ML20196G333

Ack Receipt of NRC Form 241 ,clarifying Info Provided by Western Colorado Testing Inc in NRC Form 241

ML20196G333
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/27/1997
From:	Cammie Hernandez NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Alpha K COLORADO, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20196F875	List: ML20196F869 ML20196G333
References
NUDOCS 9705160062
Download: ML20196G333 (8)

Text

__

~--.+ -

i

[

l f "84 UNITED STATES g

lg i

Jt NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

?

n l!

t REGloN IV u

2 l

0[

811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SulTE 400 0

9....

AR LINGToN. TEXA5 76011-9054 hlg Cy.4 k yk March 27,1997 g

l VOlil&

Western Colorado Testing, Inc.

.M j

ATTN: Kyle Alpha Radiation Safety Officer I

529 25-1/2 Road, Suite B-101 Grand Junction, Colorado 81505

SUBJECT:

NRC FORM 241 CLARIFICATION This acknowledges receipt of facsmile of NRC Form 241 dated March 24,1997, clarifying information previded oy Western Colorado Testing, Inc. in an NRC Form 241 dated March 24, 1997. Your agreement state license is recognized as valid for the proposed use of licensed l

j material for Gilpatrick Construction Company, Inc. at Riverton Regional Airport, Riverton, j

Wyoming. Please note that regardless of the dates listed on your NRC Form 241, your l

reciprocity activities (storage and use) are limited to 180 days during calendar year 1997.

1 Therefore, reciprocity is granted from March 30,1997, through September 25,1997, for a total of 180 days.

We appreciate your cooperation, if you have questions concerning this letter or other aspects of working in NRC jurisdiction under reciprocity, please contact me at (817) 860 8217 or Ms. Billie Gruszynski at (817) 860-8120.

l Sincerely, i

f kt2,~-

?

Christi Hernandez, Radiation Specialist Nuclear Materials Licensing Branch cc w/ copy of letter:

Wyoming Radiation Control Program Director i

9705160062 970401 PDR STPRG ESGCO PDR l

1 f

h1 EMPLtYEE PROGAESS MEPORT i

Empity:e Job ClasNfict.tiin l

Sign:ture Department Manager / Supervisor l

Date Comments i

Sign:ture Company Manager d---

Date. IC/t y/P;-

f

/

Cimm:nts THIS REPORT la MADE OUT FOR (CHECK ONE)

( ) 90 days

( ) 6 months dAnnual l

( ) Promotion

( ) Transfer

( ) Exit l

This r: ting sheet provides a practical method through which the ability of the individual can be judged with a reasonable degree j

utifstmity. Indicate your opinion of this employee by placing an "X"in the block by the phrase which seems to fit the person best. Please follo Instructions carefully:

l L

l

1. Use your own independent judgement.

2. Disregard your generalimpression of the person and concentrate on one factor at a time.

3. When rating an employee, call to mind instances that are typical of his work and way of acting.

4. Do not be influenced by UNUSUAL SITUATIONS that are not typical.

5. Make your rating with the utmost care and thought. Be sure that it represents a fair and square opinion. DON'T ALLOW PERSONAL FEELINGS TO GOVERN YOUR RATING.

I. ATTENDANCE II. PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS i

1. Punctuality

1. Appearance l

e. OQ On Time

a. ()() Neat and in good taste

b. ( ) Occasionally late

b. ( ) Needs improvement

c. ( ) Often tardy

c. ( ) Unsuitable for job

2. Dipendability

2. Personality

c. (A Good record since test rating

a. Q() Makes good impression--wears well

b. ( ) Frequently absent--but for cause

b. ( ) Makes fair impression

c. ( ) Poor record--requires counseling

c. ( ) Creates unfavorable impression

3. Notification

3. Tact and Courtesy

e. C4 Notifies in time

a. Q() Tactful and considerate of others

b. ( ) Occasionally late or absent without notification

b. ( ) Occasionally untactful and inconsiderate

c. ( ) Often fails to notify

c. ( ) Attains goal but arouses antagonism

d. ( ) Often causes trouble Ill. CAPACITY

1. Ability to learn I

a. ()() Grasps instructions readily I

b. ( ) Average ability to learn l

c. ( ) Somewhat slow in learning i

d. ( ) Umited in learning new duties

2. Initiative

s. (X) Pushes work thru on own initiative

b. ( ) Normal supervision required

c. ( ) Needs considerable supervision--not a self star.or

d. ( ) Must always be told what to do

3. Judgement 4

a. ()() Ability to reach sound and logical conclusions

b. ( ) Average judgement l

c. ( ) UsuaNy anskee decisions without considering all alternatives i

d. ( ) Conclusion often faulty a

N

(

m

[

M~BuuaEJ EARD JOS V. JOS 6

'ORMANCE l

1. Intirtst

c. (A) Shows string intirxt in wrrk

1. Accuracy 1c i

b. ( ) Shows cverage enthuism

c. ( ) Abtve evir:gn

b. @ Average

c. ( ) Shows litt:9 Sr no intercst

d. ( ) Dislikes work

c. ( ) Below average

d. ( ) Highly inaccurate

2. Cooperation

2. Nestness

a. (X) Promotes cooperation and good will

b. ( ) Moderately successfulin cooperating with others

a. ( ) Takes pride in appearance of work

c. ( ) Cooperates reluctantly and sometimes causes

b. Q4 Usually turns out neat work i

dissension

c. ( ) Apparently lacks " sense

• of neatness. Requires

d. ( ) Uncoopetetive reminding

d. ( ) Too often sacrifices neatness for quality

e. ( ) Majority of work must be done over

3. Responsibility l

s. ( ) Seeks additional responsibilities

3. Quality I

b. (4 Willingly accepts additional responsibilities

c. ( ) Reluctant to accept additional responsibilities

a. (X) Unusually high output-meets emergency demands well

d. ( ) Avoids responsibility

c. ( ) Cannot be depended upon

b. ( ) Consistently turns out more than average

c. ( ) Finishes sliotted amount

4. Company Equipment and Property

d. ( ) Does just enough to get by

c. D() Respects, maintains, cares for, and protects

e. ( ) Amount of work done is inadequate equipment

b. ( ) Takes care of equipment VI. SELF IMPROVEMENT

c. ( ) Periodically damages and or losses equipment

a. f() Voluntarily studies for self improvement and

d. ( )Indifforent to equipment promotion

c. ( ) Often damages equipment

b. ( ) Will accept training if pushed

[t g

c. ( ) Not interested in learning new jobs 6

• [

Vil REPORT PREPARATION

, g il-[ h [t,

1. Accuracy

3. Timeliness

/' %[g

a. () Rarely makes mistakes 4

s. ( ) Reports prepared in timely manner

b. C) Average p [/

[

b. Q() Occasionally needs reminding to complete reports

c. ( ) Sometimes makes mistakes

(/

j

/p

c. ( ) Allows reports to become past due j

t!. ( ) Excessive mistakes W t t > @J p

2. Neatness J

y

[

e. ( ) Takes pride in appearance of reports

]6[

g

b. 00 Usually turns out nest reports e

c. ( ) Apparently lacks " sense

• of neatness. Require

d. ( ) Too often sacrifices neatness for quantity

.[ (V y@P i

reminding j

0 g

c. ( ) Majority of reports must be done over y

0 di 9/

1. H:w long has this person been under your supervision?

SIMC E 4 AA. /k 93

2. Whit. if any, are his (or her) strong points not listed in above review?

3. Whit steps are being taken to correct this (or these) weeknesses? W AM f -T6 aer 6 *e n

( (g h

-T6

@V

)*> Ad AM (*2 A *t* 16 As h L AML Y A VIATIL 4 C.Si se_M hJQT 8

4. Give a brief appraisal of employee's potentialities: b Ch he. b N-.c e % M TC.- h u)#T (f.

I ct atM i

5. H;s this report been discussed with employee? M Yes ( ') No if not, why?

+ %

For$:

g g-

1. Running Lab is not a joke

2. Casual Attitude is not good enough and may influence other employees

3. It is your job and responsibility not Sues, Shawnas, Garys or Jims

4. You are the lab and local field supervisor

5. You are not a lead technician

6. More " formal" training as apposed to " casual" training

7. Schedule time for thorough review of paperwork

8. Critical path scheduling - DO IT

9. Mix Design Form (blank form)

10. Mix Design checklist / data sheet for completeness, le asphalt projects

11. Do you need another "Armand" i

12. STRIVE FOR EXCELLENCE

1. Professional

2. Technically well qualified

3. Very supportive of management and fellow employees

4. Good with clients - employees, easy to work with

5. Willing to take on something new

6. Enjoy challenges

7. Excellent regarding invoices

8. Goes the extra effort

9. Keeps lab well maintained

10. Good appearance

11. Professional

12. Goes after accreditation

l

/

(

f

/

(V /d'6@

s.. sow 1.-s To

== 6 y

z..

w.w %o mr 3

mean my coor co ma....

4.

A q=

3 2u-. o r 4. n p.,k MMiddd4T 44

4.. d <.,ree s u i k b r.

N,==W bracv i

-n.

.i

i..

e

=~.

'/

3 f

gt, s SVp a

No Review of Construction forms were filled out for Rock Springs Airport, figured that since Veda had filled out on he l

did not need to.

Two dates on a density sheet, should have filled out a separate Review of Construction and density sheet for each visit.

Gradations samples for Huskin that were flown in to GJ on 8/28, not done till 8/30 told Jim that data would be available but had not started tests.

AASHTO response O was off on Friday, said that he had all of his info for the response done, Gary had to complete several sections (will need to ask Gary which ones specifically)

Gave '@ a message from Kelly / Corn Construction on Thursday (day before he took time off for long weekend) regarding i

l status of Slumgullion - he must not have called because ' Gary i

and Shawna had to deal with it on Friday.

Overall casualness is infecting others.

"I don't know" and "We will get to it when we can" are not acceptable answers for our clients.

Information regarding employees should be shared you mentioned that you knew Sue was going to quit. And you kn'ew about Veda having a problem with night driving and did not tell Shawna - she could have been in en accident.

Buckhorn Geotech lab testing - told me only PIs left, told Gary had to do R-Values Blaming lost employees for not being able to complete work on time only embellishes problem, does not solve it.

We need solutions to challenges not spend all of our time with problems.

Need one lab supervisor - consulting regarding does not need Armand or Janels participation.

They should be working.

l Need Schedule - MSProject to be installed i

I l

~ -,

.n m

^

~-

-r

)

).

i 7

Certi

• ate o

Comp etion

)

{

This Certifies that

)

i s

l l

MATT NUTTER t

has successfully completed the

'Tro;t er. Radiation Safety Officer Course l

l l

conducted by the training program of I

I

'Tro;C er ' Electronic La6 oratories Inc l

t I

I l

l l

11-13-96 WILLIAM E TROXLER l(

Instructor Date President l

l I

j m

Y.'-

f

(

I

~

~ _.

l c.~,.

l l

^ m

)

l

)!

I

)

i Certi

• ate o, Comp etion

\\

(

)

This Certifies that

)

j

?

{

KYLE R. ALPHA l

l l

has successfully completed the

'Troxler Radiation Safety Officer Course t

conducted by the training program of

(

'Troxler ' Electronic Laboratories, Inc.

(

d[I OB WILSON 11-13-96 WILLIAM E TROXLER

/

t

\\

Instructor Date President t

6

(

i j

v

-~

v v v v v v I

_