ML20196J272

Order.* Intervenors 880225 Motion for Directed Certification of ASLB 880217 Scheduling Order Denied Due to Established Stds for Interlocutory Review Not Met.Served on 880210

ML20196J272
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	03/09/1988
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	AMESBURY, MA, HAMPTON, NH, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
References
CON-#188-5806 OL, NUDOCS 8803140234
Download: ML20196J272 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

' StM OCLKE TEC-U5NPC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 ME 10 M0:10 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD OFFICE OF EhiAn f Administrative Judges: 00CKE11NG t SE RVir.f.

BRANCH Alan F. Rosenthal, Chairman March 9, 1988 Thomas S. Moore Howard A. Wilber SERVED A9@ 101988

)

In the Matter of )

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL-1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-444-OL-1

)

(Seabrook Staticn, Units 1 ) (Onsite Emergency Planning and 2) ) and Safety Issues)

)

ORDER The February 25, 1988 motion of the Town of Amesbury, Massachusetts, Town of Hampton, New Hampshire, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League and New England Coalition en Nuclear j Pollution (hereinafter intervenors) for directed i

certification of the Licensing Board's February 17, 1988

scheduling order is denied. As will be developed in the opinion that will be issued shortly, we conclude simply that the established standards for interlocutory review of a scheduling order are not met in this instance. Because of the tine

constraints facing the intervenort under the J

i Licensing Board's schedule, we are announcing our result in 4

advance of the issuance of the opinion. But nothing in our 1

denini of the motion should be interpreted as precluding the interverors from seeking appropriate relief from the 1

O 000 V

1 l

• 2 Licensing Board based upon the considerations set forth in their motion to us.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD Q , [ _ N8 - -- _k C. .J in Sifoemaker SecreLary to the Appeal Board 4

1 1

I i