ML20196E922

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Believes Subj Rule Will Clear Up Confusion
ML20196E922
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: Mikos G
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00965, 53FR16435-965, NUDOCS 8807010716
Download: ML20196E922 (1)


Text

S[D V DOCKET NUI.iBER SD PROPOSE 0 RULE il SC l'

PA /6 Y3S AMa[ l 0FFr.t.

00CKE i %.. ' i m'.f.

3"NP Secretary of the Commission Attn:

Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir,

I am writing to give my support to the clarification of emergency planning requirements for low power licensing.

In short, the proposed rule would not lessen the effectiveness of emergency preparedness around Seabrook, or any other nuclear power plant.

It merely clari-fies the NRC's original intention regarding public notification requirements that must be met prior to low power testing.

For Seabrook, specifically, the proposed rule will not decrease public safety in any way.

Seabrook has already gone the extra mile to build the safest nuclear plant ever constructed. We installed a public notification system very early on, and saw it deliberately dismantled by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in their attempt to block Seabrook's opening. We have designed and submitted a new system to take the place of the original system.

The proposed rule, when approved, will clear up any confusion over the public notification system requirements for low power testing.

Si cerely yours,

, '. ^..

}

, ' i.

George P.'Mikos 48 Beaver Dam Road South Berwick, ME 03908 8807010716 DOO62P PDR l' R 50 53FR16435 I'DR g__/d