ML20196F798
| ML20196F798 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Palazzo P AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01360, 53FR16435-1360, NUDOCS 8807050328 | |
| Download: ML20196F798 (1) | |
Text
MM DOCKEi HUMBER PR So PROPOSE 0 RULE CS3 fit iWasa t.m n l
June 22..
1988 UW f
~88 WN 23 P7 :57 Secretary of the Commission GFFla
.. r s. e.
Attn: Docketing and Service Branch 00CKE %t...., 0 9 I"D 'i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sirs,
I am writina in support of Low Power Testing for the Seabrook plant.
I have been a resident of Seabrook for 25 years.
I live approximately 3 miles from the plant and have believed in it since its inception.
I have seen some of the ringleaders against the plant come to town and live quite well during these years with no visible means of support.
I have always believed that they and the opposition lawyers have been supported by special powerful interests.
I M not look fo'tward to being dependent t;n oil any more than we have to.
We, in New England, pay too much f:
1 and gas now.
I have worked at the plant for 9 years and although I am not an engineer I have seen enouch to feel that it is the safest plant that it claims to be.
I process work requests and do get some first-hand knowledge of what is going on.
Although I feel that chances of an evacuation would be very remote, I am in the Evacuation Plan and feel that it is more than adequate.
8807050320 880622 PDR PR Sincerely.
[
nay 14/W /'s n / M4 M '
L)s-#
-- -