ML20196K555

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196K555
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/21/1988
From: Sher R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01284, 53FR16435-1284, NUDOCS 8807070027
Download: ML20196K555 (1)


Text

_

DOChu NUMBER J A 54 nooosto RuafN &

x. cici.

[63 FR IbV3T) 72 JJN 23 P7 :0E OFF:Lt C-

...e-00.CKE W s 'D W L RonaldstA. Sher 42 Washington Rd. #2 Rye, NH 03870 June 21, 1988 Mr. Samuel J.

Chilk, Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Attn:

Docketing and Service Branch

Dear Mr. Chilk:

I support the proposed NRC rule which would allow low-power testing at nuclear power plants to begin without having a full scale emergency notification system in place.

The NRC is correct in pointing out that the risk of operations during low-power testing is very small.

For a nuclear power plant, like Seabrook Station -- one of the safest nuclear powar plants ever built -- to be delayed further, because local opponents have removed an excellent notification system, does not make sense.

Continued use of nuclear power must be a cornerstone to U.S.

energy policy.

I urge the NRC to support thic proposed rule and maintain a vital energy option in this country.

I b

Sincerely, UEk GL.

Ronald A. Sher 8807070027 880621 h

53 16435 PDR

.