ML20196F449

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196F449
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: Mclain D
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01510, 53FR16435-1510, NUDOCS 8807050192
Download: ML20196F449 (1)


Text

ovau huunut qi 3 ()

PROPOSED Rul.E (5sFRIG'{3S)

/(S~/o t C(. " C i!.:

Dennis G. McLain 4 Fox Chapel Court Exeter, NH W3h 23 P8 '45 June 22, 1958 vFF O I

00cnf ijtsc,,.. 7d' eR Aht e.

Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

I support the proposed interpretive rule which will allow 5%

testing in the absence of a full power notification system.

By this measure, the NRC has an excellent opportunity to clear up confusion surrounding the low power testing of Seabrook Station. My reasons for supporting thia measure include:

1) a notification system really isn't needed for 5% power based upon the analysis of core fission product inventory, and given Seabrook's containment and safety systems,
2) Massachusetts is using non-participation strictly as a poli-tical tool to prevent licensing, and 3) the Station is operationally ready to proceed with 5% testing and eventual commercial operation.

Thank you f1 opportunity to comment on this proposal.

Reapeetfu11y, hja+sud Wlke.

Dennis G. McLain DGM/mfp 8807050192 880622 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR O.s-/o

. - -