ML20196F895

Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

ML20196F895
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	06/21/1988
From:	Letourneau L AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01366, 53FR16435-1366, NUDOCS 8807050348
Download: ML20196F895 (1)

Text

e

/ 3M -

000EET tlVMBER g g PROPOSED RULE - ,

(f3 FR ICo 4 3 D a nui u ,r.,, c 118 JR 23 P7:58 June 21, 1988 0F8 1R - . o 00 CMC

• s.'; . . u r -

. n ,. cry ~

BRAte Linda J. LeTourneau 6 Freedom Circle Apt 13 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sirs:

I am writing to express my support of the proposed rule change over the emergency planning requirements that must be met before a nuclear power plant is given a license to perform low power testing.

As a New Hampshire resident I firmly feel that Feabrook Station's power is needed. As a resident of the 10-mile radius, I firmly believe that the plant is safe. I am strongly favor of Seabrook Station's being given not only a 5% license, but a full power license as well.

Seabrook Station has been the unfortunate victim of political games played by the state of Massachussetts. Its power is urgently needed. "

I strongly urge that this well-designed, well-built plant be allowed to fulfill the function it was built for.

kQ LLTem. %

Linda J. LeTourneau I

8807050348 OO PDR MI, gR33h16435

_