ML20196E990

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Hopes NRC Will Reject Obstructionist Tactics & Adopt Proposed Rule
ML20196E990
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: White R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00971, 53FR16435-971, NUDOCS 8807010733
Download: ML20196E990 (1)


Text

N 7/

DOCKET ilUMBER PROPfKF0 Rlli F <33 a

50 s

Ti Q3fR /Gy3s)

'88 JUN 23 P 1 56 June 22, 1988 yyy.

' Mf f 00CKEi M '.

BR At4P Secretary of the Commission Attn:

Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir,

I strongly recommend that the Commission adopt its proposed clarification of emergency planning requirements for low power licenses to make clear that emergency sirens are not required for low power testing.

The NRC has previously determined that risk to the public from low power operation at any nuclear power plant is significantly lower than at full power.

At Seabrook Station, one of the few plants effected by the rules clarifica-tion, the risk is even lower, in part because of the unique double-walled con-tainment structure.

Nuclear Power is one of the most benign methods of generating electricity that we now have at our disposal.

1 hope the commission will reject the childish obstructionist tactics employeed by some, and adopt the proposed rules clarifi-cation.

SinEi-]ly yours - [/

(' l W

y obert E. White 8' Pierce Ave.

Westford, MA 01886 J $. NVCllat R[Otn,A TO2Y COMMISSIOl CCff ttt';G S !!(vK! !!CitDN C" tt ! C' T I S' PI*

cc T K CC V.s.. :5 34 t r.

0" virs DCllMU'a OMT

!; p.c i R e !. **4 Ady'l {cF 3 SptCi3I CW P M 8507010733 000622 PDR PR J S -/ 0 50 53FR16A35 PDn

-