ML20196F280
| ML20196F280 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Grillo J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01404, 53FR16435-1404, NUDOCS 8807050128 | |
| Download: ML20196F280 (1) | |
Text
i 00CKE1 NUMBER
-.a m uu F R 5 o (g5 pg Mu W
June 22,19g g
Joseph Grillo Ashbrook Rd QF' l(.i s.,
7:,. t.
,y Exeter, NH 03833 00CXEl m.>.SEi.u g' SRAACH Secretary of the Commission Attn:
Docketing and Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sirs:
I am writing this letter to comment on the proposed rule designed to clarify the NRC's position en Emergency Plan requirements for 5%
testing.
I am aware that emergency planning is more a nicety relating to criti-cality (or 5%) testing due to the low inventory of fission products and the fact that there is no decay heat that must be removed.
For too long intervenors, obstructionist politicians and just plain old argumentative people have made a mockery of technology.
It is time t.o look at the issues from a factual perspective and make decisions based on those facts and accepted technology.
I strongly believe the NRC should allow the clarification to become law putting common sense into regulations.
I also strongly believe it is time the NRC made the decision to grant Secbrook Station not only the 5% license but also the full power license.
It is a well constructed, well managed facility and worthy I
of an operating license.
,2 Sincerely, 7
l l
l 1
}. (
o ph Grillo 1
l l
l l
8807050128 880622 53 16435 PDR L