ML20196F526
| ML20196F526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Farrell J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01505, 53FR16435-1505, NUDOCS 8807050225 | |
| Download: ML20196F526 (1) | |
Text
PROPOSED Rul.E ____ b, __ _ __
(5g FX 16435) mm 5or
!.3NFC 118 JN 23 P8 :45 0F'ICL..
r_..:
.r<
June 22,198f0CKE46 >. p NM-BRANe Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
The proposed rules change would make it clear that for low-power testing, it is not necessary for a plant to have the same full-scale public notification system in place that is required for full-power operation.
At this time Seabrook has a fully operational public notification system in place in New Hampshire and has submitted to the NRC plans for Massachusetts which are being "fine tuned" as this letter is written. The proposed rule would not lessen the effectiveness of emergency preparedness around Seatrook due to the aforementioned fact.
As an employee of Seabrook for 6 years and a towr. resident since 1985, I feel that my family is "safe" from all the hysteria and hype that has been generated by politicians, loud, strident, highly orchestrated and propagandized people who oppose Seabrook.
I support any effort to reduce misunderstanding.
New England needs the power Seabrook will provide. Seabrook is complete, fueled, and safe.
It's time to say "yes" to the proposed rule, and "yes" to the opening of Seabrook.
I thank you for this opportunity for me to express my sentiments.
Sincerel,
() d<.<
. d w n ohn T. Farrell P.O. Box 1318 5 Old New Boston Road Seabrook, NH 03874 yW 8807050225 880622 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR t
l D S -/0 l
t