ML20196F455

Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

ML20196F455
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	06/23/1988
From:	Lord M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01415, 53FR16435-1415, NUDOCS 8807050193
Download: ML20196F455 (1)

Text

-

a , a t. i NUMBR '

!f PPO%fDBAE_fRQ g pg l6 V3 f)\ .'m -

xw 18 JN 23 P8 :16 Melissa A Lord OU !CF ... il1 Timber Court 00CKEimu >. laTdabrook, NH 03874 (603)474-5150 Sacretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing & Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dsar Sir; As a citizen of Seabrook, residing approximately two miles from Seabrook Station, I am very concerned regarding any type of public notification systems in the unlikely event of any type of an emergency.

I believe Seabrook Station is safely built and should be granted low power license for testing. I am concerned that any procautionary alert system to notify the public in the event of an emargency should be implemented. I feel Public Service Company has taken into consideration the safety of the general population and have taken extra efforts to ensure installation of several public notification systems. Anyone who wants the removal of the siren poles is affecting the safety of the general population. If the efforts of PSNH were taken as a means of protecting the population, why should anyone want removal of any public notification system?

To me, the removal of any type of public notification system is like removing the extra safety seal on a bottle of aspirine. It might save the effort in the beginning of getting the bottle open, however, an extra precautionary method could save your life.

Removal of any precautionary method that ensures public safety, should be thought over very carefully.

I believe that Seabrook Station is safe and should go on-lino. Efforts to ensure public safety have been met via public notification systems and with N.H. participating in emergency plans in case of a need to evacuate towns in N.H. as well as Mass.

Snabrook Station should be granted a low power license. Let's stop w:ating time and money, New England needs the electricity that Scobrook Station could generate. Without it, New England is neaded l for trouble.

Sincerely, 7 - .

i 8807050193 880623 L //7etejct//Mo ['

PDR Melissa Lord 5053hR16435

. . - _ _ - .