England will suffer by losing Seabrook is the financial one caused by certain political figures trying to further their careers at our expense.
e Seabrook is safe, it's ready to produce power, and should be allowed to do so.
i Sincergly,,
S,tme m i,..
8807070085 880622 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR 1
S - / b L